Justice Scalia says has not expressed...

Justice Scalia says has not expressed view on gay marriage

There are 222 comments on the Reuters story from Oct 2, 2013, titled Justice Scalia says has not expressed view on gay marriage. In it, Reuters reports that:

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Reuters.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#175 Oct 8, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
Bullsh!t
What of it? Other than, of course, that you are full of it.
BS Detector wrote:
No sh!t Sherlock. You won. Deal with it.
I have no problem with the win.
BS Detector wrote:
I have spewed nothing. I have stated my position/opinion rather calmly. The argument (such as it is) is over. You won. Deal with it. My opinion stands. So does yours. I'm not going to have a hissy fit about it. Don't understand why you feel the need to.
No, you have offered your opinion, often claiming it to be fact. You have been confronted with the US Constitution and Court decisions, but have never been able to provide a rational response. Often you have descended into utterly irrelevant drivel. Personally, I think your arrogance and idiocy is terribly amusing.
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#176 Oct 8, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't care what you say.
Bullsh!T. You're a liar.
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
We just enjoy pointing out how wrong & stupid your position is.
Enjoy whatever fantasy gives you a tingle.
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
We also point out how anti-gay you are.
Again, you're a liar, but if it gives you the aforementioned tingle, tingle away!
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
You can say whatever you want.
I am already quite aware of that. Don't need, nor want, your permission.(And this from the moron who dishonestly claimed I was trying to violate his right to free speech!)
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as we can.
Never said you couldn't. Care to show where I even hinted at that? You can't despite your aforementioned dishonest (read: lying) claim.

However your desperation and hysteria are fun/fascinating to watch and make fun of.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#177 Oct 8, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
<quoted text> Bullsh!T. You're a liar.
<quoted text> Enjoy whatever fantasy gives you a tingle.
<quoted text> Again, you're a liar, but if it gives you the aforementioned tingle, tingle away!
<quoted text> I am already quite aware of that. Don't need, nor want, your permission.(And this from the moron who dishonestly claimed I was trying to violate his right to free speech!)
<quoted text> Never said you couldn't. Care to show where I even hinted at that? You can't despite your aforementioned dishonest (read: lying) claim.
However your desperation and hysteria are fun/fascinating to watch and make fun of.
What desperation & hysteria? We're winning, you're losing. Which probably explains why you're constantly whining about us getting equal rights.

Half the joy of winning is listening to all you anti-gays cry.
Rainbow Kid

Chesapeake, OH

#178 Oct 8, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
<quoted text>Bullsh!T. You're a liar.
WeTheSheeple wrote, "<quoted text>
We just enjoy pointing out how wrong & stupid your position is."

Enjoy whatever fantasy gives you a tingle.
WeTheSheeple wrote, "<quoted text>
We also point out how anti-gay you are. "

Again, you're a liar, but if it gives you the aforementioned tingle, tingle away!
WeTheSheeple wrote, "<quoted text>
You can say whatever you want. "

I am already quite aware of that. Don't need, nor want, your permission.(And this from the moron who dishonestly claimed I was trying to violate his right to free speech!)
WeTheSheeple wrote, "<quoted text>
Just as we can."

Never said you couldn't. Care to show where I even hinted at that? You can't despite your aforementioned dishonest (read: lying) claim.

However your desperation and hysteria are fun/fascinating to watch and make fun of.
Queers are born liars, don't you know that?

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#179 Oct 8, 2013
Rainbow Kid wrote:
Queers are born liars, don't you know that?
Much in the same way you are a born dullard?

Do you have a valid argument?
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#180 Oct 9, 2013
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
Queers are born liars, don't you know that?
No, they aren't. These two are the exception and deserve every misery that visits them. But they're not born liars. They had to learn how to do that.

These two are, however, born stupid. Much like yourself.
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#181 Oct 9, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
What desperation & hysteria? We're winning, you're losing. Which probably explains why you're constantly whining about us getting equal rights.
Half the joy of winning is listening to all you anti-gays cry.
The joy of trashing you is to see you squirm when I show your stupidity and dishonesty.

Your side got the ruling from SCOTUS. I noted to poor lides that your side won. He is desperate to have me agree with his position. I don't. Neither am I hysterical nor desperate, there being no reason to be. YOU are the one who seems to need to fantasize that I'm anti-gay. Reality indicates quite differently. But you don't deal well with reality. You're still stupid, and you're still dishonest. You are bad for the gay community you should be supporting.

And you think *I'm* anti-gay?
Rainbow Kid

Chesapeake, OH

#182 Oct 9, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
<quoted text>No, they aren't. These two are the exception and deserve every misery that visits them. But they're not born liars. They had to learn how to do that.

These two are, however, born stupid. Much like yourself.
I bet you've su:cked a d!ck or three in your time huh, sugar?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#183 Oct 9, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
The joy of trashing you is to see you squirm when I show your stupidity and dishonesty.
Your side got the ruling from SCOTUS. I noted to poor lides that your side won. He is desperate to have me agree with his position. I don't. Neither am I hysterical nor desperate, there being no reason to be. YOU are the one who seems to need to fantasize that I'm anti-gay. Reality indicates quite differently. But you don't deal well with reality. You're still stupid, and you're still dishonest. You are bad for the gay community you should be supporting.
And you think *I'm* anti-gay?
Yes, if you oppose marriage equality for same-sex couples, that makes you anti-gay.

Every post you make proves just how anti-gay you are.
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#184 Oct 9, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, if you oppose marriage equality for same-sex couples, that makes you anti-gay.
Every post you make proves just how anti-gay you are.
Not much more to say. You're wrong, stupid, a liar, and a bigot.
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#185 Oct 9, 2013
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet you've su:cked a d!ck or three in your time huh, sugar?
Bet all you'd like. You'd lose which, of course, makes you a loser.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#186 Oct 9, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
Not much more to say. You're wrong, stupid, a liar, and a bigot.
Can you substantiate any of your claims.

They aren't wrong, the US Constitution mandates state to provide all people within their jurisdiction equal protection of the law. Thus far, you haven't been able to muster a compelling governmental interest served by excluding same sex couples from legal protection to marry that would render such a restriction constitutional.

They certainly aren't stupid, which is evident when they continue to post factually supported and on topic arguments, while you respond with ad hominem attacks that fail to address the topic in any way.

They have never lied, they have simply offered truths that you don't wish to accept.

As for bigotry, I can only see them perhaps being bigoted against stupid people.
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#187 Oct 9, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you substantiate any of your claims.
They aren't wrong, the US Constitution mandates state to provide all people within their jurisdiction equal protection of the law. Thus far, you haven't been able to muster a compelling governmental interest served by excluding same sex couples from legal protection to marry that would render such a restriction constitutional.
They certainly aren't stupid, which is evident when they continue to post factually supported and on topic arguments, while you respond with ad hominem attacks that fail to address the topic in any way.
They have never lied, they have simply offered truths that you don't wish to accept.
As for bigotry, I can only see them perhaps being bigoted against stupid people.
Don't know why you're beating this dead horse. You won. Deal with it. My agreement, or lack thereof changes nothing. Your side still won.

You said something about being stupid?
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#188 Oct 9, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you substantiate any of your claims.
Those observations were about Sheeple and of course I stand by them.(Learn to read.) As for being stupid, yeah, you can share in that one. My substantiation? Your post.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#189 Oct 9, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
Those observations were about Sheeple and of course I stand by them.(Learn to read.) As for being stupid, yeah, you can share in that one. My substantiation? Your post.
I never claimed they were about me, I merely pointed out that your "observations" about Sheeple were wrong. Ironically, you seem to lack the reading comprehension to understand this. It appears I am not the one who needs to learn how to read.

Perhaps you and Justice Scalia could attend the same remedial classes. Of course, his primary difficulty seems to be memory, not reading comprehension.
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#190 Oct 9, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
I never claimed they were about me, I merely pointed out that your "observations" about Sheeple were wrong. Ironically, you seem to lack the reading comprehension to understand this. It appears I am not the one who needs to learn how to read.
Perhaps you and Justice Scalia could attend the same remedial classes. Of course, his primary difficulty seems to be memory, not reading comprehension.
Your opinion, like yourself, is worthless and was not solicited.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#192 Oct 9, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
Your opinion, like yourself, is worthless and was not solicited.
It is not my opinion that the constitution mandates states to provide all persons within their jurisdiction equal protection of the law. That is a fact.

It is not my opinion that marriage is a protection of the law in every state. That is a fact.

It is not my opinion that before a state can legally infringe upon a right, doing so must serve a compelling governmental interest. That is a fact.

You have said,
BS Detector wrote:
I don't agree with the notion of same sex marriage. I do support domestic partnerships or civil unions. Some don't agree with my position.
That is your opinion.

You are not very intelligent. That is my opinion.

Your opinion, and mine for that matter, are irrelevant as a matter of civil law. The US Constitution and rulings of the US Supreme Court, on the other hand, are relevant.
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#193 Oct 9, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not my opinion that the constitution mandates states to provide all persons within their jurisdiction equal protection of the law. That is a fact.
It is not my opinion that marriage is a protection of the law in every state. That is a fact.
It is not my opinion that before a state can legally infringe upon a right, doing so must serve a compelling governmental interest. That is a fact.
You have said, <quoted text>
That is your opinion.
You are not very intelligent. That is my opinion.
Your opinion, and mine for that matter, are irrelevant as a matter of civil law. The US Constitution and rulings of the US Supreme Court, on the other hand, are relevant.
I have noted several times that your side won. Why are you so desperate and obsessed with my using your wording and agree with your position when the fact is, I don't agree. That you consider me not very intelligent for that doesn't bother me in the slightest since I know better and I don't care what your silly opinion of me is.

We do agree on one thing. Neither your opinion nor my opinion is relevant to a decision that has already been rendered. That, of course, begs the question of why you are so incredibly and pathetically desperate for me to agree with your position if you don't think I'm intelligent, or that my opinion isn't relevant in the first place!

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#194 Oct 9, 2013
BS Detector wrote:
I don't care what your silly opinion of me is.
And yet you continue to respond with your irrelevant drivel. I'll tell you what, you can even have the last word, if you wish. I don't think you have the disciple to keep to yourself. Your posts have been largely irrelevant and trollish. Congratulations!
BS Detector

Sherman Oaks, CA

#195 Oct 10, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you continue to respond with your irrelevant drivel. I'll tell you what, you can even have the last word, if you wish. I don't think you have the disciple to keep to yourself. Your posts have been largely irrelevant and trollish. Congratulations!
Ah, the "last word" challenge. Okay, so you're clear;ly reduced to playing sill word games. With the "last word" challenge, you get to claim victory either way. If I take the last word, you can claim that my ego won't let me just walk away without availing myself of the alleged "last word." If I don't take it, you get to make the dishonest claim that you knew all along that I couldn't resist taking the said last word. Either way, you're bullsh!t and a fraud. Let's see if you are *really* giving me the last word (to wit: showing once again that you're a fraud and, like Sheeple, refuse to answer direct relevant questions as being "beneath you." Again, you would be a liar, of course, but that has been demonstrated so many times already.

Or maybe you and Sheeple are the same sick bastard using multiple aliases. Either way, you're a fraud. Now we get to see how you are going to play the "last word" ploy. And either way, you're still (like Sheeple) a demonstrated liar and also like Sheeple, are irrefutably dishonest... not to mention a detriment to the gay community that deserves far better than either one of you poor, pathetic, desperate slobs.

P.S. I'm not offering you the BS "last word" so you and Sheeple may simply slither away.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 2 min RiccardoFire 14,951
News Gay couple, devout baker take cake fight to hig... 58 min Theocraencyclical 92
News All bets are off at the Supreme Court 1 hr Theocraencyclical 38
News Kentucky Baptists issue threat regarding hiring... 5 hr Frindly 3
News For women, Islam means empowerment, not oppression 7 hr Hari mirchi 9
News Will Donald Trump be invited to the royal wedding? 17 hr ardith 100
News Top Indonesia court rejects attempt to criminal... 22 hr Abrahamanic Relig... 2
More from around the web