KiMare, you played this degeneration of the history of man before with a documented abstract. I read that abstract and what you have done is no different than what you do with interpreting the Bible. You put into what you read your own personal conclusion. You read into the abstract more than it said.<quoted text>
What you fail to understand is that the history of man is degeneration. That includes their faith. It was God's warning to the Israelites when they entered the Promise Land. It was Jesus' message to the Jews of during His ministry of 'old wine skins' It is the history of denominations, that they begin as revivals and begin a slow deterioration, and are replaced instead of revived. We are seeing the same thing with our Republic, as historians warned we would. It has even been my argument about marriage in our time.
Moreover, you falsely claim God and truth change. Direct conflict with what the Bible says. It is that very stability that we are to base our faith on. A house built on the Rock.
What you've done is to establish that marriage is a relationship established by God to which you have no proof of except to say that marriage is a doctrine of your Christian faith.
At least my conclusions have documentation. I know that the Christian community clings to this idea of man's, marriage as if it was God's law but your problem is that you cannot show proof of God's law, marriage. What can be shown is a singular idea of love throughout the Bible. That, KiMare, is the context of the Bible, not homosexuality, not sin (plural).