Homosexuality and the Bible

Aug 15, 2011 Full story: www.smh.com.au 29,692

Given the ongoing debate about same-sex marriage, it is time I looked at the two Testaments to remind myself why belief is so hard for me to embrace.

Full Story
Vick Torre

Baltimore, MD

#17557 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Vicky,
Sexual union in marriage is a reunion of our evolutionary roots. It harkens back to the earliest pre-gender life forms. Profound that the Bible takes note of that!
Moreover, it is another evidence against ss 'marriage' that redumbant gendered unions are incapable of any such reunion.
Smile.
Smile all you want. Won't justify your ignorance. Marriage occurs without sex to. You keep thumping about sex and reproduction as a staple of marriage. You keep avoiding those questions. Heteros that can't reproduce marry. Seniors that are widowed marry. So should they be denied marriage? Should shemales be denied marriage for being what they are born as? Why does'nt the bible answer that? S.S.couples can enjoy unions. They have for centuries. There is emotional bonding. That eludes you because you can't think outside the "box". Restricted thoughts bevause of religion all the while having the ability for abstact thought. No use having a "god given brain" only to keep it so confined from questioning. Like inheriting a mansion to live in and only use one room.
Vick Torre

Baltimore, MD

#17558 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Vicky, that scream means stop. My sphincter gets a charlie horse just thinking about it!
How in hell can you call something inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning 'love'???
Smile.
Kimary dear, I don't penetrate him that way. I explained it before. He says little and absolutely no screaming. You go to far and I been civil with you-till now. You insult the love I have for him. After we are finished he goes to sleep and I hold on to him and know that's my home. Wherever he and I are is home. You freaking know squat about my relationship. All you accomplished id more dispising your religious flith. I'll burn a bible in your name. Spit on it and piss on it first. SMILES!!!

Since: May 09

New York, NY

#17559 Apr 7, 2013
Because what Jesus thinks about anything is weawwy, weawwy important to me. Just saying.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17560 Apr 7, 2013
Vick Torre wrote:
<quoted text> Smile all you want. Won't justify your ignorance. Marriage occurs without sex to. You keep thumping about sex and reproduction as a staple of marriage. You keep avoiding those questions. Heteros that can't reproduce marry. Seniors that are widowed marry. So should they be denied marriage? Should shemales be denied marriage for being what they are born as? Why does'nt the bible answer that? S.S.couples can enjoy unions. They have for centuries. There is emotional bonding. That eludes you because you can't think outside the "box". Restricted thoughts bevause of religion all the while having the ability for abstact thought. No use having a "god given brain" only to keep it so confined from questioning. Like inheriting a mansion to live in and only use one room.
So since marriage doesn't require procreation OR sex, anyone who doesn't procreate or have sex qualifies for marriage?

Lets just call EVERYBODY married and be done with it!

Bazinga!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17561 Apr 7, 2013
Vick Torre wrote:
<quoted text> Kimary dear, I don't penetrate him that way. I explained it before. He says little and absolutely no screaming. You go to far and I been civil with you-till now. You insult the love I have for him. After we are finished he goes to sleep and I hold on to him and know that's my home. Wherever he and I are is home. You freaking know squat about my relationship. All you accomplished id more dispising your religious flith. I'll burn a bible in your name. Spit on it and piss on it first. SMILES!!!
All that still won't change the fact that ss couples can never be married and that anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.

That is the reality of science, not the Bible.

Just a heads up Vicky, I am a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian. I enjoy sinking the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twisting it with a smirk.

You said 'ouch'.

Smirk.
Vick Torre

Baltimore, MD

#17562 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So since marriage doesn't require procreation OR sex, anyone who doesn't procreate or have sex qualifies for marriage?
Lets just call EVERYBODY married and be done with it!
Bazinga!
That's right. Marriage does not require procreation. My brothers wife us sterile. No children out if a 35 yr marriage. Legal in everyway to. Sex not required either. People have married for love. That idealistic emotion you lack. IF you had any you would'nt have posted thst statement. Look around you! Such marriages exist. Hoe you don't know that is the mystery. Must be that book you qoute so much causes you to miss the obvious.

Since: May 09

New York, NY

#17563 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
All that still won't change the fact that ss couples can never be married and that anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
That is the reality of science, not the Bible.
Just a heads up Vicky, I am a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian. I enjoy sinking the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twisting it with a smirk.
You said 'ouch'.
Smirk.
I can only wish that Salman Khan would so demean me........Anywhere, anytime.
Vick Torre

Baltimore, MD

#17564 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
All that still won't change the fact that ss couples can never be married and that anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
That is the reality of science, not the Bible.
Just a heads up Vicky, I am a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian. I enjoy sinking the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twisting it with a smirk.
You said 'ouch'.
Smirk.
Still does'nt change the facts therr are legally married S.S. couples. Public record. Look it up. You look up lotd of baloney byebull junk you can look up real life facts instead. That is the reality of science. No knife of reality you use. Just all fantasy you stick in people. And look into human sexuality on Topix. Lots of hetetos doing long time anal. Not inherently damageing. Why they keep doing it. You need sex. You know too little about it to have any valuable comments on it. Find yourself a hooker or a church member in need and have some sex and educate yourself. Religion is what troubles this world. Toxic literature. You suffer from it is proof enough.
Join Free

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17565 Apr 7, 2013
GreaterGreece wrote:
<quoted text>
I can only wish that Salman Khan would so demean me........Anywhere, anytime.
I gather by your title, you like little boys.

Smile.
Vick Torre

Baltimore, MD

#17566 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So since marriage doesn't require procreation OR sex, anyone who doesn't procreate or have sex qualifies for marriage?
Lets just call EVERYBODY married and be done with it!
Bazinga!
Your byebull has no answers for the questions I posed. Neither do you. Why you did'nt address them. Typical to ignore real life questions. Well killmary?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17567 Apr 7, 2013
Vick Torre wrote:
<quoted text> Still does'nt change the facts therr are legally married S.S. couples. Public record. Look it up. You look up lotd of baloney byebull junk you can look up real life facts instead. That is the reality of science. No knife of reality you use. Just all fantasy you stick in people. And look into human sexuality on Topix. Lots of hetetos doing long time anal. Not inherently damageing. Why they keep doing it. You need sex. You know too little about it to have any valuable comments on it. Find yourself a hooker or a church member in need and have some sex and educate yourself. Religion is what troubles this world. Toxic literature. You suffer from it is proof enough.
If you called the tail on a dog a leg, what is it?

Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Vick Torre

Baltimore, MD

#17568 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If you called the tail on a dog a leg, what is it?
Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
That has been asked and answered before azzwhole. Answer ours. Look at human sexuality forums and get an education. Learn how wrong you are.

Since: May 09

New York, NY

#17569 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I gather by your title, you like little boys.
Smile.
" I gather by your title you like little boys "..........Wrong, Christian viper..........I like men with hairy crotches and "things" that go off..........Get yee back to the catacombs from oust which yee crawled.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#17570 Apr 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
People say I look like Bruce Willis. Even have the smirk.
Smile.
I've seen your face and I've seen Bruce Willis's ass. prefect match.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17572 Apr 8, 2013
GreaterGreece wrote:
<quoted text>
" I gather by your title you like little boys "..........Wrong, Christian viper..........I like men with hairy crotches and "things" that go off..........Get yee back to the catacombs from oust which yee crawled.
You've been busted creep. Why would you take the moniker otherwise?

How many cruises to visit the boys in Brazil have you been on?

Crawl back in your hole before we contact the FBI.

Smirk.

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#17574 Apr 8, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Acknowledging the difficulty is not excusing the failure of marriage vows. THAT is the context of his statement.
Once again rev, with all due respect, the very substance of his clarification clearly condemns ss couples.
Smile.
Sorry you have to insist upon your opinions in order to preserve your preferences for discrimination and segregation.

Jesus, throughout the body of His Teaching and Ministry, clearly defended those who did not fit in, were ostracised, were regarded as social outcasts, were not perfect, rich, healthy and conventionally blessed. He forgave their deficiencies and established the outcast individuals in the flock that He regarded as His own.

For a person who is so aware of being physically different from the supposed ideal, you are strangely unsympathetic to others who also must see the world of humanity and established convention through eyes of isolation. Such souls are often sidelined, leading their life through a heart of lonely separation, sometimes inexplicably forced - no, often forced - away from those whom they would love the most: their own family.

You have conveniently mischaracterized the Teaching by taking it out of context. The very substance of His clarification is immediately followed in the scriptural text with His cryptic statement of conditional acceptance. What is more is that He then follows his qualification with another statement regarding eunuchs - which statement, at first look, seemingly has absolutely nothing to do with [your insistence that] the conversation around the human pair-bond that is seen as the sacrament of "Marriage."

He does this specifically to show that there must be accommodation even when it is obvious that the iconic and ideal is to be understood to be the first motivation.

Same sex couples are not condemned. In accordance with the Teachings of Christ Jesus, We will make provisions for them and encourage them to find a very necessary and deserved acceptance in the presence and the openly conscious awareness that is to be Blessed in the Holy Spirit.

We will bring and welcome them into the established community of the Body of Christ. We will give them recognition, encouraging them to join in and to participate in every honest and above-board activity and to develop their lives in dignity with righteous contribution to the cause of their fellow humanity.

That is what we will do.

Rev. Ken
SHADOW

Boerne, TX

#17575 Apr 8, 2013
Vick Torre wrote:
<quoted text> Guess you never expressed love. If you have,you would know. Not difficult to fiqure.
ome on pervert tell everyone what you and your boy friend do in bed
It can't be natural now can it.
SHADOW

Boerne, TX

#17576 Apr 8, 2013
Vick Torre wrote:
<quoted text> Kimary dear, I don't penetrate him that way. I explained it before. He says little and absolutely no screaming. You go to far and I been civil with you-till now. You insult the love I have for him. After we are finished he goes to sleep and I hold on to him and know that's my home. Wherever he and I are is home. You freaking know squat about my relationship. All you accomplished id more dispising your religious flith. I'll burn a bible in your name. Spit on it and piss on it first. SMILES!!!
Oh we all know a whole lot about your relationship--
So sweety how do you "penetrate" him? And where.
I'm just having a hard time understanding this perversion.
Are you just too damn ugly to find a good woman and do it right?
Vick Torre

Newark, NJ

#17577 Apr 8, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>ome on pervert tell everyone what you and your boy friend do in bed
It can't be natural now can it.
You tell first of what your twisted ways of bed sex you have.learn something about hetero sex. Look at human sexuality forums. What I read on hetero sex ,glad I'm gay.
Vick Torre

Newark, NJ

#17578 Apr 8, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh we all know a whole lot about your relationship--
So sweety how do you "penetrate" him? And where.
I'm just having a hard time understanding this perversion.
Are you just too damn ugly to find a good woman and do it right?
What,you spying on me? Know a lot about my relationship? That's perversion! No way you can know a lot from a few posts. What to know how? Another perversion! If something truly is repulsive,you would'nt inquire to how. You want me to satisfy your carnal cravings. Go buy some porn and get off from that. You need sex education. You never seen me. Ywt you judge my appearance. That's delusional and expected from sick minds. That guy is very beautiful. Even hetero males envy hid good looks. And he does me!. Likely looks better than anything you landed. I dated females. They asked me out, Lets see if you can fiqure why.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mysterious Apopka sculptures may be 1,000 years... 2 hr the circus is in ... 1
Why I'll be voting 'No' to same-sex marriage, e... 3 hr GayleWood 1,040
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Not Yet Equal 51,332
Anti-gay hotel owners refuse to host another sa... 4 hr NE Jade 21
NY Couple's Combined Age: 212 4 hr Mary 2
Gay wedding cakes range launched 4 hr NE Jade 2
Couple who met as women five years ago set to m... 5 hr Bryan Fischer s H... 24
More from around the web