Homosexuality and the Bible

Aug 15, 2011 Full story: www.smh.com.au 26,892

Given the ongoing debate about same-sex marriage, it is time I looked at the two Testaments to remind myself why belief is so hard for me to embrace.

Full Story
Robsan5

Oklahoma City, OK

#17029 Mar 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
With gay twirl like that, rev, I can understand you wanting to change the subject.
The fact of the matter is, the issue of priests molesting boys is far to large to just be an issue of pedophiles. Even if you accept the fact that a pedophile either molests the opposite or same sex.
Moreover, science is on the verge of confirming homosexuality as a genetic epi-marker mistake. Hardly 'normal sexuality'.
Smile.
Let's add this to your list of unproven assertions, shall we, Genius?
Please prove your assertion that homosexuality is a mistake of genetic epi-markers.
Please prove your assertion that the article Regnerus wrote has received awards.
Please prove your assertion that the sun is a form of radiation.
Please prove your assertion that god evolved into Adam.
Please prove your assertion that Adam was evolved, not created.
Please prove your assertion that god is genderless.
Please prove your assertion that 80% of all seafood poisoning is from shellfish.
Please prove your assertion that eve is created in god's image.
Please prove your assertion that radiation caused Moses' face to shine.
Please your assertion that the biblical use of the word 'shine' means 'glow'.
Please prove your assertion that god can reduce radiation exposure by holding out his hand or turning his back.
Please prove your assertion that god is radioactive.
Please prove that homosexual is a better translation for the word that it replaced in bibles in 1946.

Snicker Snort.(Keep on blowing, NoIQ!)

Robert

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17030 Mar 5, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no such thing as a gay pedophiles; you're merely trolling for comments.
There are however a whole segment who only molest boys.

Nor is every priest who did so is a pedophile.

Those are simple sober facts.
Robsan5

Oklahoma City, OK

#17031 Mar 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There are however a whole segment who only molest boys.
Nor is every priest who did so is a pedophile.
Those are simple sober facts.
The only "facts" you've presented are unproven by even you, Genius.

Please prove your assertion that homosexuality is a mistake of genetic epi-markers.
Please prove your assertion that the article Regnerus wrote has received awards.
Please prove your assertion that the sun is a form of radiation.
Please prove your assertion that god evolved into Adam.
Please prove your assertion that Adam was evolved, not created.
Please prove your assertion that god is genderless.
Please prove your assertion that 80% of all seafood poisoning is from shellfish.
Please prove your assertion that eve is created in god's image.
Please prove your assertion that radiation caused Moses' face to shine.
Please your assertion that the biblical use of the word 'shine' means 'glow'.
Please prove your assertion that god can reduce radiation exposure by holding out his hand or turning his back.
Please prove your assertion that god is radioactive.
Please prove that homosexual is a better translation for the word that it replaced in bibles in 1946.

Snicker Snort.(Keep on blowing, NoIQ!)

Robert

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#17032 Mar 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There are however a whole segment who only molest boys.
Nor is every priest who did so is a pedophile.
Those are simple sober facts.
By definition, fruitcake, a pedophile is an adult who sexually abuses a child.

If a priest assaulted a child, he's a pedophile. If he schtupped the monsignor in the rectory, he's gay.

It's that simple. Don't overthink it.
Robsan5

Alexandria, VA

#17033 Mar 5, 2013
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>The only "facts" you've presented are unproven by even you, Genius.

Please prove your assertion that homosexuality is a mistake of genetic epi-markers.
Please prove your assertion that the article Regnerus wrote has received awards.
Please prove your assertion that the sun is a form of radiation.
Please prove your assertion that god evolved into Adam.
Please prove your assertion that Adam was evolved, not created.
Please prove your assertion that god is genderless.
Please prove your assertion that 80% of all seafood poisoning is from shellfish.
Please prove your assertion that eve is created in god's image.
Please prove your assertion that radiation caused Moses' face to shine.
Please your assertion that the biblical use of the word 'shine' means 'glow'.
Please prove your assertion that god can reduce radiation exposure by holding out his hand or turning his back.
Please prove your assertion that god is radioactive.
Please prove that homosexual is a better translation for the word that it replaced in bibles in 1946.

Snicker Snort.(Keep on blowing, NoIQ!)

Robert
I'm snickering and snorting for some young d!ck, preferably around 12 years old. We're just going to talk.(smile)

Robert

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17034 Mar 5, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
By definition, fruitcake, a pedophile is an adult who sexually abuses a child.
If a priest assaulted a child, he's a pedophile. If he schtupped the monsignor in the rectory, he's gay.
It's that simple. Don't overthink it.
"Don't overthink it"?

Is that for the child's sake or the gay's?
My opinion

Bangor, PA

#17035 Mar 5, 2013
I do believe in god and i know he says homosexaullity is a sin. But i honestly dont see the point of the sin. If you like another boy good for you if you like another agian good for you. Homosexaullity is not a concern that is that important and i honestly think that is kinda dumb to make it a sin. Im not going against him ( well i am) its just why does it matter that people like the same gender and its his fault. He made them homosexaul and lesbian so technichly its his responsibilty. We cant hate them because they like there sex. Its a pointless thing to sin them. God i love you but that is a really pointless thing to sin.
My opinion

Bangor, PA

#17036 Mar 5, 2013
And wtf get over the damn priest thing its not on priest melesting kids. So get over it no one really cares for the kids and you know you dont.
Join Free
Robsan5

Oklahoma City, OK

#17037 Mar 5, 2013
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm snickering and snorting for some young d!ck, preferably around 12 years old. We're just going to talk.(smile)
Robert
NoIQ, I told you I would never think of trying to move in on your action. Have fun. But isn't 12 a little too mature for you?

Roberta (just for your gay anal sex fantasies!)
Robsan5

Oklahoma City, OK

#17038 Mar 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"Don't overthink it"?
Is that for the child's sake or the gay's?
No danger of you over thinking anything, right Genius?

Please prove your assertion that homosexuality is a mistake of genetic epi-markers.
Please prove your assertion that the article Regnerus wrote has received awards.
Please prove your assertion that the sun is a form of radiation.
Please prove your assertion that god evolved into Adam.
Please prove your assertion that Adam was evolved, not created.
Please prove your assertion that god is genderless.
Please prove your assertion that 80% of all seafood poisoning is from shellfish.
Please prove your assertion that eve is created in god's image.
Please prove your assertion that radiation caused Moses' face to shine.
Please your assertion that the biblical use of the word 'shine' means 'glow'.
Please prove your assertion that god can reduce radiation exposure by holding out his hand or turning his back.
Please prove your assertion that god is radioactive.
Please prove that homosexual is a better translation for the word that it replaced in bibles in 1946.

Snicker Snort.(Keep on blowing, NoIQ!)

Robert

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#17039 Mar 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"Don't overthink it"?
Is that for the child's sake or the gay's?
Diversionary tactic. You're off topic to begin with, you banter about labels to suit twisted opinions and then you attempt to deflect by insinuating that I don't think pedophilia is a terrible thing.

Then you can't help but wonder why people call you a troll. Could be, just perhaps, because you're trolling for replies.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17041 Mar 6, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Diversionary tactic. You're off topic to begin with, you banter about labels to suit twisted opinions and then you attempt to deflect by insinuating that I don't think pedophilia is a terrible thing.
Then you can't help but wonder why people call you a troll. Could be, just perhaps, because you're trolling for replies.
The twisted opinions and gay twirl are all yours 'mangina', not to mention the troll behavior.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17042 Mar 6, 2013
5. If you desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history

rK; No desecration is to be considered. The same-sex marriage is a matter of Law, first. If it is acknowledged by a religious entity, acting freely within Constitutionally protected right and conscience, it is then and only then, a matter of spirit.

KiMare'a wrote; Every civilized culture is sensitive to the beliefs and practices of other cultures. Especially one that is as extensive as marriage across cultures and religion.

Your attempt to couch it within a single nation's constitution is simply childish myopic denial. It is in reality a blatantly callous and vulgar desecration to the vast majority of humanity.

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#17043 Mar 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
5. If you desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
rK; No desecration is to be considered. The same-sex marriage is a matter of Law, first. If it is acknowledged by a religious entity, acting freely within Constitutionally protected right and conscience, it is then and only then, a matter of spirit.
KiMare'a wrote; Every civilized culture is sensitive to the beliefs and practices of other cultures. Especially one that is as extensive as marriage across cultures and religion.
Your attempt to couch it within a single nation's constitution is simply childish myopic denial. It is in reality a blatantly callous and vulgar desecration to the vast majority of humanity.
Well,.... LOL!!!

I suppose you can draw a conclusion like that - if you ignore the Constitution.

Marriage has nothing to do with crossing cultures and religion, per se.

Marriage, the pair bond between a man and a woman, came before.

All culture, society, religion; these are compounded tribal expressions, just as morality is tribal expression, all of which relates to the stability that is Tradition.

All human beings are genetic constructions based on a combination of gametes. When these are put together, variations result. Every one of us exhibits physical expressions of both sexes. Then, having come into this world, we grow up into the traditions and morality of our tribes, societies and cultures.

You know this as well or better than most. Maleness or femaleness is a matter of degree.

The bonding of individuals in marriage is generally, traditionally, tribally and morally, recognized as the coupling of male and female. But, to the individuals who do not fit within the accepted and proper recognition of polarized sexuality, the traditional model of marriage has not generally, tribally, been an option.

However, our Constitution, whether you have recognized this or not, was written to define the rights of the minority - the ultimate minority - the individual, in ways not defined by other cultures and societal governments. Not only does the Constitution recognize the God given rights in the Spirit, such as thought and communication and assembly and a personal understanding of Being, it also defines lawful rights in terms of real property.

These are very ancient principles. They are more than just tradition borne out of tribal morality. In fact, the writers of the Constitution believed that these principles are elements of the human being in relationship with Creation, determined by being made in the "image of God." The understanding has much to do with the tenets and design principles of the Free Masons.

Individuals who do not specifically fit into the stereotypes of male and female are afforded rights in our society. Because, even in their minority, they have the right to personally define themselves and to assign the uses and privileges of their own real property, they will also be afforded the right to subjectively define their relationships with each other.

So, there is no actual desecration. The same-sex marriage is a matter of Law, first.

The SCOTUS will make this finding. It will be found to be the right of two individuals to marry, regardless of what YOU decide to recognize as the ideal. They may define it as "civil union." But, State's Rights notwithstanding, discrimination when recognized will not be allowed to prevent such unions.

Freedom of Religion will prohibit the SCOTUS from requiring religious establishments to marry those who they don't recognize as marriageable. But, other religious establishments WILL be allowed to marry such pairs.

You can howl about sin all you want. But, your howling does not make it sin. You can mischaracterize it as gay twirl. But, the real issue is a subjective understanding made between two consenting adults who are witnessing each other in the sight of God.

Rev. Ken

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#17044 Mar 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
5. If you desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
rK; No desecration is to be considered. The same-sex marriage is a matter of Law, first. If it is acknowledged by a religious entity, acting freely within Constitutionally protected right and conscience, it is then and only then, a matter of spirit.
KiMare'a wrote; Every civilized culture is sensitive to the beliefs and practices of other cultures. Especially one that is as extensive as marriage across cultures and religion.
Your attempt to couch it within a single nation's constitution is simply childish myopic denial. It is in reality a blatantly callous and vulgar desecration to the vast majority of humanity.
-THIS you choose to copy and paste? Oy vey.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#17045 Mar 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The twisted opinions and gay twirl are all yours 'mangina', not to mention the troll behavior.
Smirk.
spin it baby, spin it
Robsan5

Denver, CO

#17046 Mar 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The twisted opinions and gay twirl are all yours 'mangina', not to mention the troll behavior.
Smirk.
Speaking of twirling opinions, Genius:

Please prove your assertion that homosexuality is a mistake of genetic epi-markers.
Please prove your assertion that the article Regnerus wrote has received awards.
Please prove your assertion that the sun is a form of radiation.
Please prove your assertion that god evolved into Adam.
Please prove your assertion that Adam was evolved, not created.
Please prove your assertion that god is genderless.
Please prove your assertion that 80% of all seafood poisoning is from shellfish.
Please prove your assertion that eve is created in god's image.
Please prove your assertion that radiation caused Moses' face to shine.
Please your assertion that the biblical use of the word 'shine' means 'glow'.
Please prove your assertion that god can reduce radiation exposure by holding out his hand or turning his back.
Please prove your assertion that god is radioactive.
Please prove that homosexual is a better translation for the word that it replaced in bibles in 1946.

Snicker Snort.(Keep on blowing, NoIQ!)

Robert

“The Kingdom of God Begins NOW!”

Since: May 07

The Mountain Empire

#17048 Mar 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Where does it say that?
Especially since they had never been to Canaan when this law was given...
Could they visit prostitutes outside the temple?
<quoted text>
Like you said, the only way is very poorly. Even they knew anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Smile.
Why don't you know the Laws in Leviticus are anti-Canaanite, each and every one?

Really, history can be your friend.

Now, for those Bible versions that are more accurate due to findings such as the Dead Sea Scrolls which you have no clue about, which versions are they again?

Talk about being full of it....

“The Kingdom of God Begins NOW!”

Since: May 07

The Mountain Empire

#17049 Mar 6, 2013
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
The only "facts" you've presented are unproven by even you, Genius.
Please prove your assertion that homosexuality is a mistake of genetic epi-markers.
Please prove your assertion that the article Regnerus wrote has received awards.
Please prove your assertion that the sun is a form of radiation.
Please prove your assertion that god evolved into Adam.
Please prove your assertion that Adam was evolved, not created.
Please prove your assertion that god is genderless.
Please prove your assertion that 80% of all seafood poisoning is from shellfish.
Please prove your assertion that eve is created in god's image.
Please prove your assertion that radiation caused Moses' face to shine.
Please your assertion that the biblical use of the word 'shine' means 'glow'.
Please prove your assertion that god can reduce radiation exposure by holding out his hand or turning his back.
Please prove your assertion that god is radioactive.
Please prove that homosexual is a better translation for the word that it replaced in bibles in 1946.
Snicker Snort.(Keep on blowing, NoIQ!)
Robert
Some how our radiation expert keeps dodging backing up claims made.

How convenient....
Robsan5

United States

#17050 Mar 6, 2013
disgusted american wrote:
<quoted text>
Robert, you've become a a babbling idiot. How about shutting the crap up while you still have some dignity left.
Ha!

Robert

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Moroccoa s transgender dancer courts acceptance 20 min sarahomo 1
Poll: Support for gay marriage drops in Mich. (May '14) 8 hr scs2011 61
Church-based institutions ponder same-sex benefits 9 hr Mitt s Baptism of... 10
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 10 hr KiMare 51,279
The day Cyclone Tracy unleashed hell on Darwin,... 10 hr Storm 1
Salvation Army: Boston jewelry gifts 'contagious' 12 hr Mitt s Baptism of... 1
Zen Buddhist Temple in Japan Offers Symbolic Sa... 12 hr Switches 39
More from around the web