Homosexuality and the Bible

[Marengo Jon]

Voila wrote:

<quoted text> A growing number of states have enacted constitutional amendments against having their citizens disenfranchised on this issue. Some passed with pluralities over 80%. The Supreme Court will soon uphold Prop 8 and DOMA.
Homosexual 'marriage' will one day just be an odd footnote on history.

You have it backwards, darlin'. In the most recent election, 4 states voted to SUPPORT SSM. The momentum for SSM (support) continues to grow in our favor. You're simply too stubbord to face reality. Further, I wouldn't hold my breath on that Supreme Court theory you hold.

Doesn't matter, your back-woods views are irrelevant to my life.

[Marengo Jon]

Voila wrote:

<quoted text>The fact remains that a growing MAJORITY of states have constitutional amendments in place to prevent your ridiculous oxymoron from becoming law and your fellow homosexuals have OVERWHELMINGLY reject homosexual 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that permits it.

The fact remains that those amendments will ultimately be deemed unconstitutional and illegal.

As for the second statement in your run-on sentence, you're simply blowing smoke out your a$$. There may, in fact, be a few gay people who "reject" marriage, just as there are heterosexuals who reject marriage. Overwhelmingly, support and acceptance for SSM continues to increase (except for parts of Africa where fundamentalist Christian preachers are successfully teaching hate theology).

But here's the more important part, which you continually fail to recognize. When we do have marriage equality in the US, it has NO BEARING on your right to believe and practice your faith as you desire. You'll still have the option to to believe that the Bible condemns homosexuality. Nobody wants to take that away from you. You'll also still have the right to denigrate Christians (like myself) who don't happen to think that the Bible actually refers to homosexuality, or homosexual love as we know it in the clobber passages.

[KiMare]

Gay couples will never fulfill the core root of marriage; a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples will never bring the unique product of uniting diverse genders.

Gay couples will never procreate or bring the balance of a mother and father to the child.

The list goes on.

You can create a legal contract called marriage, but that will be all it is. Shallow and far short of the full spectrum of real marriage.

Fake, pretend, imposter and counterfeit don't do your Frankenstein creation justice. Unmarriage is more like it.

Get back to me when you can match the basic essence of marriage.

Smile.

[Robsan5]

KiMare wrote:

Gay couples will never fulfill the core root of marriage; a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples will never bring the unique product of uniting diverse genders.
Gay couples will never procreate or bring the balance of a mother and father to the child.
The list goes on.
You can create a legal contract called marriage, but that will be all it is. Shallow and far short of the full spectrum of real marriage.
Fake, pretend, imposter and counterfeit don't do your Frankenstein creation justice. Unmarriage is more like it.
Get back to me when you can match the basic essence of marriage.
Smile.

Perhaps you should look up the definition of 'constraint'.

Snicker Snort.

Robert

[BOOK OF LIES]

KiMare wrote:

Gay couples will never fulfill the core root of marriage; a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples will never bring the unique product of uniting diverse genders.
Gay couples will never procreate or bring the balance of a mother and father to the child.
The list goes on.
You can create a legal contract called marriage, but that will be all it is. Shallow and far short of the full spectrum of real marriage.
Fake, pretend, imposter and counterfeit don't do your Frankenstein creation justice. Unmarriage is more like it.
Get back to me when you can match the basic essence of marriage.
Smile.

Life according to Mangina Man.

Laughing my ass off.

[KiMare]

Here is another difference;

Even at the most intimate union, marriage is literally the reunion of two parts designed to fit together as one genderless single life form.

Anal sex on the other hand replaces screams of pleasure with screams of pain.

Snicker.

[Marengo Jon]

KiMare wrote:

Here is another difference;

Anal sex on the other hand replaces screams of pleasure with screams of pain.
Snicker.

Oh, so it's not unlike your missionary position love-making to your wife once a month.

[Marengo Jon]

KiMare wrote:

Gay couples will never fulfill the core root of marriage....

Good job with the copy and paste, skippy.

Troll on, Mangina Man.

[A Guy]

He made Men and Women and not Men and Men. God loves all the gay people but hates the SIN they commit.

[Robsan5]

A Guy wrote:

He made Men and Women and not Men and Men. God loves all the gay people but hates the SIN they commit.

God made everything. Perhaps you should read your bible.

Robert

[Marengo Jon]

A Guy wrote:

He made Men and Women and not Men and Men. God loves all the gay people but hates the SIN they commit.

God loves all people who wear blended fabrics, but he hate the clothes that they wear.
God loves all people who eat shellfish, but he hates the sins they commit.
God loves all people who eat pork, but he hates the sins they commit.

Shall I continue?

[Billie Bluejay]

A Guy wrote:

He made Men and Women and not Men and Men. God loves all the gay people but hates the SIN they commit.

Suppose your God doesn't exist. Then what?

[WasteWater]

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
God loves all people who wear blended fabrics, but he hate the clothes that they wear.
God loves all people who eat shellfish, but he hates the sins they commit.
God loves all people who eat pork, but he hates the sins they commit.
Shall I continue?

Don't bother. The Bible is crap.

[enn]

WasteWater wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't bother. The Bible is crap.

Your right. The bible IS crap. If "god" made us in his own image, then he would probably be bisexual!

[enn]

Just a quick note to all the holy rollers that are for some reason hanging out at an internet sex chat site: God is gay, and so is your dads brothers niece's and nephew's!

[KiMare]

KiMare wrote:
Here is another difference;

Anal sex on the other hand replaces screams of pleasure with screams of pain.
Snicker.

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, so it's not unlike your missionary position love-making to your wife once a month.

Which brings up butt crack buggers. A combination of toilet paper, butt hair and poop rolled up into a ball that gays call 'sexy'...

Explains alot...

Snicker.

[Marengo Jon]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
Here is another difference;
Anal sex on the other hand replaces screams of pleasure with screams of pain.
Snicker.
<quoted text>
Which brings up butt crack buggers. A combination of toilet paper, butt hair and poop rolled up into a ball that gays call 'sexy'...
Explains alot...
Snicker.

I've told you before about your sad attempts at biting humor......

[Robsan5]

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
I've told you before about your sad attempts at biting humor......

That was KickMe trying to be funny? Well, maybe he's not funny after all. Just stupid.

Robert

[Robsan5]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
Here is another difference;
Anal sex on the other hand replaces screams of pleasure with screams of pain.
Snicker.
<quoted text>
Which brings up butt crack buggers. A combination of toilet paper, butt hair and poop rolled up into a ball that gays call 'sexy'...
Explains alot...
Snicker.

You sure know quite a bit about gay anal sex.
Explains "alot". Yes it does.

Snicker Snort.

Robert

[RevKen]

KiMare wrote:

Gay couples will never fulfill the core root of marriage; a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples will never bring the unique product of uniting diverse genders.
Gay couples will never procreate or bring the balance of a mother and father to the child.
The list goes on.
You can create a legal contract called marriage, but that will be all it is. Shallow and far short of the full spectrum of real marriage.
Fake, pretend, imposter and counterfeit don't do your Frankenstein creation justice. Unmarriage is more like it.
Get back to me when you can match the basic essence of marriage.
Smile.

Dear Toothless Smile with bad breath,

In reply:

1. Marriage has nothing to do with any constraint on mating behavior. In fact, marriage is exactly the opposite. It is , most generally, a private covenant between two consenting adults that, among other benefits, liberates mutually desireable mating behavior between the participants. It is not at all limited to or defined by the act of procreation. No two couples are alike, whether heterosexual or homosexual. You have no say in their behavior.

2. On the contrary, Gay couples demonstrate the unique product of uniting diverse genders. You just don't recognize how they constitute their gender identity and you don't admit any reason for any such couple to exclusively commit to each other. Your problems. Not theirs.

3. Your statement is a lie. Whether by contribution of sperm or egg, Gay couples can and do provide the genetic material that has and will result in new human beings. Furthermore, as adoptive parents, many Gay couples have already proven their excellent capabilities in the raising of well-adjusted, normally sexually oriented children. As parents, they have proven themselves to be as good as any and much better than many who fit your stereotype of a family.

4. The universal State recognition of legal contract is precisely what the Gay couple is rightly requesting, with all of the attendant benefits, and this is precisely what they are going to receive the right to get. As for the spiritual marriage, the Gay couple who makes their mutual commitment out of a liberating love, respect, welfare and trust are already demonstrating the essentials of marriage.

5. It is not the successful Gay couple that exhibits the "Frankenstein" model of the "wedding" of two souls. It is, instead, most often the "Frankensteinian" fitting of two differentially yoked heterosexuals into a badly-wrought union that, under the guise of a socially proper heterosexual marriage, harbors the seeds of violence and mistrust and abandonment.

There is no need for any of these Gay couples to get back to you, at all. Your understanding doesn't merit their reply.

Rev. Ken
A priest and disciple of Christ Jesus.