CO Baker Found Guilty for Denying Gay...

CO Baker Found Guilty for Denying Gay Couple Wedding Cake - May Face a Year in Jail

There are 16410 comments on the Gateway Pundit story from Dec 8, 2013, titled CO Baker Found Guilty for Denying Gay Couple Wedding Cake - May Face a Year in Jail. In it, Gateway Pundit reports that:

Gay activists protest the Masterpiece Cakeshop in 2012. Owner Jack Phillips now faces charges for not baking a cake for the gay couple.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Gateway Pundit.

incredulous

Carmel, IN

#5542 Jan 22, 2014
Reverend Alan wrote:
If you think that all gays secretly belong to NAMBLA you are going to have a very tough time getting anything but insults and name calling. Do you really think it is right to group all gays into one mold because of the actions of a few? How about when the gays group all Christians into one size fits all. That isn't fair either. You see groups and I see individuals.
It isn't a matter of whether a teen cares about his frontal cortex. I have a feeling you do not have children or you would have made a better argument. If a teen is not capable of making certain decisions because the brain is not fully developed.....then they should not be exposed to homosexuality until they are physically able to make their own decision in the matter. These homosexual predators need to back off. Gays do not impact me in the least but I am bothered by how they impact children.

I don't care about whether you believe me or not about the parks. Do you honestly think the liberal media is going to want to reveal this dirty little secret? Most communities keep this very quiet in order to keep up property values and to keep scandal out of the papers. These matters are handled quietly and as expeditiously as possible. I wouldn't be miffed about this if it isn't an issue. Children should not have to witness two guys humping each other like dogs behind the bushes. This is abusive to children who witness this.

Your comments about the swimming pool scene is creepy and I really don't want to discuss your children's friends pulling their pants down in front of a bunch of gay men. It was not my intention to be inflammatory. I'd rather you drop it because it's just disgusting.

Did I say all gays belong to NAMBLA? Please read for comprehension. Years ago there was a researcher who found numerous gay travel brochures advertised where gays could find boys in various countries. Disturbing. There are clubs for gays who have back rooms where minors service patrons. They get busted all the time. Gay bars are quite different from straight bars. I can't imagine how long a guy would be able to stay in a bar if he flopped out his wing wang for his lady to caress.

Oh, and if you did see people as indiv.....why do you continue to group Christians all the same? Just as there are great gay people, there are great Christians. Be consistent.
incredulous

Carmel, IN

#5543 Jan 22, 2014
Reverend Alan wrote:
incredulous:...when the gays group all Christians into one size fits all. That isn't fair either. You see groups and I see individuals.
It isn't a matter of whether a teen cares about his frontal cortex. I have a feeling you do not have children or you would have made a better argument. If a teen is not capable of making certain decisions because the brain is not fully developed.....which is why they should not be exposed to homosexuality until they are physically able to make their own decision in the matter. These homosexual predators need to back off. Gays do not impact me in the least but I am bothered by how they impact children.

I don't care about whether you believe me or not about the parks. Do you honestly think the liberal media is going to want to reveal this dirty little secret? Most communities keep this very quiet in order to keep up property values and to keep scandal out of the papers. These matters are handled quietly and as expeditiously as possible. I wouldn't be bothered about this if it isn't an issue. Children should not have to witness two guys humping each other like dogs behind the bushes. This is abusive to children who witness this.

Your comments about the swimming pool scene is creepy and I really don't want to discuss your children's friends pulling their pants down in front of a bunch of gay men. It was not my intention to be inflammatory. I'd rather you drop it because it's just disgusting.

Did I say all gays belong to NAMBLA? Please read for comprehension. Years ago there was a researcher who found numerous gay travel brochures advertised where gays could find boys in various countries. Disturbing. There are clubs for gays who have back rooms where minors service patrons. They get busted all the time. Gay bars are quite different from straight bars. I can't imagine how long a guy would be able to stay in a bar if he flopped out his wing wang for his lady to caress.

Oh, and if you did see people as indiv.....why do you continue to group Christians all the same? Just as there are great gay people, there are great Christians. Be consistent.
incredulous

Carmel, IN

#5544 Jan 22, 2014
Liberals R Defective wrote:
<quoted text>The sad thing is, the radical homosexuals, like cpeter, are being used as pawns by the progressives to achieve their goal of bringing down and weakening the normal, moral society. Once the progressives assume total power, they'll discard the homosexuals like used condoms.
Don't think for a moment they will be discarded. Homosexuals have a great deal of power in ......Hollywood, mainstream media and the fashion industry. Many abuse their power and abuse youngsters who are seeking fame and fortune. They may be a minority group but they are also physicans, mental health professionals, politicians, judges, nurses, teachers,artists, bakers, etc. They have empowered themselves so there will be no turning back. The liberal elite have embraced this group because many of them ARE the liberal elite. They are changing society and have been active in those pursuits even before radio and silent movies captivated the country.
fingiswold

Newark, OH

#5545 Jan 22, 2014
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously, mockery and insults are all you are offering, apparently it is the only thing you are good at.
I don't care if you hate our American Republic and all it stands for, I won't stop calling you out on your authoritarian socialistic agenda.
LOL...it's so funny that you make up stupid, dishonest s--t about me then "call me out" on it.

I believe the term is "strawmanning," and you're clearly quite fond of it. Loser!

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5546 Jan 23, 2014
Rainbow Kid: That would be a business that is open to the public (or serves the public)
.
ALAN: That is non-responsive and irrelevant! The question was, and my answered followed: "When did a private business become a place of public accommodation? When the government decided to over-ride the Constitution."

I didn't ask what a public accommodation was, I asked what I asked. You "answered" a question I didn't ask.

Rainbow Kid: Because of civil unrest; It became necessary to clarify it in writing 50 years ago in 1964 http://www.citizensource.com/History/20thCen/...

ALAN: Yes, the Government did decide to violate the Constitution believing that it could force Americans to love one another by forcing them to do business with one another when they did not want to do business with one another.

Rainbow Kid: It is interesting to note the 1964 Civil Rights Act became law the same year America's First Lady was born. Both are 50 years old

ALAN: What I find interesting is that you are congratulating the destruction of our Constitution by elected criminals who are morons.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5547 Jan 23, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
You're not only wrong, but you're insane.
<quoted text>
pot/kettle

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5548 Jan 23, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
STFU, child.
<quoted text>
Like I said, that must have been some school you went to if all you have for a rebuttal is STFU.

Didn't your mother teach you any manners either?

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5549 Jan 23, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
If 20 guys are waiting outside a gay bar, or any other, then security will handle it or the police will be called. But then, that wasn't the argument, was it, fucwit?
<quoted text>
Did security handle this? http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/colin-flaher...

"""Then they just started beating me. Ruptured my ear drum. Punched my glasses into my face. Stomped on me when I was on the ground. My ribs. My back.

They said ‘Give me your phone. Your wallet.’

I got up and started running. They tackled me again. This time they were stomping on my head. Calling me a faggot. And queer. They started to kick my face.

One of them said Do you want to die? Do you want to die?"""

It is not uncommon for victims of racial violence, like Fox, to hesitate to describe the race of their attackers. Having been victimized once by an assault, many are reluctant to become victims again by being accused of racism. Some say identifying their attackers as black would be “too divisive.”

Cleveland media may be too squeamish to report the alleged perpetrators were black. But people who leave on-line comments are not.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5550 Jan 23, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
No,
<quoted text>
Inside every liberal is a totalitarian screaming to get out.

Obama 1984

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5551 Jan 23, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
If 20 guys are waiting outside a gay bar, or any other, then security will handle it or the police will be called.
<quoted text>
More proof you are a moron: http://www.advocate.com/crime/2013/06/11/gay-...

According to Ashcraft, he was smoking outside the Southbend Tavern in the Merion Village neighborhood when a man approached him asking for assistance with his car at approximately 9:30 p.m.

After the he agreed to help, the 25-year-old says, he was jumped by several men who viciously beat him, leaving him unconscious in an alley behind the bar.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5552 Jan 23, 2014
A high school senior in Florida turned to gay porn as a source of revenue in an effort to help his mom financially — a decision that almost halted his graduation, according to numerous local reports.

Robert Marucci, an 18-year-old who attends Cocoa High School in Brevard County, Fla., did five scenes for gay porn producer Sean Cody as "Noel" in 2013. Last week the teen was suspended from school for creating a campus disturbance. A Reddit user first posted the news of Marucci's suspension on a gay-related section of the site over the weekend. After several national news sources picked up the story and Marucci's schoolmates spoke out on social media in an effort to get him reinstated, school officials reversed their decision.

http://www.advocate.com/youth/2014/01/21/watc...

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5553 Jan 23, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
It's possible ....
<quoted text>
It's possible you might care someday about the destruction of our Constitution, although that is extremely unlikely.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5554 Jan 23, 2014
incredulous wrote:
<quoted text> What's insane is how society has victimized children by forcing homosexual relations on them against their will.
What is insane is you making such an unfounded and wholly unconvincing statement like that.

There is no such thing as "society". Do you mean the majority? If so the solution is simple, restore the Constitution and put all our criminal politicians in prison where they belong.

I want the death penalty for any politician who passes a law that is found to be unconstitutional.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5555 Jan 23, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
No,
<quoted text>
http://www.christiancentury.org/article/2013-...

""Evangelicals often frown upon transparency and accountability, he said, as many Protestants rely on scripture more than religious leaders, compared to Catholics. Abusers condemn gossip in their efforts to keep people from reporting abuse, he said. Victims are also told to protect the reputation of Jesus.""

In other words, Christians tell abused children to lie about being abuses so as not to make Jesus look bad. Way to go Christians.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5556 Jan 23, 2014
As police in Kansas City, Missouri, continue to look for missing 10-month old girl Lisa Irwin, detectives know where to begin their list of suspects: the toddler's parents.

http://news.discovery.com/human/psychology/us...

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5557 Jan 23, 2014
Reverend Alan wrote:
Helping a gay couple in any way with their gay marriage plans is not something the baker wants to do.
Tough ****.
Reverend Alan wrote:
Why do you get to decide that the baker can't see that as an endorsement?
I don't, he can see it as the Easter Bunny for all that I care. In the state of Colorado, he may not deny service on the basis of sexual orientation.
Reverend Alan wrote:
He sees it as an endorsement, and his is the only voice that matters when he comes to what he wants to do.
I don't, he can see it as the Easter Bunny for all that I care. In the state of Colorado, he may not deny service on the basis of sexual orientation.
Reverend Alan wrote:
You are a monster for wanting to force him to do something he has decided he doesn't want to do.
No, he is a hypocrite for purporting to be Christian while judging others and treating them other than he would be treated. I think the bible said to forgive even your enemies, and not just seven times, but seventy times seven times.
Reverend Alan wrote:
Yes, it would be a professional service, one the baker elects not to provide.
He doesn't have that choice in Colorado.
Reverend Alan wrote:
And just like comrade peter told me on page 205, if you don't like it leave.
Of course, they chose the business because they liked it. There was nothing about the business that would entice the couple to leave.
Reverend Alan wrote:
I know you being gay want gay people to have the right to refuse service but you do not want to protect that very same right to bakers.
No actually, I would argue against a gay proprietor who denied service upon the basis of sexuality just a I am arguing against the straight business owner who has ACTUALLY done so in this case. Thus far, you have only been able to cite on instance of a gay proprietor denying service, and ironically your citation was the ruling against them. It kind of negates your argument.
Reverend Alan wrote:
That is morally wrong.
What is morally wrong is judging others, denying service on the basis of sexuality, and pretending to be a personal of faith while really being a hypocrite.
Reverend Alan wrote:
That is not the way the Constitution works. I
The constitution, my dear twit, requires states to provide all persons within their jurisdiction equal protection of the law.
Reverend Alan wrote:
pot/kettle
What are you, six?

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5558 Jan 23, 2014
Liberals R Defective wrote:
<quoted text>The sad thing is, the radical homosexuals, like cpeter, are being used as pawns by the progressives to achieve their goal of bringing down and weakening the normal, moral society. Once the progressives assume total power, they'll discard the homosexuals like used condoms.
Except that there is no such thing as society. There are individuals and hardly are any of them moral. And the way you use the word moral is totally subjective. In comrade peters world it is moral to violate the rights of others if laws violating the Constitution allow for it.

Comrade peter is in reality Comrade Nanny. He wants to take care of us all and all we have to do is do what he says.

The 'salami treatment' for moving power and responsibility from the individual to the central government planners as been on a steady march towards totalitarianism for about 100 years in America, and Obama got into trouble because he cut the salami slices too thick and exposed the scam to make government our masters.

Comrade Nanny loves the idea of the government controlling our lives from birth to death because he doesn't believe he will be controlled but the one doing the controlling.

Screw you Comrade Nanny!

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5559 Jan 23, 2014
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
It is ridiculous to blame adults for everything; sugar I was a horny gay diaper baby that chased adults and made them scream "oh God!"
Now I am a horny gay college guy that chases adults and makes them scream "oh God!"
I remember being horny in the 5th grade. I never made anyone scream "oh God" but I remember saying it a few times. This girl Sandy sat next to me in class and she loved to touch me. One day the teacher saw her under our desk tops and I was the one who got yelled at. The next week when I returned to school. They sat me down in a desk next to Jim. Jim loved touching me too. But he only did so once.

Why are children so sexual? So interested in experimenting? And why are adults so over-reacting and hot headed about it.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5560 Jan 23, 2014
According to figures released by UNICEF, over the past decade more than 20,000 American children are believed to have been killed in their own homes by family members. That is nearly four times the number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and means that America has the worst record of child abuse in the industrialized world.

So far I can't find a single article where a gay parent killed his foster or adopted child. This alone makes gay parents better parents than their straight counter parts.

OK Comrade Nanny, please tell me that gays make worse parents and I do not know what the hell I am talking about and don't forget to tell me to STFU and call me a fukwit.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#5561 Jan 23, 2014
incredulous: It isn't a matter of whether a teen cares about his frontal cortex. I have a feeling you do not have children or you would have made a better argument.

ALAN: I am making a freedom argument confronting an authoritarian argument.

I have three sons, one of them still lives here at home. My parents moved back from Mexico and my gay cousin still lives here. We are three generations living under one roof.

incredulous: If a teen is not capable of making certain decisions because the brain is not fully developed.....then they should not be exposed to homosexuality until they are physically able to make their own decision in the matter.

ALAN: When my gay cousin, who was abused by his homophobic Christian parents first moved in to our home we were in the 3rd grade, if memory serves. I knew he was gay, but I did not know what it was. He always wanted to stick his hands in my underwear and I must have told him no 1,000 times. I do not hate him for it. We used to take showers together and I think it was 8th or 9th grade when he told me he liked boys. I told him I did too, but he said, "no, I mean I LIKE boys". I still didn't know what it was but I understood it somehow. That probably doesn't make sense, but I both knew and didn't know both at the same time. Anyway that is when I started taking showers by myself except when I was in way too much of a hurry.

So, I am saying I was "physically able to make" my own decision and so was my cousin. As were most other kids I knew in elementary school and Junior high school. We only went to the public schools ever two or three years and were the envy of those who went as much as the government required them to.

incredulous: These homosexual predators need to back off.

ALAN: This is the Gay and Lesbian forum, not the predators forum. Do you go to Chinese restaurants looking for pizza? Do you really believe the gay people posting here are predators?

increduloous: Gays do not impact me in the least but I am bothered by how they impact children.

ALAN: Sounds like you are making a distinction that does not exist. You keep insisting you are not homophobic and then claim that homosexuality is all about preying on children. People who know homosexuals will not agree with that. I do not agree with that. I have seen too many gay men falsely accused and a few of them went to prison for something they did not do because of people like you. "Moral" people sit by doing nothing while parents murder their own children and freak out when someone over 18 has sex with someone under 18. Personally if my only choice was a dead child or one who had a blow job, I do not believe I have to tell who which I would choose.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The Orchard seeks withdrawal from UMC 4 hr Same Old Sex 22
[Guide] Funny maid of honor speech (Sep '14) 11 hr jody70 276
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 21 hr Wondering 5,416
News Ben Carson Warns Gay Couples Against Pushing Ba... (Jan '15) 23 hr Monsantos Mexico 78
News Hawaii Republican resigns from party after crit... 23 hr American_Infidel 8
News Lacusong: What is your religion's ultimate goal? Sun True Christian wi... 3
News Canada protestor tears Quran to protest prefere... Sun just Jay _ for fr... 1
More from around the web