Marco Rubio Doesn't Want Immigration ...

Marco Rubio Doesn't Want Immigration Reform to be a Gay Rights Issue

There are 403 comments on the EDGE story from Feb 13, 2013, titled Marco Rubio Doesn't Want Immigration Reform to be a Gay Rights Issue. In it, EDGE reports that:

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, the charismatic young gun of the Republican Party, said in a recent interview he hopes the bipartisan immigration overhaul plan doesn't become a gay rights issue.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#236 Feb 23, 2013
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously, in response to your post, it meant "You are" that stupid.
Thanks for proving how stupid you are by not getting something so simple and requiring me to waste my time breaking it down for you.
Stupid.
Now piss off. Grown-ups are talking.
Yeah, you got "pissed" off alright, otherwise you wouldn't have gone through such great lengths to explain something that could of been done in one sentence. Look at yourself for the "stupid" patch the next time you look at your ugly mug in that cracked mirror, moron!

All it would have taken was simply four dots (....) after your dumb ass remark to make it legible, stupid! See how simple that is, yet more than effective at knocking you over the head? Now, stew on it!
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#238 Feb 23, 2013
Nym8387 wrote:
<quoted text>no one likes you frito,hahahahaha
Yeah, dream on. Dreams are all you have in life. In reality, you're just a loser with a knack for sniffing crotches that blow your way.
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#240 Feb 24, 2013
Nym8387 wrote:
<quoted text>is that why you hate everyone?
No, I just don't like you.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#241 Feb 24, 2013
Quest wrote:
Prove the harm, dear...
I'm for keeping the law as is, I have nothing to prove. The plaintiffs are required to prove their case, not the defense.

Same sex marriage is so backward, they would require proof of innocence instead of proof of guilt.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#243 Feb 24, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I'm for keeping the law as is, I have nothing to prove. The plaintiffs are required to prove their case, not the defense.
Same sex marriage is so backward, they would require proof of innocence instead of proof of guilt.
That's the same attitude taken by Prop 8 supporters, and that's why they lost their case.

When you support infringing on a citizen's equal rights, it IS up to you to prove why that infringement is constititutional.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#244 Feb 24, 2013
Detective Frito wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, you got "pissed" off alright, otherwise you wouldn't have gone through such great lengths to explain something that could of been done in one sentence. Look at yourself for the "stupid" patch the next time you look at your ugly mug in that cracked mirror, moron!
All it would have taken was simply four dots (....) after your dumb ass remark to make it legible, stupid! See how simple that is, yet more than effective at knocking you over the head? Now, stew on it!
Since you didn't get something so obvious, I thought it best to really spell it out, so I wouldn't have to further explain in another post.

Next time I'll draw a cartoon.

P.S. It's never four dots! It's always three dots.

Stupid!

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#245 Feb 24, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I'm for keeping the law as is, I have nothing to prove. The plaintiffs are required to prove their case, not the defense.
Same sex marriage is so backward, they would require proof of innocence instead of proof of guilt.
Nice job tripping over yourself.

We as a group feel we are on the wrong end of discrimination when it comes to marriage. Hence we are petitioning the courts to remedy this situation. The burden is on you to prove harm caused.

Since you can't, this is practically over already.

What are you going to do when gay marriage is legal everywhere?

Come here and chat with nobody? We won't have much reason to argue with you anymore. You'll be as irrelevant and marginalized and ridiculed as the KKK. You don't see us arguing with the KKK, because they don't matter anymore.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#246 Feb 24, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I'm for keeping the law as is, I have nothing to prove. The plaintiffs are required to prove their case, not the defense.
Same sex marriage is so backward, they would require proof of innocence instead of proof of guilt.
With thinking such as the above you just keep proving your the king of mental midgets.

Hint: We have won virtually every case against DOMA and Prop 8 that has been filed. That fact does and will have major impact on the SCOUS and their coming decisions. Vegas money is on marriage equality.

Hopefully you'll disappear from here come June. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#247 Feb 24, 2013
You're
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#248 Feb 24, 2013
Nym8387 wrote:
<quoted text>that's too bad,maybe if you backed up your threats I wouldn't be posting anymore.
I'd wait for you at that schoolyard your mentioned, but the likelihood of you showing up is nil, considering you're over 2 1/2 hrs away in Bridgeport, CT with no means of getting there. Anyone can see that any of your assertions in the matter are cowardly diversionary, because you never intended to travel that far to get your rump handed to you and put in jail. You're a just a big mouth troll with no guts.

I know you, but yet you don't know me, Lou! I think I'm more than ahead in the game.
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#249 Feb 24, 2013
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you didn't get something so obvious, I thought it best to really spell it out, so I wouldn't have to further explain in another post.
Next time I'll draw a cartoon.
P.S. It's never four dots! It's always three dots.
Stupid!
Three dots to start and four to finish when you're trying to express a complete sentence or thought, stupid! Look it up....
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#252 Feb 24, 2013
Nym8387 wrote:
<quoted text>hahahahahahaha,still trying to save face?you can't even face here is one and he lives just a few miles south of the border,but yet you think people are going to belive the sh!t you just said?coward
Making up stories again? Here Is One says he lives in Punta Mita near Puerto Vallarta, which is approximately 2500 miles away, almost as far as I am from you, coward!

So, when are you gonna show up at that schoolyard in the Bronx?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#254 Feb 25, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
That's the same attitude taken by Prop 8 supporters, and that's why they lost their case.
You don't think the fact the judge was gay had anything to do with his ruling? Even with his ruling, he stayed it for appeal; he knew it was wrong.

California defines marriage as one man and one woman, let's keep it that way.

.
WeTheSheeple wrote:
When you support infringing on a citizen's equal rights, it IS up to you to prove why that infringement is constititutional.
There is no right to gender equality, the ERA failed. Citizens don't have the right to redefine marriage for everyone to fit their sexual predilections.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#255 Feb 25, 2013
Tony C wrote:
Nice job tripping over yourself. We as a group feel we are on the wrong end of discrimination when it comes to marriage.
They want to start a new type of discrimination and validate gender segregated marriage; I believe in diversity and integration. This is where we differ.

There is no ban on same sex couples cohabitation and labeling themselves marriage; they have freedom. What they don't have is the right to scrap the unity of male/female marriage in favor of disunity, prejudice and gender apartheid marriage.

.
Tony C wrote:
Hence we are petitioning the courts to remedy this situation. The burden is on you to prove harm caused.Since you can't, this is practically over already.
No, the burden is on the plaintiffs to prove harm, not the defendants. We live in America, where the individual doesn't have to prove innocence, the state must prove guilt.

.
Tony C wrote:
What are you going to do when gay marriage is legal everywhere?
Wake up, most states will never dump gender integrated marriage in favor of segregation.

.
Tony C wrote:
Come here and chat with nobody? We won't have much reason to argue with you anymore. You'll be as irrelevant and marginalized and ridiculed as the KKK. You don't see us arguing with the KKK, because they don't matter anymore.
^^^Read their words, if same sex marriage becomes law, your church will be as "marginalized and ridiculed as the KKK" and you'll be labeled a hater for going to that church.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#256 Feb 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>They want to start a new type of discrimination and validate gender segregated marriage; I believe in diversity and integration. This is where we differ.
There is no ban on same sex couples cohabitation and labeling themselves marriage; they have freedom. What they don't have is the right to scrap the unity of male/female marriage in favor of disunity, prejudice and gender apartheid marriage.
.
<quoted text>No, the burden is on the plaintiffs to prove harm, not the defendants. We live in America, where the individual doesn't have to prove innocence, the state must prove guilt.
.
<quoted text>Wake up, most states will never dump gender integrated marriage in favor of segregation.
.
<quoted text>^^^Read their words, if same sex marriage becomes law, your church will be as "marginalized and ridiculed as the KKK" and you'll be labeled a hater for going to that church.
You are really bad at this.

Most states won't have a choice. They'll be forced.

That nonsense about churches doesn't matter.

Proving harm on our side is very, very easy. Let's go.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#257 Feb 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>You don't think the fact the judge was gay had anything to do with his ruling? Even with his ruling, he stayed it for appeal; he knew it was wrong.
California defines marriage as one man and one woman, let's keep it that way.
.
<quoted text>There is no right to gender equality, the ERA failed. Citizens don't have the right to redefine marriage for everyone to fit their sexual predilections.
No more than if the judge was heterosexual.

Ruling are often stayed for appeal when it overturns a current law.

Laws discriminating based on gender have to meet a heightened level of scrutiny; try refusing to rent an apartment to someone just because they're a woman and see what happens.

And yet we ARE redefining marriage......

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#258 Feb 25, 2013
Detective Frito wrote:
<quoted text>
Three dots to start and four to finish when you're trying to express a complete sentence or thought, stupid! Look it up....
The fourth dot is a period to end the sentence, which would be used if I had been quoting the beginning of a sentence, which I was not.

Stupid.
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#259 Feb 25, 2013
Nym8387 wrote:
<quoted text>as soon as you get there,I've made that clear since the first time you threaten me.
No you haven't.... You named a school yard 2 1/2 hours away from you by car, trying to make everyone here think you actually live close to that location, wannabe tough guy. I specifically asked you to name one close to your house and you didn't. The evidence is obvious. You're just a deflecting coward that never intended to show anyway.
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#261 Feb 26, 2013
Nym8387 wrote:
<quoted text>Even if that's true,why did you talk about calling the cops?because you're a huge coward who's been threatening people on topix since at least 2008,you're less than nothing and you obviously won't show up.
Hey clodhopper, I don't need to call anyone to deal with you. You're a coward that never intended to show, since you live over 2 1/2 hrs drive away in Bridgeport, CT., Luis!

BTW, nobody was threatened. On the contrary, you threatened me and I returned the gesture. You started it by stating you were going to "drop me" on post # 107 of the thread "US Chambers Makes Immigration Overhaul to Priority." Asian Guy was there and witnessed it and probably reported you. That's why you got banned.

Now, where are your links that I started it by threatening you, you clueless lazy POS?
Detective Frito

San Diego, CA

#264 Feb 26, 2013
Nym8387 wrote:
<quoted text>The post before that one is my link and Asian guy hates you too,your best bet to get rid of me is to either show up like you said or just shut up and acknowledge the fact that you're nothing but a coward who's been posting nonsense and stalking people since at least 2008,"king of trolls" fits you perfectly.when will you show up without making excuses about the Bronx,ct or anything else,when?
With IP addresses all over the Northeast, who in their right mind could believe you. Asian Guy might dislike me, but we've been in constructive debate before and I'm sure, regardless of our views, he would be one to do the right thing and report you the way he did for threatening to "drop me." You're gonna have to wait 'til June, but I'm sure you'll say you'll show, but never will, because you're scared and don't have the wherewithal to show.

The post before what? You made the threat and it's there in black and white, so don't start crying when I sack you up throw you in jail.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News How is it that cake became a favourite platform... 8 min Xstain Mullah Aroma 7
News Gay wedding cake at center of Colorado Appeals ... 45 min Reverend Alan 879
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 1 hr MORMON HUMAN RIGH... 6,668
News Lawmakers Consider Gay Discrimination Policies 1 hr Reverend Alan 5,894
News Resistance to gay marriages travels a well-worn... 1 hr Rutherford Jenkins 69
News Oregon issues final order in gay wedding cake case 2 hr DebraE 36
News End of Boy Scouts' ban on gays prompts elation ... 2 hr Florida Gator 94
More from around the web