Gay couples shouldn't be allowed marry or adopt, says Italian Prime Minister Mario Monte

Jan 17, 2013 | Posted by: Rick in Kansas | Full story: www.independent.ie

His comments are sure to inflame an increasingly fraught debate in Italy a month before an election in which he is seeking a second term.

Comments
1 - 20 of 93 Comments Last updated Jan 30, 2013
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

4

2

2

The Italians need to be less concered with blocking gay rights and more concerned about how much public money Berlusconi spent on whores.

Corruption seems to be a genetic trait for them, at least for the ones who run for office. And it seems to have gone on since the days of the Roman Empire. And in the South, they can't even run a regional government - the Cosa Nostra,'Ndrangheta and Camorra are the government.

Since: Apr 08

Chagrin Falls, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Italian Prime Ministers shouldn't be allowed to marry or parent.
david traversa

Argentina

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Much as I love Italy (where I lived for ten years) I must say that, when it comes to sex, they're terribly provincial and squeamish.. They haven't lived all those centuries under popish influence for nothing.. Even the prostitutes (of both sexes) kneel down and weep during Holy Week processions.. Everything is "Mamma!" and "Madonna Santa!" and they all go into contrition after an orgasm.. Marlene Dietrich called them "beautiful hot air" .. The women, as usual with women, are far more liberated and honest.. These corrupt politicians apparently think that by bowing and scraping to the Vatican they'll be washed clean of their sins..
poppin in for a wee bit

Watsonville, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

S.P.Q.R. = Sono porci questi Romani
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Monte is lifting his re-election tactics right out of the American Republican Playbook
.
What is it about Roman Heritage that makes a politician a soaring moron?
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
More rationalizing.
Under no circumstances should two men or women gay or straight be provided an oppurtunity that would suggest or qualify as parenting. One mother is already proven detrimental to children and obviously 2 or 3 or 4 would be even more confusing. Two men is absolutely preposterous. What is it with homosexuals that you cannot comprehend the term 'balance' That's right. A mental disorder.
So please, save the rationalizing.
Where do you think orphans should live?
disgusted american

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

2

The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
More rationalizing.
Under no circumstances should two men or women gay or straight be provided an oppurtunity that would suggest or qualify as parenting. One mother is already proven detrimental to children and obviously 2 or 3 or 4 would be even more confusing. Two men is absolutely preposterous. What is it with homosexuals that you cannot comprehend the term 'balance' That's right. A mental disorder.
So please, save the rationalizing.
awe Poor you - living in a INCLUSIVE state.....awe, you poor dear....Move to Alabama, or Mississsippi - they'd suit you better...Bigots thrive together

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Ron wrote:
Certainly children should not be placed in homosexual homes and exposed to the tragedies that follow that lifestyle choice in such increased numbers. Homosexual adoption denies a child a father or mother by definition and having both in the home is one of the best indicators of a child's future success in life. The largest scientific study on the subject provides strong evidence of problems with homosexual adoption.
Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Oh, CALEB, JAYCE, MAX, JUSTIN, RAND, DAVID MOORE, RON...why do you keep LYING? What joy do you get out of it?

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
And why should it surprise anyone that a state with such a pedophile and incest problem would allow other perversions, subversion, and decadence to thrive here.
The trees are just so beautiful here. Oh God, I think I'm gonna......
And 'WHY' should it surprise anyone that YOU tell 'the worlds biggest lie(s).....all the time! ROTFL@U. That name fits you well!
Gabe

Anonymous Proxy

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Way to go Prime Minister Mario Monte!!!
Gabe

Henderson, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

3

Way to go Italy!!!
Chance

Grove City, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

France, now Italy. I always heard that Europe was a classier place than the USA. If all continues as it is now progressing, this will prove it.

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

david traversa wrote:
Much as I love Italy (where I lived for ten years) I must say that, when it comes to sex, they're terribly provincial and squeamish.. They haven't lived all those centuries under popish influence for nothing.. Even the prostitutes (of both sexes) kneel down and weep during Holy Week processions.. Everything is "Mamma!" and "Madonna Santa!" and they all go into contrition after an orgasm.. Marlene Dietrich called them "beautiful hot air" .. The women, as usual with women, are far more liberated and honest.. These corrupt politicians apparently think that by bowing and scraping to the Vatican they'll be washed clean of their sins..
LOL! Mamma is their favourite word.

Since: Oct 10

San Francisco

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Ron wrote:
Certainly children should not be placed in homosexual homes and exposed to the tragedies that follow that lifestyle choice in such increased numbers. Homosexual adoption denies a child a father or mother by definition and having both in the home is one of the best indicators of a child's future success in life. The largest scientific study on the subject provides strong evidence of problems with homosexual adoption.
Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
David, you moron. Even after it's pointed out to you, you still don't see the absurdity of posting your usual homophobia and following it with "Why not try a little live and let live?".

I had lunch with Jesus yesterday and He told me if there's one thing He can't stand, it's intentional idiocy. "Espcially that troll from Pekin, Illinois," He explained after a couple Bloody Marys.

"Moore's MySpace page is revolting. Turning his basketball hoop into a cross was one thing, but giving me blue eyes and dressing me in a tasteless glitter shirt was just too much. That one I'm sending directly to Satan."
eresh

Vxj, Sweden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

gays can go back to wasteland USA, the country of garbage.
well

Hamilton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Prime Minister Mario Monte is 1000% right.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Ron wrote:
Certainly children should not be placed in homosexual homes and exposed to the tragedies that follow that lifestyle choice in such increased numbers. Homosexual adoption denies a child a father or mother by definition and having both in the home is one of the best indicators of a child's future success in life. The largest scientific study on the subject provides strong evidence of problems with homosexual adoption.
Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Oh David, need we all remind you that it was YOU- David Moore from Pekin Illinois who was ordered by a judge to stop trying to have sex with his own children?!!

Back to the looney bin with you......

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Since gays are already raising kids--inluding the ones you heteros throw away like trash--you can sit there and pound sand.
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
More rationalizing.
Under no circumstances should two men or women gay or straight be provided an oppurtunity that would suggest or qualify as parenting. One mother is already proven detrimental to children and obviously 2 or 3 or 4 would be even more confusing. Two men is absolutely preposterous. What is it with homosexuals that you cannot comprehend the term 'balance' That's right. A mental disorder.
So please, save the rationalizing.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

STFU, david moore.
Ron wrote:
Certainly children should not be placed in homosexual homes and exposed to the tragedies that follow that lifestyle choice in such increased numbers. Homosexual adoption denies a child a father or mother by definition and having both in the home is one of the best indicators of a child's future success in life. The largest scientific study on the subject provides strong evidence of problems with homosexual adoption.
Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

David, you have the only computer in pekin. You also write the exact same trash, same phrasing, same mental issues, every post.

So, howare those kids you're not allowed to be anywhere near? You know, I don't know any gays who aren't allowe to see their kids...
Ron wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for confirming that you can't refute anything that I posted.
Do you really think lying about my identity and your sick fantasies somehow hide that fact?
Which didn't you need, troll, a mother or a father?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••