Paul Ryan promises hate group that he'll fight equality

[lides]

Jane Dough wrote:

I gave you TWO already...
and all you do is hem and haw about some case and never address the interests...which I call pete and repeat...
whats, more, you know it!

I must have missed it, what two legitimate state interest do you think you have offered?

I've seen you offer two court decisions, one of which has been overturned by an act of the legislature; and make numerous rationalizations concerning procreation, all of which have been illustrated to be false.

[Jane Dough]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
I must have missed it, what two legitimate state interest do you think you have offered?

One was pete and the other was repeat, they were sitting on a a fence...
you do know you admitted to getting my answers already, right?

You already admitted you wont accept them because you disagree...
what a stupid tactic..

[Wondering]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
I must have missed it,

You miss most everything unless it has to do with support for homosexuality.

[lides]

Jane Dough wrote:

One was pete and the other was repeat, they were sitting on a a fence...
you do know you admitted to getting my answers already, right?
You already admitted you wont accept them because you disagree...
what a stupid tactic..

Funny, I would say the stupid tactic would be to offer excuses that can be easily disprove, like your truly idiotic assertion that the state has an interest in children being raised by two opposite sex parents.

Do you know how easy it is to decimate that claim? I can do it in one question.

Can a single parent decide to raise their child alone, or will the state intervene and provide two opposite sex foster parents?

Whoops, there goes that argument.

Keep it up, Jane. You are truly a poster child for the irrational.

[Jane Dough]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>

Can a single parent decide to raise their child alone, or will the state intervene and provide two opposite sex foster parents?
.

I think its great you think you have an argument there...you don't, but its great you think you do...

procreation and child rearing IS a fundamental right you twit...
so they couldn't do that.
what a clod!

Its right there in the quote that you must have "missed"
" a condition that they have a proved capacity or declared willingness to procreate, posing a rhetorical demand that this court must read such condition into the statute if same-sex marriages are to be prohibited. Even assuming that such a condition would be neither unrealistic nor offensive under the Griswold rationale,"

Our procreation is "none of the gov'ts business", yet they issue a marriage "license"...go figure...

[Jane Dough]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
You are truly a poster child for the irrational.

with my RATIONALizations and all...

you are too funny...
sad....
but funny!

[lides]

Jane Dough wrote:

I think its great you think you have an argument there...you don't, but its great you think you do...
procreation and child rearing IS a fundamental right you twit...
so they couldn't do that.
what a clod!
Its right there in the quote that you must have "missed"
" a condition that they have a proved capacity or declared willingness to procreate, posing a rhetorical demand that this court must read such condition into the statute if same-sex marriages are to be prohibited. Even assuming that such a condition would be neither unrealistic nor offensive under the Griswold rationale,"
Our procreation is "none of the gov'ts business", yet they issue a marriage "license"...go figure...

I never said that it wasn’t. You have, ineptly, made the argument that there is a legitimate state interest in children being raised by two biological parents, or two opposite sex parents. I have illustrated concretely that there is no state interest in either.

Procreation is neither a prerequisite for, nor a requirement of legal marriage.

Way to make an utterly tangential argument, as well as to basically start an irrelevant argument with yourself.

[lides]

Jane Dough wrote:

with my RATIONALizations and all...
you are too funny...
sad....
but funny!

You are just pathetic. It is funny that you offer many arguments that can be easily debunked, and think you have offered a rational argument for your position.

Hey, Jane, do couples that legally marry have to procreate?

[Wondering]

lides wrote:

Hey, Jane, do couples that legally marry have to procreate?

Stupid question. Better questions:
1. Can straights couples that marry procreate?
2. Do straights couples that marry procreate?
3. Can gay couples procreate?
4. Do gay couples procreate?
5. Is marriage between a man and a woman tradition in this country?
6. Is marriage between two men or two women tradition in this country?

[Wondering]

Little Blue Alien wrote:

<quoted text>
It's been four years now and Lides is like watching a little boy that never wants to get off the swingset. In the meantime the moral fabric of this nation continues to suffer because of those that wish to corrupt us dirty white goyim.
Merry 'Christmas' wondering!
May it be a peaceful.

Thanks, same to you and yours.
It's a great time of year.

[Wondering]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
You are just pathetic. It is funny that you offer many arguments that can be easily debunked, and think you have offered a rational argument for your position.

Are you going to come out of the closet for New Year's?

[Jane Dough]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
You are just pathetic. It is funny that you offer many arguments that can be easily debunked, and think you have offered a rational argument for your position.
Hey, Jane, do couples that legally marry have to procreate?

yawn.

sat on a fence who is left?

[lides]

Jane Dough wrote:

yawn.
sat on a fence who is left?

You do realize that each and every time you fail to offer a legitimate state interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law to marry, you tacitly admit that you are wrong, don’t you?

Sometimes silence speaks louder than words.

[Jane Dough]

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize that each and every time you fail to offer

you do understand that your disagreeing does not negate that they were "offered" right?

no you dont.
that is the basis of your pete and repeat game!

[Anonymous of Indy]

Little Blue Alien wrote:

The govt has no business persuading or influencing children's sexual preference in one direction or the other.
Josef Mengele and Ernst Roehm are so proud of Massachusetts.

Romney Boosted funding for homosexual “education” starting in kindergarten.

Homosexual "Rights"

Gov. Romney has a long history of promoting and furthering the homosexual agenda, and working closely with leading gay activists
• In February 2005, The American Spectator observed of Romney, "He is pro-choice and, aside from the marriage debate, generally in agreement with gay-rights advocates."
- American Spectator, 2/23/2005
• In March, 2005, Boston's leading homosexual newspaper, Bay Windows, told its readers that Romney's pro-gay record belies his new-found "conservatism":

"Governor Romney has been touring the country in the past few weeks, courting anti-gay right-wingers in South Carolina, Missouri, and Utah with speeches designed to show that he is firmly in their camp. Yet a look at Romney's record shows that his Rick Santorum drag act is a relatively new phenomenon."
- Bay Windows, 3/3/2005

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/marriage/r...

[Jupiter]

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>"That's just Snots, yakking up a bone he got out of the garbage."
"Christmas Vacation".

"Could you hurry it up Clark? I'm freezing my baguettes off out here!"

"There's nothin between the ground and my brain but a piece of government plastic."

[Jupiter]

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>Guess what I watched this evening???
Hint:
"Why is the carpet soaking wet, TODD!!!??"
"Christmas Vacation"!
I have seen it 20 times and it gets better each time.
"You couldn't hear a garbage truck driving through a nitro glycerine factory!"

Agreed! Do you sing along with Mavis Staples at the beginning too? I watch that and "A Christmas Story" and "Bad Santa" every year! Did you ever see Bad Santa? Not exactly fun for the whole family because of its, shall we say, irreverence, but in spite of it all, a sweet movie. Billy Bob Thornton is hilarious!

[Empatheist]

Pete and repeat sat on a fence...
TRANSLATED
LALALALALAAAA I'M NOT LISTENING! NANANANA BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH I'M NOT GONNA ANSWER.

If you wanna change the subject just change it. You are keeping the conversation from advancing.

I would love if you answered the question, but if you can't.. take the loss and move on.

[Mona Lott]

luv Sarah Palin wrote:

<quoted text>
Sadly not enough people are informed and as hard as my group has tried , it seems that so many remain uninformed because you do support camps for conservatives and all Christians and that is no secret.
I do not know if your lib messiah will be able t do it but the Tea Party is watching him and YOU.
"Obama's Private Army and FEMA Dentention Camps"
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/pages/obama/fe...

That's nice dear.

We're all well aware of how accurate and reliable your sources are. Just ask President Romney.

[Mona Lott]

Little Blue Alien wrote:

<quoted text>
I never liked Romney as a Governor nor did I vote for him in this election. In all honesty I haven't trusted virtually any of them for a very long time now and they sold our souls many decades ago.
What I want for Christmas this year or next year is for the federal reserve bank to be uprooted and plopped down somewhere in the Middle East without any weaponry.
Isn't it amazing that Clinton, of all people, signed DOMA into law in 1996 with Joe Biden being one of the champions for it. They will sell us out with the change of the wind for votes and money. Been doing so forever.
As The Rev Bill Owens said about Barry Obama, he sold out the same as Judas did two thousand years ago. Brilliant!

Wait.... what did you just write? Clinton signed DOMA into law... they will sell us out...

us?

US?

Are you coming out of the closet or is this just another example of your piss-poor syntax?