Paul Ryan promises hate group that he...

Paul Ryan promises hate group that he'll fight equality

There are 5436 comments on the www.wisconsingazette.com story from Oct 9, 2012, titled Paul Ryan promises hate group that he'll fight equality. In it, www.wisconsingazette.com reports that:

In a recent interview with Focus on the Family president Jim Daly, Paul Ryan reassured the anti-gay hate group that a Romney-Ryan administration will fiercely oppose gay rights.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.wisconsingazette.com.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#4992 Dec 6, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
<quoted text>
Pete and repeat sat on a fence...
are we done yet?
You clearly are, but then you could not defend your position from the word go.

Can you no admit that you cannot indicate ANY legitimate state interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law to marry? If so, then we're done; if not, then you can continue to make a fool of yourself while you offer more rationalizations that fail to establish a legitimate basis for your argument.
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#4995 Dec 6, 2012
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
.
?
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#4996 Dec 6, 2012
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
.
2 post, nothing but silly ad hominem...
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#4997 Dec 6, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
You clearly are,
pete fell off, who is left?
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#4998 Dec 6, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
I support re-education camps for idiots like Wondering.
so hateful...
being born a man really put your panties in a bind didn't it?

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5000 Dec 6, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
pete fell off, who is left?
That would be you, utterly incapable of indicating a legitimate state interest served by denying same sex couples the right to marry.

Congratulations.
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#5002 Dec 6, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be you, utterly incapable of indicating a legitimate state interest served by denying same sex couples the right to marry.
Congratulations.
repeat. Pete and repeat sat on a fence...
dude this game was dumb when we were six...

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5003 Dec 6, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
repeat. Pete and repeat sat on a fence...
dude this game was dumb when we were six...
Prove me wrong, indicate a legitimate state interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law to marry.

You can't, and what's more, you know it.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#5007 Dec 6, 2012
How about you heteros deal with your OWN messes and leave us alone?
free zimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
I feel they're not necessary and a bad idea. We have enough problems dealing with the copulation catastrophes of the heterosexuals. I predict many gays will just walk away like they were never "married".
Gays have ample opportunities to address all legal issues w/o being "married".

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#5008 Dec 6, 2012
Just another hetero who is totally mystified by the concept of safe sex.
free zimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Has there ever been a pregnant man? If Cpeter was never impregnated, with all the genetic material pumped into him, I'd say men can't get pregnant.
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#5011 Dec 6, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove me wrong, indicate a legitimate state interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law to marry.
You can't, and what's more, you know it.
I gave you TWO already...
and all you do is hem and haw about some case and never address the interests...which I call pete and repeat...
whats, more, you know it!
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5012 Dec 6, 2012
cpeter1313 wrote:
Just another hetero who is totally mystified by the concept of safe sex.
<quoted text>
Really? Maybe you should read this carefully. 2% responsible for 61% of new infections in 2009:
Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)[1] of all races and ethnicities remain the population most severely affected by HIV.
CDC estimates that MSM account for just 2% of the US population, but accounted for 61% of all new HIV infections in 2009. MSM accounted for 49% of people living with HIV infection in 2008 (the most recent year national prevalence data are available).
In 2009, white MSM continued to account for the largest number of new HIV infections of any group in the US (11,400), followed closely by black MSM (10,800).
Young, black MSM were the only risk group in the US to experience statistically significant increases in new HIV infections from 2006–2009—from 4,400 new HIV infections in 2006 to 6,500 infections in 2009.
Since the epidemic began, almost 300,000 MSM with AIDS have died, including an estimated 6,863 in 2009.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5013 Dec 6, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
I gave you TWO already...
and all you do is hem and haw about some case and never address the interests...which I call pete and repeat...
whats, more, you know it!
I must have missed it, what two legitimate state interest do you think you have offered?

I've seen you offer two court decisions, one of which has been overturned by an act of the legislature; and make numerous rationalizations concerning procreation, all of which have been illustrated to be false.
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#5014 Dec 6, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
I must have missed it, what two legitimate state interest do you think you have offered?
One was pete and the other was repeat, they were sitting on a a fence...
you do know you admitted to getting my answers already, right?

You already admitted you wont accept them because you disagree...
what a stupid tactic..
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#5015 Dec 6, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
I must have missed it,
You miss most everything unless it has to do with support for homosexuality.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5016 Dec 6, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
One was pete and the other was repeat, they were sitting on a a fence...
you do know you admitted to getting my answers already, right?
You already admitted you wont accept them because you disagree...
what a stupid tactic..
Funny, I would say the stupid tactic would be to offer excuses that can be easily disprove, like your truly idiotic assertion that the state has an interest in children being raised by two opposite sex parents.

Do you know how easy it is to decimate that claim? I can do it in one question.

Can a single parent decide to raise their child alone, or will the state intervene and provide two opposite sex foster parents?

Whoops, there goes that argument.

Keep it up, Jane. You are truly a poster child for the irrational.
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#5018 Dec 6, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>

Can a single parent decide to raise their child alone, or will the state intervene and provide two opposite sex foster parents?
.
I think its great you think you have an argument there...you don't, but its great you think you do...

procreation and child rearing IS a fundamental right you twit...
so they couldn't do that.
what a clod!

Its right there in the quote that you must have "missed"
" a condition that they have a proved capacity or declared willingness to procreate, posing a rhetorical demand that this court must read such condition into the statute if same-sex marriages are to be prohibited. Even assuming that such a condition would be neither unrealistic nor offensive under the Griswold rationale,"

Our procreation is "none of the gov'ts business", yet they issue a marriage "license"...go figure...
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#5019 Dec 6, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
You are truly a poster child for the irrational.
with my RATIONALizations and all...

you are too funny...
sad....
but funny!

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5020 Dec 6, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
I think its great you think you have an argument there...you don't, but its great you think you do...
procreation and child rearing IS a fundamental right you twit...
so they couldn't do that.
what a clod!
Its right there in the quote that you must have "missed"
" a condition that they have a proved capacity or declared willingness to procreate, posing a rhetorical demand that this court must read such condition into the statute if same-sex marriages are to be prohibited. Even assuming that such a condition would be neither unrealistic nor offensive under the Griswold rationale,"
Our procreation is "none of the gov'ts business", yet they issue a marriage "license"...go figure...
I never said that it wasn’t. You have, ineptly, made the argument that there is a legitimate state interest in children being raised by two biological parents, or two opposite sex parents. I have illustrated concretely that there is no state interest in either.

Procreation is neither a prerequisite for, nor a requirement of legal marriage.

Way to make an utterly tangential argument, as well as to basically start an irrelevant argument with yourself.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#5022 Dec 6, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
with my RATIONALizations and all...
you are too funny...
sad....
but funny!
You are just pathetic. It is funny that you offer many arguments that can be easily debunked, and think you have offered a rational argument for your position.

Hey, Jane, do couples that legally marry have to procreate?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Conservative Republicans question what's next a... 11 min Your Ex 91
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 16 min Termiraider 5,159
News Lawmakers Consider Gay Discrimination Policies 31 min NorCal Native 5,694
News Texas, Alabama blast same-sex marriage ruling 33 min Deo Vindice 5
News Religious liberty is rallying cry after gay mar... 38 min Christians In Nam... 85
News Conservative churches confront new reality on g... 44 min Fa-Foxy 23
News Texas Sen. Ted Cruz not backing down on same-se... 53 min Christians In Nam... 64
More from around the web