I never said sodomy should prevent people from marrying. I said it is abuse.
It certainly is relevant in pointing out a distinction at the most intimate level of relationship.
Marriage is a natural HEALTHY physical union.
Ss sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning abuse. Yet, that is the closest ss couples can get to imitating intimacy in marriage.
Your idea that we should drop the most visible, physical union in comparing the relationships is understandable in light of the above facts...
I've never asserted that sex is a factor in allowing people to marry.<quoted text>
But, how people choose to have sex (or if they choose to have sex at all) is not a factor in allowing people to marry, as it would require you to ban heterosexual couples from marrying if they engage in anal sex (notice you never mention cunnilingus...it's only ever THE GAY BUTT SEX), and you've made it clear that anal sex is not in any way related to whether people should be allowed to marry. So, like I said, it's entirely irrelevant, and you should drop it from your argument. Repeating irrelevant nonsense doesn't somehow make it relevant.
I clearly and simply exposed the sexual distinction between ss couples and marriage.
That distinction is clearly a relevant factor in not equating ss couples and marriage.