Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against ...

Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?

There are 16097 comments on the news.yahoo.com story from Apr 27, 2009, titled Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?. In it, news.yahoo.com reports that:

The trouble they see is not just an America where general support for gay marriage will have driven a wedge between churches and the world, but between churches themselves.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at news.yahoo.com.

Xavier Breath

West New York, NJ

#12579 Apr 7, 2013
GODS PITBULL wrote:
<quoted text>
And yours does? How many gods do you think there are?
Well, let's see. What does your buybull say?

Adrammelech II Kings 17:31 Sepharvite God.
Anammelech II Kings 17:31 Sepharvite God.
Ashima II Kings 17:30 Samaritan Moon Goddess.
Ashtoreth I Kings 11:05 Canaanite Goddess.
Baal I Kings 18:19 Canaanite God ("Lord") of
fertility, vegitation, and storms.
Baal-berith Judges 8:33 A regional variation/aspect of Baal.
Baal-peor Numbers 25:03 Moabite regional variation/aspect of
Baal.
Baal-zebub Luke 11:19 Philistine/Ekronian regional
variation/aspect of Baal.
Baalim I Kings 18:18 Canaanite Gods ("Lords"), a
collective of the different
aspects of Baa.
Bel Isiah 46:01 Assyrian/Babylonian/Sumerian God
("Lord").
Chemosh I Kings 11:07 Moabite war God.
Dagon I Samuel 05:02 Philistine/Ekronian/Babylonian God
of agriculture.
Diana of the
Ephesians Acts 19:35 Ephesian moon and nature Goddess,
("Divine/Brilliant") .
Jehovah Exodus 6:03 Hebrew God
Jupiter Acts 14:12 Roman God (possibly derived from
'Zeus-pater', Father Zeus).
Lucifer Isiah 14:12 ("Light-Bearer")
Mercurius Acts 14:12 Otherwise known as the Roman God
Mercury, God of communication and
travel, and messenger of the
Gods...which is probably why Paul
was called this at Lystra.
Milcom I Kings 11:05 Ammonite God
Molech I Kings 11:07 Ammonite God, also called Moloch,
most probably Baal-Hammon of
Carthage.
Nebo Isiah 46:01 Assyrian/Babylonian/Chaldean God of
wisdom and writing, also called
Nabu.
Nergal II Kings 17:30 Cuth/Assyrian/Babylonian war and
underworld God, also called
Meshlamthea.
Nibhaz II Kings 17:31 Avites God
Nisroch II Kings 19:37 Assyrian God
Rimmon II Kings 05:18 Babylonian/Syrian storm God
involved (as Ramman) with the
Deluge, according to Hebrew texts;
also known as Ramman/Rammon.
Succoth-benoth II Kings 17:30 Babylonian fertility Goddess ("She
Who Produces Seed"), also known as
Zarpanitu/Zerpanitum.
Tammuz Ezekial 8:14 Assyrian/Babylonian God
Tartak II Kings 17:31 Avites God

How many is that?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#12580 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
<quoted text>
You're still here. You do care.
I'm here just to piss you off. What a fucktard!!!

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#12582 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
<quoted text>You are "perishing" and "blinded".

2 Corinthians 4:3-4 (NKJV)
3 But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, 4 whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them.
Do you have your own thoughts or are you too dumb?? Any idiot can cut and paste.

dollarsbill

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#12583 Apr 7, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, let's see. What does your buybull say?
Adrammelech II Kings 17:31 Sepharvite God.
Anammelech II Kings 17:31 Sepharvite God.
Ashima II Kings 17:30 Samaritan Moon Goddess.
Ashtoreth I Kings 11:05 Canaanite Goddess.
Baal I Kings 18:19 Canaanite God ("Lord") of
fertility, vegitation, and storms.
Baal-berith Judges 8:33 A regional variation/aspect of Baal.
Baal-peor Numbers 25:03 Moabite regional variation/aspect of
Baal.
Baal-zebub Luke 11:19 Philistine/Ekronian regional
variation/aspect of Baal.
Baalim I Kings 18:18 Canaanite Gods ("Lords"), a
collective of the different
aspects of Baa.
Bel Isiah 46:01 Assyrian/Babylonian/Sumerian God
("Lord").
Chemosh I Kings 11:07 Moabite war God.
Dagon I Samuel 05:02 Philistine/Ekronian/Babylonian God
of agriculture.
Diana of the
Ephesians Acts 19:35 Ephesian moon and nature Goddess,
("Divine/Brilliant") .
Jehovah Exodus 6:03 Hebrew God
Jupiter Acts 14:12 Roman God (possibly derived from
'Zeus-pater', Father Zeus).
Lucifer Isiah 14:12 ("Light-Bearer")
Mercurius Acts 14:12 Otherwise known as the Roman God
Mercury, God of communication and
travel, and messenger of the
Gods...which is probably why Paul
was called this at Lystra.
Milcom I Kings 11:05 Ammonite God
Molech I Kings 11:07 Ammonite God, also called Moloch,
most probably Baal-Hammon of
Carthage.
Nebo Isiah 46:01 Assyrian/Babylonian/Chaldean God of
wisdom and writing, also called
Nabu.
Nergal II Kings 17:30 Cuth/Assyrian/Babylonian war and
underworld God, also called
Meshlamthea.
Nibhaz II Kings 17:31 Avites God
Nisroch II Kings 19:37 Assyrian God
Rimmon II Kings 05:18 Babylonian/Syrian storm God
involved (as Ramman) with the
Deluge, according to Hebrew texts;
also known as Ramman/Rammon.
Succoth-benoth II Kings 17:30 Babylonian fertility Goddess ("She
Who Produces Seed"), also known as
Zarpanitu/Zerpanitum.
Tammuz Ezekial 8:14 Assyrian/Babylonian God
Tartak II Kings 17:31 Avites God
How many is that?
Clearly referring to false gods, but only one true God.

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#12584 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
<quoted text>Clearly referring to false gods, but only one true God.
All are false. Gods are fiction just like unicorns, Bigfoot, Nessy, Santa, Easter bunny, tooth fairy etc

dollarsbill

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#12585 Apr 7, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have your own thoughts or are you too dumb?? Any idiot can cut and paste.
Unlike you, I'm smart enough to know that God knows more than me.

dollarsbill

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#12586 Apr 7, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
All are false. Gods are fiction just like unicorns, Bigfoot, Nessy, Santa, Easter bunny, tooth fairy etc
Prove it.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#12587 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
Unlike you, I'm smart enough to know that God knows more than me.
Just not smart enough to know that the average bag of doorknobs also knows more than you do.

dollarsbill

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#12588 Apr 7, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Just not smart enough to know that the average bag of doorknobs also knows more than you do.
And your wisdom is insults. We got it!

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#12589 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
<quoted text>Unlike you, I'm smart enough to know that God knows more than me.
Keep living your fairy tale.

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#12590 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
<quoted text>Prove it.
Prove they are real? I don't need to prove something does not exist. If it does there would be evidence to prove your point but there is not.

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#12591 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
<quoted text>Prove it.
I saw a frog with 27 eyes 29 legs and it was 55 colors. There I made something up. You can't prove that something that does not exist doesent. If something does you can prove it does. And you have no proof so that tells me it does not exist just like my fake frog.

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#12592 Apr 7, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Just not smart enough to know that the average bag of doorknobs also knows more than you do.
Exactly.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#12593 Apr 7, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
To paraphrase: "Human institutions are for humans, not humans for institutions"
There are solely what we make them.
Which is why marriage is a constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

It it were not for the natural product of evolutionary mating behavior, social scientists surmise that marriage would not exist.

That is further evidenced by the diminished commitment brought about by no-fault divorce arguing against staying together for the sake of the children.

To call ss couples 'married' would not equate them with mating behavior, it would simply radically diminish and undefine marriage as a prejudicial form of friendship.

Smile.

dollarsbill

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#12594 Apr 7, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep living your fairy tale.
And you yours.
Jeff

San Jose, CA

#12595 Apr 7, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't matter when it began. The subjugation of blacks started before the Constitution was even drafted. So what? Their rights were eventually realized, as was the right to marry outside of one's race.
The slippery slope argument was also used in the dissent to the Loving v. Virginia case. Would you include inter-racial marriage as part of the slippery slope as was done in the dissent?
Consent is not an opinion. Morality is irrelevant.
When you're ready to present a legally valid justification for prohibiting same-sex marriage, you let us know, mmkay?
Its up to the pro-same sex people to justify allowing marriage not the other way around.
Now where in the Constitution is same sex marriage allowed? Where does it mention it?

dollarsbill

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#12596 Apr 7, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove they are real? I don't need to prove something does not exist. If it does there would be evidence to prove your point but there is not.
Israel died and is alive. The Mark is stalking you. There's plenty of proof. Your days are numbered very short.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_implan...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#12597 Apr 7, 2013
dollarsbill wrote:
And your wisdom is insults. We got it!
No dear, my insults are insults. You clearly aren't ready for my wisdom, not if you aren't smart enough to tell the difference.

dollarsbill

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#12598 Apr 7, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
I saw a frog with 27 eyes 29 legs and it was 55 colors. There I made something up. You can't prove that something that does not exist doesent. If something does you can prove it does. And you have no proof so that tells me it does not exist just like my fake frog.
It's your frog, not mine. Your problem.
Jeff

San Jose, CA

#12599 Apr 7, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
And, as soon as religious beliefs are a legally valid justification for prohibiting same-sex marriage in America, you'll have a point.
No. As soon as you can demonstrate since the founding of this country that we have had same sex marriage then you'll have a point.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 8 min barry 14,249
News Gay couples exchange vows in Montana after ruling (Nov '14) 17 hr BangmoPopoPedos 184
News Meghan McCain marries Ben Domenech in Arizona 20 hr American Citizen 1
News You're gay? You're out! Gay teacher sacked due ... Wed Rabbis on the Run 2
News Free Woods: 19th century community unique in area (Feb '11) Tue Draius Jesse Ballard 6
News PolitiFact NH: Did Margaret Sanger believe Afri... (Oct '15) Tue Bill Clinton 6
News Lesbian granted rights of 'husband' in same-sex... (May '17) Tue Harry Pothead 37
More from around the web