Wow. You didn't get a single statement in that post correct.<quoted text>Really, then the difference must be your definition of harm. MSM leads to AIDS, but you gays see no harm. The homosexual lifestyle is prone to suicide, but you gays see no harm. You call gay pedophiles "chicken hawks" so you gays must not see any harm. You gays tried to lift the ban in the military on sodomy bestiality, gay sex with animals, so you must not see sex with animals as a harm.
Why is that?
HIV "leads to AIDS".
The professionals in Medicine and the Social Sciences "see no harm".
The is no "homosexual lifestyle".
Oppressed and abused teens are prone to suicide.
A pedophile has erotic attraction to children under 13 years of age. A hebephile has erotic attraction to youths aged 14 to 18 years of age.
A "chickenhawk" has erotic attraction to youths 16-20 years of age.
The only regulations in the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) that we campaign against are those related to gay orientation, miscalled "sodomy". We leave the animal regs in place or else the Marines would never get anything done.
You've created Straw Man arguments.