Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against ...

Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?

There are 16097 comments on the news.yahoo.com story from Apr 27, 2009, titled Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?. In it, news.yahoo.com reports that:

The trouble they see is not just an America where general support for gay marriage will have driven a wedge between churches and the world, but between churches themselves.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at news.yahoo.com.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#250 Jan 18, 2013
Cookie_Parker wrote:
<quoted text>
So, what you are saying is that if we had NO Jesus and NO Allah, then everyone would be at peace?
Sigh. Human nature being what it is, people would still find reasons to fight. However, that would cut down on the most senseless of the reasons to kill other human beings.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#251 Jan 18, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>...and that comes from the mouth of a good, kind, caring, and loving person... NOT lolol...
Being nice to u is like petting a rattle snake

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#252 Jan 18, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
Being nice to u is like petting a rattle snake
lol...you nothing of what it means to be nice so far as what I have experienced with your posts.
You have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that you prefer to attempt to make snide, rude, vicious, flaming, hateful, derogatory, sarcastic and super sarcastic and filthy worded statements over and over and over and over.
That is what you have repeatedly posted in these many threads. You have spoken that way to one and all in those described fashions. There was never ever a good, kind, caring, and loving person behind any of that.
A good, kind, caring, and loving person would never ever subject another person to the foul filth you loose from your lips.
A person that ISN'T a good, kind, caring, and loving person would spill the foul filth from their lips that you spill from your's.
As I like to say, it doesn't have to be that way :)

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#253 Jan 18, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>lol...you nothing of what it means to be nice so far as what I have experienced with your posts.
You have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that you prefer to attempt to make snide, rude, vicious, flaming, hateful, derogatory, sarcastic and super sarcastic and filthy worded statements over and over and over and over.
That is what you have repeatedly posted in these many threads. You have spoken that way to one and all in those described fashions. There was never ever a good, kind, caring, and loving person behind any of that.
A good, kind, caring, and loving person would never ever subject another person to the foul filth you loose from your lips.
A person that ISN'T a good, kind, caring, and loving person would spill the foul filth from their lips that you spill from your's.
As I like to say, it doesn't have to be that way :)
I've been nice to u. Just recently, actually. You're just to wound up to realize it. How long does this usually last or is it self induced?

Cookie_Parker

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#254 Jan 18, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
Sigh. Human nature being what it is, people would still find reasons to fight. However, that would cut down on the most senseless of the reasons to kill other human beings.
What?

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#255 Jan 18, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been nice to u. Just recently, actually. You're just to wound up to realize it. How long does this usually last or is it self induced?
lol...okay, I'm game. I'll venture out here with a statement I don't believe I have made. I'm sure you'll tell me your opinion if I'm wrong. I have noticed that it "seems" or at least topically "appears" that you have "toned" down your remarks. It is a nice change from how you use to speak.
I'll even go one further and dare to admit that it seems even Dana has "toned" down his remarks but seems to have a ways to go.
But, a start is a start and that is what matters.
If you have noticed, even I have "toned" down my analytical comments of your's and Dana's personality quirks. And yes I have a ways to go too :)

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#256 Jan 18, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>lol...okay, I'm game. I'll venture out here with a statement I don't believe I have made. I'm sure you'll tell me your opinion if I'm wrong. I have noticed that it "seems" or at least topically "appears" that you have "toned" down your remarks. It is a nice change from how you use to speak.
I'll even go one further and dare to admit that it seems even Dana has "toned" down his remarks but seems to have a ways to go.
But, a start is a start and that is what matters.
If you have noticed, even I have "toned" down my analytical comments of your's and Dana's personality quirks. And yes I have a ways to go too :)
U rant for pages about shit no one cares about and claim to be toned down?
LMAO loony.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#257 Jan 18, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
U rant for pages about shit no one cares about and claim to be toned down?
LMAO loony.
Actually it's *hit that people like smurf and dana care about because they're in here every day talking about what they care about. I'm just responding to their posts.
I knew Ms Vile couldn't stay away for long. You're so hooked into your own pathetic misery that the only way you can feel a piece of normalcy is to rant it out onto others in a way you think injures them. Really pathetic.
Haven't you ever wondered why so many speak so badly to you in these various threads?
One of the things you're taught in psychology is that observation will tell you more than any book you'll ever read about the subject. Out of old learning habits, I wander the threads out of interest to see how you and Dana and Smurf interact with others. Know what? You all are three peas of the same pod. You and Dana your just two really angry hateful blame it on everyone else but me people that are crass and vulgar and neither of you care that you have chose to remain as such. Now Smurf, he has anger issues also. But he's eloquent in his dialogue and intelligent and uses English instead of the crass grade school language you two use.
But the reason you three are so similar, is because you all have some deep seeded anger issues and all three of you blame others for your problems. You don't take responsibility for your personal issues.
So you all come here and do as much blasting of others as you can in the guise of verbal bullies. You and Dana do your verbal bullying directly to others. Smurf does it indirectly most of the time. But you and Dana, you're no better than that kid on the play ground that all the kids were scared of. Except here no one is scared of you two. And here, most people recognize your malevolent attitudes you bring to these threads, like the personal problems that play ground bully brought to school to make manifest onto others through physical intimidation.
You two are losers to your own irrational. It doesn't have to be that way. Change is good :)

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#258 Jan 18, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>Actually it's *hit that people like smurf and dana care about because they're in here every day talking about what they care about. I'm just responding to their posts.
I knew Ms Vile couldn't stay away for long. You're so hooked into your own pathetic misery that the only way you can feel a piece of normalcy is to rant it out onto others in a way you think injures them. Really pathetic.
Haven't you ever wondered why so many speak so badly to you in these various threads?
One of the things you're taught in psychology is that observation will tell you more than any book you'll ever read about the subject. Out of old learning habits, I wander the threads out of interest to see how you and Dana and Smurf interact with others. Know what? You all are three peas of the same pod. You and Dana your just two really angry hateful blame it on everyone else but me people that are crass and vulgar and neither of you care that you have chose to remain as such. Now Smurf, he has anger issues also. But he's eloquent in his dialogue and intelligent and uses English instead of the crass grade school language you two use.
But the reason you three are so similar, is because you all have some deep seeded anger issues and all three of you blame others for your problems. You don't take responsibility for your personal issues.
So you all come here and do as much blasting of others as you can in the guise of verbal bullies. You and Dana do your verbal bullying directly to others. Smurf does it indirectly most of the time. But you and Dana, you're no better than that kid on the play ground that all the kids were scared of. Except here no one is scared of you two. And here, most people recognize your malevolent attitudes you bring to these threads, like the personal problems that play ground bully brought to school to make manifest onto others through physical intimidation.
You two are losers to your own irrational. It doesn't have to be that way. Change is good :)
Toned down?...right.

“The Black Mermaid”

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#259 Jan 19, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
Sigh. Human nature being what it is, people would still find reasons to fight. However, that would cut down on the most senseless of the reasons to kill other human beings.
Liam, my sentiments exactly. Humans can be horribly vicious. And if they don't have a reason, they'll make one up.

Cookie_Parker

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#260 Jan 19, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
Sigh. Human nature being what it is, people would still find reasons to fight. However, that would cut down on the most senseless of the reasons to kill other human beings.
Do you mean that religion causes war?

I'm just trying to figure out your signature against the backdrop of your posts.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#262 Jan 19, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
Toned down?...right.
That was pretty tame compared to some of the intimate details I have went into of you and Dana mentality in the past, so yea, toned down a bit at least :)

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#263 Jan 19, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>That was pretty tame compared to some of the intimate details I have went into of you and Dana mentality in the past, so yea, toned down a bit at least :)
Oh, creepy. Please tell all of topix more of your "intimate details..
jack martin

Mesa, AZ

#264 Jan 19, 2013
mormons are raping children in colorado city,az and northern mexico(mitt romneys relatives) and the mormon church and mitt romney wont help these little girls..mormons are hateful awful people and rapists

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#265 Jan 19, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, creepy. Please tell all of topix more of your "intimate details..
I already have. Several times in the past. And many agree after having read what I wrote of you two and than thinking on the matter agreed.
In the past more than the present, you and Dana displayed nothing but over sarcastic, what you hoped were very vile, mean, cutting, derogatory, making fun of, the cutting down of statements with a mixture of various filthy cuss like words tossed in for effect.
You two were nothing short of imitating the mean play ground bullies actions except you couldn't use physical violence in the threads. So you resorted to malevolent attitudes here. You two were what is now defined as "cyber bullies".
I will admit you two seem to have "cleaned' up a bit over what you were once like to deal with. The change is nice :)
Now rag on me and toss some sarcasm back at me as is your normal :)

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#266 Jan 19, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
I already have. Several times in the past. And many agree after having read what I wrote of you two and than thinking on the matter agreed.
In the past more than the present, you and Dana displayed nothing but over sarcastic, what you hoped were very vile, mean, cutting, derogatory, making fun of, the cutting down of statements with a mixture of various filthy cuss like words tossed in for effect.
You two were nothing short of imitating the mean play ground bullies actions except you couldn't use physical violence in the threads. So you resorted to malevolent attitudes here. You two were what is now defined as "cyber bullies".
I will admit you two seem to have "cleaned' up a bit over what you were once like to deal with. The change is nice :)
Now rag on me and toss some sarcasm back at me as is your normal :)
Your cult is the bully, freakfest. Wen they stop bullying, they won't get backlash. What was the term...stunned?? The brethren were "stunned" at the backlash after prop8. Google it.

Cookie_Parker

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#267 Jan 20, 2013
Since there is no mention in the Bible that Christ was against homosexuality, I think the issue of gay marriage will definitely divide churches against each other...maybe not against each other, but will have some stand out as supporting more the word of Christ.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#268 Jan 20, 2013
Cookie_Parker wrote:
Since there is no mention in the Bible that Christ was against homosexuality, I think the issue of gay marriage will definitely divide churches against each other...maybe not against each other, but will have some stand out as supporting more the word of Christ.
I also think the church will finally grow up when it comes to the issue of homosexuals and their right to get married. The anti-gays will shrink over time, as the bigots die and the new generations grow up more accepting of gays. I can see the shift in attitudes even today.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#269 Jan 20, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>I also think the church will finally grow up when it comes to the issue of homosexuals and their right to get married. The anti-gays will shrink over time, as the bigots die and the new generations grow up more accepting of gays. I can see the shift in attitudes even today.
The Mormon church won't. There are no gay people in Mormon heaven. They don't fit in with the whole, spirit babies and gods and pregnant for eternity insanity. The quorum of grifters will never let it happen.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#270 Jan 20, 2013
NoMo wrote:
<quoted text>
The Mormon church won't. There are no gay people in Mormon heaven. They don't fit in with the whole, spirit babies and gods and pregnant for eternity insanity. The quorum of grifters will never let it happen.
People use to think the same thing about them allowing blacks to hold the priesthood. I think when it gets to the point it has a negative impact on their conversions, or their tax status, they will have another "revelation."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wedding Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 1 hr Casey 14,076
News Anti-gay married Republican quits after he is c... 3 hr EdmondWA 51
News Free Woods: 19th century community unique in area (Feb '11) 8 hr Versa Havard Brown 5
News Supporters of the same-sex marriage "Yes" vote ... 8 hr NotSoDivineMsM 6
News In Kentucky town, gay-marriage opponent Davis s... 11 hr Trump Plotza 25
News Organization of Arab Student celebrates culture... Fri They cannot kill ... 3
News PM continues gay marriage victory blitz Fri Gremlin 1
More from around the web