Obama's embrace of gay marriage makes...

Obama's embrace of gay marriage makes for a spiritual Mother's Day

There are 86 comments on the The Washington Post story from May 11, 2012, titled Obama's embrace of gay marriage makes for a spiritual Mother's Day. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

When President Obama threw his support behind same-sex marriage , he did something much more than please the members of the LGBT community and the people who love them.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#44 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Californis is Obamaniacland. He could appear at the Academy Awards with a machinegun and slaughter everyone there and Cali would STILL vote for him. Poor Ronny has been spinning in his grave at 2000 rpm since The Obamaniac was elected.
You really don't know Cali at all.

And "good king Ronnie" can just keep doing what he's doing ... decomposing. He was a terrible Governor.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#45 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
btw, the Dems in Cali now have total control of the state government. Governor Moonbeam is a Dem, the Assembly has a Dem majority, and the Senate has a Dem majority.
California's budget deficit has swelled to a projected $16 billion, much larger than had been predicted just a few months ago, and it will force severe cuts to schools and public safety.
The Dems are ALWAYS financially IRRESPONSIBLE wit the taxpayers' money. Why should people put the Dems in charge if they're going to bankrupt the states, as they have already done to the federal government ?
The reasons for the deficit are complex, and you ... don't ... know ... what ... they ... are.

Don't post in ignorance.

FaFoxy

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

#46 May 13, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
The reasons for the deficit are complex, and you ... don't ... know ... what ... they ... are.
Don't post in ignorance.
So you ADMIT the problesm are too big for the Democrats to handle or solve.

Democrats CAN'T solve the problem because Democrats ARE the problem !
dont

Huntsville, AL

#47 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
So you ADMIT the problesm are too big for the Democrats to handle or solve.
Democrats CAN'T solve the problem because Democrats ARE the problem !
be an idiot. You know nothing of California. There are problems because of the 2/3 majority needed to do anything, an unwieldly constitution, the co-opting of the initative process by business interests leaving little discretion to the legislature, the economy is bigger than most nations (thus more impacted by the bush recession and the wall street/mortgage deregulation), Prop 13 which essentially destroyed public education and led to tax inequality favoring longterm, large landowners, and drought. They tried Republicans a few times - didn't work.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#48 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
So you ADMIT the problesm are too big for the Democrats to handle or solve.
Democrats CAN'T solve the problem because Democrats ARE the problem !
No Dear, hey INHERITED the problem, this time around anyway.

But, you are right. The problem is two large for only half the government, or half the country, to solve.

It's going to take EVERYONE, and, with the Government polarized by the fringe elements--people like you--it isn't likely that anything will improve any time soon.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#49 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
So you ADMIT the problesm are too big for the Democrats to handle or solve.
Democrats CAN'T solve the problem because Democrats ARE the problem !
Neither is the case.

Back off!

FaFoxy

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

#50 May 13, 2012
dont wrote:
<quoted text>
be an idiot. You know nothing of California. There are problems because of the 2/3 majority needed to do anything, an unwieldly constitution, the co-opting of the initative process by business interests leaving little discretion to the legislature, the economy is bigger than most nations (thus more impacted by the bush recession and the wall street/mortgage deregulation), Prop 13 which essentially destroyed public education and led to tax inequality favoring longterm, large landowners, and drought. They tried Republicans a few times - didn't work.
Democratic mantra: "It's ALWAYS somebody else's fault".

If Democrats are not in the majority, they say, "But we can't do anything because the Republicans are in the majority !"

If the Democrats ARE IN the majority, they say, "But we can't do anything because the Republicans used to be in the majority !"

The Democrats say it's ALWAYS somebody else's fault !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#53 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Specter's an A-HOLE. I wouldn't give 2 cents for anything that Marxist has to say about anything.
You don't know jack about economics, history, or what libertarian economics professors teach.

Learn more about Milton Friedman.

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/econom...

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2007...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#54 May 13, 2012
Besides, even a-holes can't survive among the cannibals in Washington. He tells it like it is. He has nothing to lose.
you deny

Huntsville, AL

#55 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Democratic mantra: "It's ALWAYS somebody else's fault".
If Democrats are not in the majority, they say, "But we can't do anything because the Republicans are in the majority !"
If the Democrats ARE IN the majority, they say, "But we can't do anything because the Republicans used to be in the majority !"
The Democrats say it's ALWAYS somebody else's fault !
the reality of the situation which has gone on for a while.

FaFoxy

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

#56 May 13, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
Besides, even a-holes can't survive among the cannibals in Washington. He tells it like it is. He has nothing to lose.
LOL

He IS a loser !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#57 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
He IS a loser !
He was once inside. Can you say the same for yourself? If you want to know what he knows, you have to hear what the man has to say. Then you will be twice as smart because you will know what you know and what he knows.

FaFoxy

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

#58 May 13, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
He was once inside. Can you say the same for yourself? If you want to know what he knows, you have to hear what the man has to say. Then you will be twice as smart because you will know what you know and what he knows.
He's a Marxist. He supported Obamacare and The Obamanic. That's all I need to know about him. After he switched parties to the democrats, he couldn't even get THEM to nominate him so he could keep his Senate seat. GOOD RIDDANCE, ARLEN !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#59 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a Marxist. He supported Obamacare and The Obamanic. That's all I need to know about him. After he switched parties to the democrats, he couldn't even get THEM to nominate him so he could keep his Senate seat. GOOD RIDDANCE, ARLEN !
You just like calling people names. I have no time for that.

FaFoxy

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

#60 May 13, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
You just like calling people names. I have no time for that.
No. Because I am ALWAYS Fair. And Balanced.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#61 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Because I am ALWAYS Fair. And Balanced.
Yea sure, I am ALWAYS FAIR. And balanced like a blueprinted motor. I purrrr like a big pussycat, especially when I'm all revved up.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#62 May 13, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a Marxist. He supported Obamacare and The Obamanic. That's all I need to know about him. After he switched parties to the democrats, he couldn't even get THEM to nominate him so he could keep his Senate seat. GOOD RIDDANCE, ARLEN !
Can't you transform your static stubbornness into a very motive determination?

Admit you don't know and spend some pennies on a book (fer gossakes!), ruminate on what he says for a while, THEN opinionate.

Stubbornness keeps you where you are. Determination moves you forward.

Stupidity = stubborn ignorance.

Learning requires the determination to acquire new data, and to integrate that new information into one's worldview.

LEARN.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#63 May 14, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't you transform your static stubbornness into a very motive determination?
Admit you don't know and spend some pennies on a book (fer gossakes!), ruminate on what he says for a while, THEN opinionate.
Stubbornness keeps you where you are. Determination moves you forward.
Stupidity = stubborn ignorance.
Learning requires the determination to acquire new data, and to integrate that new information into one's worldview.
LEARN.
no... he doesn't want to learn anything. he wants to remain a libertarian so that it'll give everyone to laugh at him for. to a libertarian, after all, anything which might help the people just has to be 'marxist', doesn't it?

FaFoxy

“ WOOF !”

Since: Oct 10

Coolidge, AZ

#64 May 14, 2012
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
no... he doesn't want to learn anything. he wants to remain a libertarian so that it'll give everyone to laugh at him for. to a libertarian, after all, anything which might help the people just has to be 'marxist', doesn't it?
Why are you so opposed to LIBERTY ?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#65 May 14, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you so opposed to LIBERTY ?
in reality, liberals have more to do with liberty than do libertarians/teabaggers. not only that, but they are the laughing stock of the political spectrum. they're so far right that they are threatening to fall off the edge.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Interracial,Multiracial, Multiethnic, and Multicultural Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Is This Black Parenting Magazine Racist? Wed KIP 13
Interracial relationships=White GENOCIDE (Sep '13) Jun 26 Hans 14
News Interracial marriage i... Jun 22 poster213 19
Multiculturalism Sucks Jun 22 bolle 3
Do white men like girls with big butts (Aug '12) Jun 22 Hans 114
White Males - Would you date a Racist Black Woman? (Apr '10) Jun 22 straightwhitemale 5
white wome addicted to black men (Oct '09) Jun 21 Hans 41
More from around the web