Are taxes and charity equitable?

[Jane Dough]

okb2 wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean like Jimbo's concern about Dems not paying additioan security costs while letting the RNC skate without paying?

indeed. both sides are hypocrites...
like how dems play gotcha with tea partiers taking ferderal grants, but not that the dems didn't voluntairly donate their bush tax cut...

[Le Jimbo]

okb2 wrote:

<quoted text>
ring.......ring
No they have not paid and there is no plan for them to pay. Where is your outrage?

Where is the agreement with the City of Tampa. Did Tampa agree to this as part of the package to have the convension there?

[Le Jimbo]

okb2 wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean like Jimbo's concern about Dems not paying additioan security costs while letting the RNC skate without paying?

So you want to jump on the old bandwagon also, how typical. Since the city is asking for payment from the liberals it was clearly not presumed to be free gratis........unlike the RNC convension that probable negoiated into their agreement with Tampa for them to provide security........maybe you want to put your heads together and try again.

[okb2]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>Where is the agreement with the City of Tampa. Did Tampa agree to this as part of the package to have the convension there?

Hey Jimbo, Any question comes right back at you and your post. You are being a little hypocritical about this.

[okb2]

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>So you want to jump on the old bandwagon also, how typical. Since the city is asking for payment from the liberals it was clearly not presumed to be free gratis........unlike the RNC convension that probable negoiated into their agreement with Tampa for them to provide security........maybe you want to put your heads together and try again.

No, since the city is asking then it is likely that either it cost more than they estimated OR they have a REepublican council trying to embarrass the President. Where is their agreement with who pays what?