Patent case before Supreme Court coul...

Patent case before Supreme Court could have major implications for software

There are 3 comments on the MyFox St. Louis story from Nov 7, 2009, titled Patent case before Supreme Court could have major implications for software. In it, MyFox St. Louis reports that:

With the technology industry looking on, the Supreme Court on Monday will explore what types of inventions should be eligible for a patent in a pivotal case that could undermine such legal protections for software.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at MyFox St. Louis.

Power

Pulaski, TN

#1 Nov 8, 2009
The patent system is for the rich. You can't do it without a proxy lawyer acting in your place.

Worse, you don't need a working model or proof of anything. You just need an idea that is a string of words on paper.

Then those who invent nothing sit back and wait until someone actually does do the inventing to have a working model then sue them blind.

Without working models to prove anything and only patenting an idea, this prevents the progress of technology because those who can't build get patents and those who do build get sued.

Patenting an idea only means it will never be built or used.

That is mass manipulation because the patent holder refuses to build it either.

When the patent system becomes nothing but a lock everybody else out weapon it is not a patent office, it is a method of cornering the market while doing absolutely nothing.

It should change to a build it and use it or lose it scenario because as is, the patent office serves little to no purpose but to totally quash inventing and that is antithetical to having a patent.
Andrew F

Camas, WA

#2 Dec 18, 2009
Power wrote:
The patent system is for the rich. You can't do it without a proxy lawyer acting in your place.
Worse, you don't need a working model or proof of anything. You just need an idea that is a string of words on paper.
Then those who invent nothing sit back and wait until someone actually does do the inventing to have a working model then sue them blind.
Without working models to prove anything and only patenting an idea, this prevents the progress of technology because those who can't build get patents and those who do build get sued.
Patenting an idea only means it will never be built or used.
That is mass manipulation because the patent holder refuses to build it either.
When the patent system becomes nothing but a lock everybody else out weapon it is not a patent office, it is a method of cornering the market while doing absolutely nothing.
It should change to a build it and use it or lose it scenario because as is, the patent office serves little to no purpose but to totally quash inventing and that is antithetical to having a patent.
You have a mistaken impression of what is required for a patent. The USPTO does not allow ideas/concepts to be patented. It requires you to reduce the invention to practice (also referred to as teaching). That means, it has to be described in enough detail, that somebody skilled in the same art could reproduce the invention.

Additionally, the supreme court's KSR ruling in 2007 also raises the standard for 'quality of the description' for a patent to be upheld by the court if challenged.
Resamith

Melbourne, Australia

#3 Jan 21, 2010

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Patent / Trademark Law Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Judge Mayer's Concurrence in IV Shows the Probl... Jan 21 DavidSBell 7
News EDITORIAL: A case involving The Slants, an Asia... Jan '17 Anar 2
China patent in U.S. Jan '17 zlarson 1
International territories and selling preferences Oct '16 Anon 1
How Do You Bring an Idea to Market? (Oct '15) Oct '16 juegos de futbol 2
News RenovoRx Announces The U.S. Patent And Trademar... Oct '16 fnaf sister location 1
News Judge Oetken Holds that Amendments Made During ... Oct '16 run 2 2
More from around the web