Is Intellectual Property Itself Unethical?
#1 Jun 15, 2010
I think that one problem with the argument in this article is that patent law and copyright law here are discussed as if they are equivalent rights. They are not at all equivalent. They serve completely different purposes and meet different needs.That is a major problem that I often encounter in the anti-IP crowd; its proponents tend to lump the different types of IP together into one category, without recognizing the finer details that make all the difference. There is a big difference between the right to expression and the right to one's own genes. For instance, it's reasonable to make an argument that gene patents could potentially work against the public interest, for example by preventing patients from getting second opinions or less expensive treatment. But I have yet to encounter a coherent argument that would convince me that copyright presents a similar threat.
Add your comments below
|How to protect your firm's patents, trade secre... (Jan '14)||Jun 25||matthewbeazley||5|
|Does anyone know a reputable company that can s... (Sep '08)||Jun 24||amandapan||10|
|Apple's iPad Smart Cover patent looks to bend t...||May '16||Lindy||1|
|NFL Team Asks Supreme Court to Consider 'Redski...||Apr '16||discuss||1|
|How do you decide where to get your patent draw...||Mar '16||shoozy||1|
|Trademark expiration a symbolic end to Firehous... (Nov '12)||Feb '16||William Rogers||5|
|personal versus corporate liabitlity||Jan '16||ed-guy||1|
Find what you want!
Search Patent / Trademark Law Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC