Is Intellectual Property Itself Unethical?

Jun 11, 2010 Full story: Techdirt

For many years I've argued that the economics of abundance is not a moral issue .

Full Story

Los Angeles, CA

#1 Jun 15, 2010
I think that one problem with the argument in this article is that patent law and copyright law here are discussed as if they are equivalent rights. They are not at all equivalent. They serve completely different purposes and meet different needs.That is a major problem that I often encounter in the anti-IP crowd; its proponents tend to lump the different types of IP together into one category, without recognizing the finer details that make all the difference. There is a big difference between the right to expression and the right to one's own genes. For instance, it's reasonable to make an argument that gene patents could potentially work against the public interest, for example by preventing patients from getting second opinions or less expensive treatment. But I have yet to encounter a coherent argument that would convince me that copyright presents a similar threat.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Patent / Trademark Law Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Levittown Orthodontist Secures Patent for Devic... Dec 16 Gerald Vonberger 1
Why we need Patent Attorney? (Nov '13) Dec 14 danneilhunk 3
Groupon in trademark fight Nov 26 ChandraPeers 4
question about the trademark Interact Nov '14 Mark 1
Del. Norton Introduces Bill to Strip NFL of Tax... Nov '14 RayOne 1
Similar Trademarks (Jul '13) Nov '14 ChandraPeers 2
Patent or Copyright (Nov '12) Nov '14 ChandraPeers 2
More from around the web