Obama's Huge Stimulus Rewarding Democratic Strongholds

[PooPoo Platter]

Obama won the election. The majority supported him. He carried the largest metropolitan areas. Of Course stimulus money will go to where the people live and work!

LOL!!! More Newsmax hogwash!

[PooPoo Platter]

Mac-7 wrote:

<quoted text>
Buffett can't be serious.
We have only spent 5% of the first stimulus money and practically none of that went to build infastructure - which is what Obama told us the money would be used for.
Instead it's mostly going to be walking around money for Obama voters.
Why can Warren just admit that he was wrong about the Anointed One in the first place?
And now to cover his own bad judgement Buffett is willing to throw good money after bad.
Shame on him.

LOL!!!

So, we're to write off Warren Buffett? Because YOU say so???

Right!

[Mac-7]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

Obama won the election. The majority supported him. He carried the largest metropolitan areas. Of Course stimulus money will go to where the people live and work!
LOL!!! More Newsmax hogwash!

But what USA Today reported is that Obama voters got twice as much stimulus money as McCain voters.

Counties that voted for McCain get $34 per person.

Counties that voted for Obama get $69 per person.

[PooPoo Platter]

GAPatriot65 wrote:

The stimulus costs all Americans, thus - it should be spread non politically to all Americans.
or do you not understand how this stimulus debt is everyone's problem, not just left or right, Dem or GOP.
What a bunch of idiots you are.

So much for principles!

"The stimulus is wrong." "Washington has no constitutional right!" "The Founders would be scandalized!"

Gappy The Patriot

Add one more Gappyism: "Gimme mine! Gimme mine!"

LOL!!!

[PooPoo Platter]

Responsibility wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I took bets before opening this thread that it would be spearheaded by gappyhead.
No surprise there. Won the bet again!

Some sucker took that bet? LOL!!!

He's losing badly in the real world; let him win here.

[Indigenous]

The original stimulus bill has been changed many times, to appease Republicans/conservatives who said that it cost too much. I said way back that two trillion dollars was just about what it would take, to have a decent chance of working. Now, the truth is that there wasn't enough money allocated to the thing to begin with!! That is what makes it appear to fail, not that it won't work, but that the stimulus was underfunded.

That is the problem, it was underfunded, it became underfunded because, as I've said, Republicans/conservatives/nays ayers said the original stimulus cost to much, which has proven to be a lie. Two trillion dollars was just about enough to make it work, and it was pared down to less than a trillion dollars.

This is the Republican way: A penny smart, and a dollar foolish!! They are tripping over dollars, in order to save pennies!!!

[GAPatriot65]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

Obama won the election. The majority supported him. He carried the largest metropolitan areas. Of Course stimulus money will go to where the people live and work!
LOL!!! More Newsmax hogwash!

Information was taken from a USA Today article and report. Same company that owns Topix. You saying their information is rubbish?

[GAPatriot65]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

<quoted text>
So much for principles!
"The stimulus is wrong." "Washington has no constitutional right!" "The Founders would be scandalized!"
Gappy The Patriot
Add one more Gappyism: "Gimme mine! Gimme mine!"
LOL!!!

Look back during the time they pushed this stimulus originally assh*le. I fought against the stimulus back in November, was one of the hundreds of thousands that flooded Congressional lines demanding they vote no. It worked to defeat it in the House, then they backdoored it through the Senate.

They pushed the stim bill regardless, and Obama supported it. then came the Obama stim bill, on top of the stim bill congress pushed under Bush.

I fought against that.

If all Americans are going to have to pay for it - it should benefit all Americans. or is that a concept you can't understand through your STD addled brain?

[Okbuilder]

Marine Corp Pat wrote:

Why give those tea-bagging idiots any of the Stimulus funds; tell them to go see how much they can get for those unpatriotic racist signs that they parade around with at those tea party/lynch mob rallies. Maybe next time they'll help canvas with ACORN for President Obama.'That'll learn ya', LOL.
TO THE VICTORS GOES THE SPOILS!

It's spelled "Corps". Nothing sickens me like a poser. Don't drag the Corps into your support of the communist Obama. They gave too many lives fighting what that scumbag stands for.

Semper Fi

[Okbuilder]

GAPatriot65 wrote:

<quoted text>
Look back during the time they pushed this stimulus originally assh*le. I fought against the stimulus back in November, was one of the hundreds of thousands that flooded Congressional lines demanding they vote no. It worked to defeat it in the House, then they backdoored it through the Senate.
They pushed the stim bill regardless, and Obama supported it. then came the Obama stim bill, on top of the stim bill congress pushed under Bush.
I fought against that.
If all Americans are going to have to pay for it - it should benefit all Americans. or is that a concept you can't understand through your STD addled brain?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Sunny]

Marine Corp Pat wrote:

Why give those tea-bagging idiots any of the Stimulus funds; tell them to go see how much they can get for those unpatriotic racist signs that they parade around with at those tea party/lynch mob rallies. Maybe next time they'll help canvas with ACORN for President Obama.'That'll learn ya', LOL.
TO THE VICTORS GOES THE SPOILS!

Why Pat, your tone has changed on your postings. Certainly, more aggressive and not as polite.

Pat genuflects to Owebama all the time.

[Sunny]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

<quoted text>
So much for principles!
"The stimulus is wrong." "Washington has no constitutional right!" "The Founders would be scandalized!"
Gappy The Patriot
Add one more Gappyism: "Gimme mine! Gimme mine!"
LOL!!!

I luv gappy's postings!

[Lance Winslow]

GAPatriot65 wrote:

<quoted text>
Information was taken from a USA Today article and report. Same company that owns Topix. You saying their information is rubbish?

Just Newsmax and you, Bubba.

[ebbing]

PooPoo Platter wrote:

Obama won the election. The majority supported him. He carried the largest metropolitan areas. Of Course stimulus money will go to where the people live and work!
LOL!!! More Newsmax hogwash!

There was a 10 million popular vote difference. Independents and women made the difference.

It was the electoral vote that was the difference- a landslide for Obama. Hear tell Ohioans are starting to turn and with Obama's buddy, Schumer advocating that highly skilled illegals be given preference those unemployed workers in Ohio, Michigan, Penssylvania and elsewhere do NOT want competition.

The tide is turning. Too much taxing. Too much control..what you put in your mouth, your healthcare decisions, penalties for achieving, doing well...no one wants to restrict their children from success and no one wants their children and their children's children's children to be paying off the debts of Obama.

[GAPatriot65]

Lance Winslow wrote:

<quoted text>Just Newsmax and you, Bubba.

Then you are saying USA Today, who owns Topix is rubbish - because that is where the info comes from.

I guess you never did well in math either.

here's a tried and true theorum:

If A=B, and B=C, then A=C

Liberals can't handle truth

[PooPoo Platter]

GAPatriot65 wrote:

<quoted text>
Look back during the time they pushed this stimulus originally assh*le. I fought against the stimulus back in November, was one of the hundreds of thousands that flooded Congressional lines demanding they vote no. It worked to defeat it in the House, then they backdoored it through the Senate.
They pushed the stim bill regardless, and Obama supported it. then came the Obama stim bill, on top of the stim bill congress pushed under Bush.
I fought against that.
If all Americans are going to have to pay for it - it should benefit all Americans. or is that a concept you can't understand through your STD addled brain?

You could take a principled stand, you know? You could say, this is all wrong, they have no constitutional right to do this, our people should have nothing to do with this filthy money.

Instead, you're saying "Show me the money!"

You did oppose it before November. When did it become less wrong? Were you wrong last year? If so, we'll accept your apology.

And we won't begrudge you snorting so loudly at the trough. Or fighting for a bigger share.

Until you apologize to us, the lesson here is "Money talks. Gappy's "principles" walk."

[PooPoo Platter]

ebbing wrote:

<quoted text>
There was a 10 million popular vote difference. Independents and women made the difference.
It was the electoral vote that was the difference- a landslide for Obama. Hear tell Ohioans are starting to turn and with Obama's buddy, Schumer advocating that highly skilled illegals be given preference those unemployed workers in Ohio, Michigan, Penssylvania and elsewhere do NOT want competition.
The tide is turning. Too much taxing. Too much control..what you put in your mouth, your healthcare decisions, penalties for achieving, doing well...no one wants to restrict their children from success and no one wants their children and their children's children's children to be paying off the debts of Obama.

That's your dream. We'll see what happens...

[GAPatriot65]

I'm not demanding for more than anything.

Obama and Congress have threatened and cajoled over this money. It's being distributed, like it or not over the objections of the citizens you dumb f*ck.

All I am saying is that if it is going to be taken out of the pockets of those of us that pay the taxes from our hard labor (something you are clueless about), then it should be distributed regardless of politics to be used for infrastructure improvemebnts across the board.

Not to line the pockets of Obama's lackey's which doesn't help anyone - not even you idiots that voted for him.

Please tell me you aren't that f*cking stupid to recognize the difference.

PooPoo Platter wrote:

<quoted text>
You could take a principled stand, you know? You could say, this is all wrong, they have no constitutional right to do this, our people should have nothing to do with this filthy money.
Instead, you're saying "Show me the money!"
You did oppose it before November. When did it become less wrong? Were you wrong last year? If so, we'll accept your apology.
And we won't begrudge you snorting so loudly at the trough. Or fighting for a bigger share.
Until you apologize to us, the lesson here is "Money talks. Gappy's "principles" walk."

[The laughing liberal]

Mac-7 wrote:

<quoted text>
Buffett can't be serious.
We have only spent 5% of the first stimulus money and practically none of that went to build infastructure - which is what Obama told us the money would be used for.
Instead it's mostly going to be walking around money for Obama voters.
Why can Warren just admit that he was wrong about the Anointed One in the first place?
And now to cover his own bad judgement Buffett is willing to throw good money after bad.
Shame on him.

Not so fast. Buffet slapped the Obama Admin in his description of the faux stimulus comparing it to a viagra and candy pill.

He's taken several shots at Obama over the last few months seeing that he's just as dumb as bush but w/less experience.

What I'd like to see and hear from the likes of Buffet is a call to REPEAL obamam's faux stimulus and use the funds in a targeted, timely & wise way.

[Mac-7]

The laughing liberal wrote:

<quoted text>

What I'd like to see and hear from the likes of Buffet is a call to REPEAL obamam's faux stimulus and use the funds in a targeted, timely & wise way.

I'd go along with that.

But it might require more courage and combativeness than Buffett can muster.