State would stand alone with abortion-coverage bill
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Seattle Times.
#1 Apr 1, 2013
Washington State should stay OUT of the baby business re funding whether it is a pregnancy, birth or abortion.
I do not want one penny of my taxes supporting the right of another to have their abortion.
I had two babies and paid for both. I do not support abortion and do not want my taxes to go in the direction of taking a life.
We're not talking about schools, roads, bridges, gas or any other "object". I willing pay my share for such usages that support all people in this state.
But abortion? We're talking about the littlest babies on earth, not roads!
But maybe we are at the crossroads and it's time for Washington State to tell its people that they can have their abortions but WA taxes will not be used to support the death of life.
Add your comments below
|News 10 Mins Ago Burr-Hamilton? Angry lawmaker ...||10 hr||Observations||1|
|Trump tweets frustration with Republicans||11 hr||bottlecap||2|
|If there's a war between California and Kentuck...||11 hr||Calhoun-Cadiz||139|
|Angry lawmaker singles out 'female senators'...||11 hr||Putins Glock Holster||1|
|Many of key players on Trump health care reform...||Sun||Hoosier Daddy||1|
|Who Would Enjoy Tax Breaks Under The GOP Health...||Jul 22||Retribution||92|
|$45 Billion to Fight Opioid Abuse? That's Much ...||Jul 22||tomin cali||23|
Find what you want!
Search Healthcare Law Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC