Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael ...

Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?

There are 64798 comments on the crime.about.com story from Dec 9, 2008, titled Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?. In it, crime.about.com reports that:

Pedophiles can be anyone -- old or young, rich or poor, educated or uneducated, non-professional or professional, and of any race. However, pedophiles often demonstrate similar characteristics, but these are merely indicators and it should not be assumed that individuals with these characteristics are pedophiles. But knowledge of these characteristics coupled with questionable behavior can be used as an alert that someone may be a pedophile.

[The part about Stockholm Syndrome is VERY interesting indeed... -ek.]

Join the discussion below, or Read more at crime.about.com.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65779 Mar 30, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>You mean the "victims" who got millions from Micheal? I doubt if their lives are a living hell.
The children who need to be protected from you are the "victims" of "Celebrity Worship Syndrome" that YOU say are emotionally injured victims of "horrible childhoods".
You say that they adopt a star to look up to because they could not look up to their parents. And you are trying to take that away from them.
Calling these injured children "floons" and derisive names also shows your real intentions and where you are really coming from. You are here to cause pain and you enjoy it.
Yes it is a damn shame that children and adults who were injured children cannot be protected from you.
Lee, psychiatric help exists for the emotionally injured people you discuss to get past their pain and lead contented lives...without Celebrity Worship Syndrome.

By the way, I love to post these links jut to show the child whose silence was bought and grew up to be a persecuted man by f'loons was telling the truth.

Here's the link to the documents in which Sneddon wanted to introduce the child's drawing and description and the police photos of Michael's blotchy penis because they matched.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Here's the defense attorney Mesereau's response to keep them out of court. As you'll see, he never denied they were a matche.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Perhaps if they recovered from their bad cases of Celebrity Worship Syndrome and accepted the truth their messiah was a pedophile, Jordan, Jason, and Gavin could live peaceful lives.

You may want to protect idol worshipers from reality. I'd rather protect children from sexual predators and rabid fans of those predators.
No Namer

Charlotte, NC

#65780 Mar 30, 2013
Let him rest in peace god knows the truth
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#65781 Mar 30, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Lee, psychiatric help exists for the emotionally injured people you discuss to get past their pain and lead contented lives...without Celebrity Worship Syndrome.
By the way, I love to post these links jut to show the child whose silence was bought and grew up to be a persecuted man by f'loons was telling the truth.
Here's the link to the documents in which Sneddon wanted to introduce the child's drawing and description and the police photos of Michael's blotchy penis because they matched.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
Here's the defense attorney Mesereau's response to keep them out of court. As you'll see, he never denied they were a matche.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
Perhaps if they recovered from their bad cases of Celebrity Worship Syndrome and accepted the truth their messiah was a pedophile, Jordan, Jason, and Gavin could live peaceful lives.
You may want to protect idol worshipers from reality. I'd rather protect children from sexual predators and rabid fans of those predators.
I am not interested in any of that.

There is no reason for Micheals fans to get psychiatric help. If they had a bad childhood, a star to look up to is a good answer, and they do not need to be talked out of it.

Jordan, Jason, and Gavin are paying a very small price for the millions they got, and they don't need to be defended.
Squidrow

Haverhill, MA

#65782 Mar 31, 2013
MJ did Not molest those children..... He made sweet sweet love to them!
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#65783 Apr 1, 2013
This list is so broad almost every single person over 30 could fit most of the requirements to be a pedophile.

Even if a person fit ALL of these, it would not necessarily mean that he was, indeed, a pedophile.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#65784 Apr 1, 2013
No Namer wrote:
Let him rest in peace god knows the truth
Yes, God knows that Michael was innocent.
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#65785 Apr 1, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Lee, psychiatric help exists for the emotionally injured people you discuss to get past their pain and lead contented lives...without Celebrity Worship Syndrome.
By the way, I love to post these links jut to show the child whose silence was bought and grew up to be a persecuted man by f'loons was telling the truth.
Here's the link to the documents in which Sneddon wanted to introduce the child's drawing and description and the police photos of Michael's blotchy penis because they matched.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
Here's the defense attorney Mesereau's response to keep them out of court. As you'll see, he never denied they were a matche.
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
Perhaps if they recovered from their bad cases of Celebrity Worship Syndrome and accepted the truth their messiah was a pedophile, Jordan, Jason, and Gavin could live peaceful lives.
You may want to protect idol worshipers from reality. I'd rather protect children from sexual predators and rabid fans of those predators.
I notice you fail to provide links which display Judge Melville's refusal to allow such itmes because they were 'irrelevant to the case at hand'.

You do not know whether or not Mesereau saw those items, or what he thought of them. There is, however, a record of statements he made regarding his plan as to how he would have cross examined Jordan and produced witnesses to testify that Jordan had denied ever having been molested.

If you are so worred about protecting children, then why do you spend so much time on a forum complaining about a deceased celebrity who was accused by people who always wanted money?

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65786 Apr 1, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>I am not interested in any of that.
There is no reason for Micheals fans to get psychiatric help. If they had a bad childhood, a star to look up to is a good answer, and they do not need to be talked out of it.
Jordan, Jason, and Gavin are paying a very small price for the millions they got, and they don't need to be defended.
Lee, Gavin Arvizo did not file a civil suit against Pedo Pan Jackson. Therefore, he did not receive any money. He has, however, been stalked, threatened, and harassed by Michael's f'loons, ever since the trial. THAT is why f'loons need psychiatric help. It is NOT normal to need a celebrity to worship to the point at which anything rocking the fantasy boat is regarded with too much hostility.

In addition, your comments "very small price" are horrible. What a calloused attitude to take toward victims of child molestation.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65787 Apr 1, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> I notice you fail to provide links which display Judge Melville's refusal to allow such itmes because they were 'irrelevant to the case at hand'.
You do not know whether or not Mesereau saw those items, or what he thought of them. There is, however, a record of statements he made regarding his plan as to how he would have cross examined Jordan and produced witnesses to testify that Jordan had denied ever having been molested.
If you are so worred about protecting children, then why do you spend so much time on a forum complaining about a deceased celebrity who was accused by people who always wanted money?
As I have been unable to find the link to Judge Melville's refusal to allow the drawing, description, and photos of Michael's Thang into the courtroom, could you please provide it? I'd love to read it. Regardless, such a refusal to allow it into the courtroom doesn't mean Jordan's drawing and description were inaccurate. After all, in this document, they were a match.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Now, when I read the link below, it said nothing about Mesereau's plan to cross-examine Jordan. There was quite a frantic attempt to keep all of that material out of court, though.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

I'm curious to know why you think Mesereau wouldn't have seen evidence the D.A. planned to introduce into the courtroom. It's standard procedure. This reminds me of your insistence there were 14 charges against Michael when there were actually nine.

P.S. Were any gawky teenagers in your bedroom, this morning, when you walked naked, from your shower into said bedroom? Or did that happen to your husband/brother/uncle?
Pete

AOL

#65788 Apr 1, 2013
There is a certain irony to this thread being here: wouldn't Michael have loved this site? I mean, not that he needed it, but he could've really scared up some illegal tail here, or at least try to like so many of the pedos that frequent this hellhole.
You wish

Avon, CT

#65789 Apr 2, 2013
Lee wrote:
This list is so broad almost every single person over 30 could fit most of the requirements to be a pedophile.
Even if a person fit ALL of these, it would not necessarily mean that he was, indeed, a pedophile.
Brown says the AEG lawyers zeroed in on this passage, written in Jermaine’s voice:“Michael’s drug use, I’m afraid is going to be a part of his legacy and there’s nothing we can do any longer to hide it. The Demerol, the vicodin, the percocet, codeine, the cocaine, the Jack Daniels, the wine. Does he really know what he does with these kids?...[I]t is something that has concerned this family for more than two decades.”(Jermaine Jackson did not respond to requests for comment.)

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65790 Apr 2, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>You mean the "victims" who got millions from Micheal? I doubt if their lives are a living hell.
Gavin, nor his family never once sought a penny from Wacko Jacko.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65791 Apr 2, 2013
Lee wrote:
This list is so broad almost every single person over 30 could fit most of the requirements to be a pedophile.
Even if a person fit ALL of these, it would not necessarily mean that he was, indeed, a pedophile.
Really? I can honestly say that none of my family members or friends display any of those characteristics.

You must rub shoulders with some very strange people, Chastity.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#65792 Apr 2, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Gavin, nor his family never once sought a penny from Wacko Jacko.
Stupid....Clueless...more stupid...

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65793 Apr 2, 2013
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Stupid....Clueless...m ore stupid...
But Butterballs told the truth. Gavin and his family never sought a financial settlement.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#65794 Apr 2, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
But Butterballs told the truth. Gavin and his family never sought a financial settlement.
as usual you are wrong..btw..I think you are butterballs..

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65795 Apr 2, 2013
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>as usual you are wrong..btw..I think you are butterballs..
I'm very flattered you think I am Butterballs, since I like that person's posts. Alas, I only have one user nic.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#65796 Apr 2, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm very flattered you think I am Butterballs, since I like that person's posts. Alas, I only have one user nic.
uh huh..
Lee

Los Angeles, CA

#65797 Apr 3, 2013
Pamela in red wrote:
<quoted text>
This one makes more sense. They are also mostly white males. Neither of these statistics mention that very important piece of information.
Unfortunately almost all the "really bad guys" are mostly whit males!

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#65798 Apr 3, 2013
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>Unfortunately almost all the "really bad guys" are mostly whit males!
heh

It seems someone has 'daddy issues'.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Criminal Defense Law Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Dozens Arrested In Mercer County Drug Sweep (Oct '10) 8 hr For sure 175
News Jude Fitzgerald faces charges 14 hr Concerned citizen 4
News Immigration Chief: We're Sending Hundreds Of Ag... 14 hr Retribution 11
News Court: Violence law unfair to gay South Carolin... 18 hr Wondering 5
News The Latest: Top Texas police chiefs oppose - ba... 20 hr Farting Billl 2
News Police use facial recognition much more than yo... (Oct '16) 20 hr lavon affair 7
News #abq4ward: Amid growing crime epidemic, KOB new... Wed Kudos 10
More from around the web