Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66309 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#75839 Sep 21, 2013
MR CITIZEN 01 wrote:
My I.Q. is much larger than yours. How does it feel to be as ignorant as you racists? Do tell.
He has the IQ of an unheated room... in the winter.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#75841 Sep 21, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
You get all sexually excited when you end a life also don't you killer...
You Nazi types sure do love to kill and hurt people.
It makes up for their other inadequacies, you know the ones I mean. LOL.
Brian

Beckley, WV

#75842 Sep 21, 2013
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
It makes up for their other inadequacies, you know the ones I mean. LOL.
Like the men in your life.
Lameisha

Cleveland, MS

#75843 Sep 21, 2013
Brian wrote:
<quoted text>
Like the men in your life.
No, more like the men in your life lol.
Brian

Beckley, WV

#75844 Sep 21, 2013
Lameisha wrote:
<quoted text>No, more like the men in your life lol.
Oh, you are so cute! I bet you have to be cute to cover up how stupid you really are.
Lameisha

Cleveland, MS

#75845 Sep 21, 2013
Brian wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you are so cute! I bet you have to be cute to cover up how stupid you really are.
I'm just messing with you Brian lol.
Brian

Beckley, WV

#75846 Sep 22, 2013
Lameisha wrote:
<quoted text>I'm just messing with you Brian lol.
Isn't that what we all do? Its all fun.
bannedagain3

Lexington, SC

#75847 Sep 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting for that proof of your assertion: that the pedophile followed Martin for less than ten seconds.
... Funny how Pinocchio and roll around stomping his feet demanding proof when never back up his sticky mouth...
One wonders how long it will be before the pedophile is arrested again.
NOY GUILTY , bareback. Get accustomed to it. The verdict is not going to change no matter how badly you wish it would. Zimmy is free to stop anther thug DEAD if necessary SYG is not going to go away anytime soon due to the violent nature of those who do not pass the paper bag test
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#75848 Sep 22, 2013
Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
He's definitely not in law enforcement. That's why his name is citizen. I highly doubt he is even a legal citizen.
If he was in law enforcement, he would understand the difference between self-defense and felonious assault. If he was in law enforcement, he would understand the difference between self-defense and murder.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#75849 Sep 22, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
He said law enforcement, what he forgot to mention was Paul Blart, mall cop.
I see he now switched from law enforcement to attorney. Give him a few days, and I'm sure by then he'll be a scientist. ;-D
Grandpa Joe

Harrodsburg, KY

#75850 Sep 22, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea we all know it..You know Zimmerman MURDERED Trayvon..You just don't care because Trayvon was black and you Nazi KKK types love when blacks die.
As you know the jury did not convict Zimmerman of murder.
You also know that the jury did not convict O J Simpson of murder.

Here is a question to you as well as the people who support the Zimmerman/ Martin jury:

Can you support the decision of one of these juries and not the other?

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#75851 Sep 22, 2013
MR CITIZEN 01 wrote:
<quoted text>Get over it Non-Patriot biotch. That is not what Huh said. Once again, little girl, come at me, and not him. You're scared, huh?
I asked you before what you are talking about but you are too stupid to even know???

What are you going to do????
Cap lock me to death???

Or would you like to set up a meeting???

I can give you perfect directions to find me and I will not have a clue who you are??
Just another gringo wanting to go out in one of my boats.....,,..,
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#75853 Sep 22, 2013
Grandpa Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
As you know the jury did not convict Zimmerman of murder.
You also know that the jury did not convict O J Simpson of murder.
Here is a question to you as well as the people who support the Zimmerman/ Martin jury:
Can you support the decision of one of these juries and not the other?
Sure, why not?
Grandpa Joe

Harrodsburg, KY

#75854 Sep 22, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I would think that's a state issue and not a federal one. The feds can't force companies to hire people that they feel will jeopardize their business.
In my state, they are considering such a law, but under a "one strike and your out" basis. The proposed law would protect first time felons from discrimination. We have a lot of people who are in jail simply because of narcotics and nothing else. These people are not violent or thieves and only made the mistake of getting caught up in these recreational drugs.
I'm not crazy about the government getting involved with business practices such as hiring, but on the other hand, what's a convict supposed to do if he or she can never work again? It's pretty tough for an adult to make it on minimum wage if the can even find that kind of job.
Today's local newspaper has an add for employment. It says that applicants will have to have background checks for both criminal activity and drug use. IS IT DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF BLACKS WILL NOT BE HIRED BECAUSE THEY HAVE EITHER A DRUG PROBLEM OR HAVE HAD A CRIMINAL RECORD? Which is more important, public safety, employment rights, or the right of a company to hire whom they want?

Obviously those people, black, white, or yellow who are into drugs or who have a record of criminal activity will have a difficult time getting a job. What are their options? Is it possible to teach all of our young people BEFORE they get involved with criminal activity or BEFORE they experiment with drugs that there are consequences of these activities?

Then there is this question: How can background checks ON EVERYBODY discriminate against ANYBODY?

If BMW and Dollar General are forced to do away with background checks then, that soon will be the law of the land. Remember this suit is brought by a federal agency. How can these two companies be forced and not everybody else?

That is why these questions are important. Our safety and the future of those with criminal or drug problems are at stake.

Which will prevail? What would the U.S. Supreme court say?
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#75855 Sep 22, 2013
Grandpa Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Today's local newspaper has an add for employment. It says that applicants will have to have background checks for both criminal activity and drug use. IS IT DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF BLACKS WILL NOT BE HIRED BECAUSE THEY HAVE EITHER A DRUG PROBLEM OR HAVE HAD A CRIMINAL RECORD? Which is more important, public safety, employment rights, or the right of a company to hire whom they want?
Obviously those people, black, white, or yellow who are into drugs or who have a record of criminal activity will have a difficult time getting a job. What are their options? Is it possible to teach all of our young people BEFORE they get involved with criminal activity or BEFORE they experiment with drugs that there are consequences of these activities?
Then there is this question: How can background checks ON EVERYBODY discriminate against ANYBODY?
If BMW and Dollar General are forced to do away with background checks then, that soon will be the law of the land. Remember this suit is brought by a federal agency. How can these two companies be forced and not everybody else?
That is why these questions are important. Our safety and the future of those with criminal or drug problems are at stake.
Which will prevail? What would the U.S. Supreme court say?
That's a tough one. I'm a landlord and I do discriminate against felons. I won't rent to them nor allow them to live with a tenant I'm renting to. It's not that I don't think people deserve a second chance, it's that I've had too many problems renting to them in the past. One time my house nearly burnt to the ground.

Job discrimination is another story altogether. Many blacks are felons but they weren't born that way. They decided to become felons.

A few years ago, a nearby suburb had problems with the black kids. The Mayor decided to make a new curfew. All people under the age of 18 had to be inside by 6:00 pm.

The blacks went nuts saying it was discrimination even though the law obviously didn't mention race. Eventually the city had to reverse the law because of all the political pressure.

My city had the same problem, but our Mayor back then instituted a law that stated the parents are responsible for the actions of their children. The blacks went nuts but our Mayor stuck to his guns. One black mother took it to court because her kid was constantly in trouble with the police, and the court struck the law down.

You don't need to mention race for them to accuse you of racism. They say Voter ID is racist, higher penalties for crack over coke is racist, curfews are racist, Sticking up for George Zimmerman is racist, everything is racist.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#75856 Sep 22, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>That's a tough one. I'm a landlord and I do discriminate against felons. I won't rent to them nor allow them to live with a tenant I'm renting to. It's not that I don't think people deserve a second chance, it's that I've had too many problems renting to them in the past. One time my house nearly burnt to the ground.

Job discrimination is another story altogether. Many blacks are felons but they weren't born that way. They decided to become felons.

A few years ago, a nearby suburb had problems with the black kids. The Mayor decided to make a new curfew. All people under the age of 18 had to be inside by 6:00 pm.

The blacks went nuts saying it was discrimination even though the law obviously didn't mention race. Eventually the city had to reverse the law because of all the political pressure.

My city had the same problem, but our Mayor back then instituted a law that stated the parents are responsible for the actions of their children. The blacks went nuts but our Mayor stuck to his guns. One black mother took it to court because her kid was constantly in trouble with the police, and the court struck the law down.

You don't need to mention race for them to accuse you of racism. They say Voter ID is racist, higher penalties for crack over coke is racist, curfews are racist, Sticking up for George Zimmerman is racist, everything is racist.
Mi is going to make the welfare receivers work and pass drug test

How ling until the racist like sharpton start crying racialism??????

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#75859 Sep 22, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Patriot is one of those got rich off others hard work and now lives in mexico to escape paying taxes here because he is a traitor.
Don't believe any of his (and his aliases) narratives.

He can not pay his taxes here, too.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#75860 Sep 22, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Mi is going to make the welfare receivers work and pass drug test
2003. SCOTUS says no, HomoOne.

Like the 40+ times the Republicans have tried to defund the Affordable Care Act.

Why Congress as a ten percent approval rating.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#75861 Sep 22, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a tough one. I'm a landlord
You are a parasite living in the basement of section eight housing working under the table working off the rent plunging the toilets of people you rant against here.

Wipe your chin, Pinocchio.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#75862 Sep 22, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
Many blacks are felons but they weren't born that way.
There aren't any whites in prison, eh, Pinocchio?

You m/f c/s parasitic bigot: you haven't lifted a finger for this country.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Law Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News APNewsBreak: Feds advise workaround on asset fo... 18 min RustyS 1
News Bernie Sanders's claim that '36,000 people will... 2 hr Democrats R LIARS 36
News EDITORIAL: A case involving The Slants, an Asia... 3 hr Anar 2
News CPD opens investigation into alleged Jack's inc... 5 hr Grade A 2
News Republican-led Senate takes first step to repea... 6 hr INFIDEL 179
News Donald Trump may have just destroyed the Republ... 6 hr FYI 16
News Obamacare replacement may lower rates for young... 7 hr Frogface Kate 83
More from around the web