Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66307 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#56686 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Still cant post a link I see..........ROTFLMAO
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law library showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution.........
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p ...
Moron yea wrote:
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.
That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!
lol! This is why you're not as smart as a dumb person, my little idiotic chief!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#56687 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Did not read it........
lol! That's normal for you, chief pink panties!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56688 Apr 3, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Is this from your self proclaimed "law library" chief pink panties?
No it is from a dictionary..........ROTFLMAO

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56689 Apr 3, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! This is why you're not as smart as a dumb person, my little idiotic chief!
Yes we know you have proven you are black..........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56690 Apr 3, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! That's normal for you, chief pink panties!
Is that why you claim the burden of proof is on the defense?????
Ascendo Tuum

Grimsby, Canada

#56691 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
The prosecution already admitted they have no evidence that shows that Zim started the altercation.......
The evidence shows that Zim was beaten laying on his back......
ash tray was not beaten.......
Zim walks and you burn down your hood.....
Bullsh!t!!! ROTFALMFAO!!!! There is PLENTY of evidence.... enough to lay a second degree murder charge!!! heh heh heh!!! too fcuking funny!!! Evidence shows that Trayvon was ALSO on his back, consistent with rolling around during the struggle..... Evidence from the autopsy shows Trayvon suffered defensive wounds only. Evidence from the autopsy shows Trayvon had GI Jane's DNA under his fingernails.... a MAJOR indicator of a defensive stance. Janie lives out 25 to life cowering from the kindly coloured folk who will be there to greet his every waking day with a smile!!!:) Janie's sainted wife will declare bankruptcy after the Zimmerthug clan gets financially destroyed in the up coming civil suit. And you will be found by the crime boss you squealed on....WPP or no WPP!

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56692 Apr 3, 2013
Ascendo Tuum wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullsh!t!!! ROTFALMFAO!!!! There is PLENTY of evidence.... enough to lay a second degree murder charge!!! heh heh heh!!! too fcuking funny!!! Evidence shows that Trayvon was ALSO on his back, consistent with rolling around during the struggle..... Evidence from the autopsy shows Trayvon suffered defensive wounds only. Evidence from the autopsy shows Trayvon had GI Jane's DNA under his fingernails.... a MAJOR indicator of a defensive stance. Janie lives out 25 to life cowering from the kindly coloured folk who will be there to greet his every waking day with a smile!!!:) Janie's sainted wife will declare bankruptcy after the Zimmerthug clan gets financially destroyed in the up coming civil suit. And you will be found by the crime boss you squealed on....WPP or no WPP!
Really???

I see you did not click on the links posted that showed the investigator admitting they did not have evidence..........LOL

No ash tray did not have ground in mud and grass stains on his back........read the coroners report

Why cant you post where the autopsy shows that ash tray had defensive wounds???

Tell us why you cant post any evidence??????

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56694 Apr 3, 2013
Ascendo Tuum wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullsh!t!!! ROTFALMFAO!!!! There is PLENTY of evidence.... enough to lay a second degree murder charge!!! heh heh heh!!! too fcuking funny!!! Evidence shows that Trayvon was ALSO on his back, consistent with rolling around during the struggle..... Evidence from the autopsy shows Trayvon suffered defensive wounds only. Evidence from the autopsy shows Trayvon had GI Jane's DNA under his fingernails.... a MAJOR indicator of a defensive stance. Janie lives out 25 to life cowering from the kindly coloured folk who will be there to greet his every waking day with a smile!!!:) Janie's sainted wife will declare bankruptcy after the Zimmerthug clan gets financially destroyed in the up coming civil suit. And you will be found by the crime boss you squealed on....WPP or no WPP!
Try and read what Gilbreath said........They have NO evidence who started the fight........LOL
No evidence that contradicts what Zim said happened..........

Case closed.........Zim walks and you burn down your hood..........LOL

http://polipundit.com/...
Ascendo Tuum

Grimsby, Canada

#56695 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Still cant post a link I see..........ROTFLMAO
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law library showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution……
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution.........
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_p ...
Moron yea wrote:
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.
That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!
Now, Chief Itchy Bum.... why would I repost anything since you've proved quite consistently that you wouldn't understand it anyways??? Now that would just be wasted effort, wouldn't you agree??

Now, I'll try to explain it to you one last time jackazz... If a someone is charged with second degree murder, and the defense wants to play the "self defence" card. Then it is up to the defense to prove that it was, in fact, "Self Defence". Got it, Dumbazz??? Otherwise any GI Jane copy cat could shoot an innocent by-stander on a sidewalk in a lily white neighbourhood and simply claim "self defence". By YOUR logic, no one should EVER be convicted of murder!!! ROTFALMFAO!!! Do you REALLY believe that's how it works??? heh heh heh!!! You should thank your lucky stars that your lawyers were smarter than you!(Although... that wouldn't be too hard now, would it??)
Ascendo Tuum

Grimsby, Canada

#56696 Apr 3, 2013
By the way, Chief Burning Hemorrhoid, you should ask your mommy to explain that last post.... I just know you're not gonna get it on your own.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56697 Apr 3, 2013
Ascendo Tuum wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, Chief Itchy Bum.... why would I repost anything since you've proved quite consistently that you wouldn't understand it anyways??? Now that would just be wasted effort, wouldn't you agree??
Now, I'll try to explain it to you one last time jackazz... If a someone is charged with second degree murder, and the defense wants to play the "self defence" card. Then it is up to the defense to prove that it was, in fact, "Self Defence". Got it, Dumbazz??? Otherwise any GI Jane copy cat could shoot an innocent by-stander on a sidewalk in a lily white neighbourhood and simply claim "self defence". By YOUR logic, no one should EVER be convicted of murder!!! ROTFALMFAO!!! Do you REALLY believe that's how it works??? heh heh heh!!! You should thank your lucky stars that your lawyers were smarter than you!(Although... that wouldn't be too hard now, would it??)
duck and dodge and then spin spin spin..........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56698 Apr 3, 2013
Ascendo Tuum wrote:
By the way, Chief Burning Hemorrhoid, you should ask your mommy to explain that last post.... I just know you're not gonna get it on your own.
Wrong again.........LOL

It is up to the prosecution to prove it was not self defense,,,,,,,,,,ROTFLMAO

Remember innocent until proven guilty????
Ascendo Tuum

Grimsby, Canada

#56699 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again.........LOL
It is up to the prosecution to prove it was not self defense,,,,,,,,,,ROTFLMAO
Remember innocent until proven guilty????
ROTFALMFAO!!! nope, wrong again.... that isn't proving innocence or guilt... it's proving whether self defence was involved or not. Hell... all one has to do is shoot someone between the eyes and bleat "self defense! self defense!" No one could ever get convicted! It's up to GI Janie to prove that the action taken was justified.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56701 Apr 3, 2013
Ascendo Tuum wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFALMFAO!!! nope, wrong again.... that isn't proving innocence or guilt... it's proving whether self defence was involved or not. Hell... all one has to do is shoot someone between the eyes and bleat "self defense! self defense!" No one could ever get convicted! It's up to GI Janie to prove that the action taken was justified.
I see you are still to stupid to read the law.........
Ascendo Tuum

Grimsby, Canada

#56702 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you are still to stupid to read the law.........
ROTFALMFAO!!! really.... get your mommy to read it to you.... and explain it to you.... if she's not too drunk to do it, OK Chief Dingle Berry??
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#56703 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
No it is from a dictionary..........ROTFLMAO
lol! Only you made the claim, chief pink panties!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#56704 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes we know you have proven you are black..........LOL
lol! And you're still not as smart as a dumb person, chief pink panties!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#56705 Apr 3, 2013
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that why you claim the burden of proof is on the defense?????
It's just the way things work, chief pink panties.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56706 Apr 3, 2013
Ascendo Tuum wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFALMFAO!!! really.... get your mommy to read it to you.... and explain it to you.... if she's not too drunk to do it, OK Chief Dingle Berry??
I have posted the florida law here many times..........

And you definitely have not read it.......

But you are black..........LOL

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#56707 Apr 3, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Only you made the claim, chief pink panties!
Wrong again.........LOL

Just posted the definition of a word..........Never claimed anything..........ROTFLMAO

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Law Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump is making a last-ditch effort to resurrec... 6 min Retribution 4
News Trump Administration Pulls Obamacare Signup Hel... 10 min totallydisgusted 2
News Trump stops hundreds of planned regulations 25 min spud 40
News Sessions greenlights police to seize cash, prop... 1 hr spud 9
News US restoring asset seizures - with safeguards 2 hr Rattlesnake Pete 6
News Op-Ed Columnist: The Health Care Collapse Is a ... 3 hr Fundiementally ill 28
News paige_winfield_cunningham 3 hr Fundiementally ill 3
More from around the web