Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael ...

Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?

There are 64778 comments on the crime.about.com story from Dec 9, 2008, titled Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?. In it, crime.about.com reports that:

Pedophiles can be anyone -- old or young, rich or poor, educated or uneducated, non-professional or professional, and of any race. However, pedophiles often demonstrate similar characteristics, but these are merely indicators and it should not be assumed that individuals with these characteristics are pedophiles. But knowledge of these characteristics coupled with questionable behavior can be used as an alert that someone may be a pedophile.

[The part about Stockholm Syndrome is VERY interesting indeed... -ek.]

Join the discussion below, or Read more at crime.about.com.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65562 Jan 6, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> I agree--I think he did it because it reminded him of his childhood with his brothers and I think it gave him a sense of warmth and security--nothing sexual at all. I do wish he hadn't done it, because it probably turns more people against him for that than anything else he ever did.
The irony is that I think he wasn't sexually attracted to any of those kids at all, which was precisely why he thought nothing of sharing a bed with them. And it would become the one thing that people would target more than anything else when deciding whether or not he was a pedophile.
I can't count the number of times I've heard f'loons give that "lost-childhood" excuse. I've said it before, and I'll say it, again. His brother Marlon was only a year older, and he didn't have a childhood, either. Does he sleep with unrelated little boys? I didn't think so. Find another excuse.

Finally, a man who has porn, booze, and drugs in easy-to-discover locations, keeps NAMBLA-recommended books of nude and seminude children, pays off multiple families who have accused him of molesting their children, has no believable adult relationships, keeps a photo of one of his sleepover buddies in the nude, has the semen stains of two different males on his mattress and mattress pad along with his, and keeps underpants with semen stains from a third male stored with children's clothing and his own drug-in-bloodstain underpants is obviously sexually attracted to children.

You should know that, Pedophone.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65563 Jan 6, 2013
Internet Bully wrote:
<quoted text>
For starters, I have never said "kids don't lie", that is just another of your strawman arguments you trot out to make a pedophile look better than he actually is. Stop being dishonest and deceitful.
Next, as an example, to any sane person, the excuse "I just want to relive my childhood by sleeping with other people's children" just doesn't cut it when the perpetrator of said excuse had a couple of different boys shipped to his home first class from Australia a number of times when his nieces, nephews and cousins lived just down the road (and later, his own children who slept in a separate wing of his lair), amongst dozens of other indications of pedophilia.
Keep being gullible though. It suits your brain capacity.
InDaHouse, I sure wish you'd set up another account. I have always loved your posts.

On page 72, under the subtitle Limited Peer Relationships, it discusses how pedophiles associate with their own kind. It makes me wonder about the peole he associated with. Dieter Weisner and his brothel comes to mind.

http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications...
ChasUGC

Long Beach, CA

#65564 Jan 7, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I actually read the documents, with an open mind to anything that might put into a more innocent light. Unfortunately, the documents proved he should have been sent to prison.
Although it frightens you to have to face the truth Michael was a pedophile, you should check the legal documents, at the Santa Barbara County website.
These "legal documents" were part of the case against Michael Jackson. They have already been reviewed by experts. I guess you think you know more than the experts. HA!

In case you didn't know, a decision was rendered eight years ago. The decision was "Not Guilty".

You continually say, "read the legal documents".
I say read the verdict.

Get off the legal documents, they are just crap after the fact.
ChasUGC

Long Beach, CA

#65565 Jan 7, 2013
The verdict is in(Oh yeah, eight years ago now).

The verdict was "Not Guilty".

Live with it, haterz. Get over it. Move on with your own life.

Nothing you do or say can change that fact.

"Not Guilty"!!!!- need I write it fourteen times for you?!!

If I did, you still wouldn't get it.

Stupidity? Mental deficiency? Insanity?

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65566 Jan 7, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
These "legal documents" were part of the case against Michael Jackson. They have already been reviewed by experts. I guess you think you know more than the experts. HA!
In case you didn't know, a decision was rendered eight years ago. The decision was "Not Guilty".
You continually say, "read the legal documents".
I say read the verdict.
Get off the legal documents, they are just crap after the fact.
This latest f'loon (il)logic is quite amusing. If they actually read the documents, they would see the evidence revealed Michael was a pedophile. They would also see Mesereau fought to keep evidence out of the courtroom. They would also start questioning why the jury foreman refused to look at some of the key evidence.

Do I hear the words "f'loon denial?" Why, yes, I do!

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65567 Jan 7, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
The verdict is in(Oh yeah, eight years ago now).
The verdict was "Not Guilty".
Live with it, haterz. Get over it. Move on with your own life.
Nothing you do or say can change that fact.
"Not Guilty"!!!!- need I write it fourteen times for you?!!
If I did, you still wouldn't get it.
Stupidity? Mental deficiency? Insanity?
We all know he was acquitted. But the evidence still proves he was a pedophile.

Get over it, f'loon. And get over your Celebrity Worship Syndrome.
ChasUGC

Long Beach, CA

#65568 Jan 7, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
We all know he was acquitted. But the evidence still proves he was a pedophile.
Get over it, f'loon. And get over your Celebrity Worship Syndrome.
Get a life of your own, hater.

And, get over your evil obsession with Michael Jackson.

We all know? So, now you speak for everyone?

Sorry, you don't speak for me. And, I bet a million other people feel the same way.

You seem awfully confused by your self-importance.

Sounds the same as self-righteousness, and it has the same consequences.
ChasUGC

Long Beach, CA

#65569 Jan 7, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
This latest f'loon (il)logic is quite amusing. If they actually read the documents, they would see the evidence revealed Michael was a pedophile. They would also see Mesereau fought to keep evidence out of the courtroom. They would also start questioning why the jury foreman refused to look at some of the key evidence.
Do I hear the words "f'loon denial?" Why, yes, I do!
If that is the same as Gossip-denial, yes.

I stick with the facts, and what can be proven in a court of law.

Like, Fact No.1, for example.

It was proven in a court of law, wasn't it?

At least a full jury said it was.

I'll leave the Gossip and haterz websites to you.

If that makes me a f'loon, I gladly accept that moniker.

It is much better than being a hater.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65570 Jan 8, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
It proves that MJ was charged in these "court documents" and he was found "Not Guilty".
So was Mr O.J. Simpson, but that didn't stop the families, who he was found NOT GUILTY of murdering from claiming compensation from him.

Your country's government clearly doesn't have much faith in the courts.

Even when you are found NOT GUILTY, you can still be sued for something, you were found NOT GUILTY of.

The fact is, Wacko Jacko was not found 100% innocent of molesting that or any other boy.

The boy and the family who accused him were not arrested and charged with falsely accusing Wacko and wasting police time and resources.

That is not how courts work. Nobody is found 100% innocent in a court of law, that is fact.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65571 Jan 8, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
These "legal documents" were part of the case against Michael Jackson. They have already been reviewed by experts. I guess you think you know more than the experts. HA!
In case you didn't know, a decision was rendered eight years ago. The decision was "Not Guilty".
You continually say, "read the legal documents".
I say read the verdict.
Get off the legal documents, they are just crap after the fact.
Can you please give me the name of these "EXPERTS" who have reviewed the legal documents and said that Michael Jackson (Wacko Jacko) was absolutely not a paedophile or a child molester.

Please don't give me any Wikipedia pages. The reason has already been pointed out to you.
curious

Leeds, UK

#65572 Jan 8, 2013
When MJ fans say proof that Evan Chandler was lying comes from the fact he consulted a lawyer before consulting the police, what does this make Wacko when he consulted a lawyer about EC without consulting the police?
And also, why did MJ consult Anthony Pellicano the thug to claim extortion instead of filing a police reportfrom the off?

Never understood this one and hope someone clever can help me piece it together.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65573 Jan 8, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
I stick with the facts, and what can be proven in a court of law.
And the facts are that the legal documents prove that.....

Michael Jackson absolutely 100% fitted the profile of a typical paedophile.

Michael Jackson spent most of his adult life enticing completely unrelated little boys into his home and into his bed.

Michael Jackson spent hundreds and hundreds of one-on-one nights in bed with unrelated little boys.

Michael Jackson was a compulsive liar who falsely accused good police officers of physically dislocated his shoulder.

Michael Jackson collected books that showed full frontal nudity of young boys.

Michael Jackson had a nude photo of one of the boys he was sleeping with.

Michael Jackson's so-called child friendly Neverland ranch was full of pornography, drugs and booze that could have easily fallen into the hands of children.

Michael Jackson spent over 400 nights in bed with just one unrelated little boy alone.

Michael Jackson had nieces and nephews that he could have called upon any time, but instead was shipping in boys from as far as away as Australia for his one-on-one sleepovers.

Michael Jackson begged Jordy's mother June to let him sleep with her son.

Michael Jackson rewarded Jordy's mother June with expensive jewellery after she gave into his demands and allowed him to sleep with her son.

Michael Jackson spent an entire month in Jordy Chandler's own bed.

Michael Jackson had dark-coloured splotches accurately described on his genitals by Jordy Chandler.

Michael Jackson paid out at least two multimillion dollar payments instead of defending his name.

Michael Jackson didn't stop his little boy sleepovers even after being accused and making the multimillion dollar payout to JC.

Michael Jackson had three separate semen stains (YES THAT'S SEMEN THAT COMES FROM MALE TESTICLES) on his bed and bed sheets.

Michael Jackson had no long-term relationships with the opposite sex.

Michael Jackson never once allowed himself to face rigourous questioning in a court of law on his little boy addiction.

Those who did initially defend Jackson didn't think it was appropriate for a man who had so much pornography, pornography that included men sodomising each other to be crawling into bed with unrelated little boys, night after night.

Jason F had five years of counselling to overcome the sexual abuse he had received from Jackson.

I know you and your Michael Joseph Jackson church members want to brush these facts under the carpet, but sorry, you can't.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#65574 Jan 8, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you please give me the name of these "EXPERTS" who have reviewed the legal documents and said that Michael Jackson (Wacko Jacko) was absolutely not a paedophile or a child molester.
Please don't give me any Wikipedia pages. The reason has already been pointed out to you.
But...but Chas has always been such Cliffs Notes kind of a guy.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#65575 Jan 8, 2013
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
But...but Chas has always been such Cliffs Notes kind of a guy.
Careful now, don't insult the Chasywazzy. He may rebuke you in the name of Jesus Christ.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65576 Jan 9, 2013
Butterballs wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Jackson had nieces and nephews that he could have called upon any time, but instead was shipping in boys from as far as away as Australia for his one-on-one sleepovers.
The scary part about how addicted Michael was to child sleepovers is he did sleep with three of his nephews,(Some of the photos of them are eyebrow raising.) his cousin's son Rijo, and the same cousin's daughter Simone. Pedo Pan took children to bed wherever he could find them.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#65577 Jan 9, 2013
ChasUGC wrote:
<quoted text>
If that is the same as Gossip-denial, yes.
I stick with the facts, and what can be proven in a court of law.
Like, Fact No.1, for example.
It was proven in a court of law, wasn't it?
At least a full jury said it was.
I'll leave the Gossip and haterz websites to you.
If that makes me a f'loon, I gladly accept that moniker.
It is much better than being a hater.
I do not consider legal documents gossip. They prove Michael was a pedophile who got away with it.

By the way, Kasey Anthony got a not-guilty vote, and she wasn't innocent of murdering her child. O.J. Simpson got a not-guilty vote, and he wasn't innocent of murdering two people. The family of the man he murdered sued him and won.

Since: Oct 11

Channel Islands

#65578 Jan 10, 2013
The Credit Angel Can Help wrote:
<quoted text>
A handful of fans complaining about Tom Sneddon? He doesn't work there anymore but is enjoying a plush retirement. LOL
You floons are brain damaged tards, drooling and slobbering over the very dead Michael Jackson. His shattered heart and soul is in Hell and is now being pumped by Satan, hon.
'Brain damaged tards' lol such a comment, I mean WOW!!!! Get a grip, now F off and listen to Justin, and you are too young and immature to understand, your little brain can't take it. Wow he doesn't work there, makes NO difference you fool. Now go listen to Justin, quick get your obsessive fix, quick while he's still popular with teens

Since: Oct 11

Channel Islands

#65579 Jan 10, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I actually read the documents, with an open mind to anything that might put into a more innocent light. Unfortunately, the documents proved he should have been sent to prison.
Although it frightens you to have to face the truth Michael was a pedophile, you should check the legal documents, at the Santa Barbara County website.
Obviously they didn't as he was found INNOCENT, get over it!!!! It is not as if your opinion we are all waiting for

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#65580 Jan 10, 2013
Anna69 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously they didn't as he was found INNOCENT, get over it!!!! It is not as if your opinion we are all waiting for
Have you found the link which backs up your 'FACT" that the Chandlers confessed yet?

Since: Oct 11

Channel Islands

#65581 Jan 10, 2013
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you found the link which backs up your 'FACT" that the Chandlers confessed yet?
Have you found you way out the hole you live in yet????

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Law Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News FBI raids home of ex-College Board official in ... 19 min kuda 6
News Former police officer appeals termination (Aug '14) 1 hr WATCHING 79
News Doctors allegedly sold prescriptions to gang me... 2 hr Stephany McDowell 1
News Former Bus Aide in Northern Michigan Faces Sexu... 8 hr Mystical66 1
News Malone man gets prison for larceny, identity theft 9 hr Rocket man 1
News Bail set in Hartle rape case, jury selection to... 13 hr Frank 72
News Why a lifesaving drug that's been around since ... 13 hr WE THE PEOPLE 1
More from around the web