Area gun sales, fears rising

Area gun sales, fears rising

There are 7566 comments on the North Port Sun story from Nov 14, 2012, titled Area gun sales, fears rising. In it, North Port Sun reports that:

Gun stores in Charlotte County have experienced increased sales since Election Day as local gun owners brace for an anticipated restriction of gun laws following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at North Port Sun.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#644 Dec 7, 2012
JusttheFacts wrote:
<quoted text>So actually they are not Obama Phones they are BUSHPHONES.
In other words Obama is taking credit for something he has nothing to do with.

http://obamaphone.net/
stormy

Fairmont, WV

#645 Dec 7, 2012
"THE right to keep and bear arms"!

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

#647 Dec 7, 2012
La Santa Muerte wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words Obama is taking credit for something he has nothing to do with.
http://obamaphone.net/
Someone please tell this moron.

Ratliff

Orlando, FL

#649 Dec 7, 2012
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scien...

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are

It is difficult to define a whole school of political ideology precisely, but one may reasonably define liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) in the contemporary United States as the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others. In the modern political and economic context, this willingness usually translates into paying higher proportions of individual incomes in taxes toward the government and its social welfare programs. Liberals usually support such social welfare programs and higher taxes to finance them, and conservatives usually oppose them.

Defined as such, liberalism is evolutionarily novel. Humans (like other species) are evolutionarily designed to be altruistic toward their genetic kin, their friends and allies, and members of their deme (a group of intermarrying individuals) or ethnic group. They are not designed to be altruistic toward an indefinite number of complete strangers whom they are not likely ever to meet or interact with. This is largely because our ancestors lived in a small band of 50-150 genetically related individuals, and large cities and nations with thousands and millions of people are themselves evolutionarily novel.

The examination of the 10-volume compendium The Encyclopedia of World Cultures, which describes all human cultures known to anthropology (more than 1,500) in great detail, as well as extensive primary ethnographies of traditional societies, reveals that liberalism as defined above is absent in these traditional cultures. While sharing of resources, especially food, is quite common and often mandatory among hunter-gatherer tribes, and while trade with neighboring tribes often takes place, there is no evidence that people in contemporary hunter-gatherer bands freely share resources with members of other tribes.

Because all members of a hunter-gatherer tribe are genetic kin or at the very least friends and allies for life, sharing resources among them does not qualify as an expression of liberalism as defined above. Given its absence in the contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, which are often used as modern-day analogs of our ancestral life, it may be reasonable to infer that sharing of resources with total strangers that one has never met or is not likely ever to meet – that is, liberalism – was not part of our ancestral life. Liberalism may therefore be evolutionarily novel, and the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely than less intelligent individuals to espouse liberalism as a value.

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.
NoMoreUSA

Woodleaf, NC

#650 Dec 7, 2012
As promised here is repost of posty #495 that a liberal pissant went and cried to their wittle mommy waaaaaabulance moderator because they couldn;t stand the heat. Well imagine the novelty of a repost! Just goes to show how fucking reatrded these individuals are and they seem to think they have some kind of control over others which in fact they do not!

hope they bought plenty of Ammo. It's the ammo they are gonna need more than the guns. I personally have 10,000 rounds for these liberal bastards. I figure one of us for each 10,000 of them will wipe them out quite effectively and should take less than a week. We wiped out the worlds 8th largets army in less than 2 weeks, wiping out the liberal Cancer should be a cakewalk compared to Iraq 1.

Liberals? You read that re-read it. Your Liberal Tyrant is soon gonna lose all control when the Dollar hits Zero and the people rise up, and for every single one of you there are 10 of us with Guns and plenty of Ammo, and unlike you liberal pissants, we have the motivation to use them, and we definitely have plenty of practice.

ALso remember than when that Day comes you will be facing our Military Heroes both retired and Active and they are very highly trained in eliminating vile elements like you, and they too will have no qualms at all about doing it.

You see? We don't give a fuck about your feelings, we don;t give a fuck what your malfanction is...all we DO give a fuck about is what you did to the former USA and when war breaks out your gonna repay this former Country for what you did to it with your lives!

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#651 Dec 7, 2012
How funny! ec mentioned moron and look who showed up.
NoMoreUSA

Woodleaf, NC

#652 Dec 7, 2012
Here is a repost of post #496 that the liberal piece of shit has removed by the waaaaaambulance.

BTW, for those of you that do not yet have guns? Worry not. My specialization will be taking the heads right off these liberal savages because they'll never hear the shot, and especially the ones that think they can bring any pea-shooters into the fight, and after they have been reduced to a bloody stain on the ground, I will take their guns, their ammo, their ID, and I will then find their house, wipe out what's left back home of the liberal bastards, and search out the place for any remaining ammo or anything else I can bring into the fight.

I will help to arm the rest who couldn't prepare themselves, and I will help them survive.

Liberals? You have absolutely no hope of survival, or what you are up against. You have no clue of what has been happening around you and it is evidenced by the fact that you went and did exactly what you were warned not to do. You went and did it anyway, and unlike you, we were prepared for it either way it went. While you may read posts like this and get an inkling of what is going to happen to each and every one of you, you have no idea of the plan to carry it out, the timing involved, or the methods we are gonna use to break you down piece by piece physically, emotionally, and mentally, and even if you resort to crawling into a hole and ball up to cry yourself to death we are going to be the dealers of that end for you, and there is nothing you can say, there is nothing you can do to change that, and not even the God that you don't believe in will be able to save your worthless asses from that. Lie to youirselves all you want, and make up all the preposterous stories you want, because the only thing you will be able to accomplish is helping us to speed that process up. When that day comes, show yourselves if you have any guts at all. I know you won't because you are incapable of it, but we have the means to find you in any hole you crawl into and unlike the past Civil War, you will not be able to evade the technology we currently have to find you in those places. No matter where you go or how you get there you will always leave a IR signature, you will leave a motion sinature, you can be tracked by any number of visual aids that you have no clue how to use and even realize those aids are tracking you. In other words, there is no longer any safe haven for you on this planet, and you damn sure won't be able to get off it no matter how much you'll wish you could.

Your last fuckup is what is gonna cost you your very lives!
NoMoreUSA

Woodleaf, NC

#653 Dec 7, 2012
and here is post #512 that the liberal pissant had removed by the waaaaabulance!

Unfortunately for them the bullet would they are now facing is going to explode their empty heads and reduce them to a bloostain on the ground. Think I'll log for awhile and drive out to the field to put a few practice rounds downrange. I need a little moving target practice to warm up. Think I'll try for a one inch dot on the head of that mover from 800 yards today. If I can ping that I've still got it even after a week! Later on.:-)

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

#655 Dec 7, 2012
NoMoreUSA wrote:
As promised here is repost of posty #495 that a liberal pissant went and cried to their wittle mommy waaaaaabulance moderator because they couldn;t stand the heat. Well imagine the novelty of a repost! Just goes to show how fucking reatrded these individuals are and they seem to think they have some kind of control over others which in fact they do not!

hope they bought plenty of Ammo. It's the ammo they are gonna need more than the guns. I personally have 10,000 rounds for these liberal bastards. I figure one of us for each 10,000 of them will wipe them out quite effectively and should take less than a week. We wiped out the worlds 8th largets army in less than 2 weeks, wiping out the liberal Cancer should be a cakewalk compared to Iraq 1.

Liberals? You read that re-read it. Your Liberal Tyrant is soon gonna lose all control when the Dollar hits Zero and the people rise up, and for every single one of you there are 10 of us with Guns and plenty of Ammo, and unlike you liberal pissants, we have the motivation to use them, and we definitely have plenty of practice.

ALso remember than when that Day comes you will be facing our Military Heroes both retired and Active and they are very highly trained in eliminating vile elements like you, and they too will have no qualms at all about doing it.

You see? We don't give a fuck about your feelings, we don;t give a fuck what your malfanction is...all we DO give a fuck about is what you did to the former USA and when war breaks out your gonna repay this former Country for what you did to it with your lives!
Check out the "I'm off to exercise my second amendment rights" thread on the offbeat forum. I think you and Tally Ho would get along great!
JusttheFacts

Russellville, KY

#656 Dec 7, 2012
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
It's amazing how blind people can be to that when they want to be. A large percentage of Democrat voters are against gun control, yet they continue to vote Democrat.
Makes no sense.
That's because all the gun ban laws that have been put in place were by Republicans. I'm amazed how the NRA and Repub leaders fool all of you Repubs. Look over the list of gun bans I posted and pick out the Democrats.
.
It was President George Bush, Sr. who banned the import of "assault weapons" in 1989, and promoted the view that Americans should only be allowed to own weapons suitable for "sporting purposes."

It was Governor Ronald Reagan of California who signed the Mulford Act in 1967, "prohibiting the carrying of firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on any public street."

Twenty-four years later, Reagan was still pushing gun control. "I support the Brady Bill," he said in a March 28, 1991 speech, "and I urge the Congress to enact it without further delay."

One of the most aggressive gun control advocates today is Republican mayor Rudolph Giuliani of New York City, whose administration sued 26 gun manufacturers in June 2000, and whose police commissioner, Howard Safir, proposed a nationwide plan for gun licensing, complete with yearly "safety" inspections.

Another Republican, New York State Governor George Pataki, on August 10, 2000, signed into law what The New York Times called "the nation’s strictest gun controls," a radical program mandating trigger locks, background checks at gun shows and "ballistic fingerprinting" of guns sold in the state. It also raised the legal age to buy a handgun to 21 and banned "assault weapons," the sale or possession of which would now be punishable by seven years in prison.

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

#657 Dec 7, 2012
Ratliff wrote:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scien...
Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are
It is difficult to define a whole school of political ideology precisely, but one may reasonably define liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) in the contemporary United States as the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others. In the modern political and economic context, this willingness usually translates into paying higher proportions of individual incomes in taxes toward the government and its social welfare programs. Liberals usually support such social welfare programs and higher taxes to finance them, and conservatives usually oppose them.
Defined as such, liberalism is evolutionarily novel. Humans (like other species) are evolutionarily designed to be altruistic toward their genetic kin, their friends and allies, and members of their deme (a group of intermarrying individuals) or ethnic group. They are not designed to be altruistic toward an indefinite number of complete strangers whom they are not likely ever to meet or interact with. This is largely because our ancestors lived in a small band of 50-150 genetically related individuals, and large cities and nations with thousands and millions of people are themselves evolutionarily novel.
The examination of the 10-volume compendium The Encyclopedia of World Cultures, which describes all human cultures known to anthropology (more than 1,500) in great detail, as well as extensive primary ethnographies of traditional societies, reveals that liberalism as defined above is absent in these traditional cultures. While sharing of resources, especially food, is quite common and often mandatory among hunter-gatherer tribes, and while trade with neighboring tribes often takes place, there is no evidence that people in contemporary hunter-gatherer bands freely share resources with members of other tribes.
Because all members of a hunter-gatherer tribe are genetic kin or at the very least friends and allies for life, sharing resources among them does not qualify as an expression of liberalism as defined above. Given its absence in the contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, which are often used as modern-day analogs of our ancestral life, it may be reasonable to infer that sharing of resources with total strangers that one has never met or is not likely ever to meet – that is, liberalism – was not part of our ancestral life. Liberalism may therefore be evolutionarily novel, and the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely than less intelligent individuals to espouse liberalism as a value.
Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.
Are you incapable of using your own words?

The author of your piece was fired for a study called “Why Are Black Women Unattractive”. Is that proof most liberals are both liars and racists?

http://newsone.com/1285085/satoshi-kanazawa-f...

“Why call 911? 1911 is faster”

Since: Feb 08

Wesley Chapel, FL

#658 Dec 7, 2012
NoMoreUSA wrote:
Here is a repost of post #496 that the liberal piece of shit has removed by the waaaaaambulance.
BTW, for those of you that do not yet have guns? Worry not. My specialization will be taking the heads right off these liberal savages because they'll never hear the shot, and especially the ones that think they can bring any pea-shooters into the fight, and after they have been reduced to a bloody stain on the ground, I will take their guns, their ammo, their ID, and I will then find their house, wipe out what's left back home of the liberal bastards, and search out the place for any remaining ammo or anything else I can bring into the fight.
I will help to arm the rest who couldn't prepare themselves, and I will help them survive.
Liberals? You have absolutely no hope of survival, or what you are up against. You have no clue of what has been happening around you and it is evidenced by the fact that you went and did exactly what you were warned not to do. You went and did it anyway, and unlike you, we were prepared for it either way it went. While you may read posts like this and get an inkling of what is going to happen to each and every one of you, you have no idea of the plan to carry it out, the timing involved, or the methods we are gonna use to break you down piece by piece physically, emotionally, and mentally, and even if you resort to crawling into a hole and ball up to cry yourself to death we are going to be the dealers of that end for you, and there is nothing you can say, there is nothing you can do to change that, and not even the God that you don't believe in will be able to save your worthless asses from that. Lie to youirselves all you want, and make up all the preposterous stories you want, because the only thing you will be able to accomplish is helping us to speed that process up. When that day comes, show yourselves if you have any guts at all. I know you won't because you are incapable of it, but we have the means to find you in any hole you crawl into and unlike the past Civil War, you will not be able to evade the technology we currently have to find you in those places. No matter where you go or how you get there you will always leave a IR signature, you will leave a motion sinature, you can be tracked by any number of visual aids that you have no clue how to use and even realize those aids are tracking you. In other words, there is no longer any safe haven for you on this planet, and you damn sure won't be able to get off it no matter how much you'll wish you could.
Your last fuckup is what is gonna cost you your very lives!
Why are you so angry? Smoke a joint or have a drink. Go to your happy place and relax a bit. It’s not worth all that anger.

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#659 Dec 7, 2012
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit. The phones come with 250 free minutes per month.
Again, bullshit, if you pay a cell phone bill, you pay a $10 fee each month that is contributed to the free cell phones.
I don't care who's name you attach to it. It's wasteful and needs to stop. One woman in Atlanta had 103 free cell phones.
BTW, when someone steals your cell phone, and you have service cut off to that phone, it's illegal for the service provider to cut off the 911 function. Heaven forbid the criminal face danger without 911 service.
Thats why I use a TrakFone. No bill,no service contract. I buy my minutes as I need them. Since I don't spend my life an a cell phone and all I want my phone to do is be a phone,just make/recieve calls. Don't need apps,don't need internet,just make/recieve calls.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#660 Dec 7, 2012
JusttheFacts wrote:
<quoted text>That's because all the gun ban laws that have been put in place were by Republicans. I'm amazed how the NRA and Repub leaders fool all of you Repubs. Look over the list of gun bans I posted and pick out the Democrats.
.
It was President George Bush, Sr. who banned the import of "assault weapons" in 1989, and promoted the view that Americans should only be allowed to own weapons suitable for "sporting purposes."

It was Governor Ronald Reagan of California who signed the Mulford Act in 1967, "prohibiting the carrying of firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on any public street."

Twenty-four years later, Reagan was still pushing gun control. "I support the Brady Bill," he said in a March 28, 1991 speech, "and I urge the Congress to enact it without further delay."

One of the most aggressive gun control advocates today is Republican mayor Rudolph Giuliani of New York City, whose administration sued 26 gun manufacturers in June 2000, and whose police commissioner, Howard Safir, proposed a nationwide plan for gun licensing, complete with yearly "safety" inspections.

Another Republican, New York State Governor George Pataki, on August 10, 2000, signed into law what The New York Times called "the nationÂ’s strictest gun controls," a radical program mandating trigger locks, background checks at gun shows and "ballistic fingerprinting" of guns sold in the state. It also raised the legal age to buy a handgun to 21 and banned "assault weapons," the sale or possession of which would now be punishable by seven years in prison.
Too funny! You must have really done some digging to come up with those.
Do you want to compare the number if Republicans introducing gun control bills to the number of Democrats introducing gun control bills?
Village Mystery

Huntsville, AL

#661 Dec 7, 2012
Ratliff wrote:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scien...
Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are..........
That would all be very interesting if "liberal" had anything to do with altruism or "caring" about people outside of your genetic blah blah blah.

Up until the "progressives" or "collectivists" (or "eugenicists") twisted and corrupted the meaning of the word "liberal" (like they do with every word or concept they get a hold of) the word was associated DIRECTLY with Individual Liberty. LIBERTY. The government was only to be used to PROTECT the LIBERTY of the INDIVIDUAL.

Now just like the leftists (not liberals) claim to care about people so they implement govt. healthcare like in Britain and soon in the US they then quickly limit services to those they deem useless to the State. Just like they come up with laws to implement "equal pay for women" they are really just the means to loot companies for money. Just like they promise promise promise everything the mentally weakest amongst us could want without working for it, they only do it for votes and to achieve central authoritarian power.

Now please consider the campaign of the recent presidential victor. It amounted to little more than "take more money from those with more money". That along with juvenile analogies, not hugging the garbage man attacks and the Julia cartoon......um, please tell me just how "intelligent" the leftists consider their followers and supporters.

Your cutting and pasting merely reveals that school credentials, brown skin, and having mammary glands have nothing to do with intelligence, the good of a nation, or the protection of Individual Liberty (liberalism). And when journalists are no longer journalists, and the schools are no longer places of education, and the government no longer protects - but instead attacks - the citizens of the country, it is no surprise that psychiatric journals would no longer care about the objective observation of the human mind and intelligence.

Your cut and paste was completely BASED on the FALSE definition of liberalism.

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#662 Dec 7, 2012
DavidH64 wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney $4 million ($13 million income)
Obama $10,772 ($1.7 million income)
Biden $5,350 ($379,035 income)
Pelosi $84,950 ($35.2 million income) <-- How come we never hear Democrats complain about how rich she is, the usual evil rich rhetoric? Oh yea, it only applies to Republicans. Rich liberals are God's chosen ones, sent from Heaven to save all mankind.
JHC!!! The Top Democrats combined could not even donate 1/10th of Romney donations. LMAO!!!!! Can't make this sh1t up people.
I love how Obama talks about how people should give more to charity and do more. Yet he and the rest of the Democrats have the tightest sealed wallets.
Yes the Democrats prove again how "generous" they are (not). The hypocrisy of Liberals is truly amazing.
Most liberals by thei very nature are thieves. Very few thieves in prison are conservative. Most are petty thieves to be sure,but they are the stupid ones. The more intelligent manage to get elected or rise to high positions in business and steal on a grander scale. Either thru legislation or scams on the public. Bernie Madoff comes to mind. The biggest tax cheats are usually liberal too if you think about it. So its not unusual that liberals are willing to steal people blind,as long as its not THEIR money thats going to be spent.
JusttheFacts

Russellville, KY

#663 Dec 7, 2012
NoMoreUSA wrote:
As promised here is repost of posty #495 that a liberal pissant went and cried to their wittle mommy waaaaaabulance moderator because they couldn;t stand the heat. Well imagine the novelty of a repost! Just goes to show how fucking reatrded these individuals are and they seem to think they have some kind of control over others which in fact they do not!
hope they bought plenty of Ammo. It's the ammo they are gonna need more than the guns. I personally have 10,000 rounds for these liberal bastards. I figure one of us for each 10,000 of them will wipe them out quite effectively and should take less than a week. We wiped out the worlds 8th largets army in less than 2 weeks, wiping out the liberal Cancer should be a cakewalk compared to Iraq 1.
Liberals? You read that re-read it. Your Liberal Tyrant is soon gonna lose all control when the Dollar hits Zero and the people rise up, and for every single one of you there are 10 of us with Guns and plenty of Ammo, and unlike you liberal pissants, we have the motivation to use them, and we definitely have plenty of practice.
ALso remember than when that Day comes you will be facing our Military Heroes both retired and Active and they are very highly trained in eliminating vile elements like you, and they too will have no qualms at all about doing it.
You see? We don't give a fuck about your feelings, we don;t give a fuck what your malfanction is...all we DO give a fuck about is what you did to the former USA and when war breaks out your gonna repay this former Country for what you did to it with your lives!
Actually in OP Desert Storm there were 16 other nations with the US in the wipe out that took 2 weeks. But you just keep talking your BS. Sorry to interrupt.
JusttheFacts

Russellville, KY

#664 Dec 7, 2012
Dr-Sniper wrote:
<quoted text>
Too funny! You must have really done some digging to come up with those.
Do you want to compare the number if Republicans introducing gun control bills to the number of Democrats introducing gun control bills?
No... it's always actions (laws in this case) that speak much louder than words. Like the gun laws that Obama put in place. Repubs can talk all they want to, but the action by him was signing into LAW the RIGHT to carry on Federal Lands. And the RIGHT to carry on a train. Something NO Repub President had EVER done. But that just burns their ass because NO Democrat is suppose to do such things is what they have ALWAYS been trained to believe.

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#665 Dec 7, 2012
JusttheFacts wrote:
<quoted text>Someone can't understand that a person making $40,000.00 per day pays a lower tax rate than someone making $40,000.00 per year. What's wrong with your Repub math skills?
Have you been a thief all your life or just of late? Obviously you feel entitled to some part of anothers wealth if they make more than you draw from your gubbermint money. Your class envy enflamed by Obama stinks. Your ISP says Russelville,Kentucky. I hope to he11 you live elsewhere. Kentucky is too nice a place for trash like you....
JusttheFacts

Russellville, KY

#666 Dec 7, 2012
La Santa Muerte wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words Obama is taking credit for something he has nothing to do with.
http://obamaphone.net/
Surely you can't be that stupid. ALL websites connected to a government office or program ends in gov. Just because some scam uses obama phone doesn't mean it's tied to him or the government. http://dumbdumb.net

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Law Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Fitchburg man held without bail in severe child... 1 hr Fleitas 2
News Judge adds 54 years to sentence of Albuquerque ... 1 hr No pudding here 11
News Former teacher at Hayward Catholic school order... (Sep '14) 4 hr Father Hornee 3
News Health care co-ops awash in red ink, lacking mo... 5 hr goonsquad 7
News Trump aide Cohen apologizes for 'rape' comment 6 hr Responsibility 60
News Suspect in Charleston church shooting expected ... 7 hr goonsquad 1
News Planned Parenthood chief slams 'sensationalized... 7 hr Cat74 56
More from around the web