lol! You're such an idiot son. And a liar to boot!<quoted text>
yes you have proven over and over again that you are just a ghetto hood and not smart enough to read.........LOL
But you do provide hours of entertainment.......
Tell us again how the burden of proof lies with the defense..........
On post # 46912 here http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...
The moron yea claimed that the burden of proof falls on the defense even after I had posed a link from a legal law lib ray showing what everyone else knows that the burden of proof falls on the prosecution
Here Is One wrote:
Please post a link that shows that???
Would you like the link again that proves you wrong???
Burden of proof is on the prosecution
lol! Nope. Don't need to son.
That's the defense's job. Even a dumb person would know that!
"Franklin County Criminal Law Casebook
Reproduced with permission from
Allen V. Adair and the Franklin County Public Defender Office
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IN GENERAL (ME005)
Also see Abandonment; Self-defense; Duress; Entrapment; Battered Wife Syndrome; Insanity; Intoxication.
R.C. 2901.05(A)-- On an affirmative defense the defendant bears both the burden of going forward with the
evidence and the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
R.C. 2901.05(C)-- An affirmative defense is either:(1) designated by statute as such; or (2) "A defense
involving an excuse or justification peculiarly within the knowledge of the accused, on which he can fairly
be required to adduce supporting evidence."..."