China to protest after Japan arrests activists on disputed isle

Aug 15, 2012 Full story: The Star Online 343

China will lodge a complaint with Japan after it detained five Chinese activists who landed on disputed islands on Wednesday, China's Xinhua news agency said, as tension between Japan and its neighbours escalated on the anniversary of the end of World War Two.

Full Story

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#330 Sep 29, 2012
RayH wrote:
<quoted text>
How many countries recognize Tibet as an independent country today? ZERO. And that's the future too.
You are correct that the British invented "Tibet independence."
Jesus Christ, I talking about less then a generation ago TIBET was a an Independant country. Maybe you were not taught about this during your communist training but that is exactly what it was....an official country. China PRC was not recognised by any country around that time by anyone except the USSR, Tibet was recognised by the US, UK and the UN. Don't take it personally, its not you, its your education.
Why else do they every couple years revolt against BJ. Don't tell me foreign interfrance....please, might as well blame voodo.
But lets also forget about them and the other lands enslaved to your precious PRC. Lets talk about the islands that Japan took over 100years from a currupt empire which itself took vietnam for itself not so long ago, that China is not so much an innocent snow white my friend, so I'd be wise to just focus on the last decade, a succuessful caring china uplefting the living standards of its people and boost about. Even 5year olds know that no amount of rioting can change the past.
Rong

Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

#331 Sep 29, 2012
dreadman82 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow love having meaningful dialogues.... in 1914 the Tibetan government signed the Simla Accord with Britain, ceding the South Tibet region to British India, so obviously the British government did just to mention a few
Have you look at the so called Simla Accord?
It clearly stated that Tibet was under Chinese Suzerainty.
The British did not recognize Tibet as an independent country and that was why they ask China to endorse it. China wouldn't do it so the Simla accord was dead.
The British gov, under Tony Blair, apologized to China a century later saying that there was no such a thing as "Suzerainty". Britain has always recognized China's sovereignty of Tibet.
----------
Miliband clears up Britain's Tibet policy
The British government through its Foreign Secretary David Miliband officially acknowledged in November 2008 that what the British Government did in Tibet a century ago was a historical mistake, using his own word, it is an “anachronism”(The Telegraph, 5 Nov, 2008—‘UK recognised China direct rule over Tibet’).
The Foreign Secretary announced in a Written Statement on 29 October a change in the British government’s position on the status of Tibet, stating, for the first time, that “Tibet is a part of the People’s Republic of China”. The British government has up till now, for 94 years, recognised Chinese “suzerainty” in Tibet but not full Chinese sovereignty, regarding Tibet having a ‘special position’.
Rong

Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

#332 Sep 29, 2012
dreadman82 wrote:
<quoted text>
Otherwise we'll be talking about what my stone age ancestor did to your stone age ancestor.....becomes senseless, if the Chinese wants a war with Japan they should go it but not at the expense of dropping everyone's IQ with meaningless chants that where branwashed on you in the first place in order to make you forget about the present. Remember if you live in yesterday you will miss tomorrow
Lol! Don't blame me for your IQ.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#333 Sep 30, 2012
Rong wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you look at the so called Simla Accord?
It clearly stated that Tibet was under Chinese Suzerainty.
The British did not recognize Tibet as an independent country and that was why they ask China to endorse it. China wouldn't do it so the Simla accord was dead.
The British gov, under Tony Blair, apologized to China a century later saying that there was no such a thing as "Suzerainty". Britain has always recognized China's sovereignty of Tibet.
----------
Miliband clears up Britain's Tibet policy
The British government through its Foreign Secretary David Miliband officially acknowledged in November 2008 that what the British Government did in Tibet a century ago was a historical mistake, using his own word, it is an “anachronism”(The Telegraph, 5 Nov, 2008—‘UK recognised China direct rule over Tibet’).
The Foreign Secretary announced in a Written Statement on 29 October a change in the British government’s position on the status of Tibet, stating, for the first time, that “Tibet is a part of the People’s Republic of China”. The British government has up till now, for 94 years, recognised Chinese “suzerainty” in Tibet but not full Chinese sovereignty, regarding Tibet having a ‘special position’.
Am getting bored with this, you people should really learn to READ and understand rather then just recite stuff you were told by your little red books....I have heard of it and if you had tried to reason you would understand that China rejected the Accord and their plenipotentiary, Ivan Chen lead by bygone empire building dream you now foolishly pursue, withdrew on 3 July 1914. The British and Tibetan plenipotentiaries then attached a note denying China any privileges under the Accord and sealed it as a bilateral agreement the same day. In case this is too complicated for your fragile IQ I'll break it down for you, not only did Britain recognise Tibet by sealing a bilateral agreement but the Simla Accord arguement holds no water my friend because it was never agreed upon. You know what else the Brits did recognise......ownership of those islands to Japan in the 1970's so yes its a double edged sword.
Pick up a book before you expose your intellectual short comings next time mister Rong or should I say dead WRONG with your half truths......lol. I think am done here so please no more double standard stained half true comebacks I have better things to do
Rong

Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

#334 Sep 30, 2012
dreadman82 wrote:
<quoted text>
Am getting bored with this, you people should really learn to READ and understand rather then just recite stuff you were told by your little red books....I have heard of it and if you had tried to reason you would understand that China rejected the Accord and their plenipotentiary, Ivan Chen lead by bygone empire building dream you now foolishly pursue, withdrew on 3 July 1914. The British and Tibetan plenipotentiaries then attached a note denying China any privileges under the Accord and sealed it as a bilateral agreement the same day. In case this is too complicated for your fragile IQ I'll break it down for you, not only did Britain recognise Tibet by sealing a bilateral agreement but the Simla Accord arguement holds no water my friend because it was never agreed upon. You know what else the Brits did recognise......ownership of those islands to Japan in the 1970's so yes its a double edged sword.
Pick up a book before you expose your intellectual short comings next time mister Rong or should I say dead WRONG with your half truths......lol. I think am done here so please no more double standard stained half true comebacks I have better things to do
Blah blah!
The fact is Britain never recognize Tibet as an independent country. Telling me all the grandmother story about Ivan Chen will not change anything.
One more time I want to ask u which country recognize Tibet as an independent country in 1950?
BTW, I never worry about my IQ. U seem to have a problem.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#335 Sep 30, 2012
Rong wrote:
<quoted text>
Blah blah!
The fact is Britain never recognize Tibet as an independent country. Telling me all the grandmother story about Ivan Chen will not change anything.
One more time I want to ask u which country recognize Tibet as an independent country in 1950?
BTW, I never worry about my IQ. U seem to have a problem.
Am going to write this capital letters again so its clearer
for youR simple mind to grasp

THE BRITISH SIGNED AN AGREEMENT IN 1914 WITH TIBET, IN FACT UNTIL 2008 BRITAIN WAS THE LAST COUNTRY TO STILL RECOGNISE TIBET...BUT LIKE EVERY OTHER COUNTRY THAT FELT BJ's PRESSURE STOPPED THEIR SUPPORT FOR TIBET OFFICALLY AROUND THAT TIME

INDIA IS ANOTHER COUNTRY THAT RECOGNISED TIBET IN 1950, I WONT EVEN MENTION THE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT DENOUNCED THE PLA'S INVASION OF ANOTHER STATE...TIBET....BUT I WILL BE A GOOD SPORT AND NOT ADD THEM TO THE LIST.

THATS TWO COUNTRIES RECOGNISING TIBET IN 1950, IN CASE YOU COUNT AS BAD AS YOU READ, THAT IS ONE MORE THEN CHINA PRC IN 1950

BUT THATS NOT EVEN MY POINT. JUST INITIALLY SAID THAT YOU SHOULD LEARN TO LET GO JUST LIKE THE WORLD LET GO OF TIBET LIKE ADULTS.

THIS INFORMATION IS ALL OVER THE INTERNET AND FOR FINDING IT AM NOT A GENIUS....HAVE YOU HEARD OF THIS LANGUAGE "ENGLISH" YOU KNOW THE ONE YOU ARE WRITTING IN? PLEASE PUT YOUR RED BOOK DOWN AND LEARN TO READ IN IT.

SO YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN RONG....
DEN TAMIKOKYOKO DITCACCHO

France

#337 Sep 30, 2012
TAO SE~ IA? VAO MOM MAY^` THANG NG...U NHU BO` OC' CUT' ChOOOO' NG U NG U NG U NGUV. QUAN^` QUE` UONG' MAU' LON^` ChO' GHE~ ten^ la` NgUYEN^~ TAN^' DUNG~!!!

NTD NTD NTD la` CAI' thang` CHOOO' NAO` DU ME MAY^` MAT. LON^` nhu CAI' MAM^!!!

TAO iA? VAO` DAU^` thang` CHA ONG CO^' NOI. MAY^` NgUYEN^~ TAN^' DUNG~ AN CUT'!!!

TAO KY TEN: TAO la` 100000000% LY' DAI. BANG`iA? VAO` DAU^` CHA MAY^` thang` BAC' KY` CHOOO' DEAGU SON JOON CHUL NgUYEN^~ TAN^' DUNG~!!!

TYPHOON DiT. CAI' CoN Di? ME. MAY^`NgUYEN^~ TAN^' CHOOO'!!!
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#338 Sep 30, 2012
Rong wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you look at the so called Simla Accord?
It clearly stated that Tibet was under Chinese Suzerainty.
The British did not recognize Tibet as an independent country and that was why they ask China to endorse it. China wouldn't do it so the Simla accord was dead.
The British gov, under Tony Blair, apologized to China a century later saying that there was no such a thing as "Suzerainty". Britain has always recognized China's sovereignty of Tibet.
----------
Miliband clears up Britain's Tibet policy
The British government through its Foreign Secretary David Miliband officially acknowledged in November 2008 that what the British Government did in Tibet a century ago was a historical mistake, using his own word, it is an “anachronism”(The Telegraph, 5 Nov, 2008—‘UK recognised China direct rule over Tibet’).
The Foreign Secretary announced in a Written Statement on 29 October a change in the British government’s position on the status of Tibet, stating, for the first time, that “Tibet is a part of the People’s Republic of China”. The British government has up till now, for 94 years, recognised Chinese “suzerainty” in Tibet but not full Chinese sovereignty, regarding Tibet having a ‘special position’.
The simla accord speaks of Suzerainty which means :

1) Tibet is not part of China

2) China has no claim top Tibet under international law since the concept of Suzerainty is unenforcable.
lct

Beijing, China

#339 Sep 30, 2012
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
The simla accord speaks of Suzerainty which means :
1) Tibet is not part of China
2) China has no claim top Tibet under international law since the concept of Suzerainty is unenforcable.
so what support your claim?

your goverment?

or what?

Since: Feb 08

Yamashitacho, Japan

#344 Oct 3, 2012
Japanese Samurai Culture Is Almost Fake

http://book.geocities.jp/japans_conspiracy/01...

There was a samurai culture in Japan.

However the culture which we recognize as the Japanese tradition is mostly deception and fake.

So, in a word, most of us are deceived.

Probably, most samurai were much more corrupt than we think.
GIAAOTUICOMCONOI MAYTANCHO

Anonymous Proxy

#345 Oct 4, 2012
FUKUDA CAI' CoN CAC...
Dan

Maldon, UK

#346 Oct 4, 2012
DEN TAMIKOKYOKO DITCACCHO

Vienna, Austria

#348 Oct 4, 2012
10000 CAI' LON^` DA DEN SIDA THUI' NHET VAO MOM MAY^`thang` SUC' VAT. KHOMU' NGHE AN HA TINH~ THANH HOA' MO? HO^ nhu MO? CON CHOOO' BU' LoN^` CON MOT', BU' CHO DA~ DI CON...

TiEN THE^? TAO iA? CUT' iA? CHAY? THUI' CO' MAU' KINH KIET' LI. TRI~ NHAO~ NHET. ThUI' TANH HOI^ HAM' MU? GHE~ VAO` CAI' MO? NG U nhu CON CHOOO' DOI' GHE~ SON JOON CHUL HAN` KUOC' CHOOO' CONG AN CHO' NgUYEN^~ TAN^' DUNG~ VAN^ KHUNG` MUT. RUOI^` CO' CONG. LoNG^ BAN' SI` KE COCAINE SELLERS NgUYEN^~ TAN^' CHOOO' VAN^ KHUNG` LUA` DAO? thang` CON CHOOOO' HEO MAP^. DiT. CHIBA NIKKO NG U nhu BOOOO` DMM EEEEEE^' TAI`WAN NIKKO NOW ZONE ChIT' CON Di? ME. MAY^` ChUA CON thang` CHOOOO' DOI' NODA YUKIO ENDANO UTSUNOMIYA !!!

DMM POOH SHHIT CONG AN CHAU DOC^' CHOOOO' DOI' LEO? DEO? THEO SAU MUT' CUT' HUI? LON^` THUI' cua? TAO 24/24 !!!

HAHAHA CAI' Ji` MAY^. thang` MAT. HEO MOI. CONG AN CHOOOO' MUT. RUOI^` CO' CONG. LONG^ VAN^ KHUNG` MYANMAR ?!??

SAO MAY^` THEM` HUI~ LON^` THUI' CUA? TAO QUA' VAY^. MAY^. HeO MOI. MUT. RUOI^` Co' CONG. LoNG^ MYANMAR VAN^ KHUNG`!!!

TAO KY' TEN^: CHINH' TAO la` 100000/100000 REAL LY' DAI. BANG` SHHIT DiT. iA? PEE SPIT TE` TE` XE` XE` NUOC' DAI' KHAI LOM` THUI' WAC' VAO` MOM^ MAY^` SIDA COCAINE CHO' DOI' MYANMAR DUNG~ VAN^ KHUNG` 3 KIEM^...

10000 CAI' LON^` DA DEN SIDA THUI' NHET VAO MOM MAY^`thang` SUC' VAT. KHOMU' NGHE AN HA TINH~ THANH HOA' MO? HO^ nhu MO? CON CHOOO' BU' LoN^` CON MOT', BU' CHO DA~ DI CON...

TiEN THE^? TAO iA? CUT' iA? CHAY? THUI' CO' MAU' KINH KIET' LI. TRI~ NHAO~ NHET. ThUI' TANH HOI^ HAM' MU? GHE~ VAO` CAI' MO? NG U nhu CON CHOOO' DOI' GHE~ SON JOON CHUL HAN` KUOC' CHOOO' CONG AN CHO' NgUYEN^~ TAN^' DUNG~ VAN^ KHUNG` MUT. RUOI^` CO' CONG. LoNG^ BAN' SI` KE COCAINE SELLERS NgUYEN^~ TAN^' CHOOO' VAN^ KHUNG` LUA` DAO? thang` CON CHOOOO' HEO MAP^. DiT. CHIBA NIKKO NG U nhu BOOOO` DMM EEEEEE^' TAI`WAN NIKKO NOW ZONE ChIT' CON Di? ME. MAY^` ChUA CON thang` CHOOOO' DOI' NODA YUKIO ENDANO UTSUNOMIYA !!!

DMM POOH SHHIT CONG AN CHAU DOC^' CHOOOO' DOI' LEO? DEO? THEO SAU MUT' CUT' HUI? LON^` THUI' cua? TAO 24/24 !!!

HAHAHA CAI' Ji` MAY^. thang` MAT. HEO MOI. CONG AN CHOOOO' MUT. RUOI^` CO' CONG. LONG^ VAN^ KHUNG` MYANMAR ?!??

SAO MAY^` THEM` HUI~ LON^` THUI' CUA? TAO QUA' VAY^. MAY^. HeO MOI. MUT. RUOI^` Co' CONG. LoNG^ MYANMAR VAN^ KHUNG`!!!

TAO KY' TEN^: CHINH' TAO la` 100000/100000 REAL LY' DAI. BANG` SHHIT DiT. iA? PEE SPIT TE` TE` XE` XE` NUOC' DAI' KHAI LOM` THUI' WAC' VAO` MOM^ MAY^` SIDA COCAINE CHO' DOI' MYANMAR DUNG~ VAN^ KHUNG` 3 KIEM^...

NhIN CAI' DiT. ME. MAY^` MO? HO^ MUT RUOI^` Co' CONG. LoNG^ HEO MOI. DOG 4COMMUNIST KhO MU' NGHE AN THANH HOA' HA` TIN~ MYANMAR VAN^ LAN KHUNG`!!!

CUT' ME. MAY^` Diii DO^` CHO' GHE ~ NGHE AN THANH HOA' HA` TIN~ EAT SHHIT !!!
NhIN CAI' DiT. ME. MAY^` MO? HO^ MUT RUOI^` Co' CONG. LoNG^ HEO MOI. DOG 4 COMMUNIST KhO MU' NGHE AN THANH HOA' HA` TIN~ MYANMAR VAN^ LAN KHUNG`!!!

CUT' ME. MAY^` Diii DO^` CHO' GHE ~ NGHE AN THANH HOA' HA` TIN~ EAT SHHIT HUI~ LoN^` CoN DMM MAP^. MOT' ThOI^` LOI^` LAN KHUNG`!!!

Do^` BAC' KY ` CHOOO' AN CUT' AN CAP'!!!

DCDMM BAC' KY` CHOOO'!!!

DCDMM FAKE IP BAC' KY` ChOOO' AUSTRALIAN COWS !!!

MAY^` re QUAI' THAI KANKUKO NANNING BAC' KY` ChOOO' POOH SHHIT PROSTITUTES THIEVES TAMIKO KYOHKO ChOOO' DE~!!!

MAY^` thi` CO' NgUYEN MOT. CAI' LON^` SUC' VAT. SIDA THAT. BU. va` LO^? TAI CO' 2 MUT. ThIT. DZU TO^? CHANG~...

KY' TEN : TAO la` MA' cua? LY' DAI BANG` iA? DAI' SHHIT PEE SPIT TE` TE` XE` XE` VAO` MOM^` MAY^` ChOOOO' DOI' BAC' KY` CoN VO^ CUNG` MAT^' DZAY. Di? NG U TAMIKO KYOHKO !!!
HAI PHUOC YOO

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

#349 Oct 4, 2012
luon di sau cac' nuoc' lang' gien`g mac du` da~ giet' hon 1 trieu dan phan don.g va` cam` tu` 80 trieu dan phan dong khac'
Tuy nhien VC di truoc' the' gioi' voi' 1 lu? di? va` ma co^ liem' dit' bac va dang? rat' nhiet tinh` du` dit' VC rat' thui' tha tanh tuoi?
True

Yorba Linda, CA

#354 Oct 7, 2012
China has become greedy... they want to own everything.

Since: Feb 08

Yamashitacho, Japan

#357 Oct 8, 2012
Japan Plays Politics in United Nations

http://book.geocities.jp/japan_conspiracy/010...

Japan is an insidious nation.

Its basic policy is secret bullying, and killing nations very softly.
SpongeBob

Canada

#358 Oct 8, 2012
HAI PHUOC YOO wrote:
luon di sau cac' nuoc' lang' gien`g mac du` da~ giet' hon 1 trieu dan phan don.g va` cam` tu` 80 trieu dan phan dong khac'
Tuy nhien VC di truoc' the' gioi' voi' 1 lu? di? va` ma co^ liem' dit' bac va dang? rat' nhiet tinh` du` dit' VC rat' thui' tha tanh tuoi?
...Toinghiep cho may woa choi lun. May con o do thi con...liem lap suot cuoc doi day con a. Sao chua bien di ma con o do ha con? Kieu phan dong nhu may, nay mai the nao cung bi CA tum co nhot thi...con gi cai ditlat cua con nua ha con? Nen nho rang DauGau trong tu deo thich xai....vaseline. Wahahhahahaa!
True

Yorba Linda, CA

#359 Oct 8, 2012
fukuda wrote:
Japan Plays Politics in United Nations
http://book.geocities.jp/japan_conspiracy/010...
Japan is an insidious nation.
Its basic policy is secret bullying, and killing nations very softly.
China kills innocent students who want to protest. That is worse.
Sam the warmonger

Asia/Pacific Region

#360 Oct 9, 2012
It is completely useless debate here for what we should do to punish japan, for instance, shoot 100 nuke-heads to japan, north-korea will happily send 5 or more nuke-heads to japan at the same time, with a close distant China-japan N.Kor-japan (give pinoy 20), those 100+ nuke-heads will strike every inch of japan soil precisely and sink jap's country. I must admit, US as the warmonger may strike China with nuke-heads also, but, more than 300+ China's nuke-heads are aimed to US, if all those 300+ nuke-heads landed on US soil, I'm sure US population will be wiped to half, of course China also will entirely wiped out, but do you think Russia will just stay intact do nothing, yup, Russia will take this good chance to send thousand nuke-heads launched to US soil and of course that means US will also be terminated entirely, good for Russia and world because there would be no more dictator nation which always dictating others.
But... Do you think US is so Stupid to sacrifice and put hundred of millions american lives in danger ?? I don't think so, US actually will only watch and smile big (if not laughing) from behind watching China destroy japan, anyway it is part of US plan from 70s.
After all I still hope japan will stop its aggression behavior and stop occupying Diaoyu island for the sake of jap nation itself, China-jap can get along, don't let the warmonger win (might be lose also).
RayH

Shenzhen, China

#361 Oct 9, 2012
Sam the warmonger wrote:
It is completely useless debate here for what we should do to punish japan, for instance, shoot 100 nuke-heads to japan, north-korea will happily send 5 or more nuke-heads to japan at the same time, with a close distant China-japan N.Kor-japan (give pinoy 20), those 100+ nuke-heads will strike every inch of japan soil precisely and sink jap's country. I must admit, US as the warmonger may strike China with nuke-heads also, but, more than 300+ China's nuke-heads are aimed to US, if all those 300+ nuke-heads landed on US soil, I'm sure US population will be wiped to half, of course China also will entirely wiped out, but do you think Russia will just stay intact do nothing, yup, Russia will take this good chance to send thousand nuke-heads launched to US soil and of course that means US will also be terminated entirely, good for Russia and world because there would be no more dictator nation which always dictating others.
But... Do you think US is so Stupid to sacrifice and put hundred of millions american lives in danger ?? I don't think so, US actually will only watch and smile big (if not laughing) from behind watching China destroy japan, anyway it is part of US plan from 70s.
After all I still hope japan will stop its aggression behavior and stop occupying Diaoyu island for the sake of jap nation itself, China-jap can get along, don't let the warmonger win (might be lose also).
Japs will have negative economic growth this year due to the Chinese consumer boycotts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kanto, Japan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Repairing Japan-China ties 19 hr Ainu 1
Japan key to helping Myanmar farmers Sep 13 SHlTWORMKYOKODEBD... 5
International Human Resource Development Progra... Sep 10 NGROBOATRAGTOXI3K... 6
Exclusive: Japan, U.S. discussing offensive mil... Sep 10 CH4WORM100YENDEBD... 2
Japan compiles 12,000-page bio of Emperor Hirohito Sep 9 CH4WORM100YENDEBD... 2
Japan Has Its Own Batman, And He Is So Awesome Aug 29 linda bouwmeester 2
Wolves susceptible to yawn contagion: Social bo... Aug 27 paul shykora arts 1
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Kanto, Japan People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••