Iran invites Russia, China to atom si...

Iran invites Russia, China to atom sites but not U.S.

There are 25 comments on the National Post story from Jan 4, 2011, titled Iran invites Russia, China to atom sites but not U.S.. In it, National Post reports that:

Iran said Tuesday it will open its atomic sites to some world powers, in a rare move swiftly dismissed as "antics' by the United States, which along with Britain, France and Germany, is not invited.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at National Post.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Theo

Germany

#1 Jan 5, 2011
It is very well. They invite their allies who help them and not enemies, who want to damage their country.

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#2 Jan 5, 2011
Russia and China are allies of Iran?
Die

Germany

#3 Jan 6, 2011
Kenhunt wrote:
Russia and China are allies of Iran?
from years and usa is enemy of Iran and the whole this region from years. britain is enemy of Iran from centuries.

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#4 Jan 6, 2011
Die wrote:
<quoted text>
from years and usa is enemy of Iran and the whole this region from years. britain is enemy of Iran from centuries.
What is "this region?" Would you say the Al Qaeda and Taliban are friends or enemies of "this region?"
hugeFAGGET

Boston, MA

#5 Jan 6, 2011
Kenhunt wrote:
<quoted text>
What is "this region?" Would you say the Al Qaeda and Taliban are friends or enemies of "this region?"
If we're talking about the middle east, then the US's intervention in the region has been very detrimental to Iran's former democracy.

The Iranian people lost tens of billions in trade deals which were canceled by the US after the revolution, money which was never returned.

SAVAK, trained by the US and Israelis brutally tortured Iranian dissidents for forced them to listen while they tortured their families.

NATO providing Saddam Hussein with modern weaponry and chemical WMD blueprints killed hundreds of thousands of peaceful Iranians. Direct military engagements between the US and Iran in the Persian Gulf.

The bombing of an Iranian passenger airline.

The KSA is also an unnatural regime that is far, far more backwards and medieval than modern day Iran's.

Israel has used monetary aid and largely unlimited access to modern industrial military technology from the US to further displace current generations of people dwelling in Palestine.

The intentional misinformation that brought NATO partners to join the US in a war in the middle east constitutes a war crime, whose primary purpose was not as much to help get rid of a brutal dictator as it was to corner the Iranian people and help secure the Persian Gulf towards their own interests.

They have rid of aggressive and backward governments like the Taliban in Afghanistan, while simultaneously providing support and weapons to terrorists like Jundullah. They have car bombed people in Iran and kidnapped Iranians.

If you were to tally number of deaths against mid easterners on one side and number of deaths of westerners on the other, the former body count would be far higher.

The US has done some good for sure. The point is the US isn't primarily getting involved for the interests or beliefs of anyone but for those in power in the US or those who are able to lobby or influence said politicians. This is not ideal for the parties that may be bombed or invaded. With such a history it is not just for the US to continue bombing. It is likely not in the interest of Iran to be bombed, or the Iranian people. Or their neighbors.

Iran should have a right to nuclear deterrence given its history.

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#6 Jan 6, 2011
hugeFAGGET wrote:
<quoted text>
If we're talking about the middle east, then the US's intervention in the region has been very detrimental to Iran's former democracy.
The Iranian people lost tens of billions in trade deals which were canceled by the US after the revolution, money which was never returned.
SAVAK, trained by the US and Israelis brutally tortured Iranian dissidents for forced them to listen while they tortured their families.
NATO providing Saddam Hussein with modern weaponry and chemical WMD blueprints killed hundreds of thousands of peaceful Iranians. Direct military engagements between the US and Iran in the Persian Gulf.
The bombing of an Iranian passenger airline.
The KSA is also an unnatural regime that is far, far more backwards and medieval than modern day Iran's.
Israel has used monetary aid and largely unlimited access to modern industrial military technology from the US to further displace current generations of people dwelling in Palestine.
The intentional misinformation that brought NATO partners to join the US in a war in the middle east constitutes a war crime, whose primary purpose was not as much to help get rid of a brutal dictator as it was to corner the Iranian people and help secure the Persian Gulf towards their own interests.
They have rid of aggressive and backward governments like the Taliban in Afghanistan, while simultaneously providing support and weapons to terrorists like Jundullah. They have car bombed people in Iran and kidnapped Iranians.
If you were to tally number of deaths against mid easterners on one side and number of deaths of westerners on the other, the former body count would be far higher.
The US has done some good for sure. The point is the US isn't primarily getting involved for the interests or beliefs of anyone but for those in power in the US or those who are able to lobby or influence said politicians. This is not ideal for the parties that may be bombed or invaded. With such a history it is not just for the US to continue bombing. It is likely not in the interest of Iran to be bombed, or the Iranian people. Or their neighbors.
Iran should have a right to nuclear deterrence given its history.
Your comment is too long to deal with in a few words, and it is so full of propaganda lies, it is unworthy of the time.

Iran has said on many occasions that it is NOT developing a nuclear weapons capability, so it seems that deterrence will not exist, unless of course the government of Iran is lying. Is it? Is the world to not trust the words of Iran?

Anyway, the WORST thing Iran could do is develop a nuke and think of it as a deterrent. Quite the opposite, it is the equivalent of taking a knife to a gun fight. Israel cannot successfully attack Iran with conventional means, but in the nuclear realm it can literally erase Iran from the face of the earth. Why risk that?
ProudAndPersian

Boston, MA

#7 Jan 6, 2011
Your comment is too long to deal with in a few words, and it is so full of propaganda lies, it is unworthy of the time.
Iran has said on many occasions that it is NOT developing a nuclear weapons capability, so it seems that deterrence will not exist, unless of course the government of Iran is lying. Is it? Is the world to not trust the words of Iran?
Anyway, the WORST thing Iran could do is develop a nuke and think of it as a deterrent. Quite the opposite, it is the equivalent of taking a knife to a gun fight. Israel cannot successfully attack Iran with conventional means, but in the nuclear realm it can literally erase Iran from the face of the earth. Why risk that?
Your comment is too smug and baseless to deal with in a few words, and it is so full of propaganda lies.

If Israel were sufficiently depraved to decide to go on a lunatic rampage nuking everything, they could do that without an Iranian nuclear weapon.
If Iran has an arsenal of nukes with which to literally erase Israel from the face of the Earth, then it is a good thing for Iran's defense.
Besides, if someone starts shooting at me, if I were to do It'd be better I ensure in my last moments I took him out too, to die with some sense of justice against crimes against me.
ProudAndPersian

Boston, MA

#8 Jan 6, 2011
perhaps my last comment was to long.
If so, let me know, I will shorten it to fit your attention span, Alabama man.
Regardless, Iranians have suffered more than you could possibly understand in your life.
They should have a right to nuclear deterrance they develop themsleves.
Other people shouldn't kill my family because of what's done in Iran.
The rabid tone of anger and aggression you strike, talking about genocide as a viable option, makes you sound insecure, trapped, frustrated.

Since: Jan 11

Boston, MA

#9 Jan 6, 2011
Kenhunt wrote:
<quoted text>
Your comment is too long to deal with in a few words, and it is so full of propaganda lies, it is unworthy of the time.
omg it's sooo full of lies! there was no CIA led coup! SAVAK wasn't trained to torture Iranians! The US military diddn't shoot down an Iranian passenger jet!

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#10 Jan 6, 2011
ProudAndPersian wrote:
perhaps my last comment was to long.
If so, let me know, I will shorten it to fit your attention span, Alabama man.
Regardless, Iranians have suffered more than you could possibly understand in your life.
They should have a right to nuclear deterrance they develop themsleves.
Other people shouldn't kill my family because of what's done in Iran.
The rabid tone of anger and aggression you strike, talking about genocide as a viable option, makes you sound insecure, trapped, frustrated.
so Iran lied about the peaceful nature of it's nuclear program?

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#11 Jan 7, 2011
BeachJustice wrote:
<quoted text>
omg it's sooo full of lies! there was no CIA led coup! SAVAK wasn't trained to torture Iranians! The US military diddn't shoot down an Iranian passenger jet!
No, there was no CIA LED coup. The Coup, following Iran's nationalization of the British petroleum facilities there, was British led. SAVAK was trained to torture using Iran's already considerable abilities in that regard. The US Navy did shoot down an Iranian passenger jet, an error rather than a deliberate attack, under disputed circumstances. The USA compensated every family of every victim. I think Palavi was a monster, SAVAK was a murderous agency, and the Iranian jet incident a terrible tragedy, but try and get the facts straight.
Persian

Canada

#12 Jan 8, 2011
You stupid Americans bitching every day about IRAN & what it did or does or will do in his neighborhood & perhaps later to ur little Jewish rat state or some Arab countries in the middle east while major international coperations including Chinese & Russians who helped killing tens of thousands of your soldiers during Korean & Vietnamies wars are chopping US in pieces & taking over all your fixed assets since US is under by 15 to 20 Trillions Dollars!
Natural disasters will hit US in the magnatiutes never seen in recent centuries!
Civil Wars are going to start very soon, since I am sure a lot of true American Aryan nations will not sit a side to see the destruction of USA by some special interest groups!
So don't worry about IRAN if you are not IRANIANS the same way that I don't really give FU what happens to your nation!
As far as attacking IRAN goes! Dare to do so! We gonna FU so hard that you gonna love HITLER! lol

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#13 Jan 8, 2011
Poor Canada.

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#15 Jan 8, 2011
ami wrote:
<quoted text>
Never mind that alabma hick, he is hasbara propagandist, and Iran , moslem hater.He reiterates lots of same baseless rubbish and gargles sh$t every time regardles of the topics as long as he can spew his 2 cent hates. he is one redneck M-fkr
Since you cannot reply factually, you resort to profanities and personal insults, in violation of the TOS for Topix.
ami

Winter Park, FL

#16 Jan 8, 2011
Kenhunt wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you cannot reply factually, you resort to profanities and personal insults, in violation of the TOS for Topix.
Iran hater triple K. I came up to that conclusion by so called factual garbage! from your nonsense that are disseminated in here daily, so what if a sovereign nation in tough neighborhood wants to develop nuclear, who the F are you to question it and police them? calling for genocide and their demise to incite emotions, I know your true allegiance by incessant admirations, surely not for US, hasbara bitch.
ami

Winter Park, FL

#17 Jan 8, 2011
Kenhunt wrote:
<quoted text>
No, there was no CIA LED coup. The Coup, following Iran's nationalization of the British petroleum facilities there, was British led. SAVAK was trained to torture using Iran's already considerable abilities in that regard. The US Navy did shoot down an Iranian passenger jet, an error rather than a deliberate attack, under disputed circumstances. The USA compensated every family of every victim. I think Palavi was a monster, SAVAK was a murderous agency, and the Iranian jet incident a terrible tragedy, but try and get the facts straight.
since you know all factuals rebut this, http://www.payvand.com/news/03/aug/1106.html

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#18 Jan 8, 2011
ami wrote:
<quoted text>
Iran hater triple K. I came up to that conclusion by so called factual garbage! from your nonsense that are disseminated in here daily, so what if a sovereign nation in tough neighborhood wants to develop nuclear, who the F are you to question it and police them? calling for genocide and their demise to incite emotions, I know your true allegiance by incessant admirations, surely not for US, hasbara bitch.
Another violation of the TOS.

As as a matter of fact, I have never called for genocide nor for Iran's demise. You can refute that by just cutting and pasting any comment wherein I did so.

WAITING.

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#19 Jan 8, 2011
WAITING

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#20 Jan 8, 2011
ami wrote:
<quoted text>
since you know all factuals rebut this, http://www.payvand.com/news/03/aug/1106.html
HEY, that was a very useful site as on it I found: http://esalerugs.com/persian-rugs.html...

The rest of it was propaganda which for some reason omitted two things (1) who actually DID the coup and (2) why the coup was carried out. I have never said the coup was a right thing, but just get the facts straight, for instance, what was going on between the PM and the Russians at the time.

And try to speak without the profanity if you can.

“bless the USA”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#21 Jan 8, 2011
WAITING. Of course you couldn't...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Arak, Iran Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News U.S., Iran reach historic nuclear frameworka Apr '15 cancer lost 4
News Iran's top leader says no nuclear deal better t... Feb '15 Mag 1
News Iran's NPT Withdrawal Option Jan '15 Oli 1
News an Iranian Opposition Group's Fight for Freedom Dec '14 Rudi 1
News UN diplomats: Report says Iran buying for reactor Dec '14 The Sun 1
News UN diplomats: Report says Iran buying for reactor Dec '14 Jeff Brightone 1
News Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Presses Addit... Dec '14 Rico 1
More from around the web