... statistical tests for global warm...

... statistical tests for global warming fails to find ..... anthropogenic forcing

There are 96 comments on the Free Republic story from Jan 4, 2013, titled ... statistical tests for global warming fails to find ..... anthropogenic forcing. In it, Free Republic reports that:

From the journal Earth System Dynamics billed as 'An Interactive Open Access Journal of the European Geosciences Union' comes this paper which suggests that the posited AGW forcing effects simply isn't statistically significant in the observations, but other natural forcings are.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Free Republic.

First Prev
of 5
Next Last
SpaceBlues

Cypress, TX

#83 Feb 17, 2013
New name for ph'd:DRopout!

:-)

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#84 Feb 17, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
New name for ph'd:DRopout!
:-)
NO NO NO.

That implies she had "some" college.

lol.

She is a rabid anti-intellectual type with seething anger underneath about it.

no joke.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#85 Feb 18, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
NO NO NO.
That implies she had "some" college.
lol.
She is a rabid anti-intellectual type with seething anger underneath about it.
no joke.
You can’t even be original Commander TROLL!!!! See that Bull S. degree again got you walloped and in the crapper. That Ha HA you hear is the void between your ears called an echo.
Your wrong you don't have a character to insult.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#87 Feb 19, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Does PennyHD say anything a sentence or two with the words BS and scientific science fiction?
Could be a computer program with that lack of variety.
LOL.
Which would be an improvement over you. You keep posting the same tired old excuses and rewriting the past so you can appear to be right when you were really wrong.

On the other hand, you are a great tool for proving how silly many of the people who believe like you are and tend to embarrass the rest into silence.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#89 Feb 19, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Which would be an improvement over you. You keep posting the same tired old excuses and rewriting the past so you can appear to be right when you were really wrong.
On the other hand, you are a great tool for proving how silly many of the people who believe like you are and tend to embarrass the rest into silence.
Says the Dingaling who told me all the science agencies claim global warming was a hoax.

And when I showed her the official website for NASA showing the evidence for global warming

Climate change: How do we know?
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

She insisted NASA had "other" official websites that said it was a hoax.
Then she pulled all these right wing sites, that I proved were ludicrous.

**and not NASA**

But what can one expect from an avowed, loyal Rush Limbaugh dittohead.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#90 Feb 21, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the Dingaling who told me all the science agencies claim global warming was a hoax.
And when I showed her the official website for NASA showing the evidence for global warming
Climate change: How do we know?
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence
She insisted NASA had "other" official websites that said it was a hoax.
Then she pulled all these right wing sites, that I proved were ludicrous.
**and not NASA**
But what can one expect from an avowed, loyal Rush Limbaugh dittohead.
And who says NASA is right this time. After all, NASA has a record of being wrong in the past. As for your science agencies, have you ever noticed that they are all either government sponsered or like the AAAS a lobbying group. Many of which back in the seventies were also on the gobal ice age band wagon. Some in NASA were also on that band wagon according to OMNI magazine.

As for the Limbaugh comment, have you ever listened to Limbaugh or do you rely on second hand opinion. I would be willing to bet you have never bothered to listen to him yourself. Then again I doubt you would be willing because he might (gasp) say something you agree with.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#91 Feb 21, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
And who says NASA is right this time. After all, NASA has a record of being wrong in the past. As for your science agencies, have you ever noticed that they are all either government sponsered or like the AAAS a lobbying group. Many of which back in the seventies were also on the gobal ice age band wagon. Some in NASA were also on that band wagon according to OMNI magazine.
As for the Limbaugh comment, have you ever listened to Limbaugh or do you rely on second hand opinion. I would be willing to bet you have never bothered to listen to him yourself. Then again I doubt you would be willing because he might (gasp) say something you agree with.
Maybe you think your genius boy Rush could put men on the moon instead of NASA too. LOL

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#94 Feb 26, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you think your genius boy Rush could put men on the moon instead of NASA too. LOL
Actually, NASA hasn't put a man on the moon since the seventies. I not sure they could do it today any better than a private operation and Limbaugh has the wealth to put a man in orbit. Not to mention many of the people he would need are listeners of his.

There are many aerospace engineers, mathematicians and others. If fact if you use Apollo as a starting point and modernize the design you could deliver a man to the moon are return him safely far easier than they did back in the sixties. For example, the orginal AGC had less computing power than a cheap cell phone, weight 70 lbs and required a 28 VDC power supply. Compare that to many industial devices that could interface with with a portable computer or some industrial computers that are no bigger than a deck of cards with various modules to allow it to interface with the computer.

That would be far cheaper than the orginal as well as being far lighter, Of course that isn't the only place where improvements have been made. Some things like returning them from space to earth would be just as simple as contracting it out to Virgin Galactic to pick them up in orbit or from the International Space Station.

http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/ForDummies.html

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#95 Feb 26, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, NASA hasn't put a man on the moon since the seventies. I not sure they could do it today any better than a private operation and Limbaugh has the wealth to put a man in orbit. Not to mention many of the people he would need are listeners of his.
You are deranged.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#96 Mar 1, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are deranged.
Am I? Or is it you that is the deranged one. Technology has advanced since the sixties and the orginal designs are still around. So building something that could deliver a man to the moon are return him safely to earth would be easier for someone who wanted to do that. After all, there are commecial rockets now delivering people to orbit and supplies to the International Space Station. The same rocket that can deliver a ton of cargo to the space station could just as easy deliver a ton of fuel into orbit or a command capsule.

Of course you are upset. You believe the only one capable of doing anything is your god government while ignoring the fact that the orginal hardware had been built by companies and not the government.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#97 Mar 1, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Am I? Or is it you that is the deranged one. Technology has advanced since the sixties and the orginal designs are still around. So building something that could deliver a man to the moon are return him safely to earth would be easier for someone who wanted to do that. After all, there are commecial rockets now delivering people to orbit and supplies to the International Space Station. The same rocket that can deliver a ton of cargo to the space station could just as easy deliver a ton of fuel into orbit or a command capsule.
Of course you are upset. You believe the only one capable of doing anything is your god government while ignoring the fact that the orginal hardware had been built by companies and not the government.
You are deranged NOT for saying space travel could be done outside NASA.

But for suggesting Rush Limbaugh has ever shown any interest in the topic or shown ANY science acumen.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#98 Mar 5, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are deranged NOT for saying space travel could be done outside NASA.
But for suggesting Rush Limbaugh has ever shown any interest in the topic or shown ANY science acumen.
Nor did I ever say he was. If anything it was you that seem to want to use Rush Limbaugh. I would of used Bill Gates as an example since he has far more money. But then again you are hardwired to see this as a political and you want to see Limbaugh embarrassed.

The fact that Rush Limbaugh has not shown any interest in science but has shown an interest in AGW/Man made climate change is a clear indicator that it is more political than scientific.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#99 Mar 10, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>

The fact that Rush Limbaugh has not shown any interest in science but has shown an interest in AGW/Man made climate change is a clear indicator that it is more political than scientific.
It is a clear indicator is it PURELY political with ZERO science.

And you were the one who saw him as a leader on the topic. I didn't make that up.
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#100 Mar 10, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that Rush Limbaugh has not shown any interest in science but has shown an interest in AGW/Man made climate change is a clear indicator that it is more political than scientific.
ROTFL!!! No, you nitwit, it just means that AGW denial is entirely political. After all, that is his take. I suppose that the wingnuts political types that deny evolution are evidence that biology is more political then scientific! What a loon.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#101 Mar 11, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text> to Tina"
ROTFL!!! No, you nitwit, it just means that AGW denial is entirely political. After all, that is his take. I suppose that the wingnuts political types that deny evolution are evidence that biology is more political then scientific! What a loon.
Hey, Limbaugh still officiall denies tobacco smoking is a health hazard.

Maybe Tina thinks he is being "scientific" here too.
Many global warming skeptics are also skeptical that second hand smoke can have any unfavorable health consequences.
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#102 Mar 14, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, Limbaugh still officiall denies tobacco smoking is a health hazard.
Maybe Tina thinks he is being "scientific" here too.
Many global warming skeptics are also skeptical that second hand smoke can have any unfavorable health consequences.
He has to; the same "think tanks" that sold that old lie are selling the new one and giving his BS the cover provided by their "respectability". BTW, there's also a strong correlation with denying biology, geology, and another dozen fields, aka, creationism.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hadarom, Israel Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Methodist supporters of Israel divestment regro... May 17 Three Days 1
News Drag queens raise holy hell in Jerusalem's only... May 6 Jesus Latter Day ... 2
News Netanyahu Makes Outrageous Claim That Palestini... (Oct '15) Apr 27 Grant Hill jr 5
News One-Man 'Rabbi for Trump' Dumps The Donald Afte... Mar '16 bernhard rosenberg 6
News Israel's Election and America's Utterly Classle... (Mar '15) Mar '16 Israel Did 911 3
News Middle Israel: Yanush Ben-Gal, Child of the Zio... Feb '16 Liberte 2
News Area mosque working to promote peace through un... Feb '16 easylayer 6
More from around the web