judge should be struck off for verdict

judge should be struck off for verdict

Posted in the Dublin, Ireland Forum

Your right

Ireland

#2 Jan 22, 2013
merkinball wrote:
By now alot of people are outraged by the verdict the so called judge Paul carney made abt that ANIMAL that got off on bail for repeatantly raping his daughter. Makes you think abt that judge doesnt it? Considering he lets off paedos n rapists, Something real dodgy abt him, would not surprise if he was 1 him self.
And for that animal that got off on bail. Age doesnt come into this he should of been obvisiouly sent down for life, but when he was seen coming out of that court he should have been fcuked down them steps of that court, and bet around the place wit his zimmerframe.
its not the first time hes done it,gone easy on paedos that is.
part of a ring id say. Your on the right track
watch

Dublin, Ireland

#6 Jan 22, 2013
Study law. It has to be taken into account what's a fair & just punishment given the guy is very ill and the action the judge took is a normal thing to do.
Do you actually know what the judge said?
So maybe learn about law even a little, ill admit its not an easy subject. The general public are idiots stop getting your opinions from tabloid newspapers.
lmao

Ireland

#9 Jan 23, 2013
aye dirty old cnut a mate of mine got a year in the joy for breaking a bouncers jaw then the likes of these scum walk free its a fcuking disgrace
watch

Dublin, Ireland

#10 Jan 23, 2013
Ha it's not opinion. It's fact it's common law, it's the way law works and the things a judge has to take into consideration. Look it up. Learn something or remain in the mob of ignorance. Just as well you have zero power in these matters.
You clearly don't possess the education to have a well informed opinion. I in no way condone the mans actions
liam

Dublin, Ireland

#11 Jan 23, 2013
merkinball wrote:
And my opinions are not coming from tabloid, its abt being right, But of course you would say that because ALL PAEDOS N RAPIST STICK TOGETHER. FCUK OFF
Your argument is a little childish man, I don't care about any of this but having read the thread you come off as a 14 year old
watch

Dublin, Ireland

#13 Jan 24, 2013
merkinball wrote:
<quoted text>So have you anything to say, Nah i didnt think so you deluded fcuk, i was right, you say education, im well educated, its obvious that you sir are completely deluded. end of.
Not so much all I said was. It's common law which it is & I understood the decision I also understand why he's changed it.
You were saying things about throwing him down steps with his frame. You are the one who resorts to aggressive posts saying ridiculous things, these things don't exude from educated people. I was demonstrating my understanding of the decision and the legal system in general. My understanding is still the same.
So......
watch

Dublin, Ireland

#15 Jan 25, 2013
merkinball wrote:
eh watever
Case in point, when faced with a factual & reasonable argument you have nothing to say apart from what somebody with the cognitive ability of a thirteen year old girl who watches too much American daytime tv.
Good luck to ya
sickof eire

Dublin, Ireland

#16 Jan 25, 2013
ANOTHER FINE EXAMPLE OF JUST HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS IMPLODING. WATCH THE RESULTS OF JUDGE EASY ON PEADOS REVOKING HIS PRIOR JUDGEMENT BASED ON THE PUBLIC REACTION. THIS WILL HAVE A PROFOUND EFFECT ON FUTURE CASES AND THAT IS WHY HIS REALESE WAS REVOKED . IT WOULD HAVE LEAD TO A PRECIDENT TO ALLOW ANY OTHER PEDO RAPEIST WITH A COUGH OR BAD BACK TO BE RELEASED BASED ON THIS PREVIOUS JUDGEMENTS. SENTANCES ARE GIVEN BY STUDTING CASE LAW OR PREVIOUS CASES OF SIMULAR COMPLIANTS
THE JUDGES ARE TO OLD AND DISCONNECTED FROM REALITY AND THE REAL WORLD THEY SHOULD ALL BE REPLACED BY PEOPLE MORE IN TOUCH AND NOT SO FAR UP THERE OWN ARSE.
ALSO NOTING IN THE NEWS ABOUT THE BUSINESS MAN TAKING ON THE GOVERMENT IN THE HIGH COURT THIS WEEK RE THE ILLEGAL PAYMENT OF BANK DEBT TO EUROPE WHICH IS AGAINST OUR WRITTEN CONSTUTION .
THIS PLACE IS IN SHITE
WE NEED TO HAVE A NEW RISING AGAINST THESE HEADS IN THERE GOLDEN CIRCLES .. IS IT ANY WONDER THE YOUTH ARE LEAVING . PATRIOSIM IS DEAD IN THIS COUNTRY AS OUR COUNTRY IS DEAD. BUT SURE KEEP ON THE BENZOS AND DAISYS AND BAGS OF GAT CUT SPRAYED STREET WEED AND WE WILL ALLL BE FINE. OR SO WE HOPE
hmmm

Dublin, Ireland

#17 Jan 26, 2013
sickof eire wrote:
ANOTHER FINE EXAMPLE OF JUST HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS IMPLODING. WATCH THE RESULTS OF JUDGE EASY ON PEADOS REVOKING HIS PRIOR JUDGEMENT BASED ON THE PUBLIC REACTION. THIS WILL HAVE A PROFOUND EFFECT ON FUTURE CASES AND THAT IS WHY HIS REALESE WAS REVOKED . IT WOULD HAVE LEAD TO A PRECIDENT TO ALLOW ANY OTHER PEDO RAPEIST WITH A COUGH OR BAD BACK TO BE RELEASED BASED ON THIS PREVIOUS JUDGEMENTS. SENTANCES ARE GIVEN BY STUDTING CASE LAW OR PREVIOUS CASES OF SIMULAR COMPLIANTS
THE JUDGES ARE TO OLD AND DISCONNECTED FROM REALITY AND THE REAL WORLD THEY SHOULD ALL BE REPLACED BY PEOPLE MORE IN TOUCH AND NOT SO FAR UP THERE OWN ARSE.
ALSO NOTING IN THE NEWS ABOUT THE BUSINESS MAN TAKING ON THE GOVERMENT IN THE HIGH COURT THIS WEEK RE THE ILLEGAL PAYMENT OF BANK DEBT TO EUROPE WHICH IS AGAINST OUR WRITTEN CONSTUTION .
THIS PLACE IS IN SHITE
WE NEED TO HAVE A NEW RISING AGAINST THESE HEADS IN THERE GOLDEN CIRCLES .. IS IT ANY WONDER THE YOUTH ARE LEAVING . PATRIOSIM IS DEAD IN THIS COUNTRY AS OUR COUNTRY IS DEAD. BUT SURE KEEP ON THE BENZOS AND DAISYS AND BAGS OF GAT CUT SPRAYED STREET WEED AND WE WILL ALLL BE FINE. OR SO WE HOPE
That case is mostly rubbish and will go nowhere that's why. What part of paying the debt is unconstitutional quote the exact line and page number
the state of eire

Dublin, Ireland

#19 Jan 30, 2013
artice 47 sentance 2.22°" Every proposal, other than a proposal to amend the Constitution, which is submitted by Referendum to the decision of the people shall for the purposes of Article 27 hereof be held to have been approved by the people unless vetoed by them in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing sub-section of this section."
a breach of duty of care to citzens article 45 sub 3 and 4
iii. That, especially, the operation of free competition shall not be allowed so to develop as to result in the concentration of the ownership or control of essential commodities in a few individuals to the common detriment.
iv. That in what pertains to the control of credit the constant and predominant aim shall be the welfare of the people as a whole.
for those who dont know
the constitution is a set of rules for the leaders of our country to govern us by. the basis of these rules is for the people of this state and there wellbeing is not effected by the actions of the nations leaders . of course it cant say "we the people dont pay bank debt" u would have to be an idiot to think that or just an ignorant who has never looked at or into how your country is run.it trought the interprition of the acts and sections that we can base and determine what is legal and just and what is not. it is put in place so minioritoes cant speak for majorities .
prehaps thats the attitude that has us here today.
do u support paying this money? or do you think it could be put to better use for the people and children of this nation ..
hmmmm

Dublin, Ireland

#20 Jan 30, 2013
the state of eire wrote:
artice 47 sentance 2.22°" Every proposal, other than a proposal to amend the Constitution, which is submitted by Referendum to the decision of the people shall for the purposes of Article 27 hereof be held to have been approved by the people unless vetoed by them in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing sub-section of this section."
a breach of duty of care to citzens article 45 sub 3 and 4
iii. That, especially, the operation of free competition shall not be allowed so to develop as to result in the concentration of the ownership or control of essential commodities in a few individuals to the common detriment.
iv. That in what pertains to the control of credit the constant and predominant aim shall be the welfare of the people as a whole.
for those who dont know
the constitution is a set of rules for the leaders of our country to govern us by. the basis of these rules is for the people of this state and there wellbeing is not effected by the actions of the nations leaders . of course it cant say "we the people dont pay bank debt" u would have to be an idiot to think that or just an ignorant who has never looked at or into how your country is run.it trought the interprition of the acts and sections that we can base and determine what is legal and just and what is not. it is put in place so minioritoes cant speak for majorities .
prehaps thats the attitude that has us here today.
do u support paying this money? or do you think it could be put to better use for the people and children of this nation ..
Of course I don't support it but its too late for that now, it's happening and there's no way if not paying without crippling the country further unfortunately.
hmmmm

Dublin, Ireland

#21 Jan 30, 2013
the state of eire wrote:
artice 47 sentance 2.22°" Every proposal, other than a proposal to amend the Constitution, which is submitted by Referendum to the decision of the people shall for the purposes of Article 27 hereof be held to have been approved by the people unless vetoed by them in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing sub-section of this section."
a breach of duty of care to citzens article 45 sub 3 and 4
iii. That, especially, the operation of free competition shall not be allowed so to develop as to result in the concentration of the ownership or control of essential commodities in a few individuals to the common detriment.
iv. That in what pertains to the control of credit the constant and predominant aim shall be the welfare of the people as a whole.
for those who dont know
the constitution is a set of rules for the leaders of our country to govern us by. the basis of these rules is for the people of this state and there wellbeing is not effected by the actions of the nations leaders . of course it cant say "we the people dont pay bank debt" u would have to be an idiot to think that or just an ignorant who has never looked at or into how your country is run.it trought the interprition of the acts and sections that we can base and determine what is legal and just and what is not. it is put in place so minioritoes cant speak for majorities .
prehaps thats the attitude that has us here today.
do u support paying this money? or do you think it could be put to better use for the people and children of this nation ..
So it's not unconstitutional that's just your interrogation of it & as I'm said that case is complete rubbish and stands no chance of success, be cool if it did though and it was actually unconstitutional
hmmmm

Dublin, Ireland

#22 Jan 30, 2013
*interpretation*
the state of eire

Dublin, Ireland

#23 Jan 31, 2013
again thats why were where we were today , people just accecepting what there told. there is plenty of options open to us as a small nation.euro and non euro options. have a look at iceland and there recovery which did not cripple its citzens.and if we were to choose to stay with germany sorry europe they 100% cant see us go broke or its the end of the eurozone.one default and we all default .we have the cards but were not playing our hand.. not one of them wants to be the one to say this is not working and all they do is blame there predicessors. if we keep going the way we are the remainder of our youth and young adults will continue as there are doing to leave this by the hundred by the day and leave our country and home to rot. mr hall stood up and out of his own hard earned money spoke for the people of this nation against these yes men and school teachers who pretend to run the country when all they do is run what euro tells them. he took a risk on yours and my behalf in an attempt to help the nation .and the only point they could pull him on is his right to bring this case forward .? sounds like the gov are grasping at straws.await the appeal and resitting of this case. and we shall see . and yes if your interpretion of the constituion is for every citizen of this country to have a say in how the country makes its decisions which impact on the citzens and effect standard of living or there well being then yes i would like to vote on if we pay or not. would u like to pay 3.1 billion per year to UNSECURED bond holders. its like asking for your lotto ticket money back when you havent won. u gamble u loose your loss simple as . and on behalf of the isle of eire thank you mr hall for bringing this case against these usless politions. if only the country had more men like you.
all law requires interpretation.
and yes its still remains an unconstitutional act to make that payment.
lets take a quick vote
y = vote
n = no vote
hmmmmm

Dublin, Ireland

#24 Jan 31, 2013
Dude I'm studying economics and that's not true. Defaulting would totally f the country more. If we don't have eu on side Ireland is totally screwed.
Fact is people should have been clued in and gave a damn when bank guarantees were being made.... You know how many people were there protesting? About 150 if even. It's all too late for this tired repeated conversation now.
I'd love if we could default & it was all that easy
hmmmmm

Dublin, Ireland

#25 Jan 31, 2013
the state of eire wrote:
again thats why were where we were today , people just accecepting what there told. there is plenty of options open to us as a small nation.euro and non euro options. have a look at iceland and there recovery which did not cripple its citzens.and if we were to choose to stay with germany sorry europe they 100% cant see us go broke or its the end of the eurozone.one default and we all default .we have the cards but were not playing our hand.. not one of them wants to be the one to say this is not working and all they do is blame there predicessors. if we keep going the way we are the remainder of our youth and young adults will continue as there are doing to leave this by the hundred by the day and leave our country and home to rot. mr hall stood up and out of his own hard earned money spoke for the people of this nation against these yes men and school teachers who pretend to run the country when all they do is run what euro tells them. he took a risk on yours and my behalf in an attempt to help the nation .and the only point they could pull him on is his right to bring this case forward .? sounds like the gov are grasping at straws.await the appeal and resitting of this case. and we shall see . and yes if your interpretion of the constituion is for every citizen of this country to have a say in how the country makes its decisions which impact on the citzens and effect standard of living or there well being then yes i would like to vote on if we pay or not. would u like to pay 3.1 billion per year to UNSECURED bond holders. its like asking for your lotto ticket money back when you havent won. u gamble u loose your loss simple as . and on behalf of the isle of eire thank you mr hall for bringing this case against these usless politions. if only the country had more men like you.
all law requires interpretation.
and yes its still remains an unconstitutional act to make that payment.
lets take a quick vote
y = vote
n = no vote
I love when people use the Iceland example. Iceland is so much more self reliant than Ireland, we rely on foreign investment & foreign services for nearly everything. Thems the facts. We ain't Iceland
margaret heneghan judge

Dublin, Ireland

#27 Jun 21, 2013
This woman heneghan needs to be voted out from court. I hope that all who comment have gone to further measures to reporting heneghan for her biased, unlawful rulings and decision making based on opinion sizing up people. Having her as your judge is horrible, even attorneys do not like dealing with her because her lack of professionalism.
Dff

Ashbourne, Ireland

#30 May 15, 2014
margaret heneghan judge wrote:
This woman heneghan needs to be voted out from court. I hope that all who comment have gone to further measures to reporting heneghan for her biased, unlawful rulings and decision making based on opinion sizing up people. Having her as your judge is horrible, even attorneys do not like dealing with her because her lack of professionalism.
I had her recently and her ruling was appalling. She is very unprofessional and completely biased.
She has destroyed my life and the lives of my children and I am not in a financial position to appeal.
yop

Dublin, Ireland

#31 May 15, 2014
Dff wrote:
<quoted text>I had her recently and her ruling was appalling. She is very unprofessional and completely biased.
She has destroyed my life and the lives of my children and I am not in a financial position to appeal.
Hate that

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Dublin, Ireland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Coke in dublin 22 min Madman67 1
Steroids. (Mar '12) 1 hr Iani 5
looking for charlie sheen ??????????? 4 hr Amish 4
fit male 5 hr Gooball 3
online 23 hr Smokie365 7
Rave scene Fri gurr13r 10
Irish bbm pins 😍 Fri PmCiYm 2
More from around the web