It sounds to me that you just levy all these unfounded accusations and you aren't sure yourself.<quoted text>
Jordan Chandler was teased and embarrassed by his classmates.
They knew he was the boy that was molested by Michael Jackson.
He did not want to testify against MJ.
MJ offered the money and they took it rather than go to trial.
It was an ordeal for Jordan and he wanted to forget about it.
The Arvizo case was 10 years later.
Janet Arvizo knew about JC's 20 million dollar settlement.
She pimped her son out to the clown.
Just because Gavin's mother was a fraud, doesn't mean zip.
Wacko still could have molested Gavin.
The mother was not on trial, MJ was.
A criminal's child can still be molested by another criminal.
But you continue to make excuses.
All MJ had to do is stop hanging with kids but he still insisted.
The facts are there that MJ desired the company of young boys.
It was everywhere in his profile and in his lifestyle.
I notice that you use words like "he could have" or "he still can", and not words like "he did".
So why levy them?
Is it out of jealousy and contempt for someone who had everything that you didn't have?
Just because someone likes amusement parks, zoo animals, and pinball machines, and what some adults might call "childish" things, doesn't make someone a pedophile.
Just because someone likes hanging around kids who love and appreciate those things, doesn't make someone a pedophile.
Just because someone is different, doesn't mean they are a pedophile.
All these things that you mentioned does show that there was motive for the Arviso's.
Your motives are also clear. You just want to try to smear the image of Michael Jackson, calling him a clown.
You are clearly just a jealous, low life loser, with no goals or accomplishments of your own. So, you have to try to tear down someone else who did have accomplishments and did make something of their life.
You have made this completely clear for all to see.