Website to remove MMR autism claim

Aug 7, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Staffordshire Newsletter

A website offering parents advice on childhood immunisation has been ordered to remove information about the MMR vaccine after renewing claims that it could be linked to autism.

Comments
1 - 20 of 20 Comments Last updated Sep 29, 2012

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#1 Aug 7, 2012
Looks like there's a crack down on misinfo sites.
iluvmy3ds

New Orleans, LA

#2 Aug 7, 2012
I always believed that the MMR vaccIne causes Autism bc my son verbal until he took his vaccines. He stopped talkIng and was dIagnosed wIth AutIsme
HumanSpirit

High Springs, FL

#4 Aug 7, 2012
Coverup. Seen this before. Shows how big medical/and pharmacutical can force medicine on the
public without discussion.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#5 Aug 8, 2012
Has nothing to do with forcing medicine without discussion. Everyone knows the worst place to get advice is from web sites which only offer opinions. Hello. The bad thing is, many people assume those opinions are facts, when they are not.
Just shows how many sites out there are out for mass manipulation based on opinion alone.
Uh Huh

Winnipeg, Canada

#6 Aug 8, 2012
friend wrote:
Has nothing to do with forcing medicine without discussion. Everyone knows the worst place to get advice is from web sites which only offer opinions. Hello. The bad thing is, many people assume those opinions are facts, when they are not.
Just shows how many sites out there are out for mass manipulation based on opinion alone.
Opinions go both ways. Vaccine maker's opinions are that the collateral damage their products cause should be ignored because of the good they do. But the good they do is so tarnished by their lies, cons and fear mongering and the collateral damage, its pathetic to view them as humanitarians. These companies have maimed and killed hundreds of thousands of consumers with faulty, fraudulent products, and at one time you could hold them responsible. Their credibility is zero. This story is just them perpetrating another con because too many people have fallen for the "Wakefield PROVES vaccines are safe" nonsense that has evolved. Those who could and should do the proper research won't. Now that they have blanket immunity from all forms of litigation, and the FDA takes all responsibility for side effects, things will only get worse. The public has now become free, unknowing test subjects who have little power to resist or fight this Pharmafia Monster. Pharma has twisted the truth until its unrecognizable.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#7 Aug 8, 2012
No, opinions don't go both ways. There are medical facts, and then there is opinions that can not be proven. Such as "These companies have maimed and killed hundreds of thousands of consumers with faulty, fraudulent products" cant be proven and it's a scare tactic, and let's not go there with VIOXX. This article is about vaccines, mainly the MMR.
HumanSpirit

High Springs, FL

#8 Aug 8, 2012
friend wrote:
Has nothing to do with forcing medicine without discussion. Everyone knows the worst place to get advice is from web sites which only offer opinions. Hello. The bad thing is, many people assume those opinions are facts, when they are not.
Just shows how many sites out there are out for mass manipulation based on opinion alone.
I disagree with you on that point lf view. I have seen website
s with 30 - 40 thousand persons warning of drug problems and the conventional medicine site giving a different point of view. Safety is in numbers not dollar bills from the pharmacutical industry to the doctors for an article.
Friend

Brossard, Canada

#10 Aug 8, 2012
iluvmy3ds wrote:
I always believed that the MMR vaccIne causes Autism bc my son verbal until he took his vaccines. He stopped talkIng and was dIagnosed wIth AutIsme
same thing happened to so many other families. they want to force the idea that vaccines are safe desperatelly. the vaccines made by same pharmaceutical which got fined 3000000000$ last week. enough is enough. help these chlidren

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#12 Aug 8, 2012
HumanSpirit wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree with you on that point lf view. I have seen website
s with 30 - 40 thousand persons warning of drug problems and the conventional medicine site giving a different point of view. Safety is in numbers not dollar bills from the pharmacutical industry to the doctors for an article.
Yea, I've seen your web sites. They're not reliable or unbiased and use scare tactics. Kind of like the web site in this article.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#13 Aug 8, 2012
Friend wrote:
<quoted text>same thing happened to so many other families. they want to force the idea that vaccines are safe desperatelly. the vaccines made by same pharmaceutical which got fined 3000000000$ last week. enough is enough. help these chlidren
There are a few pharmaceuticals that make vaccines. And everyone knows no medicine is 100 percent safe, including pharmaceuticals so anti vaxxers who keep claiming pharma's want to force the idea that they are 100 percent safe is funny to everyone. Time for anti vaxxers to use another tactic.
HumanSpirit

High Springs, FL

#15 Aug 9, 2012
friend wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I've seen your web sites. They're not reliable or unbiased and use scare tactics. Kind of like the web site in this article.
your judgement and interpetation of subject matter leaves a lot to be desired.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#16 Aug 9, 2012
Then lets see that web site, you know, the one which 30 - 40 thousand persons warning of drug problems.
HumanSpirit

High Springs, FL

#17 Aug 9, 2012
friend wrote:
Then lets see that web site, you know, the one which 30 - 40 thousand persons warning of drug problems.
May even be more. Will transfer to my tablet to post..mean while..a reposting.

Historic Precedent

In the momentous article "Medical Science Under Dictator-ship," Dr. Leo Alexander, the chief U.S. medical consultant at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, examined "the process by which the German medical profession became a willing and unquestioning collaborator with the Nazis." He noted the early changes in medical attitudes that predisposed German physicians to first collect data on their patients to conduct what today we call "cost-effective analysis," and then to use the latter information as a vehicle to commit medical genocide under the auspices of the totalitarianism of National Socialism. Dr. Alexander warns us that "from small beginnings" the values of an entire society may be subverted, leading to the horrors of a police state. The "small beginnings" in Nazi Germany that Dr. Alexander referred to first led the physicians to collect data from their patients and then violate their patients' privacy and medical record confidentiality by supplying the information to the state.(6) Organizations with humanitarian-sounding names were set up in Nazi Germany to institute "health" programs, under deceptive, euphemistic terms. For example, questionnaires collected by a "Realm's Work Committee of Institutions for Cure and Care" gathered and reported information on patients who had been ill five years or more and who were unable to work. "On the basis of name, race, marital status, nationality, next of kin, whether regularly visited and by whom, who bore financial responsibility, and so forth," decisions were ultimately made for the patient euthanasia program heralded by the Nazi government for the good of the state and the "health of the nation." The first steps taken toward barbarism were the result of the physicians' willingness to participate in patient data collection and the violation of medical privacy. "Corrosion," as Dr. Alexander wrote, "begins in microscopic proportions." German physicians were, more than any other profession, heavily represented in the Nazi Party, which they joined in droves. German psychiatrists were no exception, and they also enthusiastically supported Nazi Germany's gun control laws of 1938 that disarmed the civilian population and left a monopoly of force in the hands of the German military and the SS. The rest, as we say, is history.

AMA Becomes Political

As to the commitment of the AMA to weakening medical privacy and individual-based ethics in favor of population-based ethics and achieve a partnership with government, there is no longer any doubt.(7,8) In the case of the American Psychiatric Association, one only has to peruse its position statement on homicide prevention and gun control promulgated by its leadership as early as 1993: "In view of the need to reinforce individual and group sanctions against the use of violence as a social instrument, behavioral mode, or adaptorional [sic] pattern, as psychiatrists have done with drug abuse, suicidal actions, and antisocial behavior, the American Psychiatric Association recommends that strong controls be placed on the availability of all types of firearms to private citizens."(9) Why would the AMA and organized medicine become involved in this politically expedient but potentially explosive issue of gun control and condone the systematic violation of the privacy of vulnerable patients?

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#19 Aug 9, 2012
That isn't a web site, but a mass copy and paste you're doing from one forum to another.
HumanSpirit

High Springs, FL

#21 Aug 9, 2012
friend wrote:
That isn't a web site, but a mass copy and paste you're doing from one forum to another.
Can't you read. I stated that I would transfer the information to my tablet from my database when I get the time. The above is for your interest (if any) in reading while you wait. There are many similarities to your postings from the above as the reason for entertaining your time.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#23 Aug 10, 2012
No one reads your rants. If you cant provide a link, then just say so.
HumanSpirit

High Springs, FL

#24 Aug 10, 2012
friend wrote:
No one reads your rants. If you cant provide a link, then just say so.
You mean you don't read logical reasoning because you don't know how many pass through the forum . Don't try to support your position on the backs of the unknown.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#25 Aug 10, 2012
You are severely off topic and using this and many other forums as a area to promote your rants which have little, if any value. You are using Nazi propaganda to promote fears in others.
Pharma Maims Kills

Winnipeg, Canada

#28 Aug 27, 2012
friend wrote:
You are severely off topic and using this and many other forums as a area to promote your rants which have little, if any value. You are using Nazi propaganda to promote fears in others.
YA VOL
Pharma Maims Kills

Winnipeg, Canada

#29 Sep 29, 2012
Censorship is used in communist countries to control public opinion.ooks like the USA is becoming a communist country.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Vaccinations Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hey, where is everybody? The "CDC whistleblower... 3 hr DD Neuropsychologist 15
Revealed: Worst child vaccination regions Wed ANTI VACCINE UNDE... 1
Congressman Posey discusses autism, vaccines an... Wed ANTI VACCINE UNDE... 1
Officials worry over rise in unvaccinated children Aug 25 MMR CAUSES AUTISM 1
Researcher Claims Absolutely No Vaccine-Autism ... Aug 25 MMR CAUSES AUTISM 2
Study: Combining vaccines boosts polio immunity Aug 21 WARNING FDA APPROVED 1
Mountainview Animal Hospital Aug 21 Jesus RamirIez 11
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Vaccinations People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••