FDA Approves New Drug to Treat Advanc...

FDA Approves New Drug to Treat Advanced Prostate Cancer

There are 3 comments on the KVOR-AM Colorado Springs story from Sep 3, 2012, titled FDA Approves New Drug to Treat Advanced Prostate Cancer. In it, KVOR-AM Colorado Springs reports that:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Friday approved a new drug to treat advanced prostate cancer that isn't responding to other therapies, Health Day reports.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KVOR-AM Colorado Springs.

FDA Maims Kills

Winnipeg, Canada

#1 Sep 3, 2012
FDA approval means the maker can not be sued no matter how much it maims and kills. It means a real life safety test will take place as doctors distribute this new miracle wonder drug to unknowing patients. Remember the FDA approved MERCK'S VIOXX that killed between 55,000 and 250,000. No owner or MERCK employee was ever charged criminally. A crime against humanity and law enforcement nowhere to be seen.

Lake Butler, FL

#2 Sep 4, 2012
Obama removed the FDA ability to allow the pharmacutical industry a free pass on defective medications...read below.

Thanks Obama


Obama’s Preemption Memo: Limiting Regulatory Preemption of State Common Law Claims By Matt Melamed, Public Justice Kazan-Wallace Fellow

On May 20, 2009, President Obama reversed one of the most nefarious practices of the Bush administration by issuing a memorandum (Preemption Memo) aimed at curbing federal preemption by regulatory fiat.

The Bush Administration’s Stealth Tort Reform Effort


The most notorious example of this practice is the preamble to a 2006 United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling regulation, which states that the FDA’s approval of a prescription drug’s label “preempts conflicting or contrary State law,” including lawsuits seeking to hold drug manufacturers liable for failing adequately to warn of a drug’s dangers. 71 Fed. Reg. 3922, 3934-35 (2006). This preemption preamble was particularly egregious because it represented a 180-degree reversal of the FDA’s prior views on the matter: before the Bush administration took power, the FDA enthusiastically endorsed tort litigation as complementing the agency’s ability to ensure the safety of prescription drugs.(As discussed below, in Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S. Ct. 1187 (2009),the U.S. Supreme Court held that the 2006 labeling regulation’s preemptive preamble was not entitled to any deference.)

The intention behind this and other Bush-era preemption preambles is clear: by attempting to strip consumers of their rights to sue, the Bush administration was pandering to the business community, which seeks at all costs to immunize itself from tort liability. Indeed, Bush administration officials had an unusually close relationship with the industries they regulated. Again, the 2006 FDA labeling regulation is instructive. As first proposed, the preamble to the labeling regulation specifically stated that the FDA did not intend to preempt state law failure-to-warn claims. See Press Release, American Association for Justice, supra. Less than six months before issuing the final regulation, FDA’s chief counsel met with legal representatives from the largest pharmaceutical companies. Id. After the meeting, the preamble was changed to state that FDA approval of a drug label preempted state common law failure-to-warn claims.

Lake Butler, FL

#3 Sep 4, 2012
Suing is an important safe guard in our democracy. Even a brain dead Republican uttering the same cloning words of losing our democracy, loss of freedom, to which the Republicans caused would have to agree for their own safety and that of their families. Now if your given the Statin drugs and lose your memory you may have a chance like the couch potatoe, Republican "Drug America" mind drugs that were introduced by the Bush Sr presidency to sue.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Prostate Cancer Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 10 commandments of cancer prevention (May '09) 3 hr hellen97 29
GreenLight Laser Surgery Complications (May '07) Wed Reeder 1,449
Plasma button surgery for BPH (Dec '11) Wed Matt in Pasadena 210
News Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Opens Prostate Can... Sep 29 Stephany McDowell 1
prostate pain at night? (Jan '11) Sep 27 Mathew 36
green light laser side effects (Sep '15) Aug '16 ixtl 16
Irritated Prostate After Sex? (Mar '09) Jul '16 Walter Mathau 7
More from around the web