MRSA jumps sixfold among people with HIV

MRSA jumps sixfold among people with HIV

There are 47 comments on the Gay.com story from Mar 15, 2006, titled MRSA jumps sixfold among people with HIV. In it, Gay.com reports that:

Gus Cairns www.guscairns.com more articles by Gus Cairns Sexually-transmitted infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , the notorious bug responsible for the flesh-eating disease necrotising ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Gay.com.

MRSA-GA

Atlanta, GA

#21 Aug 26, 2006
Just a quick response to say that this proves the ignorance of all people, you have chosen to have arguement over gays when there is truely a problem with this infection. The infection has attacked a variety of people from heterosexual, homosexual, dogs, children, women, men, etc. This is more serious than having judgemnet over someone because of their sexual orientation, race, or what have you. It is usually people like you that due to ignorance get a disease because you know nothing about the real world.
MJM

Dallas, TX

#22 Aug 26, 2006
The Solution wrote:
I dont understand why this study is so shocking that it would make any topic. Of course MRSA is six fold that because of a comprimised immune system. What rocket scientist made this discovery? I could have told them this. I need to have my own forum: News Flash People need Oxygen to Live.
Call it:

Saliva will kill you, but only if taken in small quantities over a long period of time.
MJM

Dallas, TX

#23 Aug 26, 2006
MRSA-GA wrote:
Just a quick response to say that this proves the ignorance of all people, you have chosen to have arguement over gays when there is truely a problem with this infection. The infection has attacked a variety of people from heterosexual, homosexual, dogs, children, women, men, etc. This is more serious than having judgemnet over someone because of their sexual orientation, race, or what have you. It is usually people like you that due to ignorance get a disease because you know nothing about the real world.
Sounds to me from the article that the gays are getting it in higher numbers, but maybe that's because they're attacking homosexuals, heterosexuals, dogs, children...

Hey blog guru, is there anything that we can do about the gay.com picture up there? It's giving me the willies.
MRSA-GA

Atlanta, GA

#25 Aug 28, 2006
There are many other pictures that could be placed there, so you should not complain. Again the issue is not the picture it is you.
MRSA-GA

Atlanta, GA

#26 Aug 28, 2006
The numbers are somewhat higher but look at the numbers that are proven and then look at the cases that are not reported. Its just as any other disease whether you get it from just basic contact from a handrail, using drugs, sex, or who knows if it is aitborne. The fact is that it did not start in gays necessarily, I believe that it started in hospitals!
MJM wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds to me from the article that the gays are getting it in higher numbers, but maybe that's because they're attacking homosexuals, heterosexuals, dogs, children...
Hey blog guru, is there anything that we can do about the gay.com picture up there? It's giving me the willies.
MJM

Arlington, TX

#27 Aug 28, 2006
That sounds really gay to me.
Hale Bopp

United States

#28 Aug 28, 2006
MRSA-GA wrote:
The numbers are somewhat higher but look at the numbers that are proven and then look at the cases that are not reported. Its just as any other disease whether you get it from just basic contact from a handrail, using drugs, sex, or who knows if it is aitborne. The fact is that it did not start in gays necessarily, I believe that it started in hospitals!
<quoted text>
Can you prove that it was not started by homosexuals?
That picture is making me nauseous.
MJM

Arlington, TX

#30 Aug 28, 2006
Art Bell wrote:
Is that a picture of a chupacabra?
Aren't you supposed to be in the Philipines?
MRSA-GA

Atlanta, GA

#31 Aug 28, 2006
Can you prove that it was?
And I think I like the look of whats in the picture!
Hale Bopp wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you prove that it was not started by homosexuals?
That picture is making me nauseous.
Hale Bopp

United States

#32 Aug 29, 2006
MRSA-GA wrote:
Can you prove that it was?
And I think I like the look of whats in the picture!
<quoted text>
The disease was first uncovered in homosexual men from Manhattan. Any medicine journal will tell you this.

Of course you like the picture, you are a pervert. If it had a man kissing the breast of a woman, I would still be repulsed.
CanDid

AOL

#33 Aug 29, 2006
Hale Bopp wrote:
<quoted text>
The disease was first uncovered in homosexual men from Manhattan. Any medicine journal will tell you this.
Of course you like the picture, you are a pervert. If it had a man kissing the breast of a woman, I would still be repulsed.
Sorry Hale Bopp but you're going to have to prove that if you want any credibility in this. Just saying it appears in medical journals is not enough. Cite some specifics because I, for one, think you're wrong.
Saying something is true based solely on your personal prejudices doesn't cut it.
Hale Bopp

United States

#34 Aug 29, 2006
CanDid wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Hale Bopp but you're going to have to prove that if you want any credibility in this. Just saying it appears in medical journals is not enough. Cite some specifics because I, for one, think you're wrong.
Saying something is true based solely on your personal prejudices doesn't cut it.
Do your own research. I don't get paid to do that. More people would agree with me than disagree.
MJM

Euless, TX

#35 Aug 29, 2006
CanDid wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Hale Bopp but you're going to have to prove that if you want any credibility in this. Just saying it appears in medical journals is not enough. Cite some specifics because I, for one, think you're wrong.
Saying something is true based solely on your personal prejudices doesn't cut it.
I wouldn't be repulsed by the breast kissing. I would have to make myself look away, though. I try to avoid crap that stimulates the non mental and bad decision making blood flow.
CanDid

AOL

#36 Aug 30, 2006
Hale Bopp wrote:
<quoted text>
Do your own research. I don't get paid to do that. More people would agree with me than disagree.
You are the one making the claim which you say is referenced in medical books. You don't want to do the research don't make unfounded statements. Your outburst is for you to prove not for anyone else to disprove.
I know the truth because I've written several extensive and published articles on MRSA. I don't need to do any more research.
You just seem to enjoy making outlandish claims which you cannot verify simply to assuage your juvenile anger.
That's just silly. So, put your proof where your mouth is.
Hale Bopp

United States

#37 Aug 30, 2006
MJM wrote:
<quoted text>
I wouldn't be repulsed by the breast kissing. I would have to make myself look away, though. I try to avoid crap that stimulates the non mental and bad decision making blood flow.
When I was in my 20's I had the same issues. After doing the right thing for so long, not forced but just because it is the right thing, the desire will leave.
Hale Bopp

United States

#38 Aug 30, 2006
CanDid wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one making the claim which you say is referenced in medical books. You don't want to do the research don't make unfounded statements. Your outburst is for you to prove not for anyone else to disprove.
I know the truth because I've written several extensive and published articles on MRSA. I don't need to do any more research.
You just seem to enjoy making outlandish claims which you cannot verify simply to assuage your juvenile anger.
That's just silly. So, put your proof where your mouth is.
BWHAHAHAH you have not wrote anything on the whole MRSA thing or you wouldn't even have to question wherre in American and in what group AIDS was first discovered.
CanDid

AOL

#39 Aug 30, 2006
Hale Bopp wrote:
<quoted text>
BWHAHAHAH you have not wrote anything on the whole MRSA thing or you wouldn't even have to question wherre in American and in what group AIDS was first discovered.
I don't question it. I question you and your unverified statements of where it came from. I've never made any such unlearned statements as you and I've never asked you a question.
I don't care if you believe that I've written any articles or not. I'm not attempting to prove anything to you except that you are an uniformed blowhard.
The challenge stands. Prove where you got your information if you can.
You won't because you can't. All you can do is yell and expect that to be enough. It isn't.
Valerie

Richardsville, VA

#40 Nov 7, 2006
Klaatu Nikto wrote:
<quoted text>I have mexicans that tend to my needs. It affords me time to indulge on the internet. Don't you have a leaf blower that requires your attention?
Oh, go drink some Romulin ale, you racist MF., and beem yourself off the planet earth!
Valerie

Richardsville, VA

#41 Nov 7, 2006
Klaatu Nikto wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, and it stands to reason that playing with the posterior of a nasty, dirty man is not a good idea.
The reason why People with HIV or AIDS is at a higher risk for MRSA or flesh eating bacteria is the same reason they are at a higher risk for pneumonia and other common infections. They Have a Compromised immune system due to HIV! Duh!
earl the pearl

United States

#45 Dec 1, 2006
Valerie wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason why People with HIV or AIDS is at a higher risk for MRSA or flesh eating bacteria is the same reason they are at a higher risk for pneumonia and other common infections. They Have a Compromised immune system due to HIV! Duh!
i don't understand why you blinded comatosed slaves haven't noticed that you are SLAVES. You take homw a portion of what you earned, due to that you pay for insurance that is completely unnecessary, and then you have to borrow to make ends meet. You borrow from the same fools who are stealing your earned money calling it withholding and your dumb ass doesn't realize that if someone even your own govn't takes what you earned before you get it, you have PAID anything you have been RIPPED OFF. You can't pay for something with money you never got. You simply have a huge AR account from your employer. Your income is what you have under your control, if you never have control of the money owed to you then the person who owes it to you never reliquished ownership of it. Therefore, your employer is the one paying your taxes and SSI... not half of it all of it. Then he puts that in his books as employee expenes (taxes) which is added to his overhead and included in the price of his goods/services. He then recups his overhead including the employee taxes when he sells his goods/services. When YOU buy his goods and services then you compensate him for his cost or overhead (which includes employee taxes,SSI and insurance)plus a profit. THAT'S WHEN YOU PAY TAXES. Then what is withholding. It is stealing theft by deception.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

HIV/AIDS Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Anxiety of getting infected, request your advice 23 hr sub12345 1
News Limehouse nurse - excited' about mission to Uganda (Jan '10) Mon Meanwhile back home 3
News Google Play, B cells and a genetic crusader Sun Cath League of Du... 7
hiv anonymous chat room (Oct '12) Sun ChloChlo 2,338
HIV Scare Story for Those Worried (Jun '14) Sun MrDumbass 53
Donna marie battaglia Jan 17 canjunking 2
News New Circumcision and Sexual Satisfaction Study ... (Jan '08) Jan 16 tom 180
More from around the web