Pray for me when you go to church this weekend.On the plus side, he has demonstrated he can count to at least THREE! Looks like that home-schooling is really paying off.
Immunizations are one of the most efficient and cost-effective ways to protect children against childhood diseases and Tennessee law requires documented immunizations.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chattanoogan.com.
#9233 Apr 11, 2014
#9236 Apr 12, 2014
Do you understand this vaccine is given on the day of birth to infants who are not at risk for the disease?
Do you understand the 17 billion $$$ motive?
Do you understand a 9 month old SUFFERED & DIED?
#9237 Apr 12, 2014
The first statement needs to be clarified. Which disease is being discussed here? How does one know about the risk--and when the infant will be at risk.
The money issue is a red herring. It is an example of the poison well fallacy.
The last statement is an instance of arguing from anecdotal evidence. Are you suggesting that the vaccination is harmful for everyone because it of that one 9 month old?
I ask again: are you arguing that the practice of immunization does more harm than good?
#9238 Apr 12, 2014
Sure I do!!
You gave me fortune, you gave me fame! You gave power all in your god's name! I'm every person, you need to be! I'm.... an..... Arm-....a....dill....oooo....! !!
#9239 Apr 13, 2014
If only a sane person could take you seriously.
#9240 Apr 13, 2014
Leave it up to the family or the state?
1. IFNO, it should be left up to the family to pay all the hospital bills fot any illness.
2. IF YES, then the insurance company should pay all the bills.
#9241 Apr 13, 2014
I thought you could follow our conversation.
Obviously, I overestimated your ability to follow the thread.
1. Do you understand this vaccine is given on the day of birth to infants who are not at risk for the disease?
Hep B vaccine
2. Do you understand the 17 billion $$$ motive?
Profit, shielded from any and all liability
3. Do you understand a 9 month old SUFFERED & DIED?
From Lupus, which is a "table injury" established by medical evidence recognized as being triggered by the Hep B vaccine.
That's what table injuries are....medically accepted vaccine injuries.
You can't even figure out how to turn on the spell check option in your browser, much less follow the "reply's" I've quoted to help you keep up.
If you can't stay on topic, spell or follow a simple thread, perhaps this isn't the thread for you.
#9243 Apr 13, 2014
I asked you a simple question and you get nasty, and you neglected to answer the question.
Speaking of off topic, The spell checker comment itslf is off topic.
Regarding 1, see
Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for:
All infants, starting with the first dose of Hepatitis B vaccine at birth
So, here is a simple question. Does this practice do more harm than good?
You cannot claim, with a straight face that this question is off-topic.
3. Am i suppose to conclude that from one psrson (that is what you have stated twice) that one child has died from a vaccination then the vaccine is does more harm to the population than good.
Yes, there are "medically recognized" injuries that are attributes to vaccinations, but "medically acceptable" has a negative connotations which have no place in a rational discussion.
We are dealing with the same question as in 1. above.
Perhaps I am on the wrong post. But not for the reasons you provided. Rather, it is because your hostility reveals a lack of intellectual honesty and unwillingness to entertain questions about your position. I suspect that you are not clear a out the moral principle upon which your opinion is grounded.
#9244 Apr 13, 2014
No, not really.
The opinion on the Hep B vaccine was decided decades ago.
It's difficult to take you seriously when simple spelling errors which are easily prevented escape you.
Now, actually go back in the records, cited literature, the Office of Special Masters in VICP and read.....learn.
Read journal studies from the 1950's & beyond, not just the studies printed in English, translate studies.
Gain a more rounded understanding.
Until then. You simply lack the background to speak (or even spell) intelligently on the subject.
We know there is a subset of genetically predisposed individuals who should not receive vaccines.
The Hannah Polings & Bailey Banks of the world.
Underlying conditions which are easily identified.
Simply spare them
Maybe we just have an epidemic of better diagnosticians? <<<(that's a joke, in case you didn't get it)
#9245 Apr 13, 2014
Thank you for confirming my suspicions. As of yet, you have not answered my queation.
You can read all the studies you wish, but unless you have been trained in the interpretation of medical literature then it is hard to for me to take your claims as being well-considered and informed.(In response to you comments about my proofreading.). Your repeated references to individual incidents suggests a lack of understanding of what constitutes scientific evidence. Again: does immunization do more harm than good?
It is to be noted that there are established criteria for being granted exemption from certain immunization requirements.
I repeat, your attitude is hostile. A number of your comments are on the level of calling people who question your pronouncements "dumb@sses". That is evidence that you cannot, or are not willing to, distinguish the issue at hand from a person expressing a judgment about that issue.
It is apparent that many on this thread are more interested in stroking each others egos than in furthering understanding of the topic.
#9246 Apr 13, 2014
I'm not hostile. I'm bored.
Pop for a subscription to medscape or plos one.
Go back in published literature, to the time before medical schools were funded by the pharmaceutical industry....before the American Academy of Pediatrics got their cushy new offices paid for by Merck & Friends.
And so I don't come off as an ass, have a nice night.
#9248 Apr 14, 2014
If you were bored, you would refrain from responding to my boring posts.
Again, you are unwilling or unable to answer the very basic question. Nor, have you shown evidence that you have the training to interpret medical research.
For those two reasons,
I question the veracity of your last statement.
#9250 Apr 14, 2014
You are such a pr!ck Armad1ldo. No wonder people make fun of you. Jerk.
#9251 Apr 14, 2014
A fully vaccinated 22 year old woman contracted measles and transmitted it to other people. This is a first - supposedly.
Of course the study authors couldn't help taking a pot shot at non-vaxxers at the end of the story but they do explain this is a case of "vaccine failure".
Vaccine failure is happening more and more: just think of the recent measles, pertussis, and mumps outbreaks affecting thousands of fully vaccinated people.
Moreover, vaccine induced immunity is not permanent. There are likely tens of millions of Americans walking around with no vaccine produced "protection" from measles and yet everyone is not contracting measles.
The idea of herd immunity is a farce as it relates to vaccination induced immunity. This notion is becoming increasingly clear as more and more cases of vaccine failure occur.
#9252 Apr 14, 2014
For the past several years, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been actively promoting the shingles vaccine as the solution to what some experts say is a building shingles epidemic. But a new study published in the German medical journal Der Hautarzt, or “The Dermatologist” in English, has revealed that the childhood vaccine for chicken pox, a common viral disease related to shingles, may actually be directly responsible for triggering this epidemic.
Also known clinically as varicella-zoster virus, chicken pox is a relatively mild form of herpes virus that typically manifests itself during the early childhood years. Nearly all children who develop the condition at a young age, in fact, never develop it again, and are also usually imparted with lifelong immunity to both VZV and its relative, herpes zoster, a more severe form of the disease commonly referred to as shingles.
According to the new study; however, getting vaccinated with the chicken pox vaccine, which first became commercially available in the U.S. back in 1995, could damage this natural immune cycle. Based on the available data, getting vaccinated for chicken pox may end up blocking the mechanisms the body uses to develop its own natural immunity to both chicken pox and shingles, causing much worse infection later on down the road.
A five-year-old girl, it turns out, was found recently to have developed severe symptoms of shingles not long after being vaccinated for chicken pox. Researchers from Helios Klinikum in Germany conducted a direct immunofluorescence assay on the child to look for evidence of the vaccine strain in the infection, and found that the vaccine strain had, indeed, caused the child to become infected with the much more severe shingles virus.
“This case demonstrates that a negative VZV direct immunofluorescence assay does not exclude an infection with the vaccine strain,” wrote the authors in their study abstract, which you can view here:
#9253 Apr 14, 2014
A very clear example of the way that a drug company can profit from one vaccine increasing the need for another vaccine. Prevnar 7 and Prevnar 13 both increase staphylococcal infections.
Guess what Pfizer has in their pipeline?
A vaccine against staph.
#9254 Apr 14, 2014
The study is particularly noteworthy because it was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial—and the researchers used saline solution, a genuinely inactive placebo, as a standin for the trivalent flu vaccine. Most vaccine trials utilize active placebos, which are substances that include ingredients used in the vaccines, making the studies meaningless—though this fact is almost never revealed.
While the government in the U.S. continues to resist doing a true study on vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children or adults, stating that such a study would be “unethical”, researchers in Hong Kong have conducted a true vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study on the influenza vaccine. This is probably one of the few, if not only, true study conducted in recent times where a real placebo was actually used and compared to the vaccine. The results are quite remarkable, suggesting that it is unethical NOT to pursue more studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. People receiving the flu vaccine suffered from other respiratory infections at a rate 5.5 times more than the placebo group.
#9255 Apr 14, 2014
14 pages of citations to medical journal articles showing vaccines followed by disease.
#9256 Apr 14, 2014
T DAP paralyze me for two weeks when I was young but It was a allergic reaction. so without reading everyone else's notes i'm going to say. no the one size fits all not always a good thing. but i'm also going to say we have done a lot of good with immunization. the CDC and FDA need to do more research to fix these little problems. not all doctors are here to help. I would have to say more than half of them are only in it for the money not to help the sick.
#9257 Apr 14, 2014
Your post suggests Tat you are among the ten year olds that post on topics.
Add your comments below
|Hepatitis A Outbreak: Victims File a Lawsuit Ag...||Apr 20||Suxazz||2|
|Lawsuit settled in Hepatitis A outbreak at Mila... (Jul '10)||Mar '18||Dearly||7|
|Officials issue blood-infection warning to Lond...||Jan '18||small and large p...||1|
|New immunizations required for Kentucky students||Jan '18||VACCINES MAIM KILL||1|
|More than one third of U.S. HIV patients fail t...||Dec '17||LIAM||1|
|cured with herbal medicine (Feb '17)||Dec '17||LIAM||2|
|It's now much easier to give blood if you're a ...||Nov '17||Ex Senator Santpo...||23|
Find what you want!
Search Hepatitis Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC