Roche, ImmunoGen Bullseye Breast-Canc...

Roche, ImmunoGen Bullseye Breast-Cancer Drug Wins Approval

There are 1 comment on the The Washington Post story from Feb 22, 2013, titled Roche, ImmunoGen Bullseye Breast-Cancer Drug Wins Approval. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

Roche Holding AG and ImmunoGen Inc. won U.S. approval for a breast cancer therapy that's designed to narrowly target the disease.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Since: Dec 05

Reading, PA

#1 Feb 22, 2013
In regards to response to anti-HER2 therapy after treatment with Kadcyla, I’ve heard from breast cancer patients who were bumped from the T-DM1 clinical trial because of disease progression, which meant that their cancer was growing despite the drug. Bumped off the trial because of disease progression? Wonder how many more patients there were like this?

Response rates (how much a tumor decreased in size) can be inflated when excluding patients during clinical trials (evaluable patients). Patients not considered “evaluable” are often those who do not get the benefit of an entire treatment plan. The response rate is calculated after removing patients, who die or have been excluded, from the calculation. This inflates the response rate.

But clinical oncologists want to publish their papers. They need to report on the outcomes of their experiments, but if they had to wait for survival data, it could take years until all the data was aggregated. That wouldn’t bode well for them to participate in pharma-sponsored trials in the future.

Response rates give clinical oncologists the opportunity to take a more optimistic look at therapies that have limited success. They can describe results as being complete remission, partial remission or simply clinical improvement.

If they treat all patients for three weeks, they can fairly evaluate the efficacy of a compound, which takes that lone (on average) before it can be regarded as effective. If they disregard all patients who die or were excluded after onset of therapy, and include only those treated three weeks or more, they can improve their data.

To justify their existence, they have to publish papers. That’s what they do.

http://cancerfocus.org/forum/showthread.php...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cancer Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Suzanne Somers loves bioidentical hormones (Jun '09) Wed Chaimpie 93
Itchy skin and fatigue - Help please :) Wed joshd33 1
LANGHAM CANCER RESEARCH @DERBY uk (Jul '13) Jul 24 andrew john langham 26
ESCOZUL is healing cancer patients (Mar '07) Jul 3 Anonymous 163
News Jerry Davich: Guys, time to talk frankly about ... (Aug '11) Jun 30 Joe2242 7
News VP Joe Biden Set for In-Depth Interview with NB... Jun 29 Teresa 3
News Racially biased cancer doctors spend less time ... Jun '16 Summer Friend 6
More from around the web