Dako receives FDA approval of a genetic test for patients with breast cancer
Since: Dec 05
#1 Jan 16, 2008
The headlong rush to develop tests to identify molecular predisposing mechansims still does not guarantee that a drug will be effective for an individual patient. Nor can they, for any patient or even large group of patients, discriminate the potential for clinical activity among different agents of the same class.
Genetic profiles are able to help doctors determine which patients will probably develop cancer, and those who will most likely relapse. However, it cannot be suitable for specific treatments for "individual" patients.
Cancer cells often have many mutations in many different pathways, so even if one route is shut down by a targeted treatment, the cancer cell may be able to use other routes. Targeting one pathway may not be as effective as targeting multiple pathways in a cancer cell.
Another challenge is to identify for which patients the targeted treatment will be effective. Tumors can become resistant to a targeted treatment, or the drug no longer works, even if it has previously been effective in shrinking a tumor. Drugs are combined with existing ones to target the tumor more effectively. Most cancers cannot be effectively treated with targeted drugs alone.
Gene profiling tests, important in order to identify new therapeutic targets and thereby to develop useful drugs, are still years away from working successfully in predicting treatment response for "individual" patients. Perhaps this is because they are performed on dead, preserved cells that were never actually exposed to the drugs whose activity they are trying to assess.
It will never be as effective as the cell "function" method, which exists today and is not hampered by the problems associated with genetic tests. That is because they measure the net effect of all processes within the cancer, acting with and against each other in real time, and it tests living cells actually exposed to drugs and drug combinations of interest.
The key to understanding the genome is understanding how cells work. The ultimate driver is a "functional" assay (is the cell being killed regardless of the mechanism) as opposed to a "target" assay (does the cell express a particular target that the drug is supposed to be attacking). While a "target" assay tells you whether or not to give "one" drug, a "functional" assay can find other compounds and combinations and can recommend them from the one assay.
The core of the functional assay is the cell, composed of hundreds of complex molecules that regulate the pathways necessary for vital cellular functions. If a "targeted" drug could perturb any one of these pathways, it is important to examine the effects of the drug within the context of the cell. Both genomics and proteomics can identify potential new therapeutic targets, but these targets require the determination of cellular endpoints.
Cell-based functional assays are being used for screening compounds for efficacy and biosafety. The ability to track the behavior of cancer cells permits data gathering on functional behavior not available in any other kind of assays.
#2 Sep 23, 2013
I have ordered 2 times from this website PILLSMEDSHOP. COM . I called yesterday the customer care and asked for a discount as i was about to order twice the regular amount.
Add your comments below
|I'm scared I might have male breast cancer =(!(... (Oct '06)||22 hr||Embarrassed||864|
|Varicose Veins: Fact, Fiction, & Cure (Mar '14)||Dec 15||Paul Bear||4|
|Banned DNA test kits hit UK stores||Dec 4||Kid_Tomorrow||1|
|weight loss forum||Dec 4||laura adams||1|
|Angelina Jolie is smoking cigarettes after canc...||Dec 3||bappy das||4|
|Am free from breast cancer.||Nov 28||Yolande14||1|
|Support people and their families who have brea...||Nov 19||Mom who had breas...||2|
Find what you want!
Search Breast Cancer Forum Now
Copyright © 2014 Topix LLC