Jenny McCarthy's Shocking Vaccine Com...

Jenny McCarthy's Shocking Vaccine Comments: Defying Doctors' Advice?

There are 24 comments on the HollywoodLife story from Apr 13, 2014, titled Jenny McCarthy's Shocking Vaccine Comments: Defying Doctors' Advice?. In it, HollywoodLife reports that:

Jenny McCarthy claims she isn't totally 'anti-vaccine,' but the comedian's previous anti-vaccine statement has led millions to not vaccinate their children against deadly diseases.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at HollywoodLife.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
sam

Saint-hubert, Canada

#1 Apr 13, 2014
love u jenny

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#2 Apr 14, 2014
That's right, whatever happened to critical thinking? Where one would make medical decisions based off what some non medical person thinks? Or believing everything one says because one has an adolescent love affair fantasy about them?

Science doesn't work that way, which is a bummer for McCarthy, and the media knows it and why? They never lost their critical thinking.
friend Knuckle Dragger

Winnipeg, Canada

#3 Apr 14, 2014
friend wrote:
That's right, whatever happened to critical thinking? Where one would make medical decisions based off what some non medical person thinks? Or believing everything one says because one has an adolescent love affair fantasy about them?
Science doesn't work that way, which is a bummer for McCarthy, and the media knows it and why? They never lost their critical thinking.
Who cares about your dumb thoughts?

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#4 Apr 14, 2014
Obviously more than who care about your anti vaxxer debunked thoughts.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#5 Apr 14, 2014
friend wrote:
Obviously more than who care about your anti vaxxer debunked thoughts.
Fortunately that is very true.
ric99

Winnipeg, Canada

#6 Apr 14, 2014
R C Honey wrote:
<quoted text>Fortunately that is very true.
duh

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#7 Apr 14, 2014
That's about all one can expect from anti vaxxers who cant support their claims: pretending to be someone else (location gives you away) and do they dazzle us with evidence to back up that claim? No. They dazzle us with a 3 letter word.
Vaccines Cause Autism

Winnipeg, Canada

#9 Apr 15, 2014
friend wrote:
That's about all one can expect from anti vaxxers who cant support their claims: pretending to be someone else (location gives you away) and do they dazzle us with evidence to back up that claim? No. They dazzle us with a 3 letter word.
duh

“Opposing Evil, Helping Good”

Since: Feb 14

EVERYWHERE!!!

#10 Apr 21, 2014
Hi all. Let me explain something about the user from Winnipeg.

Long-story-short, he/she is a classic textbook example of a troll. Doesn't care one way or another, about the issues. Just goes around, and takes which ever side most people are against, and posts irrelevant, inflammatory, and nonsensical comments, designed to generate a response out of serious users.

At first I was surprised to see this user on these threads, because I know that that user normally works the threads on the Health forum (and it's sub-forums).

However, then I checked and this thread is also on the Health forum (Surprisingly, I'm actually coming in from the Celebrities forum, this time, lol.) And you can also also find this thread on the Jenny McCarthy forum, and a bunch of others. It's pretty much a Topix thing (although certain other forum sites do it that way also).

Anyway, I just wanted to be sure everyone knows not to take the Winnipeg user seriously. You can read more at this link:

http://www.topix.com/forum/health/smoking/TNI...

And btw, when I posted that post, the trolling stopped, for like HOURS! Like almost a day!!! They were ABSOLUTELY STUNNED that I actually saw all that, and knew all that, and knew every detail about everything they did, like that.

They probably thought I was just some kind of a "dumb hick" type, lol. I usually do come off that way. However, truth be told, I'm a former hacker (among other things), a computer expert (among other things), my employment resume is over 100 pages, and my IQ is one of the highest in the world. And long story short, that's what you get for trying to judge someone over the Internet ;)

And I would LOVE to have been able to see the Winnipeg user's face (and the other trolls; although I believe many are actually sock-puppets (the same person)), when he/she read that post! That would have been priceless!!!

Anyway, I just wanted to be sure yall all know that, about the Winnipeg user. He/she gets off on starting trouble, but doesn't care one way or the other about the issues.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#12 Apr 22, 2014
Thanks for the heads up, but most on the autism forum already know all about Winnipeg and his multi name-changes. He's attempted to dominate this forum for years, however quantity doesn't over ride quality. He isn't here for the same reasons as others, and his behavior is predictable as well which is often so bad his posts get deleted as they have on this thread and most others. No one takes him too seriously and most here use his ignorance to our advantage and easily debunk him. He sort of keeps us in practice. He clearly is an attention seeker and the best way to approach such a person is to totally ignore them. The more attention you give him, the more he enjoys himself which then of course turns any topic into a topic about him than the important topic that this is, autism.
PHARMAFIA MAIMS KILLS

Winnipeg, Canada

#13 Apr 22, 2014
N8 the Grrr8 wrote:
Hi all. Let me explain something about the user from Winnipeg.
Long-story-short, he/she is a classic textbook example of a troll. Doesn't care one way or another, about the issues. Just goes around, and takes which ever side most people are against, and posts irrelevant, inflammatory, and nonsensical comments, designed to generate a response out of serious users.
At first I was surprised to see this user on these threads, because I know that that user normally works the threads on the Health forum (and it's sub-forums).
However, then I checked and this thread is also on the Health forum (Surprisingly, I'm actually coming in from the Celebrities forum, this time, lol.) And you can also also find this thread on the Jenny McCarthy forum, and a bunch of others. It's pretty much a Topix thing (although certain other forum sites do it that way also).
Anyway, I just wanted to be sure everyone knows not to take the Winnipeg user seriously. You can read more at this link:
http://www.topix.com/forum/health/smoking/TNI...
And btw, when I posted that post, the trolling stopped, for like HOURS! Like almost a day!!! They were ABSOLUTELY STUNNED that I actually saw all that, and knew all that, and knew every detail about everything they did, like that.
They probably thought I was just some kind of a "dumb hick" type, lol. I usually do come off that way. However, truth be told, I'm a former hacker (among other things), a computer expert (among other things), my employment resume is over 100 pages, and my IQ is one of the highest in the world. And long story short, that's what you get for trying to judge someone over the Internet ;)
And I would LOVE to have been able to see the Winnipeg user's face (and the other trolls; although I believe many are actually sock-puppets (the same person)), when he/she read that post! That would have been priceless!!!
Anyway, I just wanted to be sure yall all know that, about the Winnipeg user. He/she gets off on starting trouble, but doesn't care one way or the other about the issues.
Another poster of stool samples.
PHARMAFIA MAIMS KILLS

Winnipeg, Canada

#14 Apr 22, 2014
friend wrote:
Thanks for the heads up, but most on the autism forum already know all about Winnipeg and his multi name-changes. He's attempted to dominate this forum for years, however quantity doesn't over ride quality. He isn't here for the same reasons as others, and his behavior is predictable as well which is often so bad his posts get deleted as they have on this thread and most others. No one takes him too seriously and most here use his ignorance to our advantage and easily debunk him. He sort of keeps us in practice. He clearly is an attention seeker and the best way to approach such a person is to totally ignore them. The more attention you give him, the more he enjoys himself which then of course turns any topic into a topic about him than the important topic that this is, autism.
another fresh steaming pile

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#15 Apr 22, 2014
Thanks N8, you've pretty much called it. It's a waste of space.
DUH IM R C HONEY

Winnipeg, Canada

#16 Apr 23, 2014
R C Honey wrote:
Thanks N8, you've pretty much called it. It's a waste of space.
http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/05/italian-co... Expert wittnesses and a good judge, none of whom is connected to vaccine makers, see it differently that you, n8, friend of pharma, Sangelia and ric99%wrong. I'll go with expert wittnesses and disregard personal opinions from nobody's.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#17 Apr 23, 2014
Only a fool would rely on anything AoA has to offer and then spam it every where.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2...
friend of pharma spam

Winnipeg, Canada

#18 Apr 23, 2014
friend wrote:
Only a fool would rely on anything AoA has to offer and then spam it every where.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2...
Thanks for the spam/misinfo. When courts using expert wittnesses (not the USA scam vaccine court) can conclude MMR causes autism, the truth will be known to all soon. Right now only parents who watched their child regress into autism after an MMR or a series of vaccines know. Only media lies, government protection and pharma criminals prevent the truth from coming out.
http://whale.to/vaccine/point.html
http://vactruth.com/2010/10/02/do-vaccines-ca...
Forbes Garbage

Winnipeg, Canada

#19 Apr 23, 2014
friend wrote:
Only a fool would rely on anything AoA has to offer and then spam it every where.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2...
Forbes, owned by Big Pharma. nuff said

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#20 Apr 23, 2014
Then all your anti vaxxer links must be owned by Wakefield. They certainly are biased sites and contains many unconfirmed things. I could go through it all, but te majority don't rely on those sites for info.

You can try to make that court case into anything you want, but it's not what you want it to be. Courts like that only decide who get's money, which anti vaxxers is all about to begin with. Anti vaxxers don't care about cause, they only care about a huge payday or they'd not abuse and exploit cases like this.

That Italian case is in appeals, so yes, soon the truth will be known.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#21 Apr 23, 2014
friend wrote:
Then all your anti vaxxer links must be owned by Wakefield. They certainly are biased sites and contains many unconfirmed things. I could go through it all, but te majority don't rely on those sites for info.
You can try to make that court case into anything you want, but it's not what you want it to be. Courts like that only decide who get's money, which anti vaxxers is all about to begin with. Anti vaxxers don't care about cause, they only care about a huge payday or they'd not abuse and exploit cases like this.
That Italian case is in appeals, so yes, soon the truth will be known.
That Winnipeg person is an idiot. Can't you tell by the way they write? I'm not even going to bother anymore with him/her. The way he/she writes should clue you in enough to know that he/she is a real idiot. I've seen so many grammatical errors, it's comical. His/her reasoning skills are lacking, and she/he is only saying this stuff to get a rise out of you because that's the only thing he/she is capable of.

"I'll go with expert wittnesses and disregard personal opinions from nobody's."

"witnesses", and "nobody's"

Yo, Winnipeg moron, witnesses is spelled wrong, and the "nobody's" should read "nobodies", and even then, nobodies isn't proper, and that's with just one of your sentences. Nobody's is short for nobody is. lol Go back to school!
__________

With all that 'said', I think you should let Mr./Ms. Winterpeg continue, he/she is an excellent example for people to vaccinate their kids because if someone that stupid is against it, then it must be a good idea to vaccinate.

You go Winnipeger! Keep up the good work!

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#22 Apr 23, 2014
Winnipeg is a 'he'. The thing is, is he hasn't figured out yet that the more I address his flawed anti vaxxer thinking, the more he gives examples of predictable behavior. It's the other way around, I have more fun every time he posts than he does when I post. The other thing to remember is I'm debunking him; he's not yet been able to debunk me or anyone else and the whole time anyone reading (such as you) can see how flawed anti vaxxers are and where they base their info from, which can just as easily be debunked. In other words, the more he posts, the more the public see's how irrational he and any anti vaxxer is.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Autism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvant Toxicity and Mercury ... Tue friend 2
Looking for Similar Mothers of children w/ Auti... (Jul '08) May 12 Pcarroll 135
News Neurodiversity: disabilities or neurological di... May 8 The con is on 1
News Andrew Wakefield: How a disgraced UK doctor has... May 8 The con is on 1
News Jim Carrey apologizes for using photos kids' ph... (Jul '15) Apr '18 C Kersey 2
News Politics, not parenting, to blame for 'vaccinat... Apr '18 VACCINES MAIM KILL 1
News His first words were 'Mercury, Venus, Earth' Apr '18 VACCINES MAIM KILL 1