Immunological Factors, Genes, and the Environment in Autism

Apr 18, 2013 Full story: Health News Digest 314

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - The UC Davis MIND Institute will host an update for parents and health-care professionals on research exploring the growing body of evidence suggesting associations between environmental mechanisms, immunological susceptibility and autism on Saturday, June 1. "Immunological Factors, Genes, and the Environment in Autism," will ... (more)

Full Story

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#163 Apr 25, 2013
Let's try this again. My age has nothing to do with anything, but we know how old Winnipeg is, in his 60's and from your own comments I'd guess you're about that same age. Winnipeg hardly acts his age, but then his behavior is predictable and most just ignore him.
No one cares what you believe. You are an anti vaxxer based on how your attempt to inflict your 'beliefs' onto the right of medical choice of others. No one bases medical choices off you having the flu when you were a kid, either. Your comment 'Some vaccines are well worth the risk, some are not' will only lead to Winnipeg turning on you next. Have fun with that.
friend wrote:
Fact: No you could not sign in and out 20 times, due to a little thing called a server.
Justify what vaccines. Did I say my child had any? No. You're inflicting your fears onto children you know nothing about nor their medical history to account for your self-serving theory and fears. But don't worry, every anti vaxxers does this so I wont hold it against you.
You're only here for your fear factor agenda, and continue to drip of it against your Government and vaccines without having any proof of your claims. You're stuck on Thimerosal, which is quite funny for the up-to-date anti vaxxer. No one is pushing anything. People have free-will and can choose their own medical care and medical history, not things you're afraid of. But don't worry, every anti vaxxers does this so I wont hold it against you.
You will never get past nor explain why all kids then don't have autism and why those who were not vaccinated have autism. You wont be able to explain why more boys than girls. You wont be able to explain why the majority who get vaccines do not have life-long side effects, or that those same side effects are exactly the same if you were to contract the disease. But don't worry, no anti vaxxer can so I wont hold it against you.
Finally, you're rude, arrogant and when presented with facts and valid issues, you resort to name-calling. But don't worry, every anti vaxxers does this so I wont hold it against you.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#165 Apr 25, 2013
friend wrote:
Let's try this again. My age has nothing to do with anything, but we know how old Winnipeg is, in his 60's and from your own comments I'd guess you're about that same age. Winnipeg hardly acts his age, but then his behavior is predictable and most just ignore him.
No one cares what you believe. You are an anti vaxxer based on how your attempt to inflict your 'beliefs' onto the right of medical choice of others. No one bases medical choices off you having the flu when you were a kid, either. Your comment 'Some vaccines are well worth the risk, some are not' will only lead to Winnipeg turning on you next. Have fun with that.
<quoted text>
You mad sis? Why all the rough language calling names like anti vexxer, did you make that up? I'm against unnecessary vaccines like the flu.
ric99

Spilsby, UK

#168 Apr 26, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>You mad sis? Why all the rough language calling names like anti vexxer, did you make that up? I'm against unnecessary vaccines like the flu.
You clearly don't understand that flu can be fatal.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#169 Apr 26, 2013
Aside from that and ignoring flu fatalities, who does anyone think they are that they can decide for others what's necessary or unnecessary.
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
You clearly don't understand that flu can be fatal.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#170 Apr 26, 2013
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
You clearly don't understand that flu can be fatal.
any cold can be fatal. The problem is the flu vaccine is one big guess and most of the time not effective. It weakens the immune system. We give babies enough vaccines, the wise choice would be to wait until there is an epidemic. For seniors that have conditions, it might be worth taking the chance, but a great majority of Seniors get flu like symptoms from the vaccine itself and then get the flu anyways.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#171 Apr 26, 2013
friend wrote:
Aside from that and ignoring flu fatalities, who does anyone think they are that they can decide for others what's necessary or unnecessary.
<quoted text>
Who would put all their hope in the Pharmacy industry to decide what is necessary or unnecessary?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#173 Apr 26, 2013
Cowboy Dan wrote:
The lady in Whinny-peg isn't concerned with vaccines because she knows germs never attack anything more vile and loathsome than themselves: namely her. A second opinion: You're ugly, too.
I bet friend and her friends will vote for that comment CD. They like those that have no substance other then insulting others. Let's wait and see. Have a good weekend Cowboy Dan.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#174 Apr 26, 2013
Amazing. There's posts from 2 and they're both from Elk Grove, CA.
You think we just woke up yesterday.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#175 Apr 26, 2013
friend wrote:
Amazing. There's posts from 2 and they're both from Elk Grove, CA.
You think we just woke up yesterday.
And since this topic is on the Elk Grove Forum and there are over 155,000 people here? Are you really that amazed?

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#176 Apr 26, 2013
News flash. It's also posted in the autism forum and amazing after 9 pages, another shows up from Elk Grove. Get real.
The article, "Immunological Factors, Genes, and the Environment in Autism" (a collaboration of the Autism Research Institute, the MIND Institute, and Autism Speaks) has nothing to do with the flu vaccine, either. never mentions it once or vaccines. Immunological Factors is not vaccines. That's about autoantibodies. Try looking it up.
You and your rants about the flu vaccine and the Government is way off topic and and attempt to distract what the actual topic is about "providing insight into the potential benefits of medical treatments designed to address environmentally triggered impairments". Environmental is not vaccines. Vaccines are medical. Environmental is exposures to daily things and pathogens which could include contracting the flu virus itself. Studies, including one from Asia show pregnant mothers who contract the flu have doubled risk of having a child with autism. Does that mean every pregnant mother get's a flu vaccines? No. Vaccines are a risk.
ASK THE EYEWITNESSES

Winnipeg, Canada

#177 Apr 26, 2013
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
You clearly don't understand that flu can be fatal.
OOOH a contribution. A stupid one though.
ASK THE EYEWITNESSES

Winnipeg, Canada

#178 Apr 26, 2013
Cowboy Dan wrote:
The lady in Whinny-peg isn't concerned with vaccines because she knows germs never attack anything more vile and loathsome than themselves: namely her. A second opinion: You're ugly, too.
aren'y you funny. That's right, you aren't
ASK THE EYEWITNESSES

Winnipeg, Canada

#179 Apr 26, 2013
Cowboy Dan wrote:
The lady in Whinny-peg isn't concerned with vaccines because she knows germs never attack anything more vile and loathsome than themselves: namely her. A second opinion: You're ugly, too.
Obviously from a LARGE gay-community wears the kinky cowboy suit.
ASK THE EYEWITNESSES

Winnipeg, Canada

#180 Apr 26, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>And since this topic is on the Elk Grove Forum and there are over 155,000 people here? Are you really that amazed?
friend is such a chumpola. Thinks he's so smart and everything...not...hello!
ric99

Louth, UK

#183 Apr 27, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>any cold can be fatal. The problem is the flu vaccine is one big guess and most of the time not effective. It weakens the immune system. We give babies enough vaccines, the wise choice would be to wait until there is an epidemic. For seniors that have conditions, it might be worth taking the chance, but a great majority of Seniors get flu like symptoms from the vaccine itself and then get the flu anyways.
The death rate from flu is far higher than from common colds.
Where is your evidence that the flu vaccine is "most of the time not effective"?
Where is your evidence that flu vaccine "weakens the immune system"?
Where is your evidence that "a great majority of Seniors get flu like symptoms from the vaccine itself and then get the flu anyways"?
We await your answers to these questions with baited breath.
RiccardoSucks

Elk Grove, CA

#184 Apr 27, 2013
Check out this thread where RiccardoFool poses as "Mahmoud Abdulah", "MsSoccerMom" and "Cowboy Dan" as well as his insane self "RiccardoFire" His other persona "Bruce Suckwell" should be showing up there any time!

http://www.topix.com/forum/sacramento/TRHJL17...

No matter what the subject of the thread is RiccardoFool soon hijacks it and turns it into minority hating, science hating, liberal hating and especially Obama hating vitriolic right wing blather!

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#186 Apr 27, 2013
friend wrote:
News flash. It's also posted in the autism forum and amazing after 9 pages, another shows up from Elk Grove. Get real.
The article, "Immunological Factors, Genes, and the Environment in Autism" (a collaboration of the Autism Research Institute, the MIND Institute, and Autism Speaks) has nothing to do with the flu vaccine, either. never mentions it once or vaccines. Immunological Factors is not vaccines. That's about autoantibodies. Try looking it up.
You and your rants about the flu vaccine and the Government is way off topic and and attempt to distract what the actual topic is about "providing insight into the potential benefits of medical treatments designed to address environmentally triggered impairments". Environmental is not vaccines. Vaccines are medical. Environmental is exposures to daily things and pathogens which could include contracting the flu virus itself. Studies, including one from Asia show pregnant mothers who contract the flu have doubled risk of having a child with autism. Does that mean every pregnant mother get's a flu vaccines? No. Vaccines are a risk.
Elk Grove has 155 thousand people, the topic is on the Elk Grove Forum. http://www.topix.com/forum/post/reply , do you really think one person from Elk Grove is allowed to post? So what? Give me the off topic flag....LOL. Thanks for finally admitting vaccines are a risk.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#187 Apr 27, 2013
RiccardoSucks wrote:
Check out this thread where RiccardoFool poses as "Mahmoud Abdulah", "MsSoccerMom" and "Cowboy Dan" as well as his insane self "RiccardoFire" His other persona "Bruce Suckwell" should be showing up there any time!
http://www.topix.com/forum/sacramento/TRHJL17...
No matter what the subject of the thread is RiccardoFool soon hijacks it and turns it into minority hating, science hating, liberal hating and especially Obama hating vitriolic right wing blather!
I'm registered for a point, a lot of trolls like you have tried to post using my name. I never post using another handle. do you actually think Elk Grove is so small that I own all the posts? LOL...What's funny is you can't compete with my content, so all your jealous hate comes out of your vulgar mind. Sorry, im not stooping to that level.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#188 Apr 27, 2013
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
The death rate from flu is far higher than from common colds.
Where is your evidence that the flu vaccine is "most of the time not effective"?
Where is your evidence that flu vaccine "weakens the immune system"?
Where is your evidence that "a great majority of Seniors get flu like symptoms from the vaccine itself and then get the flu anyways"?
We await your answers to these questions with baited breath.
http://health.usnews.com/healt h-news/articles/2013/02/22/cdc -flu-shot-not-very-effective-f or-seniors

February 22, 2013 RSS Feed Print

CDC: Flu Shot 9 Percent Effective for Those over 65

You've likely been hounded by your family, the government, and certain health reporters to get your flu vaccine. While that's still a good idea, a new report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that the shot is far from 100 percent effective. In fact, USA Today reports that, overall, the vaccine was only 56 percent effective in terms of cutting the need for influenza-related medical visits. Specifically for folks age 65 and older, the vaccine was only 9 percent effective against this season's most prevalent flu strain, H3N2. "Everyone at CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting was scratching their heads over this," William Schaffner, chair of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt

Keep Clean! During high flu season, stay away from crowds.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#189 Apr 27, 2013

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Autism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Autism or Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (Mar '08) 8 hr kathryn page 70
Girl with Asperger Syndrome Performing Michael ... 21 hr Vaccines Maim Kill 67
MMR vaccines cause 340% increased risk of autis... Thu Vaccines Maim Kill 10
Massive vaccine cover-up confirmed: Secret docu... Thu Vaccines Maim Kill 2
HPV Vaccine Does Not Cause Multiple Sclerosis Oct 22 anothervoice 2
The "no debate" debate [Respectful Insolence] (Oct '12) Oct 20 DR WILLIAM THOMPS... 17
CDC experiments on unwitting African American c... Oct 19 DR WILLIAM THOMPS... 29

Autism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE