Autism And Brain Scans: Snake Oil Or The Real Deal?

May 23, 2008 Full story: www.scientificblogging.com 15
Some research shows that children with autism are prone to seizures and that 50 percent of children diagnosed as autistic would have abnormal EEGs if tested. Many top neurologists caution that these tests would by no means make sense for every child with autistic symptoms. Full Story

“Got Science?”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#1 May 23, 2008
I generally think autism is overdiagnosed and not well understood - a quaint combination in hindsight but, like skull drilling for headaches, not all that great at the time.
truthist

Austin, TX

#2 May 23, 2008
Given that there is a gender gap, 3 to 4 times more boys are diagnosed to have autism, there might be a better understanding to come sooner rather than later.
Nanoo

Cincinnati, OH

#3 May 23, 2008
truthist wrote:
Given that there is a gender gap, 3 to 4 times more boys are diagnosed to have autism, there might be a better understanding to come sooner rather than later.
I guess the feminists are angry about that.

“Lord of the fish!”

Since: Apr 08

None

#4 May 23, 2008
truthist wrote:
Given that there is a gender gap, 3 to 4 times more boys are diagnosed to have autism, there might be a better understanding to come sooner rather than later.
...I don't get it. What would the gender ratio have to do with the understanding of autistic behavior?
Besides, what is it that people can't understand about it?

Since: Jul 07

San Antonio, Texas

#5 May 23, 2008
Cash wrote:
I generally think autism is overdiagnosed and not well understood - a quaint combination in hindsight but, like skull drilling for headaches, not all that great at the time.
Please provide supporting facts (not opinion) for your statement.

“Got Science?”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#6 May 26, 2008
eigenvalue wrote:
<quoted text>Please provide supporting facts (not opinion) for your statement.
I'm no Jean Piaget but I thought you learned reading comprehension in grade school. I said,
"I think ..." not "It is a fact that ..."

Autism diagnoses are very high, which means it has likely become a default diagnosis for things that like a laboratory assay. Otherwise we're forced to revise history to show that 75% of famous scientists were actually autistic.

“Lord of the fish!”

Since: Apr 08

None

#7 May 27, 2008
Cash wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm no Jean Piaget but I thought you learned reading comprehension in grade school. I said,
"I think ..." not "It is a fact that ..."
Autism diagnoses are very high, which means it has likely become a default diagnosis for things that like a laboratory assay. Otherwise we're forced to revise history to show that 75% of famous scientists were actually autistic.
And so what if they were? That would be a good thing for autistics, right? Of course, that's mostly if you count Aspergers Syndrome as autism, although they are technically two conditions that lie upon the same spectrum.
I agree with you in thinking that it may be overdiagnosed, but then again, it might truly be fairly common. I tend to view it as a set of personality and behavioral characteristics rather than some kind of disease. I can only imagine the trouble I would have been able to avoid if only I had never spoken a word in my life...

Since: Jul 07

San Antonio, Texas

#8 Jun 4, 2008
Cash wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm no Jean Piaget but I thought you learned reading comprehension in grade school. I said,
"I think ..." not "It is a fact that ..."
Autism diagnoses are very high, which means it has likely become a default diagnosis for things that like a laboratory assay. Otherwise we're forced to revise history to show that 75% of famous scientists were actually autistic.
Silly me, I took your "Got Science?" question seriously, assumed you had proper education and postgraduate work, multiple grants to fund your resarch and pay your graduate students, and were prepared to provide references to support your position. But it seems you're just an arrogant, blowhard wannabe who's just blowing smoke out his sphincter, and you got your panties in a wad because you can't back up your spew. I won't waste further time on you.

“Find Your Happiness”

Since: Apr 08

Mt Rainier- Cascade Mountains

#9 Jun 4, 2008
Rucin wrote:
<quoted text>
And so what if they were? That would be a good thing for autistics, right? Of course, that's mostly if you count Aspergers Syndrome as autism, although they are technically two conditions that lie upon the same spectrum.
I agree with you in thinking that it may be overdiagnosed, but then again, it might truly be fairly common. I tend to view it as a set of personality and behavioral characteristics rather than some kind of disease. I can only imagine the trouble I would have been able to avoid if only I had never spoken a word in my life...
Hi Rucin. I totally agree. I'm attending a conference later this month about the autistic spectrum disorder. I plan to bring up the personality hypothisis.
Nanoo

Cincinnati, OH

#10 Jun 4, 2008
Cash wrote:
I generally think autism is overdiagnosed and not well understood - a quaint combination in hindsight but, like skull drilling for headaches, not all that great at the time.
It's not overdiagnosed. That has been factored out of many scientific studies. It really has increased drastically.

“Lord of the fish!”

Since: Apr 08

None

#11 Jun 4, 2008
Otra Tequila wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Rucin. I totally agree. I'm attending a conference later this month about the autistic spectrum disorder. I plan to bring up the personality hypothisis.
Well, thanks. Let me know how it goes, would you kindly?
Lily

Vacaville, CA

#13 Jun 5, 2008
eigenvalue wrote:
<quoted text>Silly me, I took your "Got Science?" question seriously, assumed you had proper education and postgraduate work, multiple grants to fund your resarch and pay your graduate students, and were prepared to provide references to support your position. But it seems you're just an arrogant, blowhard wannabe who's just blowing smoke out his sphincter, and you got your panties in a wad because you can't back up your spew. I won't waste further time on you.
Wow, whose panties are in a wad?
test

Makati, Philippines

#14 Jun 5, 2008
test

Since: Jul 07

San Antonio, Texas

#15 Aug 22, 2008
Lily wrote:
<quoted text> Wow, whose panties are in a wad?
All I did was ask the boy for some facts to support his position, and he insulted me. I am accustomed to conversations with proper scientists, and the defensive reactions of uneducated crackpots annoy me. I detest having my valuable time wasted and am concerned for laypeople potentially led astray by "scientific" discussions directed by such crackpots. Science is not composed of opinions, it is composed of facts, observation, reproducible experimentation, and logically derived results which are reviewed. Opinions are useless.
Derek

UK

#17 Sep 25, 2013
I have ordered 2 times from this website PILLSMEDSHOP. COM . I called yesterday the customer care and asked for a discount as i was about to order twice the regular amount.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Autism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
MMR Vaccine/Autism Revelation: Another "Tuskege... 8 hr FRAUDULENT 46
Researchers rekindle vaccine-autism debate 19 hr Starts with Vaccines 3
Toxic Vaccines and Autism: a CDC Coverup 19 hr Starts with Vaccines 3
What causes autism? What causes mental illness? Fri bertvan 1
Video: Scientist states that, '...vaccines can ... Sep 18 Vaccines Maim Kill 4
Science vs. sentiment Sep 18 Vaccines Maim Kill 33
Hey Anti-Vaxxers, Watch This ShowBy Russell Sau... Sep 17 VACCINES KILL 3
•••

Autism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••