Where do you get your information? The Declaration of Independence lists some unalienable rights, but that isn't the constitution. The constitution mentions some rights, but none of them are inviolable, and some are contradictory. There is NO individual right that is not restricted in some circumstances.
And the US isn't a dictatorship, or a tyranny . We have a democratically elected government. Frankly, I am far more concerned about the collection of gun nuts in this country imaginingg themselvestwo bit patriots than I am of the US government.
Yes a democracy, these patriots scare me;
Holder: It’s ‘Legal’ to Drone Strike Americans
Melissa Melton Infowars.com
February 5, 2013
NBC news has produced a chilling,
confidential Department of Justice
(DOJ) white paper outlining the
supposed legality of extrajudicial
drone strikes on U.S. citizens
suspected of terrorism even without
intelligence to show involvement in
a plot to attack America.
While admitting that U.S. citizens
are still afforded constitutional
protections such as due process
when they travel abroad, the 16-
page report claims,“The U.S.
citizenship of a leader of al-Qa’ida or its associated forces, however,
does not give that person constitutional immunity from
attack ”[emphasis added]. Continuing,“The Due Process Clause would
not prohibit a lethal operation of the sort contemplated here.”
As it has with thousands of men, women, and children in the Middle
East, our federal government apparently thinks it’s somehow allowed
to use drones to openly murder Americans outside the law of our
The memo also claims,“This conclusion is reached with recognition of
the extraordinary seriousness of a lethal operation by the United
States against a U.S. citizen.” Regardless of its extraordinary nature,
such lethal drone operations would be “justified as an act of national
According to the DOJ, a lethal strike against an American citizen is
okay if he or she is a suspected al-Qa’ida leader on foreign soil and
the following three conditions are met:
1) an informed, high level official of the U.S. government has
determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of
violent attack against the United States;
2) capture is infeasible, and the United States continues to monitor
whether capture becomes feasible; and
3) the operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with
applicable law of war principles. http://www.infowars.com/us-government-says-dr...