Patient-Specific Cancer Cell Lines De...

Patient-Specific Cancer Cell Lines Designed To Predict Chemotherapy Sensitivity

There are 1 comment on the Medical News Today story from Feb 19, 2013, titled Patient-Specific Cancer Cell Lines Designed To Predict Chemotherapy Sensitivity. In it, Medical News Today reports that:

In laboratory studies, scientists at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center have developed a way to personalize chemotherapy drug selection for cancer patients by using cell lines created from their own tumors.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Medical News Today.

Since: Dec 05

Reading, PA

#1 Feb 19, 2013
Cell-lines are useful for experimentation in labs as they are always available to researchers as a product and do not require harvesting (acquiring of tissue from a host) every time cells are needed in the lab.

Problem is, cell-lines don't recapitulate drug response patterns which exist in the body. For drug selection, it is better to directly remove tumor "microclusters" straight from the body and immediately test them, before they change.

The problem with using cell-lines is that they do not predict for disease or patient specific drug effects. If you can kill ovarian cancer cell-lines with a given drug, it doesn't tell you anything about how the drug will work in real world, clinical ovarian cancer (real-world conditions).

As a general rule, studies from established cell-lines (tumor cells that are cultured and maniplated so that they continue to divide) have proved worthless as models to predict the activity of drugs in cancer.

They are more misleading than helpful. An established cell-line is not reflective of the behavior of the fresh tumor samples (live samples derived from tumors) in primary culture, much less in the patient.

Established cell-lines have been a huge disappointment over the decades, with respect to their ability to correctly model the disease-specific activity of new drugs. What works in cell-lines do not often translate into human beings. You get different results when you test passaged cells compared to primary, fresh tumor.

In regards to tissue samples injured by shipping to a lab, compromising test results, what what cell culture assaysists do is they start with a piece of tumor, chop it into little pieces, digest it with collagenase, which digests the connective tissue strands which may be present.

This releases little microclusters of tumor cells, containing between 5 cells and 500 cells. These little microclusters also contain tiny capillary (endothelial) cells, running throughout the microcluster. Thus, this is "native" tumor and "native" tumor architecture. There is no growth. It is precisely as it existed within the body.

These microclusters are plated into medium on polypropylene, which does not allow them to stick to the bottom and spread out and grow. They remain just as they were (although there is a strong tendency for these microclusters to aggregate, basically grab hold of one another, so the microclusters get bigger, but this is usually not owing to cell growth but rather to cell aggregation).

Drugs are added immediately, before the cells and cultures have had the chance to change in any way. When the drugs work, they trigger apoptosis and the cells die and they detect cell death 96 hours later.

In regards to some companies offering commercial tests on surgically removed tumors using a small number of anticancer drugs, there are private laboratories that have been offering "cell-death" functional profiling assays as a non-investigational, paid service to cancer patients, in a situation where up to 30 different drugs and combinations are tested, at two drug concentrations in three different assay systems.

Another problem with cell-line technology is that cancer doesn't grow too much, it dies too little. This is why old cell-growth-based assays didn't work and why cell-death-based assays do.

The concern should be in killing the cancer cell. When the cancer cell is so damaged that it can not longer perform its duty, it will die. Scientists know that cancer is not a disease in which cells grow too abundantly, but the failure of cells to expire at their appointed time. Most basic cell biologists acknowledge that cancer is characterized by a failure of programmed cell death (apoptosis).

One way to look at programmed cell death, is cell-death assays utilizing functional profiling, use apoptotic endpoints and also a number of other indicators of programmed cell death. The advantage of this is that they are more reflective of chemotherapy’s actual effects in the human body.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Health Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why I take my daughter with me to the gynecologist (Dec '14) 1 hr pailrider 302
News All gay and bisexual men should get meningitis ... 4 hr Sheldon 9
News Feds give poor quality scores to most Central N... 9 hr Utikuhnta SUCKS 3
News Pregnancy Symptoms - 12 Very Early Symptoms of ... (Jun '07) 17 hr DeeDee 6,883
News The 'generic' version of this popular drug coul... 19 hr Tobby 1
Human Sexuality Thu Enter Username 7
News What does a low blood platelet count mean? (Jun '07) Thu Liz Liz 890
Nudity at doctor's office (Mar '07) Jul 26 james 93
More from around the web