Biology leaves gay men highly vulnerable to HIV

Jul 20, 2012 Full story: KFVS12 297

New research pinpoints a major reason why gay and bisexual men remain so vulnerable to the AIDS epidemic: When it comes to the transmission of HIV, a man who has unprotected anal intercourse is at especially high risk.

Full Story
Robsan5

United States

#180 Jul 26, 2012
troll wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow... I'm rarely invited out. As to coming out, sorry but I dig the lady trolls. Ugly as they are, they still have vaginas.
Sure, some hets engage in anal sex on occasion. It's undoubtedly dangerous for them when they do too. But it's usually one-way, male to female. She doesn't turn around and inject something up his butt. In gay men it's always dangerous and nearly always two-ways. So if one is infected there's almost a 100% chance both will come away infected.
The anus is not really made for sex. It's for taking a poop. It tears and bleeds easily, so when that happens fluid is injected directly into the blood stream. Even if there's no damage, just a bit upstream is the digestive system, also a fine point of entry for infection. Whereas the vagina is built to take a dick-pounding and a squirt without tearing or bleeding. It's simple biology.
I think gays are genetic mutations who are just born that way. They aren't "evil", don't recruit and don't choose to be that way (why the hell would they?). I think Jesus loves them too.
But you need to tone down the unprotected anal sex with multiple partners. As with intravenous drugs via needles, it's just damn dangerous due to the way people are constructed. Even if AIDS is cured, something else will come along because the mechanisms of anal sex and dirty needles are just too conducive to the spread of disease. Nor are humans ever going to evolve a dick-friendly ass because gays do not produce children. No progeny, no evolution. That's just biology too.
Wow... look at the ass on that lady troll! Just remember, het trolls know that about an inch or two away is a safer dick-friendly avenue. That ain't never going to happen for homotrolls. As to lestrolls, I think they can lick each other raw and there's not much harm that'll come of it. Again, just biology. Jesus, morality and God have nothing to do with it.
Good post.

Robert
Sheik Yerbouti

New Hope, PA

#181 Jul 26, 2012
This is not news. Doctors have known this for years!
Robsan5

United States

#183 Jul 26, 2012
Captain_Morgan02 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not sure I understand. Please elaborate.
Those fine, upstanding Christians known as nazis killed quite a few homosexuals.

Robert

Since: Jun 12

Sherbrooke, Canada

#185 Jul 26, 2012
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Those fine, upstanding Christians known as nazis killed quite a few homosexuals.
Robert
If this were Facebook, I would hit "Like."

Since: Jun 12

Sherbrooke, Canada

#186 Jul 26, 2012
Captain_Morgan02 wrote:
<quoted text>
So being Christian and disagreeing with the homosexual life style makes you a bigot and ignorant? What about Muslims? In their most extreme groups you would killed for being homosexual. When is the last time you heard of a group of Christians actually killing homosexuals?
I wasn't implying causation, merely correlation. Yes, many Christians are in fact bigots due to their chosen beliefs. Many Christians are not bigots, and are great people. Just because someone identifies with a particular group doesn't mean they automatically possess all the attributes of that group (I believe that's akin to the ecological fallacy).
MDWilder

United States

#187 Jul 26, 2012
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Those fine, upstanding Christians known as nazis killed quite a few homosexuals.
Robert
Actually, the proper name for Nazis is "National Socialist". They thought they were socialist first, nationalist second and whatever religion they embraced was a very distant third.

It would be far more accurate to say that fine, upstanding self-proclaimed socialist known as Nazis killed quite a few homosexuals.

By putting into place large-scale statist mechanisms of control, we risk a repeat of this atrocity. Once you build a system there's no guarantee it'll be used only for good. Hitler did not come to power bragging about how he'd kill millions and start a world war. Rather, he started with the usual politician's boiler plate about fixing the economy, improving the general welfare and bettering conditions for everyone.

Limited government is designed to stop this kind of abuse by curtailing the power needed to carry them out. No dictator starts by proclaiming he'll commit numerous horrors and crimes against humanity. They ALL say "trust me because, unlike other people, I'm especially noble and trustworthy". If you believe that, you're especially gullible and naive.
Robsan5

United States

#188 Jul 26, 2012
MDWilder wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, the proper name for Nazis is "National Socialist". They thought they were socialist first, nationalist second and whatever religion they embraced was a very distant third.
It would be far more accurate to say that fine, upstanding self-proclaimed socialist known as Nazis killed quite a few homosexuals.
By putting into place large-scale statist mechanisms of control, we risk a repeat of this atrocity. Once you build a system there's no guarantee it'll be used only for good. Hitler did not come to power bragging about how he'd kill millions and start a world war. Rather, he started with the usual politician's boiler plate about fixing the economy, improving the general welfare and bettering conditions for everyone.
Limited government is designed to stop this kind of abuse by curtailing the power needed to carry them out. No dictator starts by proclaiming he'll commit numerous horrors and crimes against humanity. They ALL say "trust me because, unlike other people, I'm especially noble and trustworthy". If you believe that, you're especially gullible and naive.
The fact that they considered themselves to be Christians makes them Christians, regardless of their job or political views.
I don't believe any politician. How is that relevent?

Robert
MDWilder

United States

#189 Jul 26, 2012
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that they considered themselves to be Christians makes them Christians, regardless of their job or political views.
I don't believe any politician. How is that relevent?
Robert
If you read Nazi literature, Hitler's speeches or his book, you don't find many appeals to any kind of religion, much less Christianity. He was "God" to them in every way that matters.
Lots of top Nazis were believers in all kinds of Nordic myths and other phony spiritualism crap - a lot of it totally made up. Claiming Nazis = Christians is over the top. Grossly over the top - because you're just flat out wrong.
MDWilder

United States

#190 Jul 26, 2012
Besides, claiming someone is a "Nazi" is one of the most overdone insults out there. To the point that it's lost most of its bite.

Since: Jan 10

Las Vegas, NV

#191 Jul 26, 2012
HIV/AIDS is an optional disease. It has absolutely nothing to do with "biology". It has everything to do with a sick form of sexual recreation.
Robsan5

United States

#192 Jul 26, 2012
MDWilder wrote:
<quoted text>
If you read Nazi literature, Hitler's speeches or his book, you don't find many appeals to any kind of religion, much less Christianity. He was "God" to them in every way that matters.
Lots of top Nazis were believers in all kinds of Nordic myths and other phony spiritualism crap - a lot of it totally made up. Claiming Nazis = Christians is over the top. Grossly over the top - because you're just flat out wrong.
Many nazis considered themselves Christians.
Kinda hard to argue against that, but go ahead.

Robert
Robsan5

United States

#193 Jul 26, 2012
MDWilder wrote:
Besides, claiming someone is a "Nazi" is one of the most overdone insults out there. To the point that it's lost most of its bite.
I'm claiming that nazis were nazis. How is that insulting someone else?
I'm claiming that nazis killed quite a few homosexuals. Are you doubting that fact?
I'm claiming that many nazis considered themselves Christian.
Someone asked "when was the last time Christians killed homosexuals?" and I answered 1945.
Do you have any different information?

Robert

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#194 Jul 26, 2012
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Those fine, upstanding Christians known as nazis killed quite a few homosexuals.
Robert
More pissed off homosexual atheist talking points.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#195 Jul 26, 2012
MDWilder wrote:
Besides, claiming someone is a "Nazi" is one of the most overdone insults out there. To the point that it's lost most of its bite.
Along with racist and facist. You're spot on.
Robsan5

United States

#196 Jul 26, 2012
Here in Vegas wrote:
HIV/AIDS is an optional disease. It has absolutely nothing to do with "biology". It has everything to do with a sick form of sexual recreation.
The most commonest method of HIV/AIDS transmission worldwide is male/female sex.
Learn some facts, please.

Robert
Robsan5

United States

#197 Jul 26, 2012
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text> More pissed off homosexual atheist talking points.
I'm more ambivalent than atheist.
Are you saying that the nazis didn't kill lots of homosexuals, or that many nazis weren't Christian?

Robert
Mrhunk

Satellite Provider

#198 Jul 26, 2012
no satan wants people to do things that make god angry at them

basically satan wants xou to go to hell with him..

As for the subject,

homosexual anal sex makes contracting hiv more common to the recepient so there's high risk of acquiring the disease

but in heterosexual anal sex theres no risk of acquiring the virus unless one of the partners is infected
Mrhunk

Satellite Provider

#199 Jul 26, 2012
I really began to suspect that Hiv is man-made for the benefits of drug companies & to reduce population..
ed

New York, NY

#201 Jul 26, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
<quoted text>I agree. And in the U.S. most people with hiv or AIDS are black. Why don't the black "leaders" in the U.S. such as Jese Jackson or Al Sharpton or The Obamaniac ever talk about this much ?
white Hispanic too you must be racist if you only think blacks have that you make no sense at all you just know how to discriminate other races you are garbage

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#202 Jul 26, 2012
Mrhunk wrote:
no satan wants people to do things that make god angry at them
basically satan wants xou to go to hell with him..
As for the subject,
homosexual anal sex makes contracting hiv more common to the recepient so there's high risk of acquiring the disease
but in heterosexual anal sex theres no risk of acquiring the virus unless one of the partners is infected
Dude, anal sex is anal sex irrespective of whether it is homosexual or heterosexual, to get it you have to have one of the partners infected. The virus is not discriminating.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Health Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Can Hair Loss Drugs Cause Sexual Dysfunction? 1 hr Mary 1
Becoming a Dentist (Jan '13) 3 hr Amber Johnson 35
Another study finds vaccines don't cause autism 4 hr VACCINES CAUSE GE... 17
Missing gene linked to autism 4 hr VACCINES CAUSE GE... 1
Guide to life: Is an annual medical exam a must? 4 hr kurtcooksalot16 1
Genetics Suggest Autism Isn't Just One Disorder... 4 hr friend DUHZ it again 3
African-American men, transgender women hit har... 4 hr Give a Hoot Burn ... 9
Pregnancy Symptoms - 12 Very Early Symptoms of ... (Jun '07) 18 hr Sheyla 5,991
A 25-year-old woman died in a private assessmen... Tue MERCK MAIMS KILLS 1
Flu vaccine less effective against mutant strain Tue MERCK MAIMS KILLS 1
Thanksgiving Blessings Found in Parenting an 'I... Mon VACCINES MAIM KILL 3
Ontario to restrict e-cigarettes like regular s... Mon Rabble 1

Health People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE