Colo. lawmakers lose recalls over gun...

Colo. lawmakers lose recalls over gun laws support

There are 1996 comments on the Northern Michigan News story from Sep 10, 2013, titled Colo. lawmakers lose recalls over gun laws support. In it, Northern Michigan News reports that:

Colorado voters ousted two state lawmakers Tuesday in first-ever recall elections that came in reaction to the Democrats' support for tougher gun laws in the aftermath of last year's mass shootings in Aurora and Newtown, Conn.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Northern Michigan News.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1986 Jan 5, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Deflection... no surprise...
Hmmm... let's see...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Not the remotest connection to the topic.
Help stamp out CenturySpam™!! Flag appropriately!
<quoted text>
Mindlessness, no surprise.

Far to many mindless posts to list.........

Not EVER EVEN the remotest connection to the topic.
Help stamp out barefoot2626-SPAM™!! Flag appropriately!

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1988 Jan 6, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
More cowardly name-stealing vile spam-bot drooling.
INFIDEL

Socorro, NM

#1990 Jan 13, 2014
Kentucky-Mitch wrote:
Evil, vile, and cowardly treasonous DemonRats.??????
Probably better than old white trash gun coward. Whatcha think?
Who side do ya think Jesus is on?
Jesus refused to lower himself into the sewer of politics. Jesus would definitely not be a democrat preaching sexual perversion, selfishness and propping up abortion mills. Nor would he be a republican Pharisee casting condemnation and judgment upon everything he didn't like. I doubt that Jesus would register to vote at all but if he did he would probably be a libertarian.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1991 Jan 13, 2014
INFIDEL wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus refused to lower himself into the sewer of politics. Jesus would definitely not be a democrat preaching sexual perversion, selfishness and propping up abortion mills. Nor would he be a republican Pharisee casting condemnation and judgment upon everything he didn't like. I doubt that Jesus would register to vote at all but if he did he would probably be a libertarian.
Why would the King of Kings be involved in ANY politics at all? For He is the one that would SET "policy".

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#1993 Jan 13, 2014
Kentucky-Mitch wrote:
<quoted text>
And Jesus sayeth; "Thou shall not carrieth firearms for the purpose of inflicting harm on others. They that doeth become the butt droppings of Satan in the hereafter"
I guess it's a good thing I only carry self-defense weapons, huh?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1994 Jan 13, 2014
Kentucky-Mitch wrote:
<quoted text>
And Jesus sayeth; "Thou shall not carrieth firearms for the purpose of inflicting harm on others. They that doeth become the butt droppings of Satan in the hereafter"
No further proof needed that you're a mindless little child.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1997 Jan 13, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
No further proof needed that you're a mindless little child.
Let's see...

2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".

2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.

again?

2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".

2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1998 Jan 13, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see...
2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".
2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.
again?
2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".
2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.
You already had your head caved in using this, and you continue to do it? How pathetically lame can you be?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1999 Jan 13, 2014
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
You already had your head caved in using this,?
Right.

Let's see...

2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".

2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.

again?

2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".

2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.

++

Exact quotes... of you dear.

Most people without your understanding of the English language would say you are saying the exact opposite things.

Well gee:

let's put your quotes next to each other...
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
You sure had better hope that Topix doesn't notice how the traffic has DOUBLED on the "Guns Forum".
2ndAmRight wrote:
"You are a DETRIMENT to Topix. And chase traffic away with your vile posts."

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#2000 Jan 13, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Right.
Let's see...
2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".
2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.
again?
2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".
2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.
++
Exact quotes... of you dear.
Most people without your understanding of the English language would say you are saying the exact opposite things.
Well gee:
let's put your quotes next to each other...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
So how long have you been battling your Autism anyway??? And isn't it time for your nightly meds?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#2002 Jan 14, 2014
Kentucky-Mitch wrote:
<quoted text>
So you just make fun of everything don't you? Now it's autism. I'm glad I'm not some brain dead old white trash MF like you.
So I take it you aren't white???(not that I give a damn what color you are) Don't kid yourself, KY-Bitch. Barefoot exhibits autistic traits. Like most autistics who seem to focus on just one thing, are socially inadequate and dislike change, she actually has MORE than one focus point. Her's are sexual fantasies, and a constant need to repeat the same lame posts OVER AND OVER AGAIN in order to seem relevant. And she, like you, is FAR from relevant.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2003 Jan 14, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
So how long have you been battling your Autism anyway?
Funny how the only thing in my post was Sod0mite's direct quote.

You know: when he told us that a musket wasn't a firearm and in the next said it was.

How long have you been beating your wife, DonLiqueer?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2004 Jan 14, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
Like most autistics who seem to focus on just one thing
That Sod0mite says one thing and then says exactly the opposite, and when you call her on it: she moves the goalposts?

Is that Honey?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2005 Jan 14, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
a constant need to repeat the same lame posts OVER AND OVER AGAIN
You mean the same lame posts that follow GumsShows two hundred year old posts that she copies across ten threads thousands of times since 2006?

Is that it, Honey?

Because if you don't like spam, and you think you've been appointed forum moderator, you have to go after the #1 offender.

Wipe your chin, Honey.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#2006 Jan 14, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how the only thing in my post was Sod0mite's direct quote.
You know: when he told us that a musket wasn't a firearm and in the next said it was.
How long have you been beating your wife, DonLiqueer?
So now you resurrect the whole "beating your wife" thing, huh???

LMAO!!!!! You are the punchline to your own joke of a life.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#2007 Jan 14, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the same lame posts that follow GumsShows two hundred year old posts that she copies across ten threads thousands of times since 2006?
Is that it, Honey?
Because if you don't like spam, and you think you've been appointed forum moderator, you have to go after the #1 offender.
Wipe your chin, Honey.
That would be YOU, moron. Physician....heal thyself.
cancer suxs

Faribault, MN

#2008 Jan 14, 2014
What I don't get about far righters. They want all drugs illegal drugs that only directly hurt the user. but want guns that can kill dozens in one clip legal....How does that make sense. I am all for guns being legal..In fact would like to see half or more guns laws done away with. But also drug laws have to go. Right?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#2010 Jan 14, 2014
cancer suxs wrote:
What I don't get about far righters. They want all drugs illegal drugs that only directly hurt the user. but want guns that can kill dozens in one clip legal....How does that make sense. I am all for guns being legal..In fact would like to see half or more guns laws done away with. But also drug laws have to go. Right?
Well for one thing....you have bought in to the whole "it only hurts the user" BS. Drug abuse destroys families. And yes......most gun laws should be done away with.

But hey....let's all sit around getting stoned and living off the govt teet instead of going out and doing something meaningful or productive.(and yes, I know their are PLENTY of functioning potheads out there)

So where does the legalization stop. Do we legalize just pot? How about cocaine? Heroine? Meth? etc etc etc And whoever said that pot isn't a gateway drug is full of shit. Ask just about any addict out there what was the first illegal drug they tried, and I would be willing to bet my next months salary that 95+% will say it was pot.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#2011 Jan 14, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Right.
Let's see...
2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".
2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.
again?
2ndAmRight wrote:
It most certainly IS a "firearm".
2ndAmRight wrote:
... an “antique firearm” is not a firearm.
++
Exact quotes... of you dear.
Most people without your understanding of the English language would say you are saying the exact opposite things.
Well gee:
let's put your quotes next to each other...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
"However, Federal law does not prohibit these persons from possessing or receiving an antique >>>>>firearm <<<<<. The term “antique >>>>>firearm <<<<<” means any >>>>>firearm <<<<< (including any >>>>>firearm <<<<< with a matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system) manufactured in or before 1898. The definition includes any replica of an antique >>>>>firearm <<<<<...."

- 18 U.S.C.§ 921(a)(3),(a)(16).

You really are a pathetic little child.
cancer suxs

Faribault, MN

#2012 Jan 14, 2014
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Well for one thing....you have bought in to the whole "it only hurts the user" BS. Drug abuse destroys families. And yes......most gun laws should be done away with.
But hey....let's all sit around getting stoned and living off the govt teet instead of going out and doing something meaningful or productive.(and yes, I know their are PLENTY of functioning potheads out there)
So where does the legalization stop. Do we legalize just pot? How about cocaine? Heroine? Meth? etc etc etc And whoever said that pot isn't a gateway drug is full of shit. Ask just about any addict out there what was the first illegal drug they tried, and I would be willing to bet my next months salary that 95+% will say it was pot.
LOL..guns have killed whole families....Legalize it all. Like it was when founding fathers were around.

I knew what you were. Your a I want my freedom but F everyone else.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 1 hr Capernicks daughter 1,613
News Democrats to push for universal background chec... Aug 26 payme 4
News Melania Trump will address immigration controve... Aug 23 JohnInLa 218
News George Soros, Other Democratic Megadonors Plowi... Aug 21 Heath Ledger Suic... 2
News New Dating Site Aims to Pair Concealed Carry Si... Aug 21 RobertM 1
News Psychiatrists Reminded To Refrain From Armchair... Aug 20 lorr d 4
News In Several States, Trump's Poll Monitors May Be... Aug 17 Marauder 9
More from around the web