Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1681 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You made a statement.
I proved it that it was false.
I'm not the one drinking Kool-Aid if you refuse to accept that reality.
Not quite loser. All of your vain arguments have just been shot down in flames. Take a hike.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1682 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You made a statement.
I proved it that it was false.
I'm not the one drinking Kool-Aid if you refuse to accept that reality.
Dan the Sham ,the article proves you wrong.

Are you going to parrot media propaganda and expect others to drink the Kool-Aid just because you say it taste good ?

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1683 Apr 29, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Aye. Plus the quote I just posted above proves our right beyond all shadow of doubt. So he would have been a loser regardless.
Yes.

I don't know what insecurity these people have that they would dismiss something so self evident except to say that only the weak want to be lead.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1684 Apr 29, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not quite loser. All of your vain arguments have just been shot down in flames. Take a hike.
Yeah, that's never happened here.

Ever.

I think you've been drinking that hallucinogenic Kool-Aid your buddy was talking about.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1685 Apr 29, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Dan the Sham ,the article proves you wrong.
Are you going to parrot media propaganda and expect others to drink the Kool-Aid just because you say it taste good ?
You said no poll ever showed that 90% of Americans want universal background checks.

I linked to a poll that showed over 90% of Americans want universal background checks.

I know you don't like that inconvenient fact, but your preference doesn't change reality.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1686 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You said no poll ever showed that 90% of Americans want universal background checks.
I linked to a poll that showed over 90% of Americans want universal background checks.
I know you don't like that inconvenient fact, but your preference doesn't change reality.
Dan the Sham , do you really want me to prove how stupid you are ?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1687 Apr 29, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Dan the Sham , do you really want me to prove how stupid you are ?
LOL! I'm afraid that would be impossible for you to do.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1688 Apr 29, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>I got the feeling that it was Nuggie using an unregistered account. I could be wrong.
Sorry , I forgot to post back.

You may be correct.

Lord knows , they were neck and neck in the race to be crowned most ignorant.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1689 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! I'm afraid that would be impossible for you to do.
Well then , shall we get started ?

The poll shows what means of communication ?

Polls historically have used land line telephones .

Do you have a land line phone ?

I do not and because the article did not break down the type of phones called it is safe to say only land lines were used and greater then ten percent of all phones used in this country are cell phones so in the inverse the 90 percent is a statistical impossibility.

I have plenty more.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1690 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, that's never happened here.
Ever.
I think you've been drinking that hallucinogenic Kool-Aid your buddy was talking about.
I beg to differ. You tend to get your butt whipped on a regular basis here. Just because you're too damn simple minded to realize you've been trounced doesn't mean it didn't happen. Although, it is probably easier for you to live with yourself if you completely ignore the fact that you're an idiot. You're a legend in your own mind Danny Boy but you're just another dope anywhere else.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1691 Apr 29, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Well then , shall we get started ?
The poll shows what means of communication ?
Polls historically have used land line telephones .
Do you have a land line phone ?
I do not and because the article did not break down the type of phones called it is safe to say only land lines were used and greater then ten percent of all phones used in this country are cell phones so in the inverse the 90 percent is a statistical impossibility.
I have plenty more.
Unfortunately for you, your looking for ways to dispute poll findings doesn't make me stupid.

It also doesn't prove your statement, "No poll has ever shown 90 percent of US citizens agree or insist on " universal background checks " to be true.

All it takes to prove your statement false is the existence of ONE poll with that finding. And I did that. Regardless of your opinion of that poll - it exists.

I'll bet you thought the polls showing Obama's November victory were all skewed too, didn't you? LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1692 Apr 29, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Well then , shall we get started ?
The poll shows what means of communication ?
Polls historically have used land line telephones .
Do you have a land line phone ?
I do not and because the article did not break down the type of phones called it is safe to say only land lines were used and greater then ten percent of all phones used in this country are cell phones so in the inverse the 90 percent is a statistical impossibility.
I have plenty more.
If you care about the details of the poll, go look.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers...

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1693 Apr 29, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Well then , shall we get started ?
The poll shows what means of communication ?
Polls historically have used land line telephones .
Do you have a land line phone ?
I do not and because the article did not break down the type of phones called it is safe to say only land lines were used and greater then ten percent of all phones used in this country are cell phones so in the inverse the 90 percent is a statistical impossibility.
I have plenty more.
Whoops, the link I posted was to a SECOND poll showing over 90% support for universal background checks.

The poll Reuters referenced is here:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers...

They also did two more - March 22 and April 4 - making FOUR polls showing that over 90% of Americans want universal background checks.

What was your claim? "NO polls?"

LMAO!

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1694 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Whoops, the link I posted was to a SECOND poll showing over 90% support for universal background checks.
The poll Reuters referenced is here:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers...
They also did two more - March 22 and April 4 - making FOUR polls showing that over 90% of Americans want universal background checks.
What was your claim? "NO polls?"
LMAO!
Dan the sham .

Your making this to easy , I need to wrap this up and move on so for the folks at home who are playing along there are over 300 million Americans.

One percent of 300 million is 3 million.

How many people where polled in the largest poll you got sucked in to ?

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1695 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfortunately for you, your looking for ways to dispute poll findings doesn't make me stupid.
It also doesn't prove your statement, "No poll has ever shown 90 percent of US citizens agree or insist on " universal background checks " to be true.
All it takes to prove your statement false is the existence of ONE poll with that finding. And I did that. Regardless of your opinion of that poll - it exists.
I'll bet you thought the polls showing Obama's November victory were all skewed too, didn't you? LOL!
For your own sake ,try not to make a fool of yourself.
think about it

Chambersburg, PA

#1696 Apr 29, 2013
Remember our loonie friend, Nuggin? He's on the Jamestown, Tn forum. They have come to the same conclusion we have.....he's mental. He has resorted to his bizarre behavior. On one of the threads he said incest is okay with him.

Looks like he's leaving town there too. Someone said that's what he'll do...drift from forum to forum.

Hey Dan, still think he was intelligent? You really should be careful who you praise, just because someone is liberal doesn't mean they are good people. The guy is nuts. Whacked out! Loonie! Far gone! Intelligent? No just crazy!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1697 Apr 29, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Dan the sham .
Your making this to easy , I need to wrap this up and move on so for the folks at home who are playing along there are over 300 million Americans.
One percent of 300 million is 3 million.
How many people where polled in the largest poll you got sucked in to ?
Yeah, I thought you'd run away.

LOL!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1698 Apr 29, 2013
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>For your own sake ,try not to make a fool of yourself.
You're confused. I made a fool out of YOU.

Or more accurately - you made a fool out of yourself. I just pointed it out.

LMAO!

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#1699 Apr 29, 2013
How about some interesting facts:

Pennsylvania voters approve 34 – 29 percent of the way U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey is handling gun control and give Sen. Toomey an overall 48 – 30 percent approval rating, his highest ever. By a 54 – 12 percent margin, voters think more favorably of Toomey because of his co-sponsorship of legislation to require expanded background checks.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers...

The vast majority of veterans support universal background checks, a new poll shows.
According to a survey commissioned by the organization Vote Vets and the liberal Center for American Progress Action Fund, 91 percent of veterans support requiring “a criminal background check of every person who wants to buy a firearm, including 74 [percent] who strongly support it.”
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/veteran...

65% Of Voters Are Upset At Congress For Crushing Universal Background Checks
http://www.policymic.com/articles/38573/gun-c...

More than 9 in 10 Americans (91 percent) support the idea of universal background checks for purchasing firearms, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-poli...

Lee Leffingwell says polls show 90 percent of Americans and 74 percent of NRA members support criminal background checks before all gun buys
http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/20...

Nine in 10 Americans support expanding background checks on gun purchases in a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, an extraordinary level of agreement on a political issue and a finding that’s been duplicated in nearly every major public poll.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/w...

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1700 Apr 29, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I thought you'd run away.
LOL!
Dan the Sham

How many people were polled out of 300,000,000 Americans ?

I understand this is a difficult question so please feel free to take your time.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Court: Banning Doctors From Asking About Firear... 16 hr payme 1
News With Obama leaving, Congressional Republicans l... Wed WasteWater 38
News Those Who Plan and Enjoy Murder Tue justice 1
News Pennsylvanians ask feds to help disarm intimida... (Aug '13) Tue Sisboi Markie 22
News Will Sixty Senators Vote To Protect The Second ... Feb 19 Trump your President 8
News Pistol permit fees would quadruple under the bu... Feb 19 frankspeak 2
News GOA Addresses Congress in Favor of Concealed Ca... Feb 18 jimwildrickjr 2
More from around the web