Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

Mar 29, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Chambersburg Public Opinion

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Comments
1,361 - 1,380 of 11,004 Comments Last updated Apr 3, 2014
John W Hardin

Carlisle, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1655
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Squach wrote:
<quoted text>The ILLEGAL aliens ARE criminals be cause they are here ILLEGALLY! DUH! Their very presence here is a CRIME. Gang members, drug dealers, and gun runners! If they are "honest hard working people" let them go back where they came from and work hard on coming here honestly. Try immigrating to Mexico illegally and see what happens.
Being in the US without documents is a civil offense, not a criminal offense.
John W Hardin

Carlisle, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1656
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
It does NOT matter what >you< think,(or not, as the case may be). Nor do ANY of the VAIN and IMMATERIAL arguments that you present have ANY bearing, substance, or weight.
The FACT of the matter is:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".
And NOTHING that you present will alter that FACT one iota.
Pull your head out.
This post is irrelevant and unrelated to what we were talking about.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1657
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

John W Hardin wrote:
<quoted text>
Being in the US without documents is a civil offense, not a criminal offense.
You're splitting hairs. It IS an offense. It IS illegal. It IS dishonest. It IS detrimental to our economy. Not to mention all of the gang members, drug dealers, and gun runners they bring with them to take up space in our prisons and jack up our crime rates. I wonder what percentage of gang members are illegal aliens right next door in CA.

Like I said, if they are honest hard working people let them go back where they came from and work hard on coming here honestly.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1658
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gun Control Facts:
Oh boy, more GayDavy constantly repeated off topic copy & pastes!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1659
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

GunShow1 wrote:
After a school massacre, the U.K. banned handguns in 1998. A decade later, handgun crime had doubled.
A) it hasn't
B) Homicide rate, US: 4.8; UK: 1.2
C) 90 percent of Americans insist on universal background checks

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1660
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

No poll has ever shown 90 percent of US citizens agree or insist on
" universal background checks ".

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1661
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

GunShow1 wrote:
The FACT of the matter is:
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".
The fact is: you are a liar.

A lie repeat a thousand times is still a lie, GayDavy.

Time to change your alias, Honey.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1662
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Where Is My America wrote:
No poll has ever shown 90 percent of US citizens agree or insist on
" universal background checks ".
Eight have.

Or more.

Listed several times.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1663
Apr 28, 2013
 
John W Hardin wrote:
<quoted text>
I have posted a number of studies showing a reduction in guns yields a reduction in gun violence. You've been arguing with me and claiming that is the wrong approach, saying that we have to deal with the source of the problem - criminals and psychos. So I asked you for your ideas.
Deporting _all_ undocumented immigrants is physically impossible as well as being unaffordable. It would take more than 200,000 buses stretching 1800 miles and cost almost $300 billion.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/deporting_il...
Violent criminals are already being locked up. Our incarceration rate is the highest in the world.
You claim my ideas are unworkable, then you name two unworkable ideas.
Why do you own guns ?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1664
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you own guns ?
Why do you own books?

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1665
Apr 28, 2013
 
John W Hardin wrote:
<quoted text>
This post is irrelevant and unrelated to what we were talking about.
No, more like anything that >you< claim is "irrelevant and unrelated" to the argument. Especially when the FACT is;

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1666
Apr 28, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you own books?
Go play with yourself somewhere else.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1667
Apr 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Eight have.
Or more.
Listed several times.
USA TODAY Poll: Public support for gun control ebbs
Susan Page, USA TODAY8:14 a.m. EDT April 23, 2013

WASHINGTON -- Four months after the shooting rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School, a USA TODAY Poll finds support for a new gun-control law ebbing as prospects for passage on Capitol Hill seem to fade.

Americans are more narrowly divided on the issue than in recent months, and backing for a bill has slipped below 50%, the poll finds. By 49%-45%, those surveyed favor Congress passing a new gun-control law. In an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll in early April, 55% had backed a stricter gun law, which was down from 61% in February.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2...

Good-bye, troll.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1668
Apr 29, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Where Is My America wrote:
No poll has ever shown 90 percent of US citizens agree or insist on
" universal background checks ".
Here's one.

Over 90 percent of Americans support gun background checks: poll
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/07/us-...

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1669
Apr 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's one.
Over 90 percent of Americans support gun background checks: poll
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/07/us-...
Keep drinking the Koo-Aid.

I don't expect much from you but there is no reason to prove it.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1670
Apr 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, more like anything that >you< claim is "irrelevant and unrelated" to the argument. Especially when the FACT is;
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".
I would be surprised if he comes back.

Like so many before him , he comes here with opinions then gets beaten back with facts and becomes disappointed he was not appreciated for spreading BS.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1673
Apr 29, 2013
 
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>I would be surprised if he comes back.
Like so many before him , he comes here with opinions then gets beaten back with facts and becomes disappointed he was not appreciated for spreading BS.
I got the feeling that it was Nuggie using an unregistered account. I could be wrong.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1675
Apr 29, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>Keep drinking the Koo-Aid.
I don't expect much from you but there is no reason to prove it.
You made a statement.

I proved it that it was false.

I'm not the one drinking Kool-Aid if you refuse to accept that reality.

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1678
Apr 29, 2013
 
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's one.
Over 90 percent of Americans support gun background checks: poll
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/07/us-...
MEANINGLESS. Here you go, troll:

"It is expressly provided in the Constitution of the United States, that the States may provide for their own defence in times of imminent danger. We are bound by that Constitution and we have a right to defend ourselves in the way that is reserved in the Constitution of the United States; that is left to every State in the Union, unrestricted and in full force. He knew that the people of the United States had reserved the right of self defence; but the States have given up the right to keep ships of war or troops in time of peace. What he had said he took from the book, and he had not gone beyond that. The right of preparing for war is exclusively reserved to the Government of the United States, and the States cannot, for their own defence, keep ships of war or troops in time of peace. Now for the qualification of these remarks, he would refer to the amendment to the Constitution which had already been read as follows: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Why this was intended to convey to individuals certain personal rights. This is a personal right reserved to individuals to bear arms; this was adopted to grant to every man the shield of self defence."

- Mr. Walter Forward, Oct. 3, 1837 Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention.[THE CONVENTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA TO PROPOSE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION COMMENCED AT HARRISBURG MAY 2 1837, VOL IV. Pages 96-97]. Mr. Forward,(January 24, 1786 November 24, 1852), was an American lawyer and politician. Elected to the 17th Congress in 1822, and reelected to the 18th Congress. He was appointed on March 6, 1841 by President William Henry Harrison to be First Comptroller of the Treasury. Served in that post until September 13, 1841. And was then appointed 15th U.S. Secretary of the Treasury by President John Tyler).

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1679
Apr 29, 2013
 
Where Is My America wrote:
<quoted text>I would be surprised if he comes back.
Like so many before him , he comes here with opinions then gets beaten back with facts and becomes disappointed he was not appreciated for spreading BS.
Aye. Plus the quote I just posted above proves our right beyond all shadow of doubt. So he would have been a loser regardless.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••