Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 11002 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1426 Apr 26, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
He posted it as a linked and bragged about it.
After all, that's all this thread is anymore. Unsubstantiated claims. Don't hold me to a higher standard that you hold everyone else.
No one is holding you to a higher standard. You set the standard yourself when you twist the words of other posters into something they never said and then make unsubstantiated claims based on it. Now you snivel like a petulant child because someone is doing it to you. So what are ya goin' to do Nuggie? Stomp your feet and hold your breath? You're a f@#king idiot.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1427 Apr 26, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Which post was that a direct quote from?
Would that be anything like the "direct quote" where Marisa is supposed to have told you she is "pro-rape"?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1428 Apr 26, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? You're the one throwing a sh1t fit over the fact that you guy busted posting child porn.
You should be ashamed of yourself. You know the cops can trace your posts back to you, right? Expect them to come a knocking.
Keep diggin' that hole deeper Nuggie. Your posts are becoming progressively more unhinged. You're showing your true colors now with your hateful, bigoted lies. When a leftist liberal fails at deception and diversion he responds true to form and resorts to bigoted hatred. Face it, that's all you got. Now go back to your room and pout while you dream up some new outlandish falsehoods to support your socialistic fantasy.

Remember, this is where YOU took the conversation. Others tried to communicate with you in an intelligent debate but YOU chose to twist words and make unfounded accusations. You're a fidiot!
Marisa

Fayetteville, PA

#1429 Apr 26, 2013
I see Nuggin is still up to his dirty deeds of lies and deception.

Good luck to all of you that will try to have an intelligent debate with him. I think the conclusion has been made that when it doesn't go his way, Nuggin loses his cool and resorts to very, very strange behavior, and that's putting it mildly.

Anyhow I hope you all have a good weekend.....looks like a beautiful day :-)

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1430 Apr 26, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
*sigh*
The name of the political party is irrelevant. The historical FACT is that CONSERVATIVES have always - ALWAYS - been the ones who have supported and sustained racism.
It was southern CONSERVATIVES who committed sedition against this nation so they could continue to own their fellow human beings as livestock.
It was southern CONSERVATIVES who abandoned the Republican party for the Democratic party after Lincoln freed the slaves.
It was southern CONSERVATIVES who instituted Jim Crow and fought against civil rights.
It was southern CONSERVATIVES who abandoned the Democratic party after the Civil Rights Act.
Conservatives have consistently fought against the rights and freedoms of minorities in America - and continue to do so.
These are historical facts.
So whatever party CONSERVATIVES happened to be in is completely irrelevant to the historical facts.
You do know that you'd probably be able to think better if you stopped smoking crack, right?

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1431 Apr 26, 2013
Marisa wrote:
I see Nuggin is still up to his dirty deeds of lies and deception.
Good luck to all of you that will try to have an intelligent debate with him. I think the conclusion has been made that when it doesn't go his way, Nuggin loses his cool and resorts to very, very strange behavior, and that's putting it mildly.
Anyhow I hope you all have a good weekend.....looks like a beautiful day :-)
You do the same.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1432 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that you'd probably be able to think better if you stopped smoking crack, right?
So no rebuttal on the facts? No examples from history to refute my points?

Of course not.

When you can't debate the actual issue, you just post some juvenile bullshit personal attack.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1433 Apr 26, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
.... AMONG WHITE RESIDENTS ONLY.
In other words, the Slavery Loving, KKK members from the south switched from the Dems to the Rep when the Dems came out in support of equality for everyone.
That's why the Republicans have a "Southern Strategy", it's why they hate Obama, it's why they are trying to deny African Americans the vote as a NATIONAL PARTY STRATEGY, it's why they HATE "brown immigrants".
Like your little tinker-toy friend Dan the Spam, you need to stop smoking crack.

The only things the dem[on]s ever have come out with is perversion of the truth. You and trash can Dan are living proof of that.
bobby6464

Portland, OR

#1434 Apr 26, 2013
Gun dummy, your proven ignorance never ceases to amaze

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1435 Apr 26, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
So no rebuttal on the facts? No examples from history to refute my points?
Of course not.
When you can't debate the actual issue, you just post some juvenile bullshit personal attack.
I have no problem admitting your points,(on top of your empty flat head).

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1436 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no problem admitting your points,(on top of your empty flat head).
LOL! You're speaking gibberish. Are you drunk?

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1437 Apr 26, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! You're speaking gibberish. Are you drunk?
"First comes Mr. Gunthorpe. Gentlemen, you heard him upon the stand. He said: "I joined this organization in 1868; I took there some oath, as near as I can remember, as that in this K[u]. K[lux]. consitution. I understood when I joined it that it was a society for mutual protection. When I got inside of it I got inside of it I learned that it was an organization in the interests of the democratic party, and I rejected it at once and withdrew from it. I didn't know that there was any danger from colored people, but did not know what might occur, and I joined the society for mutual protection. When I got into it I then found
that it was a cheat and a lie, and I withdrew from it."

- Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Inquire into the Condition of affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States South Carolina Volume 3 1872 - Trials at Columbia, South Carolina Circuit Court of the United States 1871.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1438 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"First comes Mr. Gunthorpe. Gentlemen, you heard him upon the stand. He said: "I joined this organization in 1868; I took there some oath, as near as I can remember, as that in this K[u]. K[lux]. consitution. I understood when I joined it that it was a society for mutual protection. When I got inside of it I got inside of it I learned that it was an organization in the interests of the democratic party, and I rejected it at once and withdrew from it. I didn't know that there was any danger from colored people, but did not know what might occur, and I joined the society for mutual protection. When I got into it I then found
that it was a cheat and a lie, and I withdrew from it."
- Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Inquire into the Condition of affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States South Carolina Volume 3 1872 - Trials at Columbia, South Carolina Circuit Court of the United States 1871.
LOL! Yeah that's right - better to paste someone else's irrelevant words than try to post your own scrambled thoughts.

You know what they say - better remain quiet and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt. LOL!

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1439 Apr 26, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Yeah that's right - better to paste someone else's irrelevant words than try to post your own scrambled thoughts.
You know what they say - better remain quiet and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt. LOL!
"We will make a democrat of you to-night; pull off your clothing, stretch out!" And he stretched out, and they beat him till they were tired, and asked him, "Will you hereafter vote the democratic ticket."

- Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Inquire into the Condition of affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States South Carolina Volume 3 1872 - Trials at Columbia, South Carolina Circuit Court of the United States 1871.
think about it

Fayetteville, PA

#1442 Apr 26, 2013
Whers nuggins at? Lose his computer privledges again? Or is he just sulking, probably both. He can sure dish it out but can't take it when it's handed right back to him.
A while back there was a poster, Dan, that thought nuggons was intelligent. I wonder if he still feels the same way after nuggins has gone off the deep end into his bizarro accusations of numerous posters?

Nuggins might have left this thread for good. He will go somewhere else and start all over then move from that one after he goes nutty.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1443 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"We will make a democrat of you to-night; pull off your clothing, stretch out!" And he stretched out, and they beat him till they were tired, and asked him, "Will you hereafter vote the democratic ticket."
- Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Inquire into the Condition of affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States South Carolina Volume 3 1872 - Trials at Columbia, South Carolina Circuit Court of the United States 1871.
Relevance?

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1445 Apr 26, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Relevance?
"Most, if not all, of this information, except what I derived from the Attorney General, came to me orally, and was to the effect that said counties were under the sway of powerful combination, properly known as "Ku-Klux Klan," the objects of which were, by force and terror, to prevent all political action not in accord with the views of the members, to deprive colored citizens of the right to bear arms, and of the right to a free ballot; to suppress schools in which colored children were taught, and to reduce the colored people to a condition closely akin to that of slavery; that these combinations were organized and armed and had rendered the local laws ineffectual to protect the classes whom they desired to oppress; that they had perpetrated many murder, and hundreds of crimes of minor degree, all of which were unpunished; and that witnesses could not safely testify against them unless the more active members were placed under restraint."
U. S. GRANT.
Executive Mansion, April 19, 1872.
The same having been read,
On motion of Mr. Dickey,
Ordered, That it be referred to the Joint Select Committee on the Insurrectionary States and printed.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1446 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Most, if not all, of this information, except what I derived from the Attorney General, came to me orally, and was to the effect that said counties were under the sway of powerful combination, properly known as "Ku-Klux Klan," the objects of which were, by force and terror, to prevent all political action not in accord with the views of the members, to deprive colored citizens of the right to bear arms, and of the right to a free ballot; to suppress schools in which colored children were taught, and to reduce the colored people to a condition closely akin to that of slavery; that these combinations were organized and armed and had rendered the local laws ineffectual to protect the classes whom they desired to oppress; that they had perpetrated many murder, and hundreds of crimes of minor degree, all of which were unpunished; and that witnesses could not safely testify against them unless the more active members were placed under restraint."
U. S. GRANT.
Executive Mansion, April 19, 1872.
The same having been read,
On motion of Mr. Dickey,
Ordered, That it be referred to the Joint Select Committee on the Insurrectionary States and printed.
Yeah, we know the politically conservative KKK was/is a bunch of evil racists who did/do morally repugnant things.

Do you have a point?

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1447 Apr 26, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, we know the politically conservative KKK was/is a bunch of evil racists who did/do morally repugnant things.
Do you have a point?
President Grant was a Republican, simpleton. He was one of the presidents that fought the hardest to secure the newly freed slaves their rights. Including sending the military to FORCE the treasonous demonrats to respect the rights of their former slaves.(To bad you freaks had to start working, eh?)

"First comes Mr. Gunthorpe. Gentlemen, you heard him upon the stand. He said: "I joined this organization in 1868; I took there some oath, as near as I can remember, as that in this K[u]. K[lux]. consitution. I understood when I joined it that it was a society for mutual protection. When I got inside of it I learned that it was an organization in the interests of the democratic party, and I rejected it at once and withdrew from it. I didn't know that there was any danger from colored people, but did not know what might occur, and I joined the society for mutual protection. When I got into it I then found that it was a cheat and a lie, and I withdrew from it."

"We will make a democrat of you to-night; pull off your clothing, stretch out!" And he stretched out,
and they beat him till they were tired, and asked him, "Will you hereafter vote the democratic ticket."

- Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Inquire into the Condition of affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States South Carolina Volume 3 1872 - Trials at Columbia, South Carolina Circuit Court of the United States 1871.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1448 Apr 26, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
President Grant was a Republican, simpleton. He was one of the presidents that fought the hardest to secure the newly freed slaves their rights. Including sending the military to FORCE the treasonous demonrats to respect the rights of their former slaves.(To bad you freaks had to start working, eh?)
"First comes Mr. Gunthorpe. Gentlemen, you heard him upon the stand. He said: "I joined this organization in 1868; I took there some oath, as near as I can remember, as that in this K[u]. K[lux]. consitution. I understood when I joined it that it was a society for mutual protection. When I got inside of it I learned that it was an organization in the interests of the democratic party, and I rejected it at once and withdrew from it. I didn't know that there was any danger from colored people, but did not know what might occur, and I joined the society for mutual protection. When I got into it I then found that it was a cheat and a lie, and I withdrew from it."
"We will make a democrat of you to-night; pull off your clothing, stretch out!" And he stretched out,
and they beat him till they were tired, and asked him, "Will you hereafter vote the democratic ticket."
- Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Inquire into the Condition of affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States South Carolina Volume 3 1872 - Trials at Columbia, South Carolina Circuit Court of the United States 1871.
More ancient history that doesn't change the fact that TODAY'S Republican party has systematically alienated all minority groups with their racist, prejudicial, and discriminatory behavior.

What are you trying to achieve here? Educating people that the Republican party was anti-slavery in the 1800s? BFD. We live TODAY.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Assault weapon bans should stand 19 hr Quirky 766
News Facebook Spends $16 Million on Armed Guards for... Fri okimar 1
News Hillary to Voter Calling for More Second Amendm... Apr 24 GoForTheBandit 1
News Crimson Trace Provides Improved Accuracy Apr 22 duzitreallymatter 1
News It's just a bill Apr 20 payme 1
News Advocates: Vegas Woman Slaying Illustrates Find... Apr 19 spytheweb 1
News Advocates: Vegas woman slaying illustrates find... Apr 17 FancyButtPirate 1
More from around the web