Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10984 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11153 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
I will fully admit that I could possibly be proven wrong. In fact, I believe that you even found me mistaken on a previous topic some time ago.....once.
More than once, Spunk Monkey.

More than once today even.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11154 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
I DISAGREE. Prove me wrong by positively proving a negative.
It's great that in your opinion you disagree.

As I said: you are wrong, I don't care, you have a right to be wrong, it is a right you use loudly daily here, I don't have to make you admit you are wrong any more than I have to make your friend from Phoenix admit he is wrong about anything or even ask you if you believe him when he says he doesn't know who Herman Cain is (or let's say was).

If you want to be enlightened: look it up, "can the negative be proved"?

Put aside for a second the obvious answer is (almost) everything can be stated as a negative proposition.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#11155 Dec 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
More than once, Spunk Monkey.
More than once today even.
While you are proven to be mistaken with each and every post. You are perpetually wrong, and of course pathetically lame. You don't even have the ability of reason enough to realize that you shouldn't even be here still. Most people that have had the snot kicked out of them as much as you have. Would be too embarrassed to keep coming back for another smack-down. But NOOOOO, not you....

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#11156 Dec 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that so?
Didn't I say:
"You keep snapping them up, darling."
Do not pass go.
Do not collect $200.
Post #11139, dufus.

Give me my $200.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#11157 Dec 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
More than once, Spunk Monkey.
More than once today even.
Never more than once, and not for a VERY long time.

Swing and a miss AGAIN!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11158 Dec 20, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
While you are proven to be mistaken with each and every post.
still no Lanza proof...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11159 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you or did you not accuse me of "snagging up" firearms in post #11115?
.
HAHAHAHAAHAH!

Is someone posting as you dear?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11160 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you or did you not accuse me of "snagging up" firearms in post #11115?
I don't like people stealing aliases, Spunk Monkey.

You let me know if this was you.

I'd be happy to flag it for you.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#11161 Dec 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's great that in your opinion you disagree.
As I said: you are wrong, I don't care, you have a right to be wrong, it is a right you use loudly daily here, I don't have to make you admit you are wrong any more than I have to make your friend from Phoenix admit he is wrong about anything or even ask you if you believe him when he says he doesn't know who Herman Cain is (or let's say was).
If you want to be enlightened: look it up, "can the negative be proved"?
Put aside for a second the obvious answer is (almost) everything can be stated as a negative proposition.
WOW!!!!

That is by far the most impressive tap-dancing i have seen by you to date.

You said that you could prove me wrong about proving a negative, and as of yet, you have not.

And I hate using Wiki, but this seems entirely relevant to our discussion:
Proving a negative:(the last bullet) Sometimes it is mistaken for an argument from ignorance, which is non-proof and a logical fallacy.

You get that?..."which is non-proof and a logical fallacy".

You're done.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11162 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Post #11139, dufus.
Give me my $200.
Wipe your chin, dear.

You do see how I use your EXACT post?

Your EXACT quote?

And do you remember how silly you look when you start playing the spelling NAZI because you BLOW IT ALL THE TIME, much like you do your boyfriend's joystick?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11163 Dec 20, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
While you are proven to be mistaken with each and every post..
Do you think that anyone on Topix believed you when you said you didn't know who Herman Cain was?

It's a curious statement- that you'd rather be seen as profoundly ignorant rather than a congenital liar... when the latter has already been established.

Adam Lanza... register Democrat... you say... waiting...

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#11164 Dec 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't like people stealing aliases, Spunk Monkey.
You let me know if this was you.
I'd be happy to flag it for you.
Post #11139, dufus.

Give me my $200.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#11165 Dec 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wipe your chin, dear.
You do see how I use your EXACT post?
Your EXACT quote?
And do you remember how silly you look when you start playing the spelling NAZI because you BLOW IT ALL THE TIME, much like you do your boyfriend's joystick?
Post #11139, dufus.
Give me my $200.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11166 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<
You said that you could prove me wrong about proving a negative, and as of yet, you have not.
I made it very clear to you I had no intent to do so.

]]]SHRUG[[[

Put something on the table- something that you will welch on when I put in the extra effort.
So I can beat on you when you welch on it.

You know, like when the Phoenix fairy promised that if he couldn't prove I "slandered" the homo Alexander Hamilton (the long dead homo Alexander Hamilton), he'd stop posting (at least stop using one of his four or five most frequently used aliases...).

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11167 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you or did you not accuse me of "snagging up" firearms in post #11115?
Not only did you do it, I provided YOUR EXACT QUOTE saying you did.
Go ahead and deny it AGAIN you LYING piece of shit.
Is this you?

Did you say this?

Why is it everyone in this forum can see #11115?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11168 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Post #11139, dufus.
Give me my $200.
Are you making a correction Spunk Monkey?

Do you think no one can see that post I quoted?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11169 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!!!
Here's your post # 11115:
"You keep snapping them up, darling.
Yes, you are misquoting me, Shug.

How is this helping your case, Spunk Monkey?

You just told everyone you are man enough to admit when you made a mistake.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11170 Dec 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep snapping them up, darling.
Wipe your chin.
Let me bring my quote up, Spunk Monkey.

This is what I said.

Unless you want to say someone in Topix went back and changed it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11171 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Post #11139, dufus.
Give me my $200.
So - and do correct me if I misunderstand what you are saying- you misquoted me (established as fact) but now I have to be responsible for your misquote?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11172 Dec 20, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!!!
Here's your post # 11115:
"You keep snapping them up, darling.
Wipe your chin. "
Oh yeah.....that would make you a F-ING LIAR and a HYPOCRITE. That is unless you weren't referring to firearms by your word "them".(snicker)
You truly are living in denial.
This is #11139, Spunk Monkey.

This is you misquoting me.

Are you trying to take away one of GayDavy's titles (Most Stupid or Biggest Liar)?

I am willing to split my vote...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Open carry" bill shot down 22 hr payme 50
News Grandfather says three teenage armed robbers 'd... Wed payme 47
News Senate votes to allow concealed carry without p... Tue 16 TEEN SHOTS chi... 6
Taurus Gaucho Revolver (May '06) Tue Westerner 28
News Appeals court upholds MD assault weapons ban Apr 22 American Patriot 417
Former University Professor Suggests the NRA Is... Apr 22 Get Out 3
News $25 Million Dollars Pledged To Stop Concealed C... Apr 20 payme 8
More from around the web