Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 11002 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1221 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
He's obsessed with you, Nuggin.
Just more proof that he knows he's defeated on the issues - obsessive (and increasingly shrill and unhinged) posts about meaningless shit...
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
He just can't stop.
LOL!
I slapped you around and now you're trying to use another poster as your redemption? That's just soooooooo lame. Give it up Danny Boy, you've already repeatedly proven that you're a waste of skin.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1222 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
This is YET ANOTHER post from you obsessing over this issue. It's your, what? 20th such post? 20 posts telling me how you are NOT obsessed with posting about this? LOL.
You're right. One other poster made ONE reference to Hollywood. Then you picked up the torch and ran with it. I replied to you.
If you had then STOP responding, end of story.
Hell, at this point, you don't even know what you are arguing. You've spent two days talking about how you never use the word "Hollywood" in posts where you are USING THE WORD "Hollywood".
Do ANY of you have ANY real points to make?
Between you and Marisa's absolute lack of an argument and Nerd's complete vanishing act after getting destroyed on the Fox NEws stuff, I don't know what you guys stand for anymore.
Let's hit the reset button.
Squatch -
Do you believe that law abiding citizens should have access to any sort of weapon they choose? OR, do you feel that there should be limits on weapons regardless of whether or not someone has previously broken the law.
You just can't leave it alone, can ya? What a moron. I'm not arguing anything right now, I'm simply pointing out what a f@#king idiot you are. You keep proving me right. What can I say?
Louiston

Des Moines, IA

#1223 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man is anything but a man.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1224 Apr 22, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>You just can't leave it alone, can ya? What a moron. I'm not arguing anything right now, I'm simply pointing out what a f@#king idiot you are. You keep proving me right. What can I say?
And yet, here you are responding YET AGAIN about how I can't let it go.

Seems like you are more than a little obsessed with getting in the last word.

You know how you can win this debate? Leave the thread and don't come back. That will really show me.

Bet you can't.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1225 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet, here you are responding YET AGAIN about how I can't let it go.
Seems like you are more than a little obsessed with getting in the last word.
You know how you can win this debate? Leave the thread and don't come back. That will really show me.
Bet you can't.
What debate??? We aren't debating ANYTHING. Once again this is so bizarre that I feel compelled to ask you if you are REALLY this f@#king stupid. It just boggles the mind. You said that I was the one who brought up Hollywood. I called you a LIAR. Even after you were forced to admit that you LIED you still tried to blame it on "the conservatives" like the liberal lame that you are. I am not engaged in a debate with you fool, I simply stated facts that exposed your LIE.

Contra principia negantem non est disputandum.

I'll leave when I see fit to and not before. This is a PUBLIC forum and, in spite of you and your kind, this is still a free country. If my staying here bothers you........learn to live with it.
Marisa

Chambersburg, PA

#1226 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet, here you are responding YET AGAIN about how I can't let it go.
Seems like you are more than a little obsessed with getting in the last word.
You know how you can win this debate? Leave the thread and don't come back. That will really show me.
Bet you can't.
This post reminds me of something a child would do...all this nah, nah, nah, nah, " bet you can't."

Grow up nuggin!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1227 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin tries to change the subject...
Nuggin wrote:
Let's hit the reset button.
Squatch -
Do you believe that law abiding citizens should have access to any sort of weapon they choose? OR, do you feel that there should be limits on weapons regardless of whether or not someone has previously broken the law.
But Squach [sic] just can't stop...
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>You just can't leave it alone, can ya? What a moron. I'm not arguing anything right now, I'm simply pointing out what a f@#king idiot you are. You keep proving me right. What can I say?
Positively OBSESSED!

LMAO!

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1228 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin tries to change the subject...
Nuggin wrote:
Let's hit the reset button.
Squatch -
Do you believe that law abiding citizens should have access to any sort of weapon they choose? OR, do you feel that there should be limits on weapons regardless of whether or not someone has previously broken the law.
Squach just can't stop...
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>You just can't leave it alone, can ya? What a moron. I'm not arguing anything right now, I'm simply pointing out what a f@#king idiot you are. You keep proving me right. What can I say?
And Marisa blames Nuggin for it...
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>This post reminds me of something a child would do...all this nah, nah, nah, nah, " bet you can't."
Grow up nuggin!
I think it's pretty clear who's perpetuating this childish argument.
local yocal

Chambersburg, PA

#1229 Apr 22, 2013
are you dingbats still yapping about big ole nuggin gettin mixed up and calling the wrong poster a liar.

Old nuggins got to much on his mind. He posts, answers the phone, posts, writes a movie, posts, answers the phone. No wonder the old dummy gets mixed up. Tryin to write a movie and answerthe phone and post right here on this forum.

Ya know what I think is funny. Why doesn't old nuggins have a secretary answer his phone? I bet he ain't know movie man. He is just full to the gills of poop.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1230 Apr 22, 2013
Right Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Heeee's Back...
"We condemn, and with arms in our hands,--a resource which Freemen will never part with,--we oppose the claim and exercise of unconstitutional powers"--Journals of the Continental Congress, Dec. 6, 1775.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1231 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
Nuggin tries to change the subject...
<quoted text>
Squach just can't stop...
<quoted text>
And Marisa blames Nuggin for it...
<quoted text>
I think it's pretty clear who's perpetuating this childish argument.
Clarity is something that constantly evades you.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1232 Apr 22, 2013
Squach wrote:
I'll leave when I see fit to and not before. This is a PUBLIC forum and, in spite of you and your kind, this is still a free country. If my staying here bothers you........learn to live with it.
See, told you you couldn't.

You being here doesn't bother me. I just proves my point about you.

You aren't interested in any discussion of facts or reasoning. Like all Conservatives you are simply contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.

If I say: "Clean water is good"
You say: "I oppose clean water"

If the Republicans say: We want taxes to be at 25%
Then Obama says: "Okay, let's make taxes be 25%
The Republicans respond with: How dare you! We will die before we allow this!

You guys are a joke.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1233 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Storage Unit Dave changed his name!
You can change your name, but you can't hide the stupid. LOL!
Why did you do that, Dave? Are you regretting that you exposed your pathetic identity to everyone here?
Oh wait ... I just looked ... ALL your posts are GONE!! Every single one!
ROFLMAO!
What happened, Dave - did Topix ban your sorry ass? LMAO! That is TOO funny!
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government ... The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms..."--Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 28.

"...Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the PEOPLE AT LARGE, than to have them properly ARMED and EQUIPPED .... but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, LITTLE, if at ALL, INFERIOR to them in discipline and the USE OF ARMS, who stand ready to DEFEND THEIR OWN RIGHTS, and those of their fellow citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army; and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."--Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 29, Independent Journal, Wednesday, January 9, 1788.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1234 Apr 22, 2013
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>This post reminds me of something a child would do...all this nah, nah, nah, nah, " bet you can't."
Grow up nuggin!
Still waiting for you to explain why you support a party that hates women.

You've spent about 100 posts now being acting like a child and yet haven't bothered to explain your position once.

Is it that you WANT to be raped?
Is that that you believe that women who are raped deserve it?
Are you jealous of women who are raped because you think they get more attention than you?

What gives?

What other violent crimes against women do you support?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1236 Apr 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
"...Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the PEOPLE AT LARGE, than to have them properly ARMED and EQUIPPED .... but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, LITTLE, if at ALL, INFERIOR to them in discipline and the USE OF ARMS, who stand ready to DEFEND THEIR OWN RIGHTS, and those of their fellow citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army; and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."--Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 29, Independent Journal, Wednesday, January 9, 1788.
Source:
http://www.guncite.com/journals/rk-exp.html

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1237 Apr 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"We condemn, and with arms in our hands,--a resource which Freemen will never part with,--we oppose the claim and exercise of unconstitutional powers"--Journals of the Continental Congress, Dec. 6, 1775.
Source:
http://keepandbeararms.net/news/nl/read_comme...

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1238 Apr 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".
"...What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental laws are established. The Constitution is certain and fixed; it contains the permanent will of the people, and is the supreme law of the land; it is paramount to the power of the Legisature, and can be revoked or altered only by the authority that made it. The life-giving principle and the death-doing stroke must proceed from the same hand. What are Legislatures? Creatures of the Constitution; they owe their existence to the Constitution: they derive their powers from the Constitution: It is their commission; and, therefore, all their acts must be conformable to it, or else they will be void. The Constitution is the work or will of the People themselves, in their original, sovereign, and unlimited capacity. Law is the work or will of the Legislature in their derivative and subordinate capacity. The one is the work of the Creator, and the other of the Creature. The Constitution fixes LIMITS to the exercise of legislative authority, and prescribes the orbit within which it MUST move. In short, gentlemen, the Constitution is the sun of the political system, around which all Legislative, Executive and Judicial bodies MUST revolve. Whatever may be the case in other countries, yet in this there can be no doubt, that every act of the Legislature, repugnant to the Constitution, as absolutely VOID."--Justice Patterson, U.S. Supreme Court, VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795), 2 U.S. 304 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 304.
Source:
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2006...
local yocal

Chambersburg, PA

#1239 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting for you to explain why you support a party that hates women.
You've spent about 100 posts now being acting like a child and yet haven't bothered to explain your position once.
Is it that you WANT to be raped?
Is that that you believe that women who are raped deserve it?
Are you jealous of women who are raped because you think they get more attention than you?
What gives?
What other violent crimes against women do you support?
mr. Nuggins i think you have gone loco. This is one dosey of a post. No one iN their right mind is gonna read this post of yours and think, great post. Even mr dan is probably thinkin you are a french fry short of a happy meal. i think you best be gettin yourself some good ole fashion witch doctor help. You only gots one oar inthe water. Soon you won't have any oars in the water and you will just be a sittin in the boat twiddling them there big dum thumbs of yours.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1240 Apr 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"We condemn, and with arms in our hands,--a resource which Freemen will never part with,--we oppose the claim and exercise of unconstitutional powers"--Journals of the Continental Congress, Dec. 6, 1775.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a bomb is a good guy with a bomb.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1241 Apr 22, 2013
local yocal wrote:
<quoted text>mr. Nuggins i think you have gone loco. This is one dosey of a post. No one iN their right mind is gonna read this post of yours and think, great post. Even mr dan is probably thinkin you are a french fry short of a happy meal. i think you best be gettin yourself some good ole fashion witch doctor help. You only gots one oar inthe water. Soon you won't have any oars in the water and you will just be a sittin in the boat twiddling them there big dum thumbs of yours.
I'm telling you, Marisa has been defending the GOP's pro-rape platform for pages now.

And since Conservatives MUST oppose anything that a liberal says, when I say "I'm against rape", she must therefore be for it.

So far, her "reasoning" has been to accuse me of not having a pretty enough girlfriend.

Then claiming that I'm lying about being married.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Federal Judge Strikes Down DC Concealed Carry Law 6 hr Prep-for-Dep 4
News Jesus and the Second Amendment 6 hr payme 2
News Facebook Spends $16 Million on Armed Guards for... 16 hr okimar 3
News It's just a bill Wed Justice Leaguer 2
News Why assault rifle sales are booming (Jun '15) May 23 Three Days 251
News Assault weapon bans should stand May 15 Sheriff Joe 529 882
News No wedding for Bristol Palin (May '15) May 6 Teenage Dutch Virgin 48
More from around the web