Firearms rally scheduled for Chambers...

Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square

There are 10987 comments on the Chambersburg Public Opinion story from Mar 29, 2013, titled Firearms rally scheduled for Chambersburg's square. In it, Chambersburg Public Opinion reports that:

Two local organizations are hosting a Second Amendment Freedom Rally on from noone to 2 p.m. April 6 on Courthouse Plaza in downtown Chambersburg.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chambersburg Public Opinion.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1201 Apr 22, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>How about the FACTS? You know, those pesky little realities that belie what Nuggie "claims" I did?
Here's the real issue.

You want to argue something but want to deny that you are arguing it. "Oh, I didn't bring it up." You've been arguing the point for what? 3 days?

At what point does something officially become your argument?

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1202 Apr 22, 2013
It's funny - the right isn't able to refute Nuggin's arguments on the issues, so they obsess over him confusing one wingnut for another.

Nuggin - it's their white flag of surrender. The more they obsess over your personal life and meaningless mistakes you make, the more you know they are feeling defeated on the issues. Just take your victory lap and ignore their pathetic bleating.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1203 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
It's funny - the right isn't able to refute Nuggin's arguments on the issues, so they obsess over him confusing one wingnut for another.
Nuggin - it's their white flag of surrender. The more they obsess over your personal life and meaningless mistakes you make, the more you know they are feeling defeated on the issues. Just take your victory lap and ignore their pathetic bleating.
Heh, I know.

Look at Marissa.

This whole personal life thing started because her main argument for rape was that she believed I didn't have a girlfriend. In fact, I'm married.

Now, why someone who doesn't understand women would be arguing AGAINST rape vs a woman who is arguing FOR rape - you've got me on that one.

What it always comes down to for me is this:

Conservatives are hypocrites. They say one thing up until it effects them, then suddenly "it's a complicated issue".

And they don't think through their positions.

They are anti-immigration because "they are stealing our jobs".
Yet free market capitalists who think "pay as little as you can for the work."

Immigrants CAN'T steal jobs from free market capitalists. Just work for less money than they are willing to accept. Or for free. Or pay your employer to work there. The immigrants will all leave when they discover that the working class in America pays employers to work there.
Louiston

Omaha, NE

#1204 Apr 22, 2013
Marisa wrote:
<quoted text>And the guy says he's a writer ( and I'm the Queen of England) and he can't even comprehend one sentence. It took him well over a day to figure it out and it took us pointing it out to him. He' s definitely slow, if nothing else.
Nuggin and Dan the WoeMan are both by-products of inbreeding and crackhead parents.
Marisa

Chambersburg, PA

#1205 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Heh, I know.
Look at Marissa.
This whole personal life thing started because her main argument for rape was that she believed I didn't have a girlfriend. In fact, I'm married.
Now, why someone who doesn't understand women would be arguing AGAINST rape vs a woman who is arguing FOR rape - you've got me on that one.
What it always comes down to for me is this:
Conservatives are hypocrites. They say one thing up until it effects them, then suddenly "it's a complicated issue".
And they don't think through their positions.
They are anti-immigration because "they are stealing our jobs".
Yet free market capitalists who think "pay as little as you can for the work."
Immigrants CAN'T steal jobs from free market capitalists. Just work for less money than they are willing to accept. Or for free. Or pay your employer to work there. The immigrants will all leave when they discover that the working class in America pays employers to work there.
More lies from the crybaby. Maybe you should write a movie about crybabies and you could give yourself the starring roll. And the title could be "Nuggin-Crybaby" Catchy huh?

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1206 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the thing
I'm dealing with 7-8 of you, many of whom change their name. Most of whom are stealing each other's positions.
You are dealing with just me.
So, when you take up the "hollywood is rape" argument after one other poster posts one thing and leaves, you'll have to understand that I just assume that you and he are the same person.
After all, none of you really think for yourselves anyway.
You idiot, I post under one name only. I have no need to do otherwise. I speak my own mind and think for myself. I don't "steal" positions from anyone, not my fault if other normal sane people agree with me. I'm posting on a total of 4 different forums with widely diverse subjects and have no trouble remembering who I am conversing with. Stop trying to blame your stupidity on everyone else! Just like a damned liberal, everything you screw up is someone else's fault. Pardon me if I think you're full of pure unadulterated bovine excrement.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1207 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the real issue.
You want to argue something but want to deny that you are arguing it. "Oh, I didn't bring it up." You've been arguing the point for what? 3 days?
At what point does something officially become your argument?
Are you really that f@#king stupid? I wasn't arguing anything when I made the comment you are referring to, I was making a joke about your argument with another poster about who is more abusive to children. The Catholics or Hollywoodites. None of which concerns me in the slightest because a pervert is a pervert no matter what religion or what region you may find them in. I haven't been "arguing" anything.....YOU have. All I had to do is poke one joke at you and you've been spouting pseudo-intellectual condescending BS ever since. Don't hate me because I'm right.

“O'er the land of the free ? ”

Since: Jan 09

Don't Tread On Me

#1208 Apr 22, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Are you really that f@#king stupid? I wasn't arguing anything when I made the comment you are referring to, I was making a joke about your argument with another poster about who is more abusive to children. The Catholics or Hollywoodites. None of which concerns me in the slightest because a pervert is a pervert no matter what religion or what region you may find them in. I haven't been "arguing" anything.....YOU have. All I had to do is poke one joke at you and you've been spouting pseudo-intellectual condescending BS ever since. Don't hate me because I'm right.
If this is not the truth nothing is !

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1209 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
It's funny - the right isn't able to refute Nuggin's arguments on the issues, so they obsess over him confusing one wingnut for another.
Nuggin - it's their white flag of surrender. The more they obsess over your personal life and meaningless mistakes you make, the more you know they are feeling defeated on the issues. Just take your victory lap and ignore their pathetic bleating.
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".

"...What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental laws are established. The Constitution is certain and fixed; it contains the permanent will of the people, and is the supreme law of the land; it is paramount to the power of the Legisature, and can be revoked or altered only by the authority that made it. The life-giving principle and the death-doing stroke must proceed from the same hand. What are Legislatures? Creatures of the Constitution; they owe their existence to the Constitution: they derive their powers from the Constitution: It is their commission; and, therefore, all their acts must be conformable to it, or else they will be void. The Constitution is the work or will of the People themselves, in their original, sovereign, and unlimited capacity. Law is the work or will of the Legislature in their derivative and subordinate capacity. The one is the work of the Creator, and the other of the Creature. The Constitution fixes LIMITS to the exercise of legislative authority, and prescribes the orbit within which it MUST move. In short, gentlemen, the Constitution is the sun of the political system, around which all Legislative, Executive and Judicial bodies MUST revolve. Whatever may be the case in other countries, yet in this there can be no doubt, that every act of the Legislature, repugnant to the Constitution, as absolutely VOID."--Justice Patterson, U.S. Supreme Court, VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795), 2 U.S. 304 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 304.

GunShow1

“Shall NOT be infringed!”

Since: Apr 13

San Jose, CA.

#1210 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Heh, I know.
Look at Marissa.
This whole personal life thing started because her main argument for rape was that she believed I didn't have a girlfriend. In fact, I'm married.
Now, why someone who doesn't understand women would be arguing AGAINST rape vs a woman who is arguing FOR rape - you've got me on that one.
What it always comes down to for me is this:
Conservatives are hypocrites. They say one thing up until it effects them, then suddenly "it's a complicated issue".
And they don't think through their positions.
They are anti-immigration because "they are stealing our jobs".
Yet free market capitalists who think "pay as little as you can for the work."
Immigrants CAN'T steal jobs from free market capitalists. Just work for less money than they are willing to accept. Or for free. Or pay your employer to work there. The immigrants will all leave when they discover that the working class in America pays employers to work there.
Yeah right, as evidenced by your 'leader' obama?
Right Rights

Carlisle, PA

#1211 Apr 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".
"...What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental laws are established. The Constitution is certain and fixed; it contains the permanent will of the people, and is the supreme law of the land; it is paramount to the power of the Legisature, and can be revoked or altered only by the authority that made it. The life-giving principle and the death-doing stroke must proceed from the same hand. What are Legislatures? Creatures of the Constitution; they owe their existence to the Constitution: they derive their powers from the Constitution: It is their commission; and, therefore, all their acts must be conformable to it, or else they will be void. The Constitution is the work or will of the People themselves, in their original, sovereign, and unlimited capacity. Law is the work or will of the Legislature in their derivative and subordinate capacity. The one is the work of the Creator, and the other of the Creature. The Constitution fixes LIMITS to the exercise of legislative authority, and prescribes the orbit within which it MUST move. In short, gentlemen, the Constitution is the sun of the political system, around which all Legislative, Executive and Judicial bodies MUST revolve. Whatever may be the case in other countries, yet in this there can be no doubt, that every act of the Legislature, repugnant to the Constitution, as absolutely VOID."--Justice Patterson, U.S. Supreme Court, VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795), 2 U.S. 304 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 304.
Heeee's Back...

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1212 Apr 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed".
"...What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental laws are established. The Constitution is certain and fixed; it contains the permanent will of the people, and is the supreme law of the land; it is paramount to the power of the Legisature, and can be revoked or altered only by the authority that made it. The life-giving principle and the death-doing stroke must proceed from the same hand. What are Legislatures? Creatures of the Constitution; they owe their existence to the Constitution: they derive their powers from the Constitution: It is their commission; and, therefore, all their acts must be conformable to it, or else they will be void. The Constitution is the work or will of the People themselves, in their original, sovereign, and unlimited capacity. Law is the work or will of the Legislature in their derivative and subordinate capacity. The one is the work of the Creator, and the other of the Creature. The Constitution fixes LIMITS to the exercise of legislative authority, and prescribes the orbit within which it MUST move. In short, gentlemen, the Constitution is the sun of the political system, around which all Legislative, Executive and Judicial bodies MUST revolve. Whatever may be the case in other countries, yet in this there can be no doubt, that every act of the Legislature, repugnant to the Constitution, as absolutely VOID."--Justice Patterson, U.S. Supreme Court, VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795), 2 U.S. 304 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 304.
Storage Unit Dave changed his name!

You can change your name, but you can't hide the stupid. LOL!

Why did you do that, Dave? Are you regretting that you exposed your pathetic identity to everyone here?

Oh wait ... I just looked ... ALL your posts are GONE!! Every single one!

ROFLMAO!

What happened, Dave - did Topix ban your sorry ass? LMAO! That is TOO funny!

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1213 Apr 22, 2013
GunShow1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah right, as evidenced by your 'leader' obama?
Are you claiming Obama is an illegal immigrant who stole the job of president?

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1214 Apr 22, 2013
Squach wrote:
All I had to do is poke one joke at you and you've been spouting pseudo-intellectual condescending BS ever since. Don't hate me because I'm right.
It's hard not to be condescending when talking to Conservatives.

Your group hates education. It's no wonder you have no foundations in history, science, or even critical thinking.

I mean, for F sake man, the Texas Republican Platform is LITERALLY _against_ teaching children critical thinking.

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1215 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
It's funny - the right isn't able to refute Nuggin's arguments on the issues, so they obsess over him confusing one wingnut for another.
Nuggin - it's their white flag of surrender. The more they obsess over your personal life and meaningless mistakes you make, the more you know they are feeling defeated on the issues. Just take your victory lap and ignore their pathetic bleating.
Just like a liberal idiot, got a conservative boot up the arse and thinks he won a prize. Nuggie was the only one obsessing over his mistake.......unless maybe you were obsessing with him/her. If the asswipe had dropped it the first time I corrected him/her it wouldn't have been an issue......would it? The other posters on this thread aren't the ones who perpetuated this thing.....Nuggie is. My flag is RED, WHITE, & BLUE.....no retreat, no surrender. Try again dipshit 'cause you dropped yer dick in the dirt with this incredibly stupid comment.
Bobby6464

Clearfield, PA

#1216 Apr 22, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
You can change your name, but you can't hide the stupid.
You're correct here Danny. This is how your multiple ID's were exposed. LMAO

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1217 Apr 22, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
It's hard not to be condescending when talking to Conservatives.
Your group hates education. It's no wonder you have no foundations in history, science, or even critical thinking.
I mean, for F sake man, the Texas Republican Platform is LITERALLY _against_ teaching children critical thinking.
Once again you confuse me with one of those phoney conservatives. I happen to be very well educated and am continuing my education all the time. I also happen to hold a degree in history. I don't live in Texas. I have absolutely no troble recognizing a pseudo-intellectual condescending idiot when I see one. YOU are a pseudo-intellectual idiot who can't see past your own pompous self rightious stupidity. Your turn to try again 'cause you just made a bigger ass of yourself than you did with your previous post. Make sure you read this three times so you know what I actually said and make a note to yourself who said it.......dumbass.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#1218 Apr 22, 2013
He's obsessed with you, Nuggin.

Just more proof that he knows he's defeated on the issues - obsessive (and increasingly shrill and unhinged) posts about meaningless shit...
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>You idiot, I post under one name only. I have no need to do otherwise. I speak my own mind and think for myself. I don't "steal" positions from anyone, not my fault if other normal sane people agree with me. I'm posting on a total of 4 different forums with widely diverse subjects and have no trouble remembering who I am conversing with. Stop trying to blame your stupidity on everyone else! Just like a damned liberal, everything you screw up is someone else's fault. Pardon me if I think you're full of pure unadulterated bovine excrement.
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Are you really that f@#king stupid? I wasn't arguing anything when I made the comment you are referring to, I was making a joke about your argument with another poster about who is more abusive to children. The Catholics or Hollywoodites. None of which concerns me in the slightest because a pervert is a pervert no matter what religion or what region you may find them in. I haven't been "arguing" anything.....YOU have. All I had to do is poke one joke at you and you've been spouting pseudo-intellectual condescending BS ever since. Don't hate me because I'm right.
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Just like a liberal idiot, got a conservative boot up the arse and thinks he won a prize. Nuggie was the only one obsessing over his mistake.......unless maybe you were obsessing with him/her. If the asswipe had dropped it the first time I corrected him/her it wouldn't have been an issue......would it? The other posters on this thread aren't the ones who perpetuated this thing.....Nuggie is. My flag is RED, WHITE, & BLUE.....no retreat, no surrender. Try again dipshit 'cause you dropped yer dick in the dirt with this incredibly stupid comment.
He just can't stop.

LOL!

“HUNTING RIGHTS ADVOCATE”

Since: Oct 08

Boggy Creek

#1219 Apr 22, 2013
The bait is set.

Since: Sep 07

Los Angeles, CA

#1220 Apr 22, 2013
Squach wrote:
<quoted text>Just like a liberal idiot, got a conservative boot up the arse and thinks he won a prize. Nuggie was the only one obsessing over his mistake.......unless maybe you were obsessing with him/her. If the asswipe had dropped it the first time I corrected him/her it wouldn't have been an issue......would it? The other posters on this thread aren't the ones who perpetuated this thing.....Nuggie is. My flag is RED, WHITE, & BLUE.....no retreat, no surrender. Try again dipshit 'cause you dropped yer dick in the dirt with this incredibly stupid comment.
This is YET ANOTHER post from you obsessing over this issue. It's your, what? 20th such post? 20 posts telling me how you are NOT obsessed with posting about this? LOL.

You're right. One other poster made ONE reference to Hollywood. Then you picked up the torch and ran with it. I replied to you.

If you had then STOP responding, end of story.

Hell, at this point, you don't even know what you are arguing. You've spent two days talking about how you never use the word "Hollywood" in posts where you are USING THE WORD "Hollywood".

Do ANY of you have ANY real points to make?

Between you and Marisa's absolute lack of an argument and Nerd's complete vanishing act after getting destroyed on the Fox NEws stuff, I don't know what you guys stand for anymore.

Let's hit the reset button.

Squatch -
Do you believe that law abiding citizens should have access to any sort of weapon they choose? OR, do you feel that there should be limits on weapons regardless of whether or not someone has previously broken the law.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guns Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Congressman plans to introduce national conceal... 52 min davy 54
News Why The Appointment Of Solicitor General Is Cri... 2 hr HORNEDFROG 1
News Trump nominee will politicize Dept. of Justice 9 hr FormerParatrooper 2
News DNC Chair Frontrunner Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Min... Fri Trump your President 56
News Big Law Firms Target Your Second Amendment Rights Fri Say What 1
News 'Miss Sloane': Bad behavior on Capitol Hill Fri Frogface Kate 1
News Mapping Reform: Where are Things Likely to Change? Dec 8 Scout1 1
More from around the web